Estimated glomerular filtration rate independently predicts outcome of azacitidine therapy in higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes. Results from 536 patients of the Hellenic National Registry of Myelodysplastic and Hypoplastic syndromes

Predicting outcome in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine

5-Azacitidine (5-AZA) is widely used for the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. However, response and survival rates vary considerably, while indicated treatment duration remains undefined. For these reasons, factors determining response and survival are of major importance. Clinical, morphological, flow cytometry, cytogenetic and molecular factors are discussed in this review. Biomarkers predictive of response and prognosis, as well as their link to the mode of action of 5-AZA are also addressed, shifting the focus from clinical practice to investigational research. Their use could further improve prognostic classification of 5-AZA treated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the near future.

Comorbidities and frailty predict outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Should we integrate them in novel prognostic scoring systems?

Prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is based on scoring systems focusing on disease-related factors; however, several studies have shown that patient-related factors might be equally important in prognostication of patients with malignancies in general but also for patients with MDS. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of comorbidities and frailty as prognostic factors as well as predictive factors of response and tolerability to hypomethylating agents. Both comorbidities and frailty were shown to be predictive of overall survival; however, they mostly correlate with risk for non-leukemic death rather than leukemia-free survival. In patients with higher-risk MDS, comorbidities burden and frailty might be predictive of poor treatment response as well as increased toxicity. In this context, all patients with MDS should be evaluated for comorbidities and frailty at baseline, preferentially using indices validated for MDS. This assessment should guide the selection of treatment. Decision regarding treatment initiation should be based on disease-related factors as captured by the established prognostic scoring systems.

Factors affecting response to 5-azacytidine and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Is long-term survival a realistic goal?

The introduction of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) 5-azacytidine and decitabine has altered the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Over the past few years, the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the revised IPSS (IPSS-R) have been used both to define the prognosis of patients with MDS and to select patients to be treated with HMAs. Nevertheless, the prognosis of individual patients with MDS can differ considerably from the one calculated with the use of the above-mentioned prognostic systems. Thus, some patients may achieve long-term survival irrespective of their initial prognostic score. Several factors besides those used to define the IPSS/IPSS-R are analyzed in this review article; these include age and gender, the baseline hematologic characteristics, the comorbidities, the cytogenetic and molecular profile of the patients, as well as their response to treatment with 5-azacytidine. Thus, insight into a more personalized way of managing patients with MDS is given and long-term survival is set as a more realistic goal of treatment with 5-azacytidine.