Autologous bone marrow transplantation in adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

High-dose thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin as conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation generally provide good results in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We have evaluated the effects of a high-dose regimen comprising thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin. After debulking and mobilization with high-dose cyclophosphamide or other schedules, forty-five patients at various disease stages were conditioned with thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 77.8% (30 CR, 66.7%; 5 PR, 11.1%). Ten patients (22.2%) did not respond. Two patients (4.4%) died from transplant-related complications. The mean 5-year overall survival was 71.1%: 12 patients relapsed within the first 5 years of follow-up. The overall response rate and 5-year overall survival were better for patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) 1 at diagnosis than for those with IPI 2 and IPI 3 (P<0.005 for all). The thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma has a good anti-lymphoma effect and provides encouraging results in terms of response to treatment and 5-year overall survival. Its good tolerance and acceptable toxicity suggest that it may a very useful in the management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy can cure patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but those who suffer treatment failure or relapse still have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve the outcome of these patients. We evaluated an intensified high-dose sequential chemotherapy program with a final myeloablative course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were age 18-65 years, histologically proven primary progressive or relapsed aggressive NHL and eligibility for HDCT. The therapy consists of two cycles DHAP: dexamethasone 40 mg (day 1-4), high-dose cytarabine 2 g/m2 12q (day 2), cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 51); patients with partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 (day 37), followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest; methotrexate 8 g/m2 (day 1) plus vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (day 51); and etoposide 500 mg/m2 (day 58-62). The final myeloblative course was BEAM: cytarabine 200 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), etoposide 150 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), melphalan 140 mg/m2 (day 80), carmustin 300 mg/m2 (day 80) followed by PBSCT.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (median age 43 years, range 24-65) were enrolled: 23 (40%) patients were refractory to primary therapy and 34 (60%) patients had relapsed NHL. The response rate (RR) after 2 cycles of DHAP was 72% (9% CR, 63% PR) and at the final evaluation (100 days post transplantation) 43% (32% CR, 11% PR). Toxicity was tolerable. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 1-76 months). Freedom from second failure (FF2F) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 25% and 47% for all patients, respectively. FF2F at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 35% and 9% (P=0.0006), respectively. OS at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 58% and 24% (P=0.0044), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this regimen is feasible, tolerable and effective in patients with relapsed NHL. In contrast, the results in patients with progressive disease are unsatisfactory. This program is currently being modified by addition of rituximab for patients with relapsed aggressive NHL.

Autologous tandem transplantation in patients with primary progressive or relapsed/refractory lymphoma

Patients with primary progressive or refractory Hodgkin's disease (HD) or aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) have a particularly poor prognosis. Here we report the results of autologous tandem transplantation in these patients. Patients aged 18-55 years with primary progressive or refractory relapsed HD and aggressive NHL were included. Patients received high-dose etoposide (2000 mg/m(2)) followed by peripheral blood stem cell harvest (PBSC). The first high-dose chemotherapy (TMC) consisted of thiotepa (750 mg/m(2)), mitoxantrone (40 mg/m(2)), and carboplatin (990 mg/m(2)). Patients with no change (NC), partial remission (PR), or complete remission (CR) after TMC then received BEAM with carmustine (300 mg/m(2)), etoposide (1200 mg/m(2)), cytarabine (1600 mg/m(2)), and melphalan (140 mg/m(2)). Patients with bulky disease (>5 cm) or residual lymphoma received involved field radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients were included (HD=10, NHL=15, median age 34 years). Two patients with HD achieved a CR and five patients a PR [response rate (RR) 70%]. Three patients (30%) experienced treatment failure including two deaths due to peritransplant complications. Five patients with aggressive NHL were in CR and two patients in PR (RR 46%). Of the eight patients (56%) with treatment failure, three had progressive disease and five died from peritransplant complications. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) for all patients after 12 months was 28% and 40%, respectively. Tandem HDCT followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) offers a chance of cure in these poor prognostic patients, but is associated with risks.

Autologous and allogeneic transplantation for aggressive NHL

BACKGROUND

Intermediate- and high-grade NHL are generally chemosensitive diseases with high initial response rates to combination chemotherapy. Dose intensification via autologous and allogeneic transplantation provides viable treatment options in specific clinical settings. Currently, autologous transplantation is the standard of care for relapsed but chemosensitive aggressive B-cell NHL. However, tools such as the International Prognostic Index allow risk-adapted analyses, and show that the magnitude of benefit from autologous transplantation differs in lymphoma subsets.

METHODS

Low-risk patients appear to do well regardless of salvage approaches, whereas high-risk patients have suboptimal outcomes with autologous transplantation. In high-risk patients, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation has been examined as part of initial therapy, with long-term data promising but still evolving.

DISCUSSION

A significant concern with autologous transplantation in aggressive and high-grade NHL is the risk of graft contamination with tumor cells. Several investigators have demonstrated the presence of malignant cells in both BM and PBSC, although the clonagenic potential of such cells is unclear. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation has several potential advantages over autologous transplantation for NHL,including procurement of an uncontaminated stem-cell graft, GvL effects, and the elimination of hematopoietic stem-cell damage and consequent secondary leukemia.

RESULTS

The ideal application of allogeneic transplantation in aggressive and high-grade lymphomas is still unclear; but the lower relapse rates demonstrated in several comparisons of the two approaches make this an exciting area to pursue. Finally, non-myeloablative stem-cell transplantation may broaden the use of allogeneic transplantation by lowering regimen-related mortality while capitalizing on GvL.

Treatment of primary progressive Hodgkin's and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is there a chance for cure?

PURPOSE

To determine differences in prognosis between primary progressive Hodgkin's disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), we retrospectively analyzed patients with progressive lymphoma who were treated with different salvage chemotherapy regimens including high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem-cell support (ASCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients with primary progressive lymphoma (HD, n = 67; NHL, n = 64) were enrolled. Primary progressive disease was defined as disease progression during first-line chemotherapy or only transient response (complete or partial response lasting </= 90 days) after induction treatment. Patients 60 years or younger with progressive lymphoma were eligible to receive HDCT with ASCT.

RESULTS

The overall response rate after salvage chemotherapy for patients with primary progressive HD and NHL was 33% and 15%, respectively. Twenty-five HD patients (37%) received HDCT. Most patients with NHL had progressive disease under salvage treatment, with only six patients (10%) receiving HDCT. Of those, only two patients were alive and in continuous complete remission 3 and 12 months after HDCT. No patient with NHL survived longer than 26 months after first diagnosis. Actuarial OS after 5 years was 19% for all HD patients; 53% for HD patients receiving HDCT, and 0% for patients who did not receive HDCT. In HD patients, multivariate regression analysis identified chemosensitive disease on salvage treatment (P =.0001) and HDCT (P =.031) as significant prognostic factors for freedom from treatment failure. Significant prognostic factors for OS are chemosensitive disease (P =.0005), HDCT (P =.039), and B symptoms at the time of progress (P =.046).

CONCLUSION

There are striking differences in the prognosis of patients with progressive HD and aggressive NHL. The prognosis of progressive NHL patients is dismal. Most patients have rapidly progressive disease after salvage treatment and are, therefore, excluded from HDCT programs. In contrast, progressive HD patients can achieve long-term survival after HDCT.

Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who have relapses. In this report we describe a prospective randomized study of such treatment.

METHOD

A total of 215 patients with relapses of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated between July 1987 and June 1994. All patients received two courses of conventional chemotherapy. The 109 patients who had a response to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive four courses of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (54 patients) or radiotherapy plus intensive chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (55 patients).

RESULTS

The overall rate of response to conventional chemotherapy was 58 percent; among patients with relapses after chemotherapy, the response rate was 64 percent, and among those with relapses during chemotherapy, the response rate was 21 percent. There were three deaths from toxic effects among the patients in the transplantation group, and none among those in the group receiving chemotherapy without transplantation. The two groups did not differ in terms of prognostic factors. The median follow-up time was 63 months. The response rate was 84 percent after bone marrow transplantation and 44 percent after chemotherapy without transplantation. At five years, the rate of event-free survival was 46 percent in the transplantation group and 12 percent in the group receiving chemotherapy without transplantation (P = 0.001), and the rate of overall survival was 53 and 32 percent, respectively (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with conventional chemotherapy, treatment with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation increases event-free and overall survival in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in relapse.