Gemmeke M, Koster ES, van der Velde N, Taxis K, Bouvy ML. Establishing a community pharmacy-based fall prevention service - An implementation study.
Res Social Adm Pharm 2022;
19:155-166. [PMID:
35995694 DOI:
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.044]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Community pharmacists are in the position to contribute to fall prevention, but this is not yet common practice.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a community pharmacy-based fall prevention service.
METHODS
A fall prevention service, consisting of a fall risk screening and assessment including a medication review, was implemented in pharmacies during three months. A preparative online training was provided to the pharmacy team to enhance adoption of the service. Included patients were aged ≥70 years, using ≥5 drugs of which ≥1 fall risk-increasing drug. The implementation process was quantitively assessed by registering medication adaptations, recommendations, and referrals. Changes in patient scores on the Short Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) and a fall prevention knowledge test were documented at one month follow-up. Implementation was qualitatively evaluated by conducting semi-structured interviews with pharmacists before and after the project, based on the consolidated framework of implementation research.
RESULTS
The service was implemented in nine pharmacies and 91 consultations were performed. Medication was adapted of 32 patients. Patients' short FES-I scores were significantly higher at follow-up (p = 0.047) and patients' knowledge test scores did not differ (p = 0.86). Pharmacists experienced the following barriers: lack of time, absence of staff, and limited multidisciplinary collaboration. Facilitators were training, motivated staff, patient engagement, and project scheduling.
CONCLUSION
The service resulted in a substantial number of medication adaptations and lifestyle recommendations, but many barriers were identified that hamper the sustained implementation of the service.
Collapse