Ethnopsychopharmacology study of patients' beliefs regarding concerns about and necessity of taking psychiatric medications

Ethnopsychopharmacology: Clinical and scientific writing pearls

The concept of ethnopsychopharmacology aims to predict or explain the pharmacologic response to psychiatric medications based on the influence of biologic and nonbiologic factors. Interactions involving these factors are complex and influence patient outcomes in health care. Pharmacists and other clinicians working in patient care environments, research, or medical education should engage in lifelong learning to enhance ethnopsychopharmacologic knowledge gaps, which ultimately may improve and individualize care across diverse populations. Through two cases, this paper provides pearls on how biogeographical ancestry and cytochrome P450 status may influence pharmacotherapy selection, dosing, or response. A third scenario highlights a publication, like many other published works, with deficiencies in how data on ancestry, race, and ethnicity are collected or reported. Current recommendations on the use of inclusive language in scientific writing are reviewed, with attention to specific examples.

Effect of necessity-concern framework and polypharmacy on treatment adherence in psychiatric patients. Comparing an Argentinian with a Spanish sample

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to replicate a prior Spanish study of medication adherence where logistic regression models provided highly significant odds ratios (ORs) for three continuous scores: necessity, concern and the necessity-concern differential, and a dichotomous variable: skeptical attitude. Adherence ORs in the necessity-concern framework were very strong in patients taking five or six medications.

METHODS

The sample comprised consecutive adult psychiatric outpatients in Mendoza, Argentina. The necessity-concerns framework was assessed using a subscale of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Adherence (yes/no) to prescribed psychiatric medications was assessed by the Sidorkiewicz adherence tool.

RESULTS

When compared with the Spanish sample, the Argentinian group (508 patients with 875 medications) was characterized by: (1) significantly stronger adherence ORs with the necessity-concern framework, (2) significantly lower number of medications per patient and percentage of patients with marked psychiatric polypharmacy (≥4 medications), (3) though a higher number of medications still was significantly associated with poor adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

The Argentinian sample replicated the previous finding that patient beliefs regarding necessity and concern were associated with poor adherence to prescribed medications. Polypharmacy had an additive role decreasing adherence in both samples. In both samples, when prescribed ≥4 psychiatric medications, patients reported adherence to only two-third of the medications.

Self-Report for Measuring and Predicting Medication Adherence: Experts' Experience in Predicting Adherence in Stable Psychiatric Outpatients and in Pharmacokinetics

THE PROBLEM

Poor adherence to appropriately prescribed medication is a global challenge for psychiatrists.

PRIOR STUDIES

Measuring adherence is complicated. In our recent three-country naturalistic study including more than 1000 patients and their adherence to multiple medication prescriptions at the same time, patients' self-report of adherence to each specific drug was the only practical option for measuring adherence. Systematic literature reviews provide inconsistent results for sociodemographic, clinical and medication variables as predictors of adherence to psychiatric drugs. Our studies over the last 10 years in relatively stable psychiatric outpatients have shown that some self-reported health beliefs had consistent, strong effects and a better predictive role. Three dimensions of these health beliefs are characteristics of the individual: 1) attitudes toward psychiatric medication such as pharmacophobia (fear of taking drugs or medicines), 2) health locus of control (the belief patients have about who or what agent determines the state of their health), 3) psychological reactance (an emotional reaction in direct contradiction to rules or regulations that threaten or suppress certain freedoms in behavior). They can be measured by the Patient Health Beliefs Questionnaire on Psychiatric Treatment. The attitude toward each specific medication can be measured by the necessity-concern framework and summarized as the presence or absence of skepticism about that drug. After 25 years conducting pharmacokinetic studies in psychiatric drugs, particularly antipsychotics, we have limited understanding of how to use blood levels to predict the effects of non-adherence or to establish it.

EXPERT OPINION ON FUTURE STUDIES

Future studies to predict adherence should include the inpatient setting and explore insight. Studying the pharmacokinetics associated with non-adherence in each psychiatric drug is a major challenge. Medication adherence is a complex and dynamic process changing over time in the same patient. Personalizing adherence using psychological or pharmacological variables are in their initial stages.

The necessity-concern framework in the assessment of treatment adherence of psychiatric patients and the role of polypharmacy in a Spanish sample

OBJECTIVE

This study compares three measures (necessity and concern scores, the necessity-concern differential, and a skeptical attitude vs. three other attitudes) for studying the relationship between the necessity-concern framework and treatment adherence after considering the number of prescribed drugs.

METHODS

The sample included 588 consecutive adult psychiatric outpatients in the Canary Islands, Spain. The necessity-concern framework was assessed using a specific subscale of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Adherence (yes/no) to 1,101 prescribed psychiatric drugs was assessed using the Sidorkiewicz adherence tool.

RESULTS

In the three logistic regression models including 1,101 drugs, with adherence as the dependent variable, the highly significant odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were (a) OR = 1.57 (CI = 1.37-1.79) for necessity and OR = 0.747 (CI = 0.660-0.847) for concern; (b) OR = 1.44 (CI = 1.32-1.58) for the necessity-concern differential; and (c) OR = 0.452 (CI = 0.343-0.597) for a skeptical attitude (yes/no), defined as low necessity and high concern. In patients taking five or six drugs, adherence was associated with extremely high/low ORs for necessity, concern, and the differential.

CONCLUSION

If replicated, our results suggest clinicians need to pay careful attention to each drug in each patient taking five or six drugs, emphasize necessity, and listen carefully to patient concerns.