Dissociation between objective psychomotor impairment and subjective sleepiness after diazepam administration in the aged people

Psychomotor and subjective effects of bilastine, hydroxyzine, and cetirizine, in combination with alcohol: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, and positive-controlled and placebo-controlled Phase I clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of concomitant administration of alcohol and bilastine versus alcohol alone on the central nervous system.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy young volunteers of both sexes participated in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, and positive-controlled and placebo-controlled clinical trials. At 1-week intervals, subjects received six different treatments: (i) placebo; (ii) alcohol 0.8 g/kg alone (ALC); (iii) ALC in combination with: bilastine 20 mg (B20 + A); (iv) bilastine 80 mg (B80 + A); (v) cetirizine 10 mg (CET + A); and (vi) hydroxyzine 25 mg (HYD + A). Psychomotor performance tests (fine motor, finger tapping, nystagmus, critical flicker-fusion frequency, temporal estimation, 'd2' cancellation, and simple reaction time) and subjective self-reports (drunkenness, drowsiness, mental slowness, clumsiness, anger, attentiveness, competence, happiness, hostility, interest, and extroversion) were carried out at baseline and multiple points thereafter.

RESULTS

All active treatments induced a significant psychomotor impairment. The greatest and most lasting impairment was observed with HYD + A followed by B80 + A and CET + A. In contrast, objective measures showed less impairment with B20 + A and ALC, both with a similar magnitude. Self-reports showed a subjective perception of performance impairment in all active treatments.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant administration of bilastine (at therapeutic dose) and alcohol does not produce greater central nervous system depressant effects than ACL alone.

Psychomotor functioning and alertness with guanfacine extended release in subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether treatment with guanfacine extended release (GXR) in subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) disrupted psychomotor functioning and alertness, or impacted daytime sleepiness.

METHOD

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 2, dose-optimization, noninferiority, laboratory classroom study of GXR (1, 2, and 3 mg/day) in 182 subjects aged 6 to 17 years with ADHD. Psychomotor functioning and alertness were assessed through several measures, including the Choice Reaction Time (CRT) test from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Sedative effects were examined via spontaneously reported adverse events of sedation, somnolence, and hypersomnia as well as fatigue and lethargy, and with two validated subject- and observer-rated sleepiness scales. Standard efficacy measures for ADHD also were included. Cardiovascular and laboratory parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the GXR and placebo groups on measures of psychomotor functioning or alertness from the CRT at endpoint (least-square mean difference: 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): -22.9, 28.0], p = 0.8 for CRT; 2.5 [95% CI: -21.5, 26.4], p = 0.84 for correct responses; 15.5 [95% CI: -45.1, 14.1], p = 0.30 for movement time; and -8.2 [95% CI: -54.1, 37.6] p = 0.72 for total time). Most sedative adverse events were mild to moderate, occurred during dose titration, decreased with dose maintenance, and resolved during the study period. One subject in the GXR group discontinued due to fatigue and somnolence. GXR was not associated with increased daytime sleepiness. GXR treatment was associated with significant improvement in ADHD symptoms (6.3 [95% CI: 2.7, 9.8], p = 0.001 for ADHD Rating Scale IV total scores at endpoint).

CONCLUSIONS

At doses that resulted in significant improvement in ADHD symptoms, impairment on cognitive tasks was not observed. Daytime sleepiness did not differ with GXR compared with placebo. Results suggest that the beneficial effects of GXR on ADHD symptoms are independent of sedation.

Pimavanserin tartrate, a 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist, increases slow wave sleep as measured by polysomnography in healthy adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Determine the effects of pimavanserin tartrate [ACP-103; N-(4-flurophenylmethyl)-N-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-N'-(4-(2-methylpropyloxy)phenylmethyl)carbamide], a selective serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist, on slow wave sleep (SWS), other sleep parameters, and attention/vigilance.

METHODS

Forty-five healthy adults were randomized to pimavanserin (1, 2.5, 5, or 20 mg) or placebo in a double-blind fashion (n=9/group). Pimavanserin or placebo was administered once daily in the morning for 13 consecutive days. The effects of pimavanserin were measured after the first dose and again after 13 days. Sleep parameters were measured by polysomnography. Effects on attention/vigilance were measured by a continuous performance task.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, pimavanserin significantly increased SWS following single and multiple dose administration. Pimavanserin also decreased number of awakenings. PSG variables not affected by pimavanserin included sleep period time, total sleep time, sleep onset latency, number of stage shifts, total time awake, early morning wake, and microarousal index. Changes in sleep architecture parameters, sleep profile parameters, and spectral power density parameters were consistent with a selective increase in SWS. Pimavanserin did not adversely affect performance on the continuous performance test measured in the evening before or morning after polysomnography.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that pimavanserin selectively increases slow wave sleep and decreases awakenings, an effect that does not diminish with repeated administration.