Orally disintegrating olanzapine and potential differences in treatment-emergent weight gain

The effect of ranitidine on olanzapine-induced weight gain

Induced weight gain is a disturbing side effect of Olanzapine that affects the quality of life in psychotic patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Ranitidine in attenuating or preventing Olanzapine-induced weight gain. A parallel 2-arm clinical trial was done on 52 patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders who received Olanzapine for the first time. All these were first-episode admitted patients. They were randomly allocated to receive either Ranitidine or placebo. The trend of body mass index (BMI) was compared between groups over 16-week course of treatment. Mean weight was 62.3 (SD: 9.6) kg at baseline. Thirty-three subjects (63.5%) had positive family history of obesity. The average BMI increment was 1.1 for Ranitidine group and 2.4 for the placebo group. The multivariate analysis showed this effect to be independent of sex, family history of obesity, and baseline BMI value. The longitudinal modeling after controlling for baseline values failed to show the whole trend slope to be different. Although the slight change in trend's slope puts forward a hypothesis that combined use of Ranitidine and Olanzapine may attenuate the weight gain long run, this needs to be retested in future larger scale long-term studies. This trial is registered with IRCT.ir 201009112181N5.

Changes in body weight and psychotropic drugs: a systematic synthesis of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Psychotropic medication use is associated with weight gain. While there are studies and reviews comparing weight gain for psychotropics within some classes, clinicians frequently use drugs from different classes to treat psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a systematic review of all classes of psychotropics to provide an all encompassing evidence-based tool that would allow clinicians to determine the risks of weight gain in making both intra-class and interclass choices of psychotropics.

METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

We developed a novel hierarchical search strategy that made use of systematic reviews that were already available. When such evidence was not available we went on to evaluate randomly controlled trials, followed by cohort and other clinical trials, narrative reviews, and, where necessary, clinical opinion and anecdotal evidence. The data from the publication with the highest level of evidence based on our hierarchical classification was presented. Recommendations from an expert panel supplemented the evidence used to rank these drugs within their respective classes. Approximately 9500 articles were identified in our literature search of which 666 citations were retrieved. We were able to rank most of the psychotropics based on the available evidence and recommendations from subject matter experts. There were few discrepancies between published evidence and the expert panel in ranking these drugs.

CONCLUSION

Potential for weight gain is an important consideration in choice of any psychotropic. This tool will help clinicians select psychotropics on a case-by-case basis in order to minimize the impact of weight gain when making both intra-class and interclass choices.

[Orally disintegrating tablets--advantages and drawbacks]

Orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) or fast-melting tablets have gained appeal lately. ODT are tablets which disintegrate in the mouth within seconds without the need for additional liquid. This dosage form was originally developed to improve the compliance of patients who had difficulty in swallowing tablets, such as children, the elderly and bedridden patients. ODTs combine the advantages of solid dosage forms with those of liquid forms and appeal to broader groups of patients than originally expected. ODTs may prove to have higher bioavailability and an earlier pharmacological effect than conventional tablets. Technical challenges are related to taste masking, mechanical strength and stability to humidity.

Effect of olanzapine orally disintegrating tablet versus oral standard tablet on body weight in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized open-label trial

Olanzapine has frequently been reported to induce substantial weight gain, which is associated with an increased prevalence of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes. Several reports have described that olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) induce less weight gain than oral standard tablets (OST) do, although both forms have equal bioavailability. We tried to clarify whether or not body weight change differed between olanzapine ODT and OST treatments in olanzapine-naïve schizophrenia patients. An open-label, 12-month, multicenter, randomized, flexible-dose study was conducted for direct comparison of the effects of OST (mean dosage, 15.7 mg; N=57) and ODT (mean dosage, 15.2 mg; N=61) on body weight and metabolic measures such as blood glucose, hemoglobin(A1c), total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides in olanzapine-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Outcome measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), The World Health Organization Quality of Life 26 (WHO-QOL26), Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI)-10, and tolerability assessed by the UKU side-effect rating scale. This study was conducted between June 2007 and April 2010. No significant difference was found in the weight gain between the two forms of olanzapine. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any metabolic measure, efficacy, tolerability, WHO-QOL26, or DAI-10 score. Previous reports describing that olanzapine ODT induced less weight gain than OST were not supported by results of this randomized study.

Orally disintegrating olanzapine review: effectiveness, patient preference, adherence, and other properties

Orally disintegrating olanzapine (ODO) is a rapid-dissolving formulation of olanzapine which disintegrates in saliva almost immediately, developed as a convenient and adherence-enhancing alternative to the standard olanzapine-coated tablet (SOT). Clinical studies, which form the basis of this review, have shown ODO and SOT to have similar efficacy and tolerability profiles. However, ODO appears to have a number of advantages over SOT in terms of adherence, patient preference, and reduction in nursing burden. Overall, the existing clinical data suggests that compared to SOT, ODO is not only well-suited for difficult-to-treat, agitated, and/or nonadherent patients but, due to its potential ability to improve adherence and greater patient preference, may also be an appropriate formulation for the majority of patients for which olanzapine is the antipsychotic of choice.

An exploratory analysis of factors associated with weight change in a 16-week trial of oral vs. orally disintegrating olanzapine: the PLATYPUS study

BACKGROUND

We conducted exploratory analyses of the data from a multinational, randomised study to identify factors associated with weight change after 16 weeks of treatment with standard olanzapine tablets (SOT) or sublingual orally disintegrating olanzapine (ODO).

METHODS

One hundred and forty nine outpatients who gained weight during prior SOT therapy were enrolled into the study and treated with ODO (N = 84) or SOT (N = 65). Exploratory analyses were conducted with the subset of compliant patients (ODO: n = 60; SOT: n = 47).

RESULTS

The decrease in the rate of weight gain at the end of study therapy (change from baseline) was greater in the ODO group than the SOT group (-0.59 kg/week vs. -0.38 kg/week, p = 0.0246). Age was negatively associated with weight change (p = 0.0203) in both treatment groups combined: patients gained 0.7 kg less for every 10 years of age. The least squares mean weight gain was lower with ODO than SOT in male patients (0.35 kg vs. 3.04 kg, p = 0.061), but not female patients and in American patients (0.55 kg vs. 6.21 kg, p < 0.0001), but not Canadian or Mexican patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not conclusive, these data suggest that ODO may be a reasonable treatment option for some patients who gain weight with SOT. Further research is required to confirm these findings.

Patients' preference for olanzapine orodispersible tablet compared with conventional oral tablet in a multinational, randomized, crossover study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare patients' preference for olanzapine orodispersible tablet (ODT) with oral conventional tablet (OCT).

METHODS

A 12-week randomized, crossover, multinational, open-label study was conducted to estimate the proportion of patients preferring ODT or OCT. Outpatients with stable schizophrenia on OCT monotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to ODT or OCT. Compliance and drug attitude were measured using the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10) and Medication Adherence Form (MAF) scales; tolerability and safety by Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP-5) questionnaire and adverse event summary.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients answered a preference question: 106 (61%) preferred ODT and 48 (27%) preferred OCT (P<0.001 adjusted for treatment sequence); 21 (12%) expressed no preference. There was no significant change in DAI-10 with either formulation. MAF was above 75% in 94% vs. 93% of patients on ODC and OCT, respectively. Compliance as measured by tablet count was above 98% on both formulations. The adverse event profiles did not differ between formulations. Mean weight increase over 6 weeks on ODT was 0.8 kg and on OCT was 0.6 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the importance of patients' preference for treatment planning and success, the ODT formulation should be routinely considered as a treatment option.

The potential role of appetite in predicting weight changes during treatment with olanzapine

BACKGROUND

Clinically significant weight gain has been reported during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. It has been suggested that weight changes in patients treated with olanzapine may be associated with increased appetite.

METHODS

Data were used from adult patients for whom both appetite and weight data were available from 4 prospective, 12- to 24-week clinical trials. Patients' appetites were assessed with Eating Behavior Assessment (EBA, Study 1), Platypus Appetite Rating Scale (PARS, Study 2), Eating Inventory (EI, Study 3), Food Craving Inventory (FCI, Study 3), and Eating Attitude Scale (EAS, Study 4).

RESULTS

In Studies 1 (EBA) and 4 (EAS), patients who reported overall score increases on appetite scales, indicating an increase in appetite, experienced the greatest overall weight gains. However, in Studies 2 (PARS) and 3 (EI, FCI), patients who reported overall score increases on appetite scales did not experience greater weight changes than patients not reporting score increases. Early weight changes (2-4 weeks) were more positively correlated with overall weight changes than early or overall score changes on any utilized appetite assessment scale. No additional information was gained by adding early appetite change to early weight change in correlation to overall weight change.

CONCLUSIONS

Early weight changes may be a more useful predictor for long-term weight changes than early score changes on appetite assessment scales.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This report represents secondary analyses of 4 clinical studies. Studies 1, 2, and 3 were registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home, under NCT00190749, NCT00303602, and NCT00401973, respectively. Study 4 predates the registration requirements for observational studies that are not classified as category 1 observational studies.

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of sublingual orally disintegrating olanzapine versus oral olanzapine on body mass index: the PLATYPUS Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have frequently reported weight gain during olanzapine treatment. Previous studies have observed a decrease in weight gain, or weight loss, in patients switching from standard olanzapine tablets (SOT) to orally disintegrating olanzapine (ODO) tablets. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the change in body mass index (BMI) in patients who had previously gained weight with SOT and continued with this therapy during the study period, compared with those patients who switched to ODO during the study period.

METHODS

This was a 16-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, study of outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, related psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder, who were taking 5-20 mg SOT daily. Patients continued treatment with 5-20 mg olanzapine in a flexible single daily dose, and were randomized to either receive sublingual ODO plus an oral placebo, or sublingual placebo plus SOT.

RESULTS

No statistically significant between group differences in mean change from baseline in BMI, weight or waist circumference were observed. Analysis of change in body weight from baseline, by pre-specified category (no change, loss of >or=1.5 kg, gain of >or=1.5 kg), revealed a significant difference between groups, favoring ODO patients, who also experienced a significant reduction in subjective appetite and better treatment compliance, compared to patients in the SOT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients treated with ODO experienced a similar mean change in BMI and weight from baseline, to those patients treated with SOT.