Does smoking decrease the response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease?

Opening a Window on Attention: Adjuvant Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), most commonly known as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative disease (UC), is a chronic and relapsing intestinal disease which cannot be cured completely. The prevalence of IBD in Europe and in North America has increased over the past 20 years. As most IBD patients are young at onset, their quality of life (QOL) can be influenced to varying degrees. Thus, current treatment goals are typically focused on preventing complications, including maintaining clinical remission and improving the QOL. Adjuvant therapies have been widely concerned as an effective treatment in alleviating IBD symptoms, including dietary intervention, traditional Chinese medicine, smoking, alcohol, and physical activities. This review focuses on different ancillary therapies for IBD treatments, in particular the mechanism of reducing inflammation based on the actual data from research studies. Moreover, comparing the latest data, this review also presented potential future prospect for adjuvant therapies.

Early diagnosis and treatment of postoperative endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease: partial benefit by infliximab--a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Current data indicate that infliximab-given immediately after surgery-may be very effective in preventing postsurgical recurrence of Crohn's disease. However, it is unknown whether a similar benefit would result from early diagnosis and treatment, rather than prevention of endoscopic recurrence.

AIMS

The primary outcome of this study was to clarify whether infliximab, given after diagnosis of postoperative endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's diseases (Rutgeerts score ≥ 2) can induce endoscopic remission (score <2) at 54 weeks. The secondary outcomes were improvement in the endoscopic score and clinical recurrence at 54 weeks.

METHODS

In this prospective open label multicenter pilot study 43 patients with ileocolonic Crohn's disease subjected to curative surgery underwent colonoscopy 6 months after surgery. Patients with endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥2) were treated with either mesalamine 800 mg tid or infliximab 5 mg/kg bw on a maintenance basis. Colonoscopy was performed after 54 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24/43 patients were diagnosed with endoscopic recurrence at 6 months. Thirteen were treated with infliximab and 11 with mesalamine. None of the 11 mesalamine-treated patients had endoscopic remission at 54 weeks. Two had clinical recurrence at 8 and 9 months. Fifty-four percent of patients treated with infliximab had endoscopic remission at 54 weeks (P = 0.01) while 69% had an improvement in the endoscopic score. None had clinical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of postsurgical endoscopic lesions by infliximab appears superior to mesalamine. However, a sizeable proportion of patients did not fully benefit from this strategy.

Use of biological molecules in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

The introduction of biological agents (i.e. antitumour necrosis factor-α and anti-integrin treatments) for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [i.e. Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis] has led to a substantial change in the treatment algorithms and guidelines, especially in CD. However, many questions still remain about the true efficacy and the best treatment regimens. Thus, a need for further treatment options still exists as up to 40% of IBD patients treated with the presently available biologicals do not have positive clinical responses. Better patient selection might maximize the clinical benefit for those in most need of an effective therapy to avoid disabling disease whilst also minimizing the complications associated with therapy. Further, the 'trough-level strategy' may help clinicians to optimize therapy and to avoid loss of response and/or immunogenicity. The idea behind this dosage regimen is that correct dosing must ensure that the patient's lowest level of drug concentration (i.e. the trough level) occurring just before the next drug administration is high enough for the full effect to be seen. Controversy continues regarding the appropriate use of biologicals; therefore, in this review, we focus on considerations that might lead to a more rational strategy for antitumour necrosis factor-α agents in IBD, emphasizing the situations in which the risks may outweigh the benefits. Finally, the need for an appropriate strategy for stopping biological treatment is discussed.