Are there differences in type, dosage, and method of administration for the systemic steroids in IBD treatment?

Effectiveness of budesonide MMX (Cortiment) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis: study protocol for a prospective multicentre observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

A study has been developed to assess the use and effectiveness of budesonide MMX for mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis (UC) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort study of 300 patients prescribed budesonide MMX for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active UC will be conducted in Europe, Israel and Canada. Patients will be treated with budesonide MMX9 mg daily for induction of remission for ≤8 weeks. Data on effectiveness, including patient-reported outcomes, tolerability and use will be recorded at the end of treatment and at ≥2 weeks after. The primary outcome (improvement ≥3 point in the clinical subscores of the UC Disease Activity Index score at the end of treatment) will be compared in: patients who receive budesonide MMX added to mesalazine >2 weeks after increased/optimised mesalazine dose for the treatment of flare (late add-on); patients who receive budesonide MMX added to mesalazine ≤2 weeks since mesalazine increased/optimised for the treatment of flare, or without mesalazine dose modification (early add-on); and patients who receive budesonide MMX as monotherapy for the treatment of flare (mono). Propensity scoring will be used to minimise bias and confounding inherent in observational studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

First ethical approval: Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg (12/22/2015). The results will be published in full.

DISCUSSION

Completion of primary data collection is expected in December 2017. Our results will provide further evidence on the effectiveness of budesonide MMX to support clinicians in their daily practice and inform therapeutic guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02586259.

Glycyrrhizin enhances therapeutic activity of a colon-specific methylprednisolone prodrug against experimental colitis

BACKGROUND

Co-administration of a reduction inhibitor and a colon-specific prodrug of a glucocorticoid susceptible to colonic reductive metabolism is suggested as a strategy to circumvent the therapeutic loss of the glucocorticoid delivered to and acting locally at the large intestine.

AIMS

We examined whether the strategy was feasible as a pharmacotherapy for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Glycyrrhizin (GCZ), a reduction inhibitor, was tested for its inhibition of the colonic metabolism of methylprednisolone (MP). Therapeutic activity against TNBS-induced rat colitis and adrenal suppression were compared after oral administration of methylprednisolone 21-sulfate sodium (MPS), a colon-specific prodrug of MP, or MPS/GCZ to colitic rats.

RESULTS

Upon incubation of MP with the cecal contents, MP disappeared, and this was delayed by addition of GCZ. In addition, more MP produced from MPS in the cecal contents accumulated in the presence of GCZ. Consistent with these results, upon oral administration of MPS/GCZ, MPS or MP, MP was detected at a greater level in the large intestine for MPS/GCZ. MPS/GCZ ameliorated TNBS-induced colitis of rats, and this therapeutic effect was superior to that of MPS and MP. Moreover, MPS/GCZ decreased the plasma levels of corticosterone and ACTH to a greater extent than MPS, but less than MP.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of GCZ, a reduction inhibitor, may be a plausible strategy to reduce the therapeutic loss of MP produced from MPS in the large intestine, thus improving the therapeutic property of the prodrug against inflammatory bowel disease.

Glucocorticoid sensitivity in inflammatory bowel disease

Glucocorticoid therapy is used in the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, IBD patients display varying degrees of glucocorticoid sensitivity: some respond rapidly to the given treatment, whereas others show no response, or develop steroid therapy-related side-effects. At present, we cannot foresee whether the patient will benefit from the administered glucocorticoids or not. During the past 10 years, numerous attempts have been made to provide the means to identify and predict steroid therapy-sensitive patients in advance. This would be vital to avoid unnecessary glucocorticoid exposure in patients that do not respond to treatment with steroids. Here we provide a concise review of recent developments regarding the molecular basis of glucocorticoid sensitivity in IBD patients and the methods employed to assess it.