1
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Rubin DT, Kane SV, Navaneethan U, Bernstein CN, Cross RK, Sugita A, Schairer J, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, McCormick JT, D'Hoore A, Shah SA, Farraye FA, Kariv R, Liu X, Rosh J, Chang S, Scherl E, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, Picoraro JA, Vermeire S, Sandborn WJ, Silverberg MS, Pardi DS. Treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's disease, cuffitis, and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:69-95. [PMID: 34774224 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00214-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, polyps, and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are common inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Acute pouchitis is treated with oral antibiotics and chronic pouchitis often requires anti-inflammatory therapy, including the use of biologics. Aetiological factors for secondary pouchitis should be evaluated and managed accordingly. Crohn's disease of the pouch is usually treated with biologics and its stricturing and fistulising complications can be treated with endoscopy or surgery. The underlying cause of cuffitis determines treatment strategies. Endoscopic polypectomy is recommended for large, symptomatic inflammatory polyps and polyps in the cuff. The management principles of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with pouches are similar to those in patients without pouches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Center for IBD and Interventional IBD Unit, Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital/Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork Presbytarian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Kariv R, Liu X, Navaneethan U, Rubin DT, Cross RK, Sugita A, D'Hoore A, Schairer J, Farraye FA, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, Rosh J, Shah SA, Chang S, Scherl E, Pardi DS, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Kane SV, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, McCormick JT, Picoraro JA, Silverberg MS, Bernstein CN, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S. Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:826-849. [PMID: 34416186 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00101-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, MO, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- IBD Center and IBD Interventional Unit, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital Yokohama, Japan
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital-Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Weill Cornell Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD Outpatients Clinic, Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghouri YA, Tahan V, Shen B. Secondary causes of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:3998-4017. [PMID: 32821067 PMCID: PMC7403802 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i28.3998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), conventionally consist of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. They occur in individuals with high risk genotype for the disease in the setting of appropriate environmental factors. The pathogenesis of IBD involves a dysregulated autoimmune response to gut dysbiosis, which in turn is triggered due to exposure to various inciting environmental factors. But there is no clearly defined etiology of IBD and this type of disease is termed as “idiopathic IBD”, “classic IBD”, or “primary IBD”. We reviewed the current medical literature and found that certain etiological factors may be responsible for the development of IBD or IBD-like conditions, and we consider this form of de novo IBD as “secondary IBD”. Currently known factors that are potentially responsible for giving rise to secondary IBD are medications; bowel altering surgeries and transplantation of organs, stem cells or fecal microbiome. Medications associated with the development of secondary IBD include; immunomodulators, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents, anti-interleukin agents, interferons, immune stimulating agents and checkpoint inhibitors. Colectomy can in some cases give rise to de novo CD, pouchitis of the ileal pouch, or postcolectomy enteritis syndrome. After solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the recipient may develop de novo IBD or IBD flare. Fecal microbiota transplantation has been widely used to treat patients suffering from recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but can also causes IBD flares.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yezaz A Ghouri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri- School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65201, United States
| | - Veysel Tahan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri- School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65201, United States
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Interventional IBD Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ardalan ZS, Sparrow MP. A Personalized Approach to Managing Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:337. [PMID: 32064264 PMCID: PMC7000529 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery is generally good. However, patients can be troubled by pouch-related symptoms and pouch disorders that can be inflammatory, mechanical/surgical, and functional. Management of patients with IPAA begins with measures to maintain a healthy pouch such as optimizing pouch function, providing tailored advice on a healthy diet and lifestyle, screening for and addressing metabolic complications of IPAA, pouch surveillance, and risk stratification for risk of pouchitis and pouch failure. Pouchitis is the most common inflammatory disorder. Primary pouchitis is a spectrum currently classified into three progressive phases-an antibiotic-responsive, an antibiotic-dependent, and an antibiotic-refractory phase. It is predominately microbially mediated in acute antibiotic-responsive pouchitis and predominately immune mediated in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP). Secondary prophylaxis is recommended for recurrent antibiotic-responsive and for antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Secondary causes of antibiotic-refractory pouchitis should be ruled out before a diagnosis of CARP is made. CARP is best classified as primary sclerosing cholangitis associated, immunoglobulin G4-associated, and autoimmune. Primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated CARP can be treated with budesonide or oral vancomycin. Early recognition of immunoglobulin G4-associated pouchitis minimizes ineffective antibiotic use. Autoimmune CARP can be managed in a manner similar to UC. The current place of immunosuppressives in the treatment algorithm depends on availability and early access to biological agents. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are the preferred first- and second-line biologics for autoimmune CARP owing to their efficacy, better side effect profile, and low immunogenicity and need for concomitant immunomodulatory therapy. Antitumor necrosis factor should be reserved for autoimmune CARP failing the above and for CD of the pouch. There are no guidelines for the surveillance of pouches for dysplasia. Incidence varies based on a patient's risk. Since incidence is low, a risk-stratified approach is recommended.
Collapse
|
5
|
Seril DN, Yao Q, Shen B. Auto-inflammatory diseases in ileal pouch patients with NOD2/CARD15 mutations. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2014; 4:73-6. [PMID: 25313006 PMCID: PMC4760059 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gou069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Pouchitis is common in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis occurs in a subgroup of the patients. Auto-inflammatory diseases are characterized by systemic inflammation, manifesting as periodic fever, rash, arthritis, and serositis. We describe two cases with ulcerative colitis and an ileal pouch, who presented with extra-intestinal manifestations and genetic features atypical for inflammatory bowel disease alone. Case 1 had a spectrum of clinical manifestations including refractory pouchitis, intermittent fevers, polyarthralgia, and pericarditis. Case 2 presented with oral ulcers, migratory oligoarthritis, and periodic papular rash. Genetic testing in both cases revealed mutations of the NOD2/CARD15 gene, including the IVS8+158 mutation commonly detected among patients with NOD2-associated auto-inflammatory disease. Both of the patients demonstrated clinical improvement of these diverse systemic complaints following treatment with immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren N Seril
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Qingping Yao
- Departments of Rheumatic and Immunologic Disease, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pouchitis, representing a spectrum of disease phenotypes, is the most common long-term complication in patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Its management and prevention are challenging. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment modalities vary according to phenotypes of pouchitis. The medical therapy of pouchitis remains largely empiric and antibiotic-based. However, patients may develop de-novo chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) or progress from acute antibiotic-responsive phenotype. Patients with CARP often require alternative medical approaches to routine antibiotics, including the use of oral or topical mesalazine, corticosteroids, and sometimes immunomodulators or biological agents against tumour necrosis factor. There are two strategies to prevent pouchitis, the primary (i.e., the prevention of the initial episode) and secondary (i.e., the prevention of recurrent episodes) prophylaxis. There are scant data in the literature on nutritional aspects. SUMMARY We evaluated the efficacy of current strategies of prevention and treatments of pouchitis and propose algorithms, including attention to nutrition wherein data exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoxiu Liu
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu, China bDepartment of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA cDepartment of General Surgery, Qidong City Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is commonly used in the management of ulcerative colitis. Inflammation of the ileal pouch reservoir, or pouchitis, is a common complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis that is incompletely understood. Risk factors including nonsmoker status and primary sclerosing cholangitis have been linked with pouchitis development, but the etiopathogenesis of pouchitis remains poorly defined. Pouchitis is more commonly a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed in patients with ulcerative colitis, and similar to ulcerative colitis, chronic pouchitis is associated with extraintestinal manifestations and other diseases of immune origin, suggesting overlap in the disease pathogenesis. It is becoming apparent that pouchitis encompasses clinically distinct subtypes based on the response or lack of response to antibiotic therapy. There is also emerging evidence of the role of autoimmunity in a subgroup of patients with pouchitis, including patients with concurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, seropositivity for immunoglobulin G4, or infiltration of immunoglobulin G4-expressing plasma cells in the pouch mucosa. The identification of underlying autoimmunity may have important clinical implications in the diagnosis, subclassification, and management of pouchitis.
Collapse
|
8
|
Navaneethan U, Venkatesh PGK, Manilich E, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Shen B. Prevalence and clinical implications of positive serum anti-microsomal antibodies in symptomatic patients with ileal pouches. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:1577-82. [PMID: 21717284 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1586-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2011] [Accepted: 06/10/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Autoimmune disorders (AID) have been shown to be associated with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP). The role of anti-microsomal antibodies in ileal pouch disorders has not been investigated. The aims of the study were to investigate the prevalence of positive anti-microsomal antibody in symptomatic patients with ileal pouches and to investigate its clinical implications. METHODS A total of 118 consecutive symptomatic patients with ileal pouches were included between January and October 2010. Anti-microsomal antibodies were measured at the time of presentation. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics were compared between patients with positive and negative anti-microsomal antibody. RESULTS There were 14 patients (11.9%) with positive serum anti-microsomal antibody. The mean age of patients in the antibody positive and negative groups were 41.8 ± 14.4 and 42.0 ± 14.0 years, respectively (p = 0.189). All 14 patients in the antibody positive group (100%) had some form of AID, as compared to 20 patients (19.2%) in the antibody negative group (p < 0.001). Four (28.6%) patients in the antibody positive group had at least one AID in addition to Hashimoto's thyroiditis in contrast to four (3.8%) in the antibody negative group (p = 0.003). In addition, five (35.7%) patients had associated primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in the antibody positive group compared to nine (8.7%) in the antibody negative group (p = 0.012). Eleven patients (78.6%) in the antibody positive group required steroids for treatment of pouch related symptoms in contrast to 26/104 (25%) patients in the antibody negative group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Anti-microsomal antibodies were common in pouch patients presenting with symptoms. Patients with positive anti-microsomal antibodies were much more likely to have concurrent AID and PSC. These patients were more likely to require therapy with steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Navaneethan U, Shen B. Diagnosis and management of pouchitis and ileoanal pouch dysfunction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010; 12:485-94. [PMID: 20890738 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-010-0143-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the surgical treatment of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or UC with dysplasia and for the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. However, UC patients with IPAA are susceptible to inflammatory and noninflammatory sequelae, such as pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome, in addition to common surgery-associated complications, which adversely affect the surgical outcome and compromise health-related quality of life. Pouchitis is the most frequent long-term complication of IPAA in patients with UC, with a cumulative prevalence of up to 50%. Pouchitis may be classified based on the etiology into idiopathic and secondary types, and the management is often different. Pouchoscopy is the most important tool for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis in patients with pouch dysfunction. Antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for active pouchitis. Some patients may develop dependency on antibiotics, requiring long-term maintenance therapy. Although management of antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis has been challenging, secondary etiology for pouchitis should be evaluated and modified, if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udayakumar Navaneethan
- The Pouchitis Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with symptoms of pouchitis retractable to antibiotic therapy, serology is often ordered to exclude concurrent celiac disease. The clinical utility of celiac serology in patients with ileal pouches is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical implications of false-positive celiac serology in patients with ileal pouches. METHODS All patients with pouches who had underlying ulcerative colitis and available celiac serology were included from the subspecialty Pouchitis Clinic at the Cleveland Clinic between 2002 and 2007. Chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis was diagnosed based on persistent symptomatic pouchitis after a 4-week single- or dual-antibiotic therapy. RESULTS A total of 126 patients were studied, and a false-positive celiac serology was observed in 19 patients. Chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis was diagnosed in 47% (9/19) of patients with false-positive celiac serology compared with 14% (15/107) of patients with a negative celiac serology (P = .003). In multivariate analysis, the association between false-positive celiac serology and chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis remained significant (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-16.7; P = .004) after adjusting for sex (P = .03), pouch duration (P = .83), the presence of autoimmune disorders (P = .46), and extraintestinal manifestations (P = .63). CONCLUSION False-positive celiac serology appeared to be common in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and it may be associated with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis.
Collapse
|
11
|
Navaneethan U, Shen B. Secondary pouchitis: those with identifiable etiopathogenetic or triggering factors. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:51-64. [PMID: 19755972 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for the majority of patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or UC with dysplasia, or familial adenomatous polyposis. Various forms of pouchitis frequently occur after surgery. In fact, pouchitis is the most frequent long-term complication of IPAA in patients with UC, with a cumulative prevalence of up to 50%. The etiology and pathogenesis of pouchitis are not entirely clear. It is generally believed that the initiation and development of the disease process of pouchitis is associated with dysbiosis of pouch reservoir, as evidenced by a favorable response to antibiotic therapy. However, the majority of the patients do not show identifiable etiopathogenetic or triggering factors, therefore being labeled to have idiopathic pouchitis. In contrast, a subgroup of patients, particularly those with antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, may have obvious triggering factors for disease flare-up and progression and may be considered to have secondary pouchitis. Therefore, pouchitis can be classified on the basis of etiology into idiopathic and secondary causes. Approximately 20-30% of patients who present with chronic pouchitis have secondary identifiable and triggering factors, including cytomegalovirus or Clostridium difficile infection, ischemia, concurrent immune-mediated disorders, radiation, collagen deposition, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Careful evaluation of these secondary causes of pouchitis that may contribute to resistance to antibiotics should be performed before the introduction of next-line medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udayakumar Navaneethan
- The Pouchitis Clinic, Digestive Disease Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|