Durability of infliximab in Crohn's disease: a single-center experience

Frequency and Effectiveness of Empirical Anti-TNF Dose Intensification in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Loss of response to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. Our aim was to evaluate the loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, considered as the need for dose intensification (DI), DI effectiveness and the possible variables influencing its requirements. Bibliographical searches were performed.

SELECTION

prospective and retrospective studies assessing DI in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients treated for at least 12 weeks with an anti-TNF drug.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

studies using anti-TNF as a prophylaxis for the postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease or those where DI was based on therapeutic drug monitoring.

DATA SYNTHESIS

effectiveness by intention-to-treat (random effects model). Data were stratified by medical condition (ulcerative colitis vs. Crohn's disease), anti-TNF drug and follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-three studies (33,241 patients) were included. Overall rate of the DI requirement after 12 months was 28% (95% CI 24-32, I2 = 96%, 41 studies) in naïve patients and 39% (95% CI 31-47, I2 = 86%, 18 studies) in non-naïve patients. The DI requirement rate was higher both in those with prior anti-TNF exposure (p = 0.01) and with ulcerative colitis (p = 0.02). The DI requirement rate in naïve patients after 36 months was 35% (95% CI 28-43%; I2 = 98%; 18 studies). The overall short-term response and remission rates of empirical DI in naïve patients were 63% (95% CI 48-78%; I2 = 99%; 32 studies) and 48% (95% CI: 39-58%; I2 = 92%; 25 studies), respectively. The loss of response to anti-TNF agents-and, consequently, DI-occurred frequently in inflammatory bowel disease (approximately in one-fourth at one year and in one-third at 3 years). Empirical DI was a relatively effective therapeutic option.

A Population-Based Study of Combination vs Monotherapy of Anti-TNF in Persons With IBD

BACKGROUND

Few data exist about the utilization of combination therapy (anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF] plus immunosuppressives) in clinical practice. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of combination therapy use vs anti-TNF monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Canadian province of Manitoba.

METHODS

All 23 prescribers of anti-TNF medications for IBD in Manitoba facilitated chart review of their comprehensive lists of adult anti-TNF patients from 2005 to 2015. Subjects were stratified by year of first anti-TNF exposure. Patient, disease, and prescriber factors influencing combination therapy use were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 774 patients met inclusion criteria. Seventy-one point one percent had Crohn's disease (CD), 28.3% had ulcerative colitis (UC), and 0.6% had IBD unclassified; 45.3% received combination therapy, with no difference between CD and UC. Crohn's disease subjects receiving combination therapy were more likely to have penetrating or perianal disease (56.9% vs 42.8%; P = 0.001) and less likely to have had previous IBD-related surgeries (36.2% vs 46.2%; P = 0.02). The median age at diagnosis and at anti-TNF initiation was lower among combination therapy users. Adalimumab users were as likely as infliximab users to receive combination therapy but persisted with treatment for a shorter time. The proportion of new anti-TNF users receiving combination therapy did not change over time (P = 0.43). There was substantial variation in combination therapy use between prescribers (P = 0.002). The most frequently encountered reasons for avoiding combination therapy were previous intolerance or ineffectiveness of immunosuppressive monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Use of combination therapy has remained unchanged over time despite the publication of high-quality data supporting its efficacy over anti-TNF monotherapy.

Concomitant Therapy with Immunomodulator Enhances Infliximab Durability in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Data on long-term durability of infliximab (IFX) and outcomes of concomitant therapy with immunomodulator in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease are limited.

METHODS

Children with inflammatory bowel disease who received IFX ± immunomodulator were retrospectively reviewed. Predictors of induction response were assessed using a binary logistic regression model and long-term outcomes evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching examined long-term efficacy of concomitant therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

RESULTS

Among 148 patients (113 CD, 35 ulcerative colitis; median age at IFX initiation 14.09 years [interquartile range 12.16-15.65]), 91% experienced response to induction therapy; patients with CD were more likely to respond (95% versus 77%, odds ratio = 2.63, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-6.85, P = 0.048). Despite dose optimization, secondary loss of response occurred at a rate of 9.01% and 8.33% per year for patients with CD and ulcerative colitis, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that concomitant therapy >6 months significantly lowered the risk of secondary loss of response in CD (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.88, P = 0.025). The same trend was observed in ulcerative colitis but did not reach significance. A higher proportion of patients on IFX monotherapy stopped IFX because of loss of response or infusion reactions (55% versus 21%, P < 0.001). Propensity score analysis of patients with CD showed significantly higher steroid-free remission rates for concomitant versus monotherapy at 1 year (78% versus 54%, P = 0.020) and 2 years (68% versus 46%, P = 0.044), and durability of response (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate sustained efficacy of IFX in a cohort of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease with durability of response enhanced by concomitant therapy.

A Retrospective Claims Database Study on Drug Utilization in Japanese Patients with Crohn's Disease Treated with Adalimumab or Infliximab

Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic and progressive disease in which the long-term management is important. This study sought to assess treatment persistence and dose escalation in the maintenance phase with adalimumab (ADA) or infliximab (IFX) in a Japanese real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Japan Medical Data Center database. CD patients with either ADA or IFX prescriptions between January 2012 and February 2015 were included. Outcomes of interest were (1) failure in the induction phase (defined as switch or discontinuation) and (2) persistence in the maintenance phase (defined as the absence of switch or discontinuation over 12 months since maintenance initiation).

Results

Overall, 133 patients (53 ADA; 80 IFX) were included. Of them, treatment failed in 26 patients (19.6%) in the induction phase. During the induction phase, there was a trend towards fewer treatment failures with ADA than IFX (88.7% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.051). Of those who completed induction, 64 patients (33 ADA; 31 IFX) had at least 12 months of valid insurance enrolment after the initiation of maintenance and 13 (5 ADA; 8 IFX) had either switch or discontinuation within 12 months after the initiation of maintenance. Probabilities of switch or discontinuation over 12 months after the maintenance date were 15.2% and 20.9% for ADA and IFX groups, respectively (p-log rank = 0.7764).

Conclusion

Japanese patients have a high primary response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the real-world setting, in line with the results of clinical trials. This initial therapeutic advantage can be lost during the maintenance phase, leading to dose escalation, treatment switch, or discontinuation. This study suggests that those events occurred in comparable proportions of patients treated with either ADA or IFX. However, these findings should be considered with caution given the retrospective nature and small size of the study.

Funding

Abbvie GK, Tokyo, Japan.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0406-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Registry Derived from Observational Electronic Health Record Data for Comprehensive Clinical Phenotyping

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a heterogeneous collection of chronic inflammatory disorders of the digestive tract. Clinical, genetic, and pathological heterogeneity makes it increasingly difficult to translate efficacy studies into real-world practice. Our objective was to develop a comprehensive natural history registry derived from multi-year observational data to facilitate effectiveness and clinical phenotypic research in IBD.

METHODS

A longitudinal, consented registry with prospectively collected data was developed at UPMC. All adult IBD patients receiving care at the tertiary care center of UPMC are eligible for enrollment. Detailed data in the electronic health record are accessible for registry research purposes. Data are exported directly from the electronic health record and temporally organized for research.

RESULTS

To date, there are over 2565 patients participating in the IBD research registry. All patients have demographic data, clinical disease characteristics, and disease course data including healthcare utilization, laboratory values, health-related questionnaires quantifying disease activity and quality of life, and analytical information on treatment, temporally organized for 6 years (2009-2015). The data have resulted in a detailed definition of clinical phenotypes suitable for association studies with parameters of disease outcomes and treatment response. We have established the infrastructure required to examine the effectiveness of treatment and disease course in the real-world setting of IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

The IBD research registry offers a unique opportunity to investigate clinical research questions regarding the natural course of the disease, phenotype association studies, effectiveness of treatment, and quality of care research.

Long-term outcomes of thalidomide in refractory Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Several open-label and retrospective studies have indicated that thalidomide may be beneficial in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD).

AIM

To report our long-term experience with the use of thalidomide for adults with refractory Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of long-term clinical and safety outcomes among adults treated with thalidomide for refractory Crohn's disease. Response was defined as a clinician's assessment of improvement after at least 7 days treatment of one or more of the following: bowel movement frequency, fistula output, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, extraintestinal manifestations, or well-being. Remission required all of the following: <3 stools/day, no bleeding, abdominal pain or extraintestinal manifestations and increased well-being.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven adults with refractory Crohn's disease were treated with thalidomide for a median of 4.4 months and followed up for a median of 58 months. Clinical response and remission rates were 54% and 19%, respectively. About 40% of patients were able to stop steroids. Response rates were higher for those treated with more than 50 mg/day (85%) than for those treated with a maximum of 50 mg/day (40%; P = 0.01). An adverse event occurred in 68% of patients. Approximately one-third of patients (38%) experienced neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Thalidomide appears to be safe and effective in some patients with refractory Crohn's disease. Although side effects may limit long-term use, thalidomide has potential to induce significant clinical responses.

Comparison of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity between infliximab mono- versus combination therapy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The association of concomitant immunosuppressant use with infliximab (IFX) and therapeutic outcomes in correlation with pharmacokinetic properties in ulcerative colitis (UC) remains unclear.

AIMS

To assess the effect of concomitant immunosuppressant use on the duration of IFX therapy, and the pharmacokinetic properties of IFX in patients with UC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of UC patients treated with IFX. Duration of efficacious IFX therapy, and serum IFX and antibody-to-IFX (ATI) levels were compared between those receiving IFX as monotherapy and in combination with an immunosuppressant.

RESULTS

Among the 85 UC patients who received IFX, 46 (54.1%) received concomitant immunosuppressants, and 38 (45.9%) received IFX monotherapy. Concomitant immunosuppressant use was associated with increased duration of IFX therapy as 90% of patients receiving immunosuppressants remained on therapy at 1 year versus 61% of patients on monotherapy (Log-rank, P = 0.016). Concomitant immunosuppressant use, as compared with monotherapy, was associated with greater IFX levels (20.4 mg/L vs 10.5 mg/L, P = 0.025) and less frequent ATI formation (4.5% vs 33.3%, P = 0.031). Patients receiving greater than 2.0 mg/kg of azathioprine had greater IFX lev l than those receiving less than 2.0 mg/kg (26.0 vs 10.6 mcg/mL, P = 0.03) and those receiving IFX monotherapy (26.0 vs 11.2 mcg/mL, P = 0.03). The duration of IFX therapy among patients receiving less than 2.0 mg/kg azathioprine was indistinguishable from patients on IFX monotherapy (Log-rank, P = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant immunosuppressant therapy with IFX improves outcomes in UC as shown by increased duration of therapy, decreased immunogenicity against IFX, and increased blood levels of IFX. Our data suggest that this benefit may be dependent on the dose of concomitant immunosuppression.

A 10-year, single tertiary care center experience on the durability of infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing use of infliximab (IFX) in children with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), long-term durability and safety of IFX beyond 1 year is limited in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

We performed a 10-year single-center retrospective cohort study of 188 patients initiating IFX at <21 years of age with 1-year minimum follow-up. Data were retrieved from medical records. IFX outcomes were defined as sustained remission in the absence of dose modification (sustained durable remission), recaptured response, and treatment failure. Adverse events, anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI), and role of concomitant low-dose oral methotrexate (<10 mg/wk) on IFX durability were analyzed. Univariate associations and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

As of the last follow-up, 39% of patients with CD and 29% of patients with UC achieved sustained durable remission and another 60% recaptured and maintained response. For CD, 88% remained on IFX at 1 year, 80% at 2 years, and 82% at 5 years. In UC, 70% avoided colectomy at 1 year. Of IFX failures, 25% with CD and 11% with UC developed ATI. The most common adverse event causing cessation of therapy was infusion reactions. Treatment limiting recurrent infections occurred in <1%, and 1 patient developed lymphoproliferative disease. Low-dose methotrexate did not influence any IFX outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

IFX is safe and effective for long-term maintenance therapy in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. IFX dose intensification can optimize durability and overcome loss of response. Loss of response is likely affected by development of ATI. Higher doses of oral methotrexate may be needed to optimize IFX.

Value of concomitant endoscopic balloon dilation for intestinal stricture during long-term infliximab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease

AIM

We assessed the long-term outcome of infliximab (IFX) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and investigated the efficacy of concomitant endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) for intestinal stricture during treatment.

METHODS

The effectiveness of maintenance therapy with IFX was retrospectively evaluated in 185 patients with CD in a single center (median observation period 24 months). IFX effectiveness with and without immunomodulators (IMM) and enteral nutrition (EN), as well as cumulative surgery-free rates, were compared. The efficacy of concomitant EBD in patients with obstructive symptoms and high-level stricture was evaluated.

RESULTS

In 185 patients receiving the maintenance therapy, the long-term efficacy rate was 84.9% at 24 months and 79.0% at 48 months. The cumulative surgery-free rate was significantly higher in the maintenance group (P < 0.001). Concomitant IMM and EN did not significantly affect the effectiveness of IFX. IFX was discontinued in only 18 cases (7.3%). Symptomatic high-level stricture occurred in 33 patients (17.8%) in the maintenance group and the cumulative surgery-free rate was significantly higher in the EBD combination compared with the non-EBD group (P < 0.05). If EBD were considered invasive intervention, the actual cumulative surgery rate in the maintenance group was significantly lower compared with the cumulative invasive intervention rate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with IFX is highly effective. The surgery-free rate was clearly higher in the maintenance group. Only concomitant EBD for intestinal stricture helped in the avoidance of surgery.

Use of the tumor necrosis factor-blockers for Crohn's disease

The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease represents the most important advance in the care of these patients since the publication of the National Co-operative Crohn's disease study thirty years ago. The recommendations of numerous consensus groups worldwide are now supported by a wealth of clinical trials and several meta-analyses. In general, it is suggested that tumor necrosis factor-α blockers (TNFBs) are indicated (1) for persons with moderately-severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC) who have failed two or more causes of glucocorticosteroids and an acceptably long cause (8 wk to 12 wk) of an immune modulator such as azathioprine or methotrexate; (2) non-responsive perianal disease; and (3) severe UC not responding to a 3-d to 5-d course of steroids. Once TNFBs have been introduced and the patient is responsive, therapy given by the IV and SC rate must be continued. It remains open to definitive evidence if concomitant immune modulators are required with TNFB maintenance therapy, and when or if TNFB may be weaned and discontinued. The supportive evidence from a single study on the role of early versus later introduction of TNFB in the course of a patient's illness needs to be confirmed. The risk/benefit profile of TNFB appears to be acceptable as long as the patient is immunized and tested for tuberculosis and viral hepatitis before the initiation of TNFB, and as long as the long-term adverse effects on the development of lymphoma and other tumors do not prone to be problematic. Because the rates of benefits to TNFB are modest from a population perspective and the cost of therapy is very high, the ultimate application of use of TNFBs will likely be established by cost/benefit studies.

A survey of applications of biological products for drug interference of immunogenicity assays

PURPOSE

Biological drugs in circulation can interfere with anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays and cause false ADA negatives. We surveyed the applications of biological products approved by FDA during 2005-2011 for prevalence of drug interferences and proposed approaches to address this issue scientifically.

METHODS

The immunogenicity assay drug tolerance, steady-state drug concentrations, and immunogenicity rates were reviewed for 26 BLA/NDA and 2 sBLA.

RESULTS

Many FDA approved biologics had higher steady-state drug concentrations than the drug tolerance of ADA assays, by 1.2- to 800-fold. Reported immunogenicity rates may be negatively impacted. Some sponsors triaged immunogenicity samples according to the drug tolerance, leaving some samples un-assayed or reporting them as inconclusive ADA; but these samples were interpreted as ADA- for calculating immunogenicity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ADA assays that can tolerate therapeutic drug concentrations is imperative. Given drug interferences, we propose in this paper the following practices: (i) to measure drug concentrations in ADA samples, (ii) to explicitly list all ADA status, including inconclusive ADA and un-assayed samples, (iii) to calculate population immunogenicity rates based on only subjects with confirmed ADA+ and ADA-, and (iv) to make available ADA assay specifics relevant to the use of ADA data in disease management.

Efficacy, tolerability, and predictors of response to infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease: a large single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is licenced for use in Crohn's disease (CD). Trial data demonstrate that infliximab is effective for inducing remission of active CD, healing fistulising CD, and preventing relapse once in remission. However, long-term data regarding efficacy, safety, and predictors of response are still emerging.

AIM

To examine these issues in a large cohort of patients who received infliximab for CD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed for 210 patients receiving infliximab for luminal or fistulising CD. Response to infliximab induction therapy, and sustained clinical benefit, were assessed by a decrease in Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) of ≥ 2 points. Remission was defined as an HBI ≤ 4. Physician's global assessment was used where HBI could not be obtained. Demographic and disease factors that may predict response to therapy were analysed by Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 173 (82.4%) patients responded to infliximab induction, with 114 (65.9%) achieving sustained clinical benefit. Almost 40% of the study cohort had an HBI ≤ 4, indicating remission, at last point of follow-up (median 24 months). Concomitant immunosuppression predicted sustained clinical benefit in the first 6 months of therapy (P=0.03). An inflammatory disease phenotype (P=0.04 univariate analysis, P=0.03 Kaplan Meier analysis) and male gender (P=0.03) also predicted sustained clinical benefit. Episodic therapy was associated with an increased likelihood of secondary non-response. Adverse events, including malignancies, were few.

CONCLUSION

In this single centre study, infliximab was efficacious and well-tolerated in CD.

Certolizumab pegol compared to natalizumab in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease: results of a decision analysis

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) lose response to antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor α (TNF). Prior TNF-antagonist failure is associated with lower rates of response to subsequent TNF-antagonist therapy. In patients failing two anti-TNF agents, a choice exists between using a third-anti-TNF therapy or natalizumab (NAT), an α-4 integrin inhibitor. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing these competing strategies has not been performed.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was constructed to compare the performance of certolizumab pegol (CZP) versus NAT in patients with moderate to severe CD. Previously published estimates of efficacy of third-line anti-TNF therapy and NAT were used to inform the model. Costs were expressed in 2010 US dollars. A 1-year time frame was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

In the base case estimate, use of NAT was only marginally more effective [0.71 vs. 0.70 quality adjusted life-years (QALYs)] than CZP but was expensive with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $381,678 per QALY gained. For CZP 2 months response rate of at least 24%, NAT had an ICER above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. The model was sensitive to the costs of both therapies; for all CZP costs below $2,300 per dose, NAT had higher ICER than the WTP threshold. Substituting adalimumab for CZP resulted in similar ICER estimates and thresholds for NAT use.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate to severe CD failing two TNF-antagonists, using a third TNF-antagonist therapy appears to be a cost-effective strategy without significantly compromising treatment efficacy.

The London Position Statement of the World Congress of Gastroenterology on Biological Therapy for IBD with the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization: when to start, when to stop, which drug to choose, and how to predict response?

The advent of biological therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. Nonetheless, not all patients require biological therapy. Selection of patients depends on clinical characteristics, previous response to other medical therapy, and comorbid conditions. Availability, reimbursement guidelines, and patient preferences guide the choice of first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) has the most extensive clinical trial data, but other biological agents (adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and natalizumab (NAT)) appear to have similar benefits in CD. Steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or complex fistulizing CD are indications for starting biological therapy, after surgical drainage of any sepsis. For fistulizing CD, the efficacy of IFX for inducing fistula closure is best documented. Unique risks of NAT account for its labeling as a second-line biological agent in some countries. Patients who respond to induction therapy benefit from systematic re-treatment. The combination of IFX with azathioprine is better than monotherapy for induction of remission and mucosal healing up to 1 year in patients who are naïve to both agents. Whether this applies to other agents remains unknown. IFX is also effective for treatment-refractory, moderate, or severely active ulcerative colitis. Patients who have a diminished or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may respond to dose adjustment of the same agent or switching to another agent. Careful consideration should be given to the reasons for loss of response. There are insufficient data to make recommendations on when to stop anti-TNF therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission for >1 year, without signs of active inflammation can remain in remission after stopping treatment.

Editorial: improved efficacy of biological maintenance therapy in "early" compared with "late" Crohn's disease: strike while the iron is hot with anti-TNF agents?

There is growing interest in the use of biologic therapy early in the course of Crohn's disease. In this issue, Schreiber et al. use data from the PRECISE trials to demonstrate a greater response to certolizumab in patients with shorter duration of disease. This suggests that early treatment prior to the occurrence of significant tissue remodeling and irreversible cumulative bowel damage may result in better outcomes. This editorial describes the data published so far on the correlation between disease duration and treatment response and examines the potential benefits to such treatment algorithms.