Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with an integrated boost to the macroscopic tumor volume in the treatment of high-grade gliomas

Advances in radiotherapy and comprehensive treatment of high-grade glioma: immunotherapy and tumor-treating fields

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common primary malignant brain tumors. They have a high degree of malignancy and show invasive growth. The personal treatment plan for HGG is based on the patient's age, performance status, and degree of tumor invasion. The basic treatment plan for HGG involves tumor resection, radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. The basic radiation technology includes conventional RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, and stereotactic RT. As our understanding of tumor pathogenesis has deepened, so-called comprehensive treatment schemes have attracted attention. These combine RT with chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or tumor-treating fields. These emerging treatments are expected to improve the prospects of patients with HGG. In the present article, we review the recent advances in RT and comprehensive treatment for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG.

Research progress on radiotherapy technology and dose fraction scheme for advanced gliomas

Glioma is the most common central malignant tumor. High-grade glioma (HGG) has high malignancy and a short median survival. Complete surgical resection and comprehensive treatment with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for HGGs at present in clinic. Postoperative radiotherapy can reduce the local recurrence rate and prolong the survival time of patients. In recent years, researchers have made some progress on different radiotherapy technologies and dose fraction schemes. With the continuous development of medical technology, different groups of people should choose different dose fraction schemes, in order to realize the individualization of treatment schemes, and provide more benefits to patients. At present, the optimal radiotherapy dose, the fraction model, and how to achieve individualized radiotherapy remains unclear. In view of the poor prognosis of this disease, patients should be encouraged to participate in properly conducted experimental studies.

Comparison of Dosimetric Gains Provided by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volume-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Helical Tomotherapy for High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE

Because of the poor prognosis for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients, it is important to increase the dose of the tumor to improve the efficacy while minimizing the dose of organs at risk (OARs). Thus, we evaluated the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for high-grade glioma (HGG).

METHODS

A total of 42 HGG patients were retrospectively selected who had undergone helical tomotherapy; then, IMRT and VMAT plans were generated and optimized for comparison after contouring crucial neuronal structures for neurogenesis and neurocognitive function. IMRT and VMAT were optimized with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) (Version 11.0.31) and HT using TomoTherapy Hi-Art Software (Version 2.0.7) (Accuray, Madison, WI, USA). All three techniques were optimized for simultaneously delivering 60 Gy to planning target volume (PTV) 1 and 50-54 Gy to PTV2. We also analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTVs and organ at risk (OAR) sparing.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the PTV coverage among IMRT, VMAT, or HT. As for the HI, HT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.09 ± 0.03, PTV2 HI: 0.17 ± 0.05) had the best homogeneity when compared to IMRT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.10 ± 0.04, PTV2 HI: 0.18 ± 0.04) and VMAT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.11 ± 0.03, PTV2 HI: 0.20 ± 0.03). The CI value of HT (PTV1 CI: 0.98 ± 0.03, PTV2: 0.98 ± 0.05) was closest to the optimal value. Except for the IMRT and VMAT groups, there were statistically significant differences between the other two groups of the CI values in both PTV1 and PTV2. The other comparison values were statistically significant except for the optic nerve, and VMAT had the best sparing of the optic chiasm. The mean and max doses of OARs declined significantly in HT.

CONCLUSIONS

For high-grade glioma patients, HT had superior outcomes in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing as compared with IMRT/VMAT.

Dosimetric Comparison and Feasibility of Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) in Treatment of Malignant Gliomas Using Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

Objective:

To evaluate the dosimetric parameters of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in the treatment of malignant gliomas and compare the SIB plans of VMAT and IMRT.

Methodology:

CT and MRI of 28 patients were used for generating SIB plans with VMAT and IMRT. A dose of 2Gy per fraction was prescribed to the CPTV and 2.4Gy to the GPTV for a total of 25 fractions. The plans were accepted only if they met the set of planning objectives defined in the protocol.

Results:

We could achieve the planning objectives in all the SIB plans. Although GPTV coverage was statistically better in VMAT (98.67% vs 98.19% ;p=0.024) the difference is not clinically meaningful. The conformity index for GPTV was higher in IMRT (0.83 vs 0.76; p=0.001). The coverage of CPTV was better in IMRT (97.88% vs 96.87%; p=0.021). But the conformity index of CPTVannulus was higher in VMAT (0.72 vs 0.67; p=0.01). There was no difference in homogeneity index of GPTV and CPTV annulus between the plans. The mean dose received by normal brain was higher in IMRT (28Gy vs 24.2Gy; p<0.001). Ipsilateral optic nerve has received lesser Dmax in IMRT (44.2Gy vs 46.95Gy; p=0.02). No difference was seen in Dmax of brainstem, optic chiasm, contralateral optic nerve. The treatment times and monitor units were significantly less in VMAT.

Conclusion:

SIB is dosimetrically feasible for hypofractionation in malignant gliomas using IMRT and VMAT. IMRT plans had better boost conformity, lower ipsilateral optic nerve and brainstem maximum doses compared to VMAT. Whereas, VMAT had better coverage, better overall PTV conformity, lower normal brain mean dose, lower monitor units and lesser treatment times. Although planning of VMAT is cumbersome and time consuming, the advantage of reducing treatment time is beneficial to the patients’ comfort and better managing of patient load in high volume centres.

Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the parametrium and cervix in radiotherapy for uterine cervical carcinoma: a dosimetric study using a new alternative approach

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dose distributions of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique with that of the traditional midline block (MB) technique for boosting the parametrium in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

Treatment plans using VMAT or IMRT with the SIB technique (VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB) and IMRT followed by the MB technique (IMRT-MB) were generated for each of the 10 patients with cervical cancer. For the SIB plans, 45-Gy and 50-Gy dose levels in 25 equal fractions were set for the pelvis planning target volume 45 (PTV₄₅) and the parametrial boost volume (PTV₅₀), respectively. For the IMRT-MB plans, the parametrium was sequentially boosted with the MB technique (5.4 Gy in three fractions) after pelvic IMRT (PTV₄₅).

RESULTS

Volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose or more coverage of the PTV₅₀ was significantly better for VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB than that for IMRT-MB (99.08 and 99.31% compared with 91.79%, respectively; p < 0.05). VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB both generated significantly greater doses to the organs at risk (OARs) except for the volume receiving 50 Gy or more doses, which were significantly lower for the bladder and bowel. Comparable results were achieved with VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB.

CONCLUSION

The VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB techniques are promising in terms of dose distributions and tumour coverage, although these approaches might result in slightly higher doses of radiation to the OARs. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study to examine the feasibility of the SIB technique using IMRT or VMAT to boost the parametrium. The techniques dosimetrically produced better target coverage but resulted in slightly higher doses to the OARs.

Simultaneous integrated vs. sequential boost in VMAT radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND

In 20 patients with high-grade gliomas, we compared two methods of planning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT): simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) vs. sequential boost (SEB). The investigation focused on the analysis of dose distributions in the target volumes and the organs at risk (OARs).

METHOD

After contouring the target volumes [planning target volumes (PTVs) and boost volumes (BVs)] and OARs, SIB planning and SEB planning were performed. The SEB method consisted of two plans: in the first plan the PTV received 50 Gy in 25 fractions with a 2-Gy dose per fraction. In the second plan the BV received 10 Gy in 5 fractions with a dose per fraction of 2 Gy. The doses of both plans were summed up to show the total doses delivered. In the SIB method the PTV received 54 Gy in 30 fractions with a dose per fraction of 1.8 Gy, while the BV received 60 Gy in the same fraction number but with a dose per fraction of 2 Gy.

RESULTS

All of the OARs showed higher doses (Dmax and Dmean) in the SEB method when compared with the SIB technique. The differences between the two methods were statistically significant in almost all of the OARs. Analysing the total doses of the target volumes we found dose distributions with similar homogeneities and comparable total doses.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that the SIB method offers advantages over the SEB method in terms of sparing OARs.

Dosimetric comparison of the simultaneous integrated boost in whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery: IMRT, IMRT plus an electron boost and VMAT

Objectives

To compare the target volume coverage and doses to organs at risks (OARs) using three techniques that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), IMRT plus an electron boost (IMRT-EB), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods

A total of 10 patients with early-stage left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery were included in this study. IMRT, IMRT-EB and VMAT plans were generated for each patient.

Results

The conformity index (CI) of the planning target volumes evaluation (PTV-Eval) of VMAT was significantly superior to those of IMRT and IMRT-EB (P < 0.05). The CI of the PTV Eval-boost of VMAT was better than that of IMRT (P = 0.018) and IMRT-EB (P < 0.001), while the CI of the PTV Eval-boost of IMRT was better than that of IMRT-EB (P = 0.002). The V5, V10 and Dmean in ipsilateral lung with VMAT were significantly higher than IMRT (P < 0.05) and IMRT-EB (P < 0.05). The Dmean, V5 and V10 in heart with VMAT were significantly greater than those of IMRT and IMRT-EB (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the OARs between IMRT and IMRT-EB (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Considered the target volume coverage and radiation dose delivered to the OARs (especially the heart and lung), IMRT may be more suitable for the SIB in WBI than IMRT-EB and VMAT. Additional clinical studies with a larger sample size will be needed to assess the long-term feasibility and efficacy of SIB using different radiotherapy techniques.

Modified simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for an unresectable huge refractory pelvic tumor diagnosed as a rectal adenocarcinoma

A clinical trial of radiotherapy with modified simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique against huge tumors was conducted. A 58-year-old male patient who had a huge pelvic tumor diagnosed as a rectal adenocarcinoma due to familial adenomatous polyposis was enrolled in this trial. The total dose of 77 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction) and 64.5 Gy was delivered to the center of the tumor and the surrounding area respectively, and approximately 20% dose escalation was achieved with the modified SIB technique. The tumor with an initial maximum size of 15 cm disappeared 120 d after the start of the radiotherapy. Performance status of the patient improved from 4 to 0. Radiotherapy with modified SIB may be effective for patients with a huge tumor in terms of tumor shrinkage/disappearance, improvement of QOL, and prolongation of survival.

Modified simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of modified simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy for patients with extensive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with macroscopic tumor and histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast were enrolled in the study. Patients were included whether they had or did not have previous surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or molecular targeted therapy; patients with past history of thoracic radiotherapy were excluded. Under conditions of not exceeding the tolerance dose for normal tissue, irradiation to the tumor was increased to the maximum possible extent using the modified SIB technique.

RESULTS

Three breast cancer patients were treated with the modified SIB technique. All patients were diagnosed as T4b (median maximum diameter of the tumor: 16 cm; range, 15.5-22 cm), and all patients exhibited symptoms because of the extremely large tumor. The median total dose to the part of tumor tissue was 128.8 Gy (range, 110-140 Gy). Total dose to normal tissue was < 72 Gy in all patients. Although large tumors were radio-resistant, it was macroscopically confirmed that all tumors eventually disappeared. Although skin defects persisted because of tumor disappearance, there were no Grade ≥ 3 toxicities due to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Although much care is required in delivering extremely high doses of radiotherapy to the tumor, modified SIB radiotherapy was shown to be effective against extremely large tumors that could not be controlled using conventional radiotherapy. In future, an increase in the number of study patients and establishment of the technique will be required.

Dosimetric comparison of absolute and relative dose distributions between tissue maximum ratio and convolution algorithms for acoustic neurinoma plans in Gamma Knife radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

The treatment planning for Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) that performs dose calculations based on tissue maximum ratio (TMR) algorithm has disadvantages in predicting dose in tissue heterogeneity. The latest version of the planning software is equipped with a convolution dose algorithm as an optional extra and the new algorithm is able to compensate for head inhomogeneity. However, the effect of this improved calculation method requires detailed validation in clinical cases. In this study, we compared absolute and relative dose distributions of treatment plans for acoustic neurinoma between TMR and the convolution calculation.

METHODS

Twenty-nine clinically used plans created by TMR algorithm were recalculated by convolution method. Differences between TMR and convolution were evaluated in terms of absolute dose (beam-on time), dosimetric parameters including target coverage, selectivity, conformity index, gradient index, radical homogeneity index and the dose-volume relationship.

RESULTS

The discrepancy in estimated absolute dose to the target ranged from 1 to 7 % between TMR and convolution. In addition, dosimetric parameters of the two methods achieved statistical significance. However, it was difficult to see the change of relative dose distribution by visual assessment on a monitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Convolution, heterogeneity correction calculation, and the algorithm are necessary to reduce the dosimetric uncertainty of each case in GK SRS.

A dosimetric comparison of IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for brain tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Helical tomotherapy (HT) can deliver highly conformal, uniform doses to the target volume. However, HT can only be delivered in a coplanar mode. The purpose of this study was to perform a dosimetric comparison of HT versus coplanar (cIMRT) and non-coplanar (n-cIMRT) beam arrangements on a conventional linear accelerator in a diverse group of brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 treatment plans were calculated retrospectively for 15 cases. For each case, 3 different delivery techniques (n-cIMRT, cIMRT and HT) were used. The treatment plans were compared using the parameters of the target coverage (conformity index; CI) and homogeneity (HI) for the planning target volume (PTV) and the maximum and mean doses for organs at risk (OARs).

RESULTS

Median HI and CI were the best for HT plans and the worst for cIMRT. The largest reduction of maximum dose for lenses and mean dose for both eyes was achieved for n-cIMRT plans. Mean dose for chiasm and the ipsilateral optic nerve were the lowest for HT. The contralateral optic nerve was most spared with n-cIMRT. For D1% in the brain stem, there was no significant difference between HT and the IMRT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HT and n-cIMRT are capable of producing conformal and homogeneous treatment plans with a good sparing of OARs. However, due to the non-coplanar capabilities of IMRT, n-cIMRT led to a superior dose reduction to the lenses.

IMRT or 3D-CRT in Glioblastoma? A Dosimetric Criterion for Patient Selection

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly employed in glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. The present work aimed to assess which clinical-dosimetric scenario could benefit the most from IMRT application, with respect to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). The number of organs at risk (OARs) overlapping the planning target volume (PTV) was the parameter describing the clinical-dosimetric pattern. Based on the results, a dosimetric decision criterion to select the most appropriate treatment technique is provided. Seventeen previously irradiated patients were retrieved and re-planned with both 3D-CRT and IMRT. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/30fx. The cases were divided into 4 groups (4 patients in each group). Each group represents the scenario where 0, 1, 2 or 3 OARs overlapped the target volume, respectively. Furthermore, in one case, 4 OARs overlapped the PTV. The techniques were compared also in terms of irradiated healthy brain tissue. The results were evaluated by paired t-test. IMRT always provided better target coverage (V95%) than 3D-CRT, regardless the clinical-dosimetric scenario: difference ranged from 0.82% ( p = 0.4) for scenario 0 to 7.8% ( p = 0.02) for scenario 3, passing through 2.54% ( p = 0.18) and 5.93% ( p = 0.08) for scenario 1 and 2, respectively. IMRT and 3D-CRT achieved comparable results in terms of dose homogeneity and conformity. Concerning the irradiation of serial-kind OARs, both techniques provided nearly identical results. A statistically significant dose reduction to the healthy brain in favor of IMRT was scored. IMRT seems a superior technique compared to 3D-CRT when there are multiple overlaps between OAR and PTV. In this scenario, IMRT allows for a better target coverage while maintaining equivalent OARs sparing and reducing healthy brain irradiation. The results from our patients dataset suggests that the overlap of three OARs can be used as a dosimetric criterion to select which patients should receive IMRT treatment.

Accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a phase I dose-escalation study (ISIDE-BT-1)

BACKGROUND

We performed a dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with standard concurrent and sequential-dose temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

METHODS

Histologically proven glioblastoma patients underwent IMRT dose escalation. IMRT was delivered over 5 weeks with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to the two planning target volumes (PTVs) defined by adding 5-mm margin to the respective clinical target volumes (CTVs). CTV1 was the tumor bed plus the enhancing lesion with 10-mm margin; CTV2 was the area of perifocal edema with 20-mm margin. Only the PTV1 dose was escalated (planned dose escalation: 60, 62.5, 65, 67.5, 70 Gy) while the PTV2 dose remained the same (45 Gy).

RESULTS

Forty consecutive glioblastoma patients were treated. While no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was recorded during the dose escalation up to 67.5/2.7 Gy, two out of the first six consecutively enrolled patients on the highest dose level (70/2.8 Gy) experienced a DLT, and therefore a cohort expansion was required. 3/14 patients experienced a DLT on the highest planned dose level, and therefore the MTD was not exceeded. After a median follow-up time of 25 months no grade >2 late neurological toxicity was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a SIB IMRT technique, a radiation dose of 70 Gy in 25 fractions (biological effective dose--BED--of 92.8 Gy) can be delivered with concurrent and sequential standard dose TMZ, without unacceptable acute toxicity in patients with glioblastoma.

Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare treatment plans generated using fixed beam Intensity Modulated photon Radiation Therapy (IMRT), inversely optimized arc therapy (RapidArc(R), RA) with spot-scanned Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) for high-grade glioma patients. Plans were compared with respect to target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs), with special attention to the possibility of hippocampus sparing.

METHOD

Fifteen consecutive patients diagnosed with grade III and IV glioma were selected for this study. The target and OARs were delineated based on computed tomography (CT), FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) and T1-, T2-weigted, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fiber-tracking. In this study, a 6 MV photon beam on a linear accelerator with a multileaf collimator (MLC) with 2.5 mm leaves and a spot-scanning proton therapy machine were used. Two RA fields, using both a coplanar (clinical standard) and a non-coplanar, setup was compared to the IMRT and IMPT techniques. Three and three to four non-coplanar fields where used in the spot-scanned IMPT and IMRT plans, respectively. The same set of planning dose-volume optimizer objective values were used for the four techniques. The highest planning priority was given to the brainstem (maximum 54 Gy) followed by the PTV (prescription 60 Gy); the hippocampi, eyes, inner ears, brain and chiasm were given lower priority. Doses were recorded for the plans to targets and OARs and compared to our clinical standard technique using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULT

The PTV coverage was significantly more conform for IMPT than the coplanar RA technique, while RA plans tended to be more conform than the IMRT plans, as measured by the standard deviation of the PTV dose. In the cases where the tumor was confined in one cerebral hemisphere (eight patients), the non-coplanar RA and IMPT techniques yielded borderline significantly lower doses to the contralateral hippocampus compared to the standard (22% and 97% average reduction for non-coplanar RA and IMPT, respectively). The IMPT technique allowed for the largest healthy tissue sparing of the techniques in terms of whole brain doses and to the fiber tracts. The maximum doses to the chiasm and brainstem were comparable for all techniques.

CONCLUSION

The IMPT technique produced the most conform plans. For tumors located in the one of the cerebral hemispheres, the non-coplanar RA and the IMPT techniques were able to reduce doses to the contralateral hippocampus. The IMPT technique offered the largest sparing of the brain and fiber tracts. RA techniques tended to produce more conform target doses than IMRT.

Simultaneous integrated boost for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer--intensity modulated vs. conventional radiotherapy: the IMRT-MC2 trial

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy is an essential modality in the treatment of breast cancer. Addition of radiotherapy to surgery has significantly increased local control and survival rates of the disease. However, radiotherapy is also associated with side effects, such as tissue fibrosis or enhanced vascular morbidity. Modern radiotherapy strategies, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), can shorten the overall treatment time by integration of the additional tumor bed boost significantly. To what extent this might be possible without impairing treatment outcome and cosmetic results remains to be clarified.

METHODS/DESIGN

The IMRT-MC2 study is a prospective, two armed, multicenter, randomized phase-III-trial comparing intensity modulated radiotherapy with integrated boost to conventional radiotherapy with consecutive boost in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. 502 patients will be recruited and randomized into two arms: patients in arm A will receive IMRT in 28 fractions delivering 50.4 Gy to the breast and 64.4 Gy to the tumor bed by integrated boost, while patients in arm B will receive conventional radiotherapy of the breast in 28 fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy and consecutive boost in 8 fractions to a total dose of 66.4 Gy.

DISCUSSION

Primary objectives of the study are the evaluation of the cosmetic results 6 weeks and 2 years post treatment and the 2- and 5-year local recurrence rates for the two different radiotherapy strategies. Secondary objectives are long term overall survival, disease free survival and quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT01322854.

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

We analyzed outcomes of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with high-grade gliomas, compared with a literature review.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty consecutive patients (WHO grade III, 14 patients; grade IV, 26 patients) treated with SIB-IMRT were analyzed. A dose of 2.0 Gy was delivered to the planning target volume with a SIB of 0.4 Gy to the gross tumor volume with a total dose of 60 Gy to the gross tumor volume and 50 Gy to the planning target volume in 25 fractions during 5 weeks. Twenty patients received temozolomide chemotherapy.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 13.4 months (range, 3.7-55.9 months), median survival was 14.8 months. One- and 2-year survival rates were 78% and 65%, respectively, for patients with grade III tumors and 56% and 31%, respectively, for patients with grade IV tumors. Age (≤50 vs. >50), grade (III vs. IV), subtype (astrocytoma vs. oligodendroglioma or mixed), and a Zubrod performance score (0-1 vs. >2) were predictive of survival. Of 25 (63%) patients who had recurrences, 17 patients had local failure, 9 patients had regional failure, and 1 patient had distant metastasis. Toxicities were acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

SIB-IMRT with the dose/fractionation used in this study is feasible and safe, with a survival outcome similar to the historical control. The shortening of treatment time by using SIB-IMRT may be of value, although further investigation is warranted to prove its survival advantage.

Integrated-boost IMRT or 3-D-CRT using FET-PET based auto-contoured target volume delineation for glioblastoma multiforme--a dosimetric comparison

Background

Biological brain tumor imaging using O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-PET combined with inverse treatment planning for locally restricted dose escalation in patients with glioblastoma multiforme seems to be a promising approach.

The aim of this study was to compare inverse with forward treatment planning for an integrated boost dose application in patients suffering from a glioblastoma multiforme, while biological target volumes are based on FET-PET and MRI data sets.

Methods

In 16 glioblastoma patients an intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique comprising an integrated boost (IB-IMRT) and a 3-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique were generated for dosimetric comparison. FET-PET, MRI and treatment planning CT (P-CT) were co-registrated. The integrated boost volume (PTV1) was auto-contoured using a cut-off tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR) of ≥ 1.6 from FET-PET. PTV2 delineation was MRI-based. The total dose was prescribed to 72 and 60 Gy for PTV1 and PTV2, using daily fractions of 2.4 and 2 Gy.

Results

After auto-contouring of PTV1 a marked target shape complexity had an impact on the dosimetric outcome. Patients with 3-4 PTV1 subvolumes vs. a single volume revealed a significant decrease in mean dose (67.7 vs. 70.6 Gy). From convex to complex shaped PTV1 mean doses decreased from 71.3 Gy to 67.7 Gy. The homogeneity and conformity for PTV1 and PTV2 was significantly improved with IB-IMRT. With the use of IB-IMRT the minimum dose within PTV1 (61.1 vs. 57.4 Gy) and PTV2 (51.4 vs. 40.9 Gy) increased significantly, and the mean EUD for PTV2 was improved (59.9 vs. 55.3 Gy, p < 0.01). The EUD for PTV1 was only slightly improved (68.3 vs. 67.3 Gy). The EUD for the brain was equal with both planning techniques.

Conclusion

In the presented planning study the integrated boost concept based on inversely planned IB-IMRT is feasible. The FET-PET-based automatically contoured PTV1 can lead to very complex geometric configurations, limiting the achievable mean dose in the boost volume. With IB-IMRT a better homogeneity and conformity, compared to 3D-CRT, could be achieved.

A dosimetric comparison of four treatment planning methods for high grade glioma

Background

High grade gliomas (HGG) are typically treated with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Three dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy treatment planning is still the main stay of treatment for these patients. New treatment planning methods suggest better dose distributions and organ sparing but their clinical benefit is unclear. The purpose of the current study was to compare normal tissue sparing and tumor coverage using four different radiotherapy planning methods in patients with high grade glioma.

Methods

Three dimensional conformal (3D), sequential boost IMRT, integrated boost (IB) IMRT and Tomotherapy (TOMO) treatment plans were generated for 20 high grade glioma patients. T1 and T2 MRI abnormalities were used to define GTV and CTV with 2 and 2.5 cm margins to define PTV1 and PTV2 respectively.

Results

The mean dose to PTV2 but not to PTV1 was less then 95% of the prescribed dose with IB and IMRT plans. The mean doses to the optic chiasm and the ipsilateral globe were highest with 3D plans and least with IB plans. The mean dose to the contralateral globe was highest with TOMO plans. The mean of the integral dose (ID) to the brain was least with the IB plan and was lower with IMRT compared to 3D plans. The TOMO plans had the least mean D10 to the normal brain but higher mean D50 and D90 compared to IB and IMRT plans. The mean D10 and D50 but not D90 were significantly lower with the IMRT plans compared to the 3D plans.

Conclusion

No single treatment planning method was found to be superior to all others and a personalized approach is advised for planning and treating high-grade glioma patients with radiotherapy. Integral dose did not reflect accurately the dose volume histogram (DVH) of the normal brain and may not be a good indicator of delayed radiation toxicity.

A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the predecessor to Varian's RapidArc, is a novel extension of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) wherein the dose is delivered in a single gantry rotation while the multileaf collimator leaves are in motion. Leaf positions and the weights of field samples along the arc are directly optimized, and a variable dose rate is used. This planning study compared seven-field coplanar IMRT (cIMRT) with VMAT for high-grade gliomas that had planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping organs at risk (OARs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

10 previously treated patients were replanned to 60 Gy in 30 fractions with cIMRT and VMAT using the following planning objectives: 98% of PTV covered by 95% isodose without violating OAR and hotspot dose constraints. Mean OAR doses were maximally decreased without reducing PTV coverage or violating hotspot constraints. We compared dose-volume histogram data, monitor units, and treatment times.

RESULTS

There was equivalent PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformality. VMAT significantly reduced maximum and mean retinal, lens, and contralateral optic nerve doses compared with IMRT (p < 0.05). Brainstem, chiasm, and ipsilateral optic nerve doses were similar. For 2-Gy fractions, mean monitor units were as follows: cIMRT = 789 +/- 112 and VMAT = 363 +/- 45 (relative reduction 54%, p = 0.002), and mean treatment times (min) were as follows: cIMRT = 5.1 +/- 0.4 and VMAT = 1.8 +/- 0.1 (relative reduction 65%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cIMRT, VMAT achieved equal or better PTV coverage and OAR sparing while using fewer monitor units and less time to treat high-grade gliomas.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost and weekly paclitaxel in malignant gliomas clinical and pharmacokinetics results

Management of Malignant Gliomas continues to be a challenge. We prospectively studied the role of adding weekly Paclitaxel to Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (FSRT) in the treatment of Malignant Gliomas. Twenty-three Glioblastoma Multiforme and two Anaplastic Astrocytoma were studied. Patients received 46 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction followed by a boost utilizing FSRT at a fraction of 2.5 Gy for 8 fractions. Paclitaxel is delivered concomitantly at 150 mg/m(2) weekly for six cycles. Eighteen patients had pharmacokinetic assays of Paclitaxel levels. All patients were followed until death or for a maximum of 36 months. The overall survival of the whole group was 14 months. The median survival for RPA prognostic classes III, IV, V, and VI were 20, 14, 12, and 11 months. Higher survival (14 months) was noted in the subtherapeutic phenytoin level group compared to 10 months in the therapeutic group (P=0.271). No grade 4 CTCAE (version 3.0) toxicities were observed. Enhanced survival was demonstrated with gross tumor resection (20.8 months), KPS > or =80 (18.7 months) and age < or =60 years (27 months) as compared to subtotal resection or biopsy (12.1 months, P< 0.005), KPS < or =70 (10.8 months, P=0. 005) and older age > 60 (10.46 months, P=0.006), respectively. Our study suggests that: i) the use of weekly Paclitaxel and FSRT in Gliomas is well tolerated with a survival of 14 months; ii) the regimen resulted in improvement of survival of RPA classes IV, V, VI; and iii) the use of FSRT boost may be studied with other chemotherapeutic agents to see if superior results can be attained.

Radiotherapeutic alternatives for previously irradiated recurrent gliomas

Re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas has been discussed controversially in the past. This was mainly due to only marginal palliation while being associated with a high risk for side effects using conventional radiotherapy.

With modern high-precision radiotherapy re-irradiation has become a more wide-spread, effective and well-tolerated treatment option. Besides external beam radiotherapy, a number of invasive and/or intraoperative radiation techniques have been evaluated in patients with recurrent gliomas.

The present article is a review on the available methods in radiation oncology and summarizes results with respect to outcome and side effects in comparison to clinical results after neurosurgical resection or different chemotherapeutic approaches.

Standard fractionation intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of primary and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) affords unparalleled capacity to deliver conformal radiation doses to tumors in the central nervous system. However, to date, there are few reported outcomes from using IMRT, either alone or as a boost technique, for standard fractionation radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

Forty-two patients were treated with IMRT alone (72%) or as a boost (28%) after 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Thirty-three patients with primary disease and 9 patients with recurrent tumors were included. Thirty-four patients (81%) had surgery, with gross tumor resection in 13 patients (36%); 22 patients (53%) received chemo-radiotherapy. The median total radiation dose for all patients was 60 Gy with a range from 30.6 to 74 Gy. Standard fractions of 1.8 Gy/day to 2.0 Gy/day were utilized.

RESULTS

Median survival was 8.7 months, with 37 patients (88%) deceased at last contact. Nonparametric analysis showed no survival difference in IMRT-boost vs. IMRT-only groups.

CONCLUSION

While technically feasible, preliminary results suggest delivering standard radiation doses by IMRT did not improve survival outcomes in this series compared to historical controls. In light of this lack of a survival benefit and the costs associated with use of IMRT, future prospective trials are needed to evaluate non-survival endpoints such as quality of life and functional preservation. Short of such evidence, the use of IMRT for treatment of GBM needs to be carefully rationalized.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the dosimetry, efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 7 patients who were definitively treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy. Patients who did not receive IMRT radiation and concurrent chemotherapy were not included in this analysis. IMRT plans were evaluated to assess the tumor coverage and normal tissue avoidance. Treatment response was evaluated and toxicities were assessed.

RESULTS: Five- to nine-beam IMRT were used to deliver a total dose of 59.4-66 Gy (median: 64.8 Gy) to the primary tumor with 6-MV photons. The minimum dose received by the planning tumor volume (PTV) of the gross tumor volume boost was 91.2%-98.2% of the prescription dose (standard deviation [SD]: 3.7%-5.7%). The minimum dose received by the PTV of the clinical tumor volume was 93.8%-104.8% (SD: 4.3%-11.1%) of the prescribed dose. With a median follow-up of 15 mo (range: 3-21 mo), all 6 evaluable patients achieved complete response. Of them, 2 developed local recurrences and 2 had distant metastases, 3 survived with no evidence of disease. After treatment, 2 patients developed esophageal stricture requiring frequent dilation and 1 patient developed tracheal-esophageal fistula.

CONCLUSION: Concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy resulted in an excellent early response in patients with locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer. However, local and distant recurrence and toxicity remain to be a problem. Innovative approaches are needed to improve the outcome.

Inverse planned stereotactic intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of incompletely and completely resected adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck: initial clinical results and toxicity of treatment

BACKGROUND

Presenting the initial clinical results in the treatment of complex shaped adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) of the head and neck region by inverse planned stereotactic IMRT.

MATERIALS

25 patients with huge ACC in different areas of the head and neck were treated. At the time of radiotherapy two patients already suffered from distant metastases. A complete resection of the tumor was possible in only 4 patients. The remaining patients were incompletely resected (R2: 20; R1: 1). 21 patients received an integrated boost IMRT (IBRT), which allow the use of different single doses for different target volumes in one fraction. All patients were treated after inverse treatment planning and stereotactic target point localization.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 22.8 months (91-1490 days). According to Kaplan Meier the three year overall survival rate was 72%. 4 patients died caused by a systemic progression of the disease. The three-year recurrence free survival was according to Kaplan Meier in this group of patients 38%. 3 patients developed an in-field recurrence and 3 patient showed a metastasis in an adjacent lymph node of the head and neck region. One patient with an in-field recurrence and a patient with the lymph node recurrence could be re-treated by radiotherapy. Both patients are now controlled. Acute side effects >Grade II did only appear so far in a small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

The inverse planned stereotactic IMRT is feasible in the treatment of ACC. By using IMRT, high control rates and low side effects could by achieved. Further evaluation concerning the long term follow-up is needed. Due to the technical advantage of IMRT this treatment modality should be used if a particle therapy is not available.

Thallium-201 SPECT in prognostic assessment of malignant gliomas treated with postoperative radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the value of preoperative thallium-201 (201Tl) SPECT as a predictor of outcome in malignant glioma.

METHODS

From January 1990 to September 2003, 109 patients with glioma were treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Of these, 36 patients with malignant gliomas who underwent preoperative 201Tl-SPECT were included in this study (grade 3: n=14, grade 4: n=22). On early (10 minutes) and delayed (2 hours) images after 111 MBq 201TlCl injection, we calculated radioactivity ratios of tumors to contralateral normal brain (T/N ratios) and retention indices (RIs). For early and delayed images, we compared outcome between a high T/N ratio group (T/N ratio equal or greater than the average) and a low T/N ratio group (T/N ratio less than the average). We also divided the patients into two groups on the basis of RI; a high RI group (RI equal or greater than the average) and a low RI group (RI less than the average), and similarly compared outcome between the two groups.

RESULTS

Median survival time was 12 months for both grade 3 and grade 4 tumors; however, two-year survival was 53% for grade 3 and 15% for grade 4. In both early and delayed images, outcome was significantly better for patients with low T/N ratios (early < 4.71, delayed < 3.96) than those with high T/N ratios (early: p = 0.030, delayed: p = 0.049). However, no significant survival difference was apparent between the low- (< -12.25) and high RI groups. In grade 3 glioma, patients with high T/N ratios demonstrated a tendency toward poorer outcome, although this trend was not significant (early: p = 0.079, delayed: p = 0.099). Overall outcome was poor for grade 4 glioma, and the difference in survival between low and high T/N ratio groups was not significant (early: p = 0.51, delayed: p = 0.53). However, long survival was seen only in patients with lower T/N ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences of 201Tl uptake in malignant gliomas could predict outcome. 201Tl-SPECT is potentially useful in the management of patients with malignant gliomas.

Diffusion tensor imaging: possible implications for radiotherapy treatment planning of patients with high-grade glioma

AIMS

Radiotherapy treatment planning for high-grade gliomas (HGG) is hampered by the inability to image peri-tumoural white-matter infiltration. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an imaging technique that seems to show white-matter abnormalities resulting from tumour infiltration that cannot be visualised by conventional computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We propose a new term, the image-based high-risk volume (IHV) for such abnormalities, which are distinct from the gross-tumour volume (GTV). For IHV based on DTI, we use the term IHVDTI. This study assesses the value of DTI for the individualisation of radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with HGG.

METHODS

Seven patients with biopsy-proven HGG were included in a theoretical planning exercise, comparing standard planning techniques with individualised plans based on DTI. Standard plans were generated using a 2.5 cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin added to the GTV. For DTI-based plans, the CTV was generated by adding a 1 cm margin to the IHVDTI. Estimates of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated and used to estimate the level of dose escalation that could be achieved using the DTI-based plans.

RESULTS

The use of DTI resulted in non-uniform margins being added to the GTV to encompass areas at high risk of tumour involvement, but, in six out of seven cases, the IHVDTI was encapsulated by the standard CTV margin. In all cases, DTI could be used to reduce the size of the planning-target volume (PTV) (mean 35%, range 18-46%), resulting in escalated doses (mean 67 Gy, range 64-74 Gy), with NTCP levels that matched the conventional treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

DTI can be used to individualise radiotherapy target volumes, and reduction in the CTV permits modest dose escalation without an increase in NTCP. DTI may also be helpful in stratifying patients according to the degree of white-matter infiltration.

Dosimetric issues in radiation protection of radiotherapy patients

As life expectancy increases, thanks to improving general medical practices, cancer treatments for the ageing population become evermore necessary. Radiation therapy is increasingly a treatment of choice, promoted by continuing improvements in dose delivery technologies. Some techniques, collectively referred to as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, are encountering widespread acceptance and implementation, promoted by reports of superior tumour control and reduced toxicity. However, these new techniques pose new challenges in terms of radiation protection of patients, as they cause a more extensive low-dose exposure of normal tissues compared with conventional radiation therapy. The related dosimetric challenges and the methods available to tackle them are reviewed in this paper, which also emphasises the need for standard radiation protection dosimetry procedures so that information may be consistently gathered for a comparative evaluation of the different treatment modalities.

Evaluating changes in tumor volume using magnetic resonance imaging during the course of radiotherapy treatment of high-grade gliomas: Implications for conformal dose-escalation studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether changes in tumor volume occur during the course of conformal 3D radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas by use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during treatment and whether these changes had an impact on tumor coverage.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 2000 and January 2004, 21 patients with WHO Grades 3 to 4 supratentorial malignant gliomas treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (median dose, 70 Gy) were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. All patients underwent T1-weighted contrast-enhancing and T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging at approximately 1 to 2 weeks before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (Weeks 1 and 3), and at routine intervals thereafter. All MRI scans were coregistered to the treatment-planning CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV Pre-Rx) was defined from a postoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhancing MRI performed 1 to 2 weeks before start of radiotherapy. A second GTV (GTV Week 3) was defined by use of an MRI performed during Week 3 of radiotherapy. A uniform 0.5 cm expansion of the respective GTV, PTV (Pre-Rx), and PTV (Week 3) was applied to the final boost plan. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to analyze any potential adverse changes in tumor coverage based on Week 3 MRI.

RESULTS

All MRI scans were reviewed independently by a neuroradiologist (DGH). Two patients were noted to have multifocal disease at presentation and were excluded from analysis. In 19 cases, changes in the GTV based on MRI at Week 3 during radiotherapy were as follows: 2 cases had an objective decrease in GTV (> or =50%); 12 cases revealed a slight decrease in the rim enhancement or changes in cystic appearance of the GTV; 2 cases showed no change in GTV; and 3 cases demonstrated an increase in tumor volume. Both cases with objective decreases in GTV during treatment were Grade 3 tumors. No cases of tumor progression were noted in Grade 3 tumors during treatment. In comparison, three of 12 Grade 4 tumors had tumor progression, based on MRI obtained during Week 3 of radiotherapy. Median increase in GTV (Week 3) was 11.7 cc (range, 9.8-21.3). Retrospective DVH analysis of PTV (Pre-Rx) and PTV (Week 3) demonstrated a decrease in V(95%)(PTV volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose) in those 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine MR imaging during radiotherapy may be essential in ensuring tumor coverage if highly conformal radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic boost and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used in dose-escalation trials that utilize smaller treatment margins.

[Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of head and neck tumors. Increased biological effectiveness in high-risk situations by "integrated boost" therapy]

Primary tumors of the paranasal sinuses are rare entities which, because of precarious localization and frequently diffuse propagation into neighbouring cavities and the skull base, pose a significant therapeutic problem. Even after complete surgical resection, local relapses are frequent. Postoperative radiotherapy is therefore usually indicated. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a new technique that helps creating dose distributions that conform closely to the target volume while maximally sparing the organs at risk. This results in the possibility of applying escalated doses to the target while still keeping the incidence of side effects low. What is especially appealing is the possibility of shaping the dose distribution within the target in such a way that areas with a presumably high tumor cell load receive increased doses, a concept which is best described by the term "integrated boost". We present the case of a patient with a sinunasal carcinoma and describe the implications of the clinical implementation of this technique.

Analysis of dose conformity and normal-tissue sparing using two different IMRT prescription methodologies for irregularly shaped CNS lesions irradiated with the Beak and 1-cm MIMiC collimators

PURPOSE

To determine whether intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy using the NOMOS Beak provides superior dose conformity and organ sparing to the MIMiC "1-cm" mode, and if so, to identify a subset of patients most likely to benefit from Beak intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twelve patients with irregularly shaped central nervous system tumors were selected for intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. Two treatment plans, one using the Beak collimator and the other using the 1-cm MIMiC collimator, were generated for each patient with identical anatomic contouring, prescriptions, and optimization algorithms. The Beak attaches to the MIMiC collimator and truncates the 1-cm MIMiC mode beamlet size from 1.00 x 0.85 cm(2) to 1.00 x 0.39 cm(2) at isocenter. Conformity indexes were calculated for each lesion using two different prescription methodologies, and mean doses to critical structures were recorded.

RESULTS

For the first prescription methodology using uniform prescribed isodose, mean conformity index was 2.19 (range, 1.33-3.90) for the Beak compared to 2.67 (range, 1.64-4.75) for the 1-cm mode (p = 0.0003). Mean doses to the brainstem, right orbit, and left optic nerve were significantly lower with the Beak than with the 1-cm mode (p = 0.0150, 0.0068, and 0.0284, respectively). For the second prescription methodology using uniform target volume coverage prescription, mean conformity index was 2.04 (range, 1.56-2.70) for the Beak compared to 2.73 (range, 1.70-8.58) for the 1-cm mode (p = 0.07). Mean doses to the brain, brainstem, optic chiasm, right optic nerve, left optic nerve, and left orbit were significantly lower with the Beak than with the 1-cm mode (p = <0.0001, <0.0026, <0.0016, <0.0076, <0.0007, and <0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Beak intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy is superior to the 1-cm MIMiC mode for irregularly shaped central nervous system tumors, because it provides better conformity and critical organ sparing. These differences may allow for safer dose escalation and retreatment, so the method presents an alternative to gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

3D MRSI for resected high-grade gliomas before RT: tumor extent according to metabolic activity in relation to MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate the presence of residual disease after surgery but before radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-grade glioma by MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) and to estimate the impact of MRSI on the definition of postoperative target volumes for RT treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients (27 glioblastoma multiforme, 3 Grade III astrocytoma) underwent MRI and MRSI within 4 weeks after surgery but before the initiation of RT. The MRI data were manually contoured; the regions of interest included T(2)-weighted hyperintensity (T(2)), T(1)-weighted contrast enhancement (T(1)), and the resection cavity (RC). Levels of choline and N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) in the three-dimensional MRSI data were analyzed on the basis of a choline-to-N-acetyl-aspartate index (CNI). The CNI and other metabolic indexes were superimposed on the MRI data as three-dimensional contours. Composite, conjoint, and disjoint volumes were defined for T(1) and T(2), with/without RC, and within the CNI contour, corresponding to a value of 2. In addition, follow-up MRI studies were examined for new onset contrast enhancement and compared with the initial spectroscopic findings obtained before RT.

RESULTS

Substantial variation was found in the spatial relationship between the MRI and MRSI volumes. Ten patients had no contrast enhancement after surgery, and MRSI revealed abnormal metabolic activity in 8 of 10, averaging 20 cm(3) and extending 11-36 mm beyond the RC. In 20 patients with contrast-enhancing lesions, substantial variation was found between T(1) and CNI2; metabolic activity fell outside the contrast enhancement in 19 patients, averaging 21 cm(3) and extending 8-33 mm beyond the contrast enhancement. For all patients, the T(2) encompassed most of the metabolic volume. However, the CNI2 extended beyond the T(2) in 6 of 10 patients without contrast enhancement (mean, 8 cm(3); maximum, 15-23 mm) and in 13 of 20 patients with contrast enhancement (mean, 7 cm(3); maximum, 8-22 mm), representing an increase in the T(2) volume by as much as 180% (median 13%) and 86% (median 14%) for non-contrast-enhancing and contrast-enhancing patients, respectively. Preliminary evaluation of the MRI follow-up examinations revealed correspondence of areas of new contrast enhancement with initial MRSI abnormalities in 8 of 10 non-contrast-enhancing patients. In addition, CNI volumes correlated inversely with the time to onset of new contrast enhancement.

CONCLUSION

MRSI is a valuable diagnostic tool for the assessment of residual disease after surgical resection in high-grade glioma. The incorporation of areas of metabolic abnormality into treatment planning for postoperative patients would produce different sizes and shapes of target volumes for both primary and boost volumes. It also may encourage the use of nonuniform margins to define the extent of tumor cell infiltration, rather than the current use of uniform margins.

External beam and conformal radiotherapy in the management of gliomas

External beam radiotherapy remains an important local treatment modality in both high and low grade gliomas, however its contribution to outcome remains modest. In high grade tumours this is because of their extreme clinical radioresistance, with local recurrences occurring even after doses over 70 Gy. In low grade tumours radiation does not seem to alter the overall pattern of disease progression significantly. Therefore despite use of the new technologies now available that allow radiotherapy to be delivered more accurately and to higher doses, local control of these tumours is still rarely achieved. Unfortunately these tumours have not proven sensitive to changes in radiotherapy fractionation or to the addition of radiosensitising agents. Novel approaches to these tumours are needed, based on an improved understanding of both tumour and normal tissue response to radiation.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost after post-operative radiotherapy in patients with high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

To determine the value and the toxicity of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost as used in the joint randomized EORTC-22972/MRC-BR10 study in patients with malignant gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (11 male, six female) with a high-grade glioma (two WHO III, 15 WHO IV) < or =4 cm in maximum diameter, with a good performance status (WHO > or =2), were treated with a fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) boost to 20 Gy in four fractions following partial brain irradiation to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. This patient group was compared with historical data in a matched-pair analysis.

RESULTS

All patients were treated by conventional radiotherapy and a SRT boost (15 patients received 20 Gy and two patients 10 Gy). Acute side effects included fatigue (two), impairment of short-term memory (one) and worsening of pre-existing symptoms (one). No patient developed steroid dependence after SRT. One patient was re-operated for radiation necrosis. At a median follow-up of 25 months (9-50 months) 14 patients recurred locally. Survival was 77% at 1 year and 42% at 2 years; progression-free survival was 70% at 1 year and 35% at 2 years for all patients, respectively. Median survival for the whole patient group is 20 months. Comparison with a matched historical group showed a significantly better survival for the group treated with a stereotactic boost (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A fractionated stereotactic boost after standard external beam radiotherapy in selected patients with high-grade glioma is feasible and well tolerated with low toxicity. Compared to historical data survival is significantly better with an additional SRT boost. However, its effectiveness has to be proven in a randomized trial.

Stereotactic intensity modulated radiation therapy and inverse treatment planning for tumors of the head and neck region: clinical implementation of the step and shoot approach and first clinical results

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the feasibility of inverse treatment planning and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer in daily clinical routine. A step and shoot IMRT approach was developed which allows the treatment of large target volumes without the need to use a split beam technique. By using the IMRT approach better protection of different organs at risk in the head and neck region may be achieved and an escalation of the dose in the tumor should be possible. We evaluated the feasibility of the treatment technique and the patient tolerance to the treatment. First clinical results are reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2002, 48 patients with a carcinoma of the head and neck region were treated with curative intention. All patients were treated in a patient-specific Scotch-Cast mask. Patients who required treatment of the lymph node levels I-VI, were additionally positioned by a vacuum pillow in order to immobilize the upper part of the thorax. For inverse treatment planning, the software module KonRad was used which was integrated into the VIRTUOS planning system. Each treatment plan was verified using quantitative film dosimetry in a head and neck phantom. The step and shoot IMRT technique with a multileaf collimator integrated in a Primus (Siemens) accelerator was used for treatment. For all target volumes the whole target including the lymph nodes were covered completely by the IMRT treatment.

RESULTS

The mean total dose for the target volumes of macroscopic disease ranged between 63.0 and 64.1 Gy. The mean total dose of microscopic disease ranged between 55.2 and 60.1 Gy. The mean percentage of planning target volume receiving <90% of the prescribed dose ranged between 3.0 and 11.5%. For the treatment, the median number of beams was seven (range: five to nine). The time to deliver the treatment ranged between 9 and 18 min. The results of the verification revealed a mean deviation between measured and calculated absolute doses for the 48 patients of 0.1+/-1.4%. Including the phantom verification the IMRT treatment of the patients could be started approximately after five working days. The treatment was well tolerated by all patients. The 2-year actuarial overall survival was 92% and the 2-year actuarial local control rate was 93%. According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), no higher acute toxicity than Grade 3 was seen. Observation of the late effects revealed only one transient Grade 4 toxicity of the bone and only four patients had a xerostomia higher than Grade 1.

CONCLUSION

The use of an inversely-planned and intensity-modulated step and shoot approach is feasible in clinical routine for head and neck tumors. Treatment could be applied as planned and no increased toxicity was found. Compared to other IMRT approaches for the head and neck region the used technique allows the treatment of the primary tumor and the lymph nodes level I-VI with only one intensity modulated treatment volume. The presented technique avoids to match conventional radiotherapy fields and IMRT fields, and therefore, reduce the risk of overdosage or underdosage at the matching line. Compared to conventional treatment techniques IMRT shows advantages in tumor dose and dose at the organs at risk.

Importance of hypoxia in the biology and treatment of brain tumors

The resistance of gliomas to treatment with radiation and antineoplastic drugs may result in part from the effects of the extensive, severe hypoxia that is present in these tumors. It is clear that brain tumors contain extensive regions in which the tumor cells are subjected to unphysiological levels of hypoxia. Hypoxic cells are resistant to radiation. Hypoxia and the perfusion deficits and metabolic changes that accompany hypoxia in vivo also produce resistance to many commonly used anticancer drugs. The resistance of cells that are hypoxic at the time of therapy may influence the efficacy of the treatment of these tumors with radiation, chemotherapy, and combined modality regimens. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly evident from laboratory studies that exposure of cells to adverse microenvironments produces transient changes in gene expression, induces mutations, and selects for cells with altered genotypes, thus driving the evolution of the cell population toward increasing malignancy and increasingly aggressive phenotypes. Hypoxia may therefore be involved in the evolution of cells in low-grade malignancies to the resistant, aggressive phenotype characteristic of glioblastomas. During the past 50 years, many attempts have been made to circumvent the therapeutic resistance induced by hypoxia, by improving tumor oxygenation, by using oxygen-mimetic radiosensitizers, by adjuvant therapy with drugs that are preferentially toxic to hypoxic cells, by using hyperthermia, or by devising radiation sources and regimens that are less affected by hypoxia. Past clinical trials have provided tantalizing suggestions that the outcome of therapy can be improved by many of these approaches, but none has yet produced a significant, reproducible improvement in the therapeutic ratio, which would be needed for any of these approaches to become the standard therapy for these diseases. Several ongoing clinical trials are addressing other, hopefully better regimens; it will be interesting to see the results of these studies.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an increasingly popular technical means of tightly focusing the radiation dose around a cancer. As with stereotactic radiotherapy, IMRT uses multiple fields and angles to converge on the target. The potential for total dose escalation and for escalation of daily fraction size to the gross cancer is exciting. The excitement, however, has greatly overshadowed a range of radiobiological and clinical concerns.