1
|
Corso G, Fusco N, Guerini-Rocco E, Leonardi MC, Criscitiello C, Zagami P, Nicolò E, Mazzarol G, La Vecchia C, Pesapane F, Zanzottera C, Tarantino P, Petitto S, Bianchi B, Massari G, Boato A, Sibilio A, Polizzi A, Curigliano G, De Scalzi AM, Lauria F, Bonanni B, Marabelli M, Rotili A, Nicosia L, Albini A, Calvello M, Mukhtar RA, Robson ME, Sacchini V, Rennert G, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Magnoni F. Invasive lobular breast cancer: Focus on prevention, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:106-122. [PMID: 38897820 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast malignancies. The distinctive biological features of ILC include the loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, which drives the tumor's peculiar discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, such tumors originate in the lobules, are more commonly bilateral compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and require a more accurate diagnostic examination through imaging. They are luminal in molecular subtype, and exhibit estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity and HER2 negativity, thus presenting a more unpredictable response to neoadjuvant therapies. There has been a significant increase in research focused on this distinctive breast cancer subtype, including studies on its pathology, its clinical and surgical management, and the high-resolution definition of its genomic profile, as well as the development of new therapeutic perspectives. This review will summarize the heterogeneous pattern of this unique disease, focusing on challenges in its comprehensive clinical management and on future insights and research objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Zagami
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Zanzottera
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Salvatore Petitto
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bianchi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Massari
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony Boato
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sibilio
- Division of Breast Surgery Forlì (Ravenna), AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polizzi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Lauria
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Marabelli
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rotili
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Adriana Albini
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Hematology, Clinica Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Rita A Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Virgilio Sacchini
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gad Rennert
- B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion and the Association for Promotion of Research in Precision Medicine (APRPM), Haifa, Israel
| | - Viviana Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mukama T, Kharazmi E, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Fallah M. Risk-adapted starting age of breast cancer screening in women with a family history of ovarian or other cancers: A nationwide cohort study. Cancer 2021; 127:2091-2098. [PMID: 33620751 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for the age at which women with a family history of cancers other than breast cancer should start breast cancer screening. METHODS Using Swedish family cancer data sets, the authors conducted a nationwide cohort study including 5,099,172 Swedish women born after 1931 (follow-up, 1958-2015). Accounting for calendar time, they calculated the relative risk of breast cancer for women with a family history of a discordant cancer in 1 first-degree relative. Furthermore, the authors used 10-year cumulative risk to determine the ages at which women with a family history of discordant cancer reached risk thresholds at which women in the general population were recommended to start breast cancer screening. RESULTS A family history of cancer at 15 sites was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Among women younger than 50 years, the highest risk of breast cancer was observed for those with a family history of ovarian cancer (standardized incidence ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.64). In these women, the risk of breast cancer associated with a family history at other cancer sites ranged from 1.08-fold for prostate cancer to 1.18-fold for liver cancer. When breast cancer screening was recommended to be started at the age of 50 years for the general population, women with 1 first-degree relative with ovarian cancer attained the threshold risk for screening at the age of 46 years. Women with a family history of other discordant cancers did not reach the risk thresholds for screening at younger ages. CONCLUSIONS Many cancers showed familial associations with breast cancer, but women with a family history of these cancers (except for ovarian cancer) did not reach risk thresholds for screening at younger ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trasias Mukama
- Risk Adapted Prevention Group, Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Elham Kharazmi
- Risk Adapted Prevention Group, Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.,Statistical Genetics Group, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristina Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Center for Community-Based Healthcare Research and Education, Department of Functional Pathology, School of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan
| | - Jan Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Center for Community-Based Healthcare Research and Education, Department of Functional Pathology, School of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan
| | - Mahdi Fallah
- Risk Adapted Prevention Group, Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Pancreatic cancers arise through a series of genetic events both inherited and acquired. Inherited genetic changes, both high penetrance and low penetrance, are an important component of pancreatic cancer risk, and may be used to characterize populations who will benefit from early detection. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer patients with inherited mutations may be particularly sensitive to certain targeted agents, providing an opportunity to personalized treatment. Family history of pancreatic cancer is one of the strongest risk factors for the disease, and is associated with an increased risk of caners at other sites, including but not limited to breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer. The goal of this chapter is to discuss the importance of family history of pancreatic cancer, and the known genes that account for a portion of the familial clustering of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cárdenas-Rodríguez N, Lara-Padilla E, Bandala C, López-Cruz J, Uscanga-Carmona C, Lucio-Monter PF, Floriano-Sánchez E. CYP2W1, CYP4F11 and CYP8A1 polymorphisms and interaction of CYP2W1 genotypes with risk factors in Mexican women with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012; 13:837-46. [PMID: 22631658 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.3.837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BCa) is the leading type of cancer in Mexican women. Genetic factors, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of P450 system, have been reported in BCa. In this report, and for the first time in the literature, we analyzed the rs3735684 (7021 G>A), rs11553651 (15016 G>T) and rs56195291 (60020 C>G) polymorphisms in the CYP2W1, 4F11 and 8A1 genes in patients with BCa and in healthy Mexican women to identify a potential association between these polymorphisms and BCa risk. Patients and controls were used for polymorphism analysis using an allelic discrimination assay with TaqMan probes and confirmed by DNA sequencing. Links with clinic-pathological characteristics were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the standard χ2 or Fisher exact test statistic. No significant differences were observed in the distributions of CYP2W1 (OR 8.6, 95%CI 0.43-172.5 P>0.05; OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.76-5.4, P>0.05) and CYP4F11 (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.01-8.4 P>0.05) genotypes between the patients and controls. Only the CYP8A1 CC genotype was detected in patients with BCa and the controls. All polymorphism frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in the controls (P>0.05). We found a significant association between BCa risk and smoking, use of oral contraceptives or hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), obesity, hyperglycemia, chronic diseases, family history of cancer and menopausal status in the population studied (P<0.05). Tobacco, oral contraceptive or HRT, chronic diseases and obesity or overweight were strongly associated with almost eight, thirty-five, nine and five-fold increased risk for BCa. Tobaco, obesity and hyperglycemia significantly increased the risk of BCa in the patients carrying variant genotypes of CYP2W1 (P<0.05). These results indicate that the CYP2W1 rs3735684, CYP4F11 rs11553651 and CYP8A1 rs56195291 SNPs are not a key risk factor for BCa in Mexican women. This study did not detect an association between the CYP2W1, 4F11 and 8A1 genes polymorphisms and BCa risk in a Mexican population. However, some clinico-pathological risk factors interact with CYP2W1 genotypes and modifies susceptibility to BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Cárdenas-Rodríguez
- Section of Research and Graduate Studies, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dite GS, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Tumour morphology of early-onset breast cancers predicts breast cancer risk for first-degree relatives: the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14:R122. [PMID: 22929433 PMCID: PMC3680941 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2012] [Accepted: 08/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We hypothesised that breast cancer risk for relatives of women with early-onset breast cancer could be predicted by tumour morphological features. Methods We studied female first-degree relatives of a population-based sample of 452 index cases with a first primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 40 years. For the index cases, a standardised tumour morphology review had been conducted for all; estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status was available for 401 (89%), and 77 (17%) had a high-risk mutation in a breast cancer susceptibility gene or methylation of the BRCA1 promoter region in peripheral blood DNA. We calculated standardised incidence ratios (SIR) by comparing the number of mothers and sisters with breast cancer with the number expected based on Australian incidence rates specific for age and year of birth. Results Using Cox proportional hazards modelling, absence of extensive sclerosis, extensive intraductal carcinoma, absence of acinar and glandular growth patterns, and the presence of trabecular and lobular growth patterns were independent predictors with between a 1.8- and 3.1-fold increased risk for relatives (all P <0.02). Excluding index cases with known genetic predisposition or BRCA1 promoter methylation, absence of extensive sclerosis, circumscribed growth, extensive intraductal carcinoma and lobular growth pattern were independent predictors with between a 2.0- and 3.3-fold increased risk for relatives (all P <0.02). Relatives of the 128 (34%) index cases with none of these four features were at population risk (SIR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.85) while relatives of the 37 (10%) index cases with two or more features were at high risk (SIR = 5.18, 95% CI = 3.22 to 8.33). Conclusions This wide variation in risks for relatives based on tumour characteristics could be of clinical value, help discover new breast cancer susceptibility genes and be an advance on the current clinical practice of using ER and PR as pathology-based predictors of familial and possibly genetic risks.
Collapse
|