1
|
Rasmussen M, Fredsøe J, Tin AL, Vickers AJ, Ulhøi B, Borre M, Eastham J, Ehdaie B, Guillonneau B, Laudone V, Scardino PT, Touijer K, Sørensen KD, Lilja H. Independent validation of a pre-specified four-kallikrein marker model for prediction of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1004-1009. [PMID: 34903844 PMCID: PMC8980060 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01661-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate markers for prostate cancer (PC) risk stratification could aid decision-making for initial management strategies. The 4Kscore has an undefined role in predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We included 1476 patients with 4Kscore measured prior to RP at two institutions. The 4Kscore was assessed for prediction of adverse pathology at RP and biochemical recurrence (BCR) relative to a clinical model. We pre-specified that all analyses would be assessed in biopsy Grade Group 1 (GG1) or 2 (GG2) PC patients, separately. RESULTS The 4Kscore increased discrimination for adverse pathology in all patients (delta area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) 0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.002, 0.016; clinical model AUC 0.767), driven by GG1 (delta AUC 0.040, 95% CI 0.006, 0.073) rather than GG2 patients (delta AUC 0.005, 95% CI -0.012, 0.021). Adding 4Kscore improved prediction of BCR in all patients (delta C-index 0.014, 95% CI 0.007, 0.021; preop-BCR nomogram C-index 0.738), again with larger changes in GG1 than in GG2. CONCLUSIONS This study validates prior investigations on the use of 4Kscore in men with biopsy-confirmed PC. Men with GG1 PC and a high 4Kscore may benefit from additional testing to guide treatment selection. Further research is warranted regarding the value of the 4Kscore in men with biopsy GG2 PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rasmussen
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob Fredsøe
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Amy L. Tin
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Andrew J. Vickers
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Benedicte Ulhøi
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - James Eastham
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Bertrand Guillonneau
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Uro-Oncology Department, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent Laudone
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Peter T. Scardino
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Karim Touijer
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Karina D. Sørensen
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hans Lilja
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carlsson SV, Murata K, Danila DC, Lilja H. PSA: role in screening and monitoring patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824302-2.00001-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
3
|
Do Carmo Silva J, Vesely S, Luksanova H, Prusa R, Babjuk M. Early prediction of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence and identification of disease persistence using PSA isoforms and human kallikrein-2. Tumour Biol 2021; 43:197-207. [PMID: 34486998 DOI: 10.3233/tub-211509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of isoforms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and other kallikrein-related markers in early detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is not well known and serum PSA is currently used in preoperative risk nomograms. OBJECTIVE The aim of this research was to study pre- and early postoperative levels of important PSA isoforms and human kallikrein-2 to determine their ability to predict BCR and identify disease persistence (DP). METHODS This study included 128 consecutive patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. PSA, fPSA, %fPSA, [-2]proPSA, PHI and hK2 were measured preoperatively, at 1 and 3 months after RP. We determined the ability of these markers to predict BCR and identify DP. RESULTS The DP and BCR rate were 11.7%and 20.3%respectively and the median follow up was 64 months (range 3-76 months). Preoperatively, the independent predictors of BCR were PSA (p-value 0.029), [-2]proPSA (p-value 0.002) and PHI (p-value 0.0003). Post-RP, PSA was the single marker correlating with BCR, both at one (p-value 0.0047) and 3 months (p-value 0.0004). PSA, fPSA, [-2]proPSA and PHI significantly correlated to DP at 1 and 3 months post-RP (p-value < 0.05), although PSA had the most significant existing correlation (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS [-2]proPSA and PHI are preoperative predictors of BCR and DP that outperform the currently used serum PSA. At the early postoperative period there is no additional benefit of the other markers tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Do Carmo Silva
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Stepan Vesely
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Luksanova
- Department of Medical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Richard Prusa
- Department of Medical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haese A, Tin AL, Carlsson SV, Sjoberg DD, Pehrke D, Steuber T, Huland H, Graefen M, Scardino PT, Schlomm T, Vickers AJ, Lilja H, Sauter G. A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood improves predictions of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:604-609. [PMID: 32467601 PMCID: PMC7434907 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0914-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood, commercially available as 4Kscore, predicts Gleason Grade (GG) 3 + 4 or higher prostate cancer on biopsy. However, sampling error and variation in pathology reporting may miss aggressive disease. Methods The 4Kscore was measured in cryopreserved blood from 2330 men obtained before prostatectomy at a single institution between 2002 and 2010. Adverse surgical pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were pre-specified to be assessed in all men, biopsy GG 3 + 3, and 3 + 4. Results Adjusted for established clinical predictors, the 4Kscore was significantly associated with adverse pathology (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.32, 1.67; p < 0.0001). Adding 4Kscore increased discrimination from (AUC) 0.672 to 0.718 and 0.644 to 0.659 within biopsy GG 3 + 3 and 3 + 4, respectively. Higher 4Kscore was associated with higher risk of BCR (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06, 1.26; p = 0.001). Adding 4Kscore improved the prediction of BCR (C-index 0.630–0.660) within GG 3 + 3, but not GG 3 + 4. Conclusions The 4Kscore can help guide the clinical decision whether additional risk assessment—such as confirmatory biopsy—is needed to decide between active surveillance versus curative therapy. Evidence that the panel could influence management in biopsy GG 3 + 4 is less strong and requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dirk Pehrke
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. .,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assel MJ, Ulmert HD, Karnes RJ, Boorjian SA, Hillman DW, Vickers AJ, Klee GG, Lilja H. Kallikrein markers performance in pretreatment blood to predict early prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis after radical prostatectomy among very high-risk men. Prostate 2020; 80:51-56. [PMID: 31603253 PMCID: PMC6944058 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess whether a prespecified statistical model based on the four kallikrein markers measured in blood-total, free, and intact prostate-specific antigen (PSA), together with human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (hK2)-or any individual marker measured in pretreatment serum were associated with biochemical recurrence-free (BCR) or metastasis-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a subgroup of men with very high-risk disease. METHODS We identified 106 men treated at Mayo Clinic from 2004 to 2008 with pathological Gleason grade group 4 to 5 or seminal vesicle invasion at RP. Univariable and multivariable Cox models were used to test the association between standard predictors (Kattan nomogram and GPSM [Gleason, PSA, seminal vesicle and margin status] score), kallikrein panel, and individual kallikrein markers with the outcomes. RESULTS BCR and metastasis occurred in 67 and 30 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for patients who did not develop a BCR was 10.3 years (interquartile range = 8.2-11.8). In this high-risk group, neither Kattan risk, GPSM score, or the kallikrein panel model was associated with either outcome. However, after adjusting for Kattan risk and GPSM score, separately, preoperative intact PSA was associated with both outcomes while hK2 was associated with metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Conventional risk prediction tools were poor discriminators for risk of adverse outcomes after RP (Kattan risk and GPSM risk) in patients with very high-risk disease. Further studies are needed to define the role of individual kallikrein marker forms in the blood to predict adverse prostate cancer outcomes after RP in this high-risk setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J. Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans David Ulmert
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | - David W. Hillman
- Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew J. Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - George G. Klee
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Corresponding author: Hans Lilja, MD, PhD, 1275 York Ave, BOX 213, New York, NY 10065, (P) 212-639-6982, (F) 646-422-2379,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han L, Xia H, Yin L, Petrenko VA, Liu A. Selected landscape phage probe as selective recognition interface for sensitive total prostate-specific antigen immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 2018; 106:1-6. [PMID: 29414074 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The level of total prostate-specific antigen (t-PSA) is generally known as the key index of prostate cancer. Here, phage probes against t-PSA were selected from f8/8 landscape phage library. After three rounds of biopanning, four t-PSA-binding phage clones were isolated and identified by the DNA sequencing. Based on the phage capture assay, the phage clone displaying the fusion peptide ATRSANGM showed highest affinity and specificity against t-PSA. Subsequently, the t-PSA-specific phage was used as t-PSA capture probe in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) assay systems. Both assay methods showed high specificity and acceptable reliability for real serum samples analysis. By comparison, DPV method showed wider linear range (0.01-100 ng mL-1) and lower limit of detection (3 pg mL-1) than those (3.3-330 ng mL-1 and 1.6 ng mL-1) of ELISA. Moreover, DPV system showed smaller distinction to the authoritative method in real samples assay. Excitingly, the phage probe based DPV immunosensor showed high sensitivity for the detection of t-PSA and LOD achieved the pg mL-1 level, which was far lower than those values (usually above 0.1 ng mL-1) for reported immunosensors based on antibodies. Due to the biocompatibility, multivalency, stability, and high structural homogeneity, the t-PSA-specific landscape phage demonstrates as a novel specific interface in biosensors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Han
- Institute for Biosensing, and College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; College of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, 700 Changcheng Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hongqi Xia
- Institute for Biosensing, and College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
| | - Long Yin
- Institute for Biosensing, and College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Valery A Petrenko
- Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, 269 Greene Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5519, United States
| | - Aihua Liu
- Institute for Biosensing, and College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China; Department of Drug Metabolism and Analysis,School of Pharmacy, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lang Q, Wang F, Yin L, Liu M, Petrenko VA, Liu A. Specific Probe Selection from Landscape Phage Display Library and Its Application in Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of Free Prostate-Specific Antigen. Anal Chem 2014; 86:2767-74. [DOI: 10.1021/ac404189k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaolin Lang
- Laboratory for Biosensing, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy & Bioprocess Technology, and Key Laboratory of Bioenergy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Laboratory for Biosensing, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy & Bioprocess Technology, and Key Laboratory of Bioenergy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Long Yin
- Laboratory for Biosensing, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy & Bioprocess Technology, and Key Laboratory of Bioenergy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Mingjun Liu
- Department
of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao 266003, China
| | - Valery A. Petrenko
- Department
of Pathobiology, Auburn University, 269 Greene Hall, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5519, United States
| | - Aihua Liu
- Laboratory for Biosensing, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy & Bioprocess Technology, and Key Laboratory of Bioenergy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu R, Wang C, Jiang Q, Zhang W, Yue Z, Liu G. Magnetic-particle-based, ultrasensitive chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for free prostate-specific antigen. Anal Chim Acta 2013; 801:91-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.09.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 07/20/2013] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
This chapter addresses issues relevant to prostate cancer overdiagnosis. Factors promoting the overdiagnosis of prostate cancer are reviewed. First is the existence of a relatively large, silent reservoir of this disease, as can be seen by evaluating autopsy studies and histologic step-sectioning results of prostates removed for other causes. The second main factor responsible for prostate cancer overdiagnosis is fairly widespread prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination-based screening, which has been fairly widely practiced in the United States for the past 20 years among heterogeneous groups of men. This has resulted in the identification of many men from this reservoir who otherwise may never have been diagnosed with symptomatic prostate cancer and is substantially responsible for the current annual incidence to mortality ratio for prostate cancer of approximately 6 to 1. Finally, the relatively indolent natural history and limited cancer-specific mortality as reported in a variety of contemporary randomized screening and treatment trials is reviewed. We attempt to quantitate the proportion of newly diagnosed prostate cancers that are overdiagnosed using various trial results and models. We explore the impact of prostate cancer overdiagnosis in terms of patient anxiety and the potential for overtreatment, with its attendant morbidity. We explore strategies to minimize overdiagnosis by targeting screening and biopsy only to men at high risk for aggressive prostate cancer and by considering the use of agents such as 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Future prospects to prevent overtreatment, including better biopsy and molecular characterization of newly diagnosed cancer and the role of active surveillance, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurdarshan S Sandhu
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 4960 Children's Place, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Value of Prostate Specific Antigen Density and Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Prognosis. J Urol 2012; 188:2165-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
11
|
Carter HB. Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics. Asian J Androl 2012; 14:355-60. [PMID: 22343493 DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer has led to a decrease in cancer mortality. However, the high prevalence of low-grade prostate cancer and its long natural history, competing causes of death in older men and treatment patterns of prostate cancer, have led to dramatic overtreatment of the disease. Improved markers of prostate cancer lethality are needed to reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer that leads to a reduced quality of life without extending life for a high proportion of men. The PSA level prior to treatment is routinely used in multivariable models to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness. PSA isoforms and PSA kinetics have been associated with more aggressive phenotypes, but are not routinely employed as part of prediction tools prior to treatment. PSA kinetics is a valuable marker of lethality post treatment and routinely used in determining the need for salvage therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Ballentine Carter
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287-2101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kössler W, Fiebeler A, Willms A, ElAidi T, Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U. Formation of translational risk score based on correlation coefficients as an alternative to Cox regression models for predicting outcome in patients with NSCLC. Theor Biol Med Model 2011; 8:28. [PMID: 21794149 PMCID: PMC3156745 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-8-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2011] [Accepted: 07/27/2011] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personalised cancer therapy, such as that used for bronchial carcinoma (BC), requires treatment to be adjusted to the patient's status. Individual risk for progression is estimated from clinical and molecular-biological data using translational score systems. Additional molecular information can improve outcome prediction depending on the marker used and the applied algorithm. Two models, one based on regressions and the other on correlations, were used to investigate the effect of combining various items of prognostic information to produce a comprehensive score. This was carried out using correlation coefficients, with options concerning a more plausible selection of variables for modelling, and this is considered better than classical regression analysis. Methods Clinical data concerning 63 BC patients were used to investigate the expression pattern of five tumour-associated proteins. Significant impact on survival was determined using log-rank tests. Significant variables were integrated into a Cox regression model and a new variable called integrative score of individual risk (ISIR), based on Spearman's correlations, was obtained. Results High tumour stage (TNM) was predictive for poor survival, while CD68 and Gas6 protein expression correlated with a favourable outcome. Cox regression model analysis predicted outcome more accurately than using each variable in isolation, and correctly classified 84% of patients as having a clear risk status. Calculation of the integrated score for an individual risk (ISIR), considering tumour size (T), lymph node status (N), metastasis (M), Gas6 and CD68 identified 82% of patients as having a clear risk status. Conclusion Combining protein expression analysis of CD68 and GAS6 with T, N and M, using Cox regression or ISIR, improves prediction. Considering the increasing number of molecular markers, subsequent studies will be required to validate translational algorithms for the prognostic potential to select variables with a high prognostic power; the use of correlations offers improved prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Kössler
- Institute of Computer Science, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peltola MT, Niemelä P, Väisänen V, Viitanen T, Alanen K, Nurmi M, Pettersson K. Intact and Internally Cleaved Free Prostate-Specific Antigen in Patients With Prostate Cancer With Different Pathologic Stages and Grades. Urology 2011; 77:1009.e1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Revised: 10/26/2010] [Accepted: 11/04/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19:221-6. [PMID: 19318948 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32832a2d10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To delineate how recent findings on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can improve prediction of risk, detection, and prediction of clinical endpoints of prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS The widely used PSA cut-point of 4.0 ng/ml increasingly appears arbitrary, but no cut-point achieves both high sensitivity and high specificity. The accuracy of detecting PCa can be increased by additional predictive factors and a combinations of markers. Evidence implies that a panel of kallikrein markers improves the specificity and reduces costs by eliminating unnecessary biopsies. Large, population-based studies have provided evidence that PSA can be used to predict PCa risk many years in advance, improve treatment selection and patient care, and predict the risk of complications and disease recurrence. However, definitive evidence is currently lacking as to whether PSA screening lowers PCa -specific mortality. SUMMARY PSA is still the main tool for early detection, risk stratification, and monitoring of PCa. However, PSA values are affected by many technical and biological factors. Instead of using a fixed PSA cut-point, using statistical prediction models and considering the integration additional markers may be able to improve and individualize PCa diagnostics. A single PSA measurement at early middle age can predict risk of advanced PCa decades in advance and stratify patients for intensity of subsequent screening.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hunter JM, Paramithiotis E. Protein biomarker quantification by mass spectrometry. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 4:11-20. [DOI: 10.1517/17530050902929214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|