Lejbkowicz F, Salzberg S. Biological effects of photoactivated-HPD and cholesteryl hemisuccinate on erythroid differentiation.
BIOMATERIALS, ARTIFICIAL CELLS, AND IMMOBILIZATION BIOTECHNOLOGY : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ARTIFICIAL CELLS AND IMMOBILIZATION BIOTECHNOLOGY 1992;
20:1111-20. [PMID:
1391432 DOI:
10.3109/10731199209119770]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
In order to establish the ability of porphyrins to distinguish between differentiated and undifferentiated cells of the erythropoietic pathway, the cytotoxic effects of hematoporphyrin derivative (HPD) on Friend erythroleukemic cells (FLC) were derivative (HPD) on Friend erythroleukemic cells (FLC) were studied. Since cholesterol affects the fluidity of cell membranes, the inhibitory effect of cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) on HPD was similarly tested. FLC were induced with either dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), hemin, or both. The cells responded to DMSO-treatment by the synthesis of a large amount of hemoglobin and a decrease in both the cell volume and rate of cell-growth. Hemin, on the other hand, did not drive FLC to synthesize hemoglobin and reduced only moderately the growth rate compared to untreated cultures. The combined effect of DMSO and hemin led to a profound inhibition of the growth rate, but did not increase the synthesis of hemoglobin compared to the level observed in cells treated with DMSO only. The binding property of HPD to FLC was also determined. DMSO-treatment significantly reduced the amount of HPD-binding, and combined treatment with DMSO and hemin resulted in even a lower level of HPD-binding. On the other hand, induced as well as non-induced cells showed the same sensitivity to photoactivated HPD when both DNA and protein synthesis were examined. Pretreatment of both differentiated and undifferentiated cells with CHS reduced the cytotoxicity of photoactivated HPD to the same level. We conclude that the decreased binding of HPD to differentiated cells is a result of a reduction in their cell volume. Thus, the differentiation process per se does not protect cells against the photodynamic effect of HPD. Moreover, CHS may act as a scavenger or first acceptor of singlet oxygen blocking the photodynamic effect.
Collapse