Elevated stromelysin-1 and reduced collagenase-IV expression in invasive rat embryo fibroblasts expressing E1A deletion mutants + T24-H-ras

Biological significance of a thyroid hormone-regulated secretome

The thyroid hormone, 3,3,5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3), modulates several physiological processes, including cellular growth, differentiation, metabolism and proliferation, via interactions with thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) in the regulatory regions of target genes. Several intracellular and extracellular protein candidates are regulated by T3. Moreover, T3-regulated secreted proteins participate in physiological processes or cellular transformation. T3 has been employed as a marker in several disorders, such as cardiovascular disorder in chronic kidney disease, as well as diseases of the liver, immune system, endocrine hormone metabolism and coronary artery. Our group subsequently showed that T3 regulates several tumor-related secretory proteins, leading to cancer progression via alterations in extracellular matrix proteases and tumor-associated signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinomas. Therefore, elucidation of T3/thyroid hormone receptor-regulated secretory proteins and their underlying mechanisms in cancers should facilitate the identification of novel therapeutic targets. This review provides a detailed summary on the known secretory proteins regulated by T3 and their physiological significance. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: An Updated Secretome.

Presence of activated ras correlates with increased cysteine proteinase activities in human colorectal carcinomas

The metastatic potential of ras-transfected cells has been attributed in part to significant ras induction of proteinase expression. To determine whether primary cancers also demonstrate higher cysteine proteinase activities in the presence of activated ras genes or altered ras protein expression, we have analyzed 60 primary human colorectal carcinomas for ras gene or protein changes together with the expression of cathepsins B and L. Cancers containing K-ras mutations (47% of 60 carcinomas) demonstrated greater increases in cathepsin L activity than cancers without K-ras mutations (p = 0.029), with particularly significant correlations for earlier stage cancers (Dukes' A and B carcinomas, p = 0.006). Western blots used to characterize ras protein patterns in the same cancer/normal pairs have demonstrated that N-ras protein is more highly expressed in colon tissues than H- or K-ras proteins and that N-ras overexpression occurs in almost 70% of colorectal cancers, with or without a concurrent change in electrophoretic mobility of N-ras protein. Our current study has now shown that N-ras protein overexpression alone does not significantly induce cathepsin B or L activity levels in colon cancers. However, carcinomas demonstrating altered N-ras protein forms, in the absence of any K- or N-ras mutations, expressed significantly higher levels of cathepsin B and L activities compared with carcinomas with normal N-ras protein banding patterns. Our data suggest that colorectal carcinomas with either K-ras mutations or altered forms of N-ras protein may increase their tumorigenic potential via the induction of cathepsin L or B expression levels. Our results also confirm that ras oncogene up-regulation of cathepsin B and L activities, previously reported in cultured cells, is a frequent event in primary human colorectal carcinomas.

The metastatic phenotype--prognostic implications

Strong efforts are being made in order to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer dissemination. We have attempted to summarise some of the findings in this area. A large number of differences in gene expression have been described in metastatic and non-metastatic cells. In the mouse B16 melanoma system, more than 50 different markers have been described. It is likely that many of these differences reflect the same genetic alteration (i.e. a mutation in a regulatory gene alters the expression of a set of co-regulated target genes). One could argue that it is more effective to study mutations in regulatory as opposed to expression of down-stream target genes. However, we feel that proto-oncogenes are less suitable as markers compared to target genes, since it is difficult to screen for mutations at multiple levels in regulatory pathways. In contrast, measuring the expression of a small number of target genes (i.e. one of the targets in Fig. 1), the expression of which are stimulated by upstream regulators, is accomplished more easily. It is anticipated that the future of optimised panels of independent markers will sharpen cancer diagnosis and lead to individualised therapy.