DeNardo GL, DeNardo SJ, O'Donnell RT, Kroger LA, Kukis DL, Meares CF, Goldstein DS, Shen S. Are radiometal-labeled antibodies better than iodine-131-labeled antibodies: comparative pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of copper-67-, iodine-131-, and yttrium-90-labeled Lym-1 antibody in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
CLINICAL LYMPHOMA 2000;
1:118-26. [PMID:
11707820 DOI:
10.3816/clm.2000.n.010]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Radioimmunotherapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens has been efficacious, particularly in the treatment of radiosensitive malignancies such as lymphoma. Antilymphoma monoclonal antibody Lym-1, labeled with copper-67 ((67)Cu), iodine-131 ((131)I), or yttrium-90 ((90)Y), has been effective salvage therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Although (131)I has had the dominant role in radioimmunotherapy thus far, several properties of radiometals are preferable. A total of 70 patients with B-lymphocytic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were studied using (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, or (111)In-2IT-BAD-Lym-1. Because (90)Y does not have good emissions for imaging, indium-111 ((111)In), its analogue, was used as a surrogate to estimate (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry. Subsets of four patients in each group received (67)Cu- and (131)I-labeled Lym-1 or (111)In- and (131)I-labeled Lym-1, allowing direct comparisons of the radioimmunoconjugates. Sequential blood samples and planar images were used to quantitate radioimmunoconjugate in tissues in order to determine pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry. (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 exhibited higher cumulated activity concentrations and radiation absorbed doses per unit of administered radioactivity for tumors than did (131)I-Lym-1. The mean tumor cumulated activity (area under the time-activity curve) concentrations per unit of administered radioactivity for (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were 96.89, 33.96, and 43.42 GBq-s/GBq/g, respectively. The mean tumor radiation doses from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were 2.5, 1.0, and 6.6 Gy/GBq, respectively, because (90)Y deposits more radiation per unit of administered radioactivity. Per unit of administered radioactivity, radiation doses from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 and (131)I-Lym-1 to normal tissues were similar except that the liver received a higher dose from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 than from (131)I-Lym-1; radiation doses to normal tissues from (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were generally higher. Consequently, the therapeutic indices (ratio of radiation doses to tumor and normal tissues) for (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, and less generally for (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1, were more favorable when compared to those for (131)I-Lym-1. Data from the matched subsets of patients showed similar therapeutic indices to those for the groups of patients. (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 showed more potential than (131)I-Lym-1 or (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma radioimmunotherapy.
Collapse