Poor prognosis of male triple-positive breast Cancer patients: a propensity score matched SEER analysis and molecular portraits

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore clinicalpathology features, molecular features and outcome of male breast cancer patients who expressed ER, PR as well as HER-2, namely triple-positive male breast cancer (TP-MBC), and compared them with triple-positive female breast cancer patients (TP-FBC).

Methods

TP-MBC and TP-FBC from 2010 to 2017 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Kaplan-Meier plotter and multivariable Cox regression model were applied to analyse the difference between TP-MBC and TP-FBC on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was used to ensure well-balanced characteristics. 7 cases TP-MBC and 174 cases TP-FBC patients with the genomic and clinical information were identified from the cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK).

Result

336 TP-MBC and 33,339 TP-FBC patients were taken into the study. The percentages of TP-MBC in MBC patients were higher than the rates of TP-FBC in FBC patients from 2010 to 2017 except 2012. Compared with TP-FBC, more TP-MBC were staged III (17.9% vs. 13.5%) or stage IV (11.0% vs. 6.9%). TP-MBC were more frequently to be older than 65-years-old (47.0% vs. 29.3%), Balck (15.2% vs. 10.8%), ductal carcinoma (91.7% vs. 84.4%) and metastases to lung (4.5% vs. 2.1%) or bone (8.6% vs. 4.7%). TP-MBC had worse OS and CSS than TP-FBC in all stages (P < 0.001). In multivariable prediction model of TPBC, male patients had a higher risk than female. Lastly, the worse OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P = 0.013) were seen in the 1:3 PSM analysis between TP-MBC and TP-FBC. Genomic analysis revealed that TP-MBCs have some notable rare mutations, like ERBB2, ERBB3, RB1, CDK12, FGFR2, IDH1, AGO2, GATA3, and some of them are not discovered in TP-FBC.

Conclusion

TP-MBC had a worse survival than TP-FBC, and there were different genomic features between two groups. Current knowledge and treatment to TP-MBC maybe inadequate and remain to be explored.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08267-9.

Survival benefit of tamoxifen in male breast cancer: prospective cohort analysis

Background

Due to the lack of prospective data, current treatment of male breast cancer (MBC) is based on information obtained from retrospective analysis or by extrapolation from studies on female patients. In this prospectively enrolled cohort study, we retrospectively examined the survival effect of tamoxifen in MBC patients.

Methods

In this prospectively enrolled cohort study, 448 patients with MBC were treated between May 2009 and June 2018. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Between May 2009 and June 2018, 448 men with breast cancer were identified, with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years (range 27–96 years). The median follow-up was 39 months (range 3–89 months). Most tumours were larger than 20 mm; invasive ductal carcinoma was of no special histological type and with an intermediate grade of differentiation. Almost half of the men were diagnosed with positive axillary lymph nodes (43.5%). Hormone receptor (HR) positivity was observed in 98.4% of the patients. Notably, DFS among men who did not receive tamoxifen was significantly reduced as compared with those who underwent tamoxifen therapy (P = 0.002). The recurrence rate and mortality in the group of patients without and with tamoxifen treatment were 18.2% and 11.2%, respectively. The most common localisation of metastases was the bone. After adjustment for prognostic factors, we found that tamoxifen was found to reduce the recurrence rate by 68% (hazard ratio HR = 0.32; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.14–0.74).

Conclusions

Tamoxifen treatment was associated with improved DFS for MBC patients.

Clinical trial registration

DRKS00009536.

Metastasis pattern and prognosis of male breast cancer patients in US: a population-based study from SEER database

Background

The aims of this study were to analyze the metastasis pattern and prognosis of male breast cancer (MBC) and compare it with female breast cancer (FBC), and to determine the independent factors affecting the prognosis of MBC patients.

Methods

Metastatic MBC diagnosed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 were selected. Chi-squared test was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics. Survival differences were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the prognostic factors affecting overall survival.

Results

A total of 2754 MBC patients were identified, of which 196 had distant metastasis. Compared with nonmetastatic MBC, metastatic MBC patients had a higher proportion of <60 years old and grade III-IV, and were more likely to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, while the proportion of surgery, central portion of the breast, and Her2-/HR+ was lower. Compared with metastatic FBC, metastatic MBC patients had a higher proportion of ⩾60 years old, central portion of the breast, surgery, simultaneous bone and lung metastasis, while the proportion of Her2+/HR-, triple negative, liver metastasis only, and simultaneous bone and liver metastasis was lower. MBC patients with lung alone, bone alone, and simultaneous lung and bone metastasis had a higher hazard ratio (2.41; 3.06; 2.52; p < 0.0001) compared with nonmetastatic patients.

Conclusions

Compared with nonmetastatic MBC patients, metastatic MBC patients had unique clinicopathological features, and were also different from metastatic FBC patients. However, there was no difference in prognosis between metastatic MBC and FBC patients. Distant metastasis was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of MBC patients.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in suspected recurrence of male breast cancer

Purpose

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare malignancy, with recurrence being one of the main adverse predictors for prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic and predictive value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT in the setting of suspected recurrence of MBC.

Patients and methods

Retrospective analysis of PET/CT findings was performed in 23 previously treated, histologically proven patients with MBC (mean age: 59.3±10.9 years; range: 36–79 years) with suspected recurrence. Kaplan–Meier disease-specific survival analysis was made with respect to histological, hormonal profile as well as PET/CT findings.

Results

Of the 23 patients, 19 (82.6%) showed recurrence. Recurrence at primary site with/without regional/distant site recurrence was seen in 12 (52.2%) patients. Only metastatic recurrence without primary site was seen in seven (30.4%) patients. Bone was the most common site of distant metastasis (14/23) followed by lungs (9/23), liver (4/23), brain (2/23), and adrenal (1/23). No recurrence (regional/distant) was noted in 4/23 (17.3%) patients; however, three of them had ¹⁸F-FDG-avid soft tissue lesions in esophagus, rectum and tongue, correspondingly, confirmed as second primaries with histopathology. Disease-specific survival analysis yielded nodal (P=0.01) as well as distant metastases (P=0.02) as the main survival predictors on PET/CT. Lung (P=0.001), followed by liver (P=0.009), and skeletal (P=0.01) metastases were the most adverse survival predictive factors.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT showed good diagnostic and prognostic utility in recurrent MBC. It was better than bone scan in evaluation of skeletal metastases. Most importantly, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT helped in early detection of second malignancy and their clinical management in studied patients.

Magee Equation Recurrence Score Is Associated With Distal Metastatic Risk in Male Breast Carcinomas: Experience From Two Institutions

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a clinicopathologic study of male breast carcinoma with Magee equation recurrence score (RS).

METHODS

Seventy-four cases of male invasive breast cancers (MBCs) were studied, including 63 hormone receptor (HR)-positive, 10 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and one triple-negative breast cancers.

RESULTS

Among 63 HR-positive MBC patients, nine patients developed distal metastasis. Statistical analysis demonstrated distal metastasis was significantly associated with positive lymph node, high Nottingham grade, and increased Magee equation RS. All HR-positive MBCs were further stratified into two categories (low RS <18; intermediate/high RS ≥18). There was a significantly increased risk for distal metastasis in MBCs with intermediate/high Magee equation RS, but no increased risk for lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest Magee equation RS may be useful to predict distal metastatic risk in MBC patients.

Ghrelin expression is associated with a favorable outcome in male breast cancer

Ghrelin and obestatin are two gastrointestinal peptides, derived from a common precursor. Expression of both peptides have been found in breast cancer tissue and ghrelin has been associated with breast cancer development. Ghrelin expression is associated with longer survival in women diagnosed with invasive and node negative breast cancer. The clinical implications of the peptide expression in male breast cancer are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role and potential clinical value of ghrelin and obestatin in male breast cancer. A tissue microarray of invasive male breast cancer specimens from 197 patients was immunostained with antibodies versus the two peptides. The expression of the peptides was correlated to previously known prognostic factors in breast cancer and to the outcome. No strong correlations were found between ghrelin or obestatin expression and other known prognostic factors. Only ghrelin expression was statistically significantly correlated to breast cancer-specific survival (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.83) in univariate analyses and in multivariate models, adjusted for tumor size and node status (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.87). HR for obestatin was 0.38 (95% CI 0.11–1.24). Ghrelin is a potential prognostic factor for breast cancer death in male breast cancer. Patients with tumors expressing ghrelin have a 2.5-fold lower risk for breast cancer death than those lacking ghrelin expression. Drugs targeting ghrelin are currently being investigated in clinical studies treating metabolic or nutritional disorders. Ghrelin should be further evaluated in forthcoming studies as a prognostic marker with the aim to be included in decision algorithms.

Survival analysis for male ductal and lobular breast cancer patients with different stages

AIM

We aimed to investigate risk factors and current treatment effects in male breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier plot, log-rank test, COX model, nomograms and propensity score matching were used.

RESULTS

Among stage I-III patients, surgery was associated with better prognosis. In subgroup analysis, performing surgery and no radiation or chemotherapy led to worse prognosis in research group. Among stage IV patients, chemotherapy correlated with better prognosis and radiation led to better breast cancer-specific survival. In addition, brain and liver metastasis correlated with worse prognosis; and lung correlated with worse breast cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

For stage I-III patients, surgery and chemotherapy were recommended. And not applying radiation or chemotherapy could be carefully considered for ER(+) HER-2(-) patients. For stage IV patients, chemotherapy and radiation were commended.

Male Breast Cancer in the Age of Genetic Testing: An Opportunity for Early Detection, Tailored Therapy, and Surveillance

In detection, treatment, and follow-up, male breast cancer has historically lagged behind female breast cancer. On the whole, breast cancer is less common among men than among women, limiting utility of screening, yet the incidence of male breast cancer is rising, and there are men at high risk for breast cancer. While women at high risk for breast cancer are well characterized, with clearly established guidelines for screening, supplemental screening, risk prevention, counseling, and advocacy, men at high risk for breast cancer are poorly identified and represent a blind spot in public health. Today, more standardized genetic counseling and wider availability of genetic testing are allowing identification of high-risk male relatives of women with breast cancer, as well as men with genetic mutations predisposing to breast cancer. This could provide a new opportunity to update our approach to male breast cancer. This article reviews male breast cancer demographics, risk factors, tumor biology, and oncogenetics; recognizes how male breast cancer differs from its female counterpart; highlights its diagnostic challenges; discusses the implications of the widening clinical use of multigene panel testing; outlines current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (version 1, 2018) for high-risk men; and explores the possible utility of targeted screening and surveillance. Understanding the current state of male breast cancer management and its challenges is important to shape future considerations for care. Shifting the paradigm of male breast cancer detection toward targeted precision medicine may be the answer to improving clinical outcomes of this uncommon disease. ^©RSNA, 2018.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Male Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study

PURPOSE

Male breast cancer (MBC) represents < 1% of breast cancer patients, and limited data exists regarding metastatic MBC. To better characterize this patient subset, we performed a population-based study examining prognostic factors among patients with stage IV MBC.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV MBC diagnosed between 1988 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 394 patients had metastatic disease meeting inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 21 months. The 5-year OS and CSS rates were 21.1% and 38.3%, respectively. Of those with known progesterone receptor (PR) status, 52% were PR-positive, which was associated with better OS (P < .001) and CSS (P = .003). Overall, 197 patients (50%) received surgery for the primary tumor, and 197 (50%) did not. Patients undergoing surgery had longer median CSS than those who did not (36 vs. 21 months; P < .001). Additional factors that correlated with prolonged OS and CSS were smaller tumor size (≤ 2 cm; P < .05) and younger age (≤ 65 years; P < .05). In multivariate analysis, smaller tumor size, PR-positivity, younger age, and resection of the primary tumor were associated with longer OS and CSS (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although stage IV MBC has poor OS and CSS, patients with PR-positive disease, younger age (≤ 65 years), tumor size ≤ 2 cm, or who undergo surgery of the primary tumor have better OS and CSS. This is the largest study of stage IV MBC to date, and these findings address some of the questions regarding this rare presentation of breast cancer.

Metastatic Breast Carcinoma to the Superior Oblique in a Male

We describe a case of breast cancer metastatic to the superior oblique, in a male. The patient was a 66-year-old Caucasian male with a history of stage IIIB rectal adenocarcinoma and stage IIA left breast carcinoma diagnosed 12 years and 5 years prior, respectively, who presented with headaches and intermittent diplopia. He underwent left total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy 6 years prior, which showed ER/PR+, HER2/neu-, moderately-differentiated, infiltrating ductal carcinoma with 3/14 positive nodes. He completed adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and oral tamoxifen, and prior routine surveillance imaging had found no evidence of recurrent disease. MRI of the orbit revealed a 0.7 × 1.4 × 1.9 cm mass in the superomedial right orbit in the region of the superior oblique. Transcaruncular orbitotomy with biopsy of the superior oblique revealed metastatic breast carcinoma. Unfortunately, he developed new metastases. Post-operatively, he continues to have good vision with minimal diplopia.