Breast cancer risk in relation to history of preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum: Prospective analysis in the Generations Study

Causal effects of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on future gynecologic tumors: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Numerous observational studies have investigated the potential link between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) and the subsequent risks of gynecologic tumors, yet the findings have been inconsistent. In this study, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess the influence of HDPs on the future risks of ovarian, cervical, endometrial, and breast cancer and uterine fibroids, controlling for confounding factors.

METHODS

The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data relevant to HDPs was obtained from the FinnGen databases (10,736 cases and 136,325 controls). Gynecologic tumor outcomes were extracted from the IEU Open GWAS project and UK Biobank (47,690 cases and 1, 092,073 controls). The inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach was selected as the principal method for MR analysis, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted model, simple model methods, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test, and leave-one-out method. Multivariate MR (MVMR) analysis was conducted after adjusting systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

RESULTS

Our univariate MR analysis (UVMR) results revealed no significant relationship between HDPs and the risks of ovarian cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.924, p = 0.360), cervical cancer (OR = 1.230, p = 0.738), endometrial cancer (OR = 1.006, p = 0.949), uterine fibroids (OR = 1.155, p = 0.158), and breast cancer (OR = 0.792, p = 0.241) by IVW test. Similar results were observed in gestational hypertension and preeclampsia/eclampsia. Additionally, our study detected neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy. MVMR analysis also provided no evidence of a causal association between HDPs and common gynecologic tumors after adjusting SBP, BMI, and T2DM.

CONCLUSION

We discovered no causal relationship between HDPs and ovarian, cervical, endometrial, breast cancer, and uterine fibroids in European populations. However, present analysis did not explore the effect of HDPs on the subtypes of gynecologic tumors across varied ethnic populations, which may require additional research.

Hypertensive conditions of pregnancy, preterm birth, and premenopausal breast cancer risk: a premenopausal breast cancer collaborative group analysis

PURPOSE

Women with preeclampsia are more likely to deliver preterm. Reports of inverse associations between preeclampsia and breast cancer risk, and positive associations between preterm birth and breast cancer risk are difficult to reconcile. We investigated the co-occurrence of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension with preterm birth and breast cancer risk using data from the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

METHODS

Across 6 cohorts, 3096 premenopausal breast cancers were diagnosed among 184,866 parous women. We estimated multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for premenopausal breast cancer risk using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Overall, preterm birth was not associated (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92, 1.14), and preeclampsia was inversely associated (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76, 0.99), with premenopausal breast cancer risk. In stratified analyses using data from 3 cohorts, preterm birth associations with breast cancer risk were modified by hypertensive conditions in first pregnancies (P-interaction = 0.09). Preterm birth was positively associated with premenopausal breast cancer in strata of women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.18), but not among women with normotensive pregnancy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.28). When stratified by preterm birth, the inverse association with preeclampsia was more apparent, but not statistically different (P-interaction = 0.2), among women who did not deliver preterm (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68, 1.00) than those who did (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.73, 1.56).

CONCLUSION

Findings support an overall inverse association of preeclampsia history with premenopausal breast cancer risk. Estimates for preterm birth and breast cancer may vary according to other conditions of pregnancy.

Gestational Hypertensive Disorders and Maternal Breast Cancer Risk in a Nationwide Cohort of 40,720 Parous Women

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension are hypothesized to be associated with reduced maternal breast cancer risk, but the epidemiologic evidence is inconclusive. Our objective was to examine associations between gestational hypertensive disorders and breast cancer in a nationwide cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer.

METHODS

Women ages 35-74 years who had a sister previously diagnosed with breast cancer, but had never had breast cancer themselves, were enrolled in the Sister Study from 2003 to 2009 (N = 50,884). At enrollment, participants reported diagnoses of eclampsia, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension in each pregnancy. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between history of a gestational hypertensive disorder and incident invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ among 40,720 parous women. We used age as the time scale and adjusted for birth cohort, race-ethnicity, and reproductive, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors. We examined effect measure modification by risk factors for gestational hypertensive disease and breast cancer and assessed possible etiologic heterogeneity across tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gestational hypertensive disease was 12%. During follow-up (mean = 10.9 years), 3,198 eligible women self-reported a breast cancer diagnosis. History of a gestational hypertensive disorder was not associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.1). We did not observe clear evidence of effect measure modification or etiologic heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

History of a gestational hypertensive disorder was not associated with breast cancer risk in a cohort of women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer.

Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and risk of breast cancer in the Black Women's Health Study

PURPOSE

Compared to white women, Black women have increased risk of developing hypertensive diseases of pregnancy (HDOP) and have a higher incidence of aggressive breast cancer subtypes. Few studies of HDOP and breast cancer risk have included large numbers of Black women. This study examined the relation of HDOP to incidence of breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status in Black women.

METHODS

We followed 42,982 parous women in the Black Women's Health Study, a nationwide prospective study of Black women. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess associations of self-reported HDOP, including preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, with breast cancer incidence overall and by ER subtype, adjusted for age and established breast cancer risk factors.

RESULTS

Over 20 years of follow-up, we identified 2376 incident breast cancer cases. History of HDOP (11.7%) was not associated with breast cancer risk overall (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.87, 1.11). HRs for invasive ER+ and ER- breast cancer were 1.11 (95% CI 0.93, 1.34) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.61, 1.07), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HDOP was not associated with risk of overall breast cancer in Black women. A suggestive inverse association with ER- breast cancer may reflect an anti-tumorigenic hormone profile in HDOP, but those results require confirmation in other studies.

Preeclampsia and cancer risk in women in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

IMPORTANCE

Results of this work may provide some guidance for subsequent ovarian cancer screening in women with preeclampsia and provide new directions for future studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the difference in cancer risk between women with preeclampsia and women with a normal pregnancy.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Electronic databases, namely PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies from database inception to February 4, 2021. The results are expressed as risk ratios (RRs).

FINDINGS

The study included 13 cohort studies comprising 5,254,150 participants. The difference in the total cancer risk between the control and preeclampsia groups was statistically nonsignificant. However, breast cancer (BC) risk was lower in the preeclampsia group (RR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-0.93; I2 = 57.2%). A subgroup analysis stratified by reproductive factors demonstrated that BC risk in the preeclampsia population decreased in parous women (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72-0.87; I2 = 0%), women with full-term pregnancies (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.84; I2 = 0%), and women with increasing parity. Furthermore, BC risk reduced in women with preeclampsia regardless of their menopausal status and the sex of their offspring.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Overall, women with preeclampsia have a decreased BC risk and increased ovarian cancer risk compared with the normal population. A subgroup analysis stratified by reproductive factors demonstrated that BC risk decreased in the preeclampsia population in parous women, women with full-term pregnancies, and women with increasing parity regardless of their menopausal status and the sex of their offspring.

Assessment of All-Cause Cancer Incidence Among Individuals With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia During First Pregnancy

IMPORTANCE

Preeclampsia or eclampsia (preeclampsia/eclampsia) during pregnancy induces major physiological changes and may be associated with specific cancer occurrences in later life. The current data regarding the association between preeclampsia/eclampsia and cancer are heterogeneous, and cancer risk after preeclampsia/eclampsia could be different depending on the organ. These uncertainties warrant reexamination of the association between preeclampsia/eclampsia and the risk of cancer overall and by specific cancer type.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of cancer, overall and by type, after preeclampsia/eclampsia during a first pregnancy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the French hospital discharge database to identify all female individuals who had a pregnancy-associated hospitalization between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. To allow a minimum of 2 years for the detection of medical history, individuals with a first detected pregnancy before January 1, 2012, were excluded, as were those with a cancer-associated hospitalization before or during their first detected pregnancy. Exposures, comorbidities, and occurrences of cancer were evaluated using data from the medico-administrative registers of hospitalizations in private and public French hospitals. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze cancer risk according to the occurrence of preeclampsia/eclampsia during first pregnancy.

EXPOSURES

Preeclampsia/eclampsia-associated hospitalization during the first detected pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incidence of cancer, including myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative diseases, after a first pregnancy with and without preeclampsia/eclampsia.

RESULTS

After exclusions, a total of 4 322 970 female individuals (mean [SD] age at first detected pregnancy, 29.6 [6.2] years) with and without preeclampsia/eclampsia during their first pregnancy were included. Of those, 45 523 individuals (1.1%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia/eclampsia during their first detected pregnancy. The maximum follow-up was 8 years, during which 29 173 individuals (0.7%) were diagnosed with cancer. No significant difference in overall cancer incidence was found between those with and without preeclampsia/eclampsia during their first pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05). Preeclampsia/eclampsia was associated with an increase in the risk of myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative diseases (AHR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46-4.06) and kidney cancer (AHR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.09-4.42) and a decrease in the risk of breast cancer (AHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99) and cervical cancer (AHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, a history of preeclampsia/eclampsia during first pregnancy was associated with an increase in the incidence of myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative diseases and kidney cancer and a decrease in the incidence of cervical and breast cancers. These associations might reflect an underlying common factor among preeclampsia/eclampsia and these pathologies and/or an association between preeclampsia/eclampsia and the development of these cancers.

Preeclampsia: Cardiotonic Steroids, Fibrosis, Fli1 and Hint to Carcinogenesis

Despite prophylaxis and attempts to select a therapy, the frequency of preeclampsia does not decrease and it still takes the leading position in the structure of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. In this review, we present a new theory of the etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia that is based on the interaction of Na/K-ATPase and its endogenous ligands including marinobufagenin. The signaling pathway of marinobufagenin involves an inhibition of transcriptional factor Fli1, a negative regulator of collagen synthesis, followed by the deposition of collagen in the vascular tissues and altered vascular functions. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo neutralization of marinobufagenin is associated with the restoration of Fli1. The inverse relationship between marinobufagenin and Fli1 opens new possibilities in the treatment of cancer; as Fli1 is a proto-oncogene, a hypothesis on the suppression of Fli1 by cardiotonic steroids as a potential anti-tumor therapeutic strategy is discussed as well. We propose a novel therapy of preeclampsia that is based on immunoneutralization of the marinobufagenin by monoclonal antibodies, which is capable of impairing marinobufagenin-Na/K-ATPase interactions.

Macrophage-stimulating protein is decreased in severe preeclampsia and regulates the biological behavior of HTR-8/SVneo trophoblast cells

Preeclampsia (PE) is a major challenge for obstetricians. There is no effective way to block the development of PE other than terminating the pregnancy. The biological behavior of trophoblast cells, which are similar to cancer cells, may be closely related to the onset of PE. The vital role of macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP) in the development and progression of cancer has been recognized, while a role for this protein in PE has rarely been reported. This study aimed to explore whether MSP affects severe PE (sPE) and, if so, to characterize the mechanism. Patient information, blood samples and/or placental tissues were collected. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the plasma MSP concentration. The relationships between the plasma MSP concentration and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Immunofluorescence was performed to localize MSP in placental tissues. Western blotting and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were used to determine MSP protein and mRNA expression in placental tissues. MSP was overexpressed or underexpressed in the trophoblastic cell line HTR-8/SVneo by lentiviral transfection and the proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion and angiogenesis of cells were detected. MSP was downregulated in sPE, and the underexpression of MSP inhibited HTR-8/SVneo cell proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. We further verified that MSP affects the biological behavior of trophoblast cells through the β-catenin/ZEB1 signaling pathway. These results suggest that decreased MSP in the blood and placental tissues of patients with sPE, especially those with early-onset sPE, leads to reduced trophoblast cell invasion, which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PE.

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is a common condition that affects as many as 70% of pregnant women. Although no consensus definition is available for hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), it is typically viewed as the severe form of NVP and has been reported to occur in 0.3-10.8% of pregnant women. HG can be associated with poor maternal, fetal and child outcomes. The majority of women with NVP can be managed with dietary and lifestyle changes, but more than one-third of patients experience clinically relevant symptoms that may require fluid and vitamin supplementation and/or antiemetic therapy such as, for example, combined doxylamine/pyridoxine, which is not teratogenic and may be effective in treating NVP. Ondansetron is commonly used to treat HG, but studies are urgently needed to determine whether it is safer and more effective than using first-line antiemetics. Thiamine (vitamin B1) should be introduced following protocols to prevent refeeding syndrome and Wernicke encephalopathy. Recent advances in the genetic study of NVP and HG suggest a placental component to the aetiology by implicating common variants in genes encoding placental proteins (namely GDF15 and IGFBP7) and hormone receptors (namely GFRAL and PGR). New studies on aetiology, diagnosis, management and treatment are under way. In the next decade, progress in these areas may improve maternal quality of life and limit the adverse outcomes associated with HG.