Treatment of melanoma of unknown primary in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapy: A Dutch population-based study

Survival of patients with unfavorable prognosis cutaneous melanoma with increased use of immunotherapy agents: a population-based study in Belgium

BACKGROUND

Although metastatic cutaneous melanoma is associated with an unfavorable prognosis, innovative therapies including immunomodulating agents and targeted therapies have shown survival benefits in clinical trials. We assessed the impact of the introduction of innovative drugs into clinical practice on the survival of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma during the period 2004-2017, in Belgium. The evolution of associated expenses was also analyzed.

METHODS

This is a retrospective population-based study using data from the national Belgian Cancer Registry, compulsory health insurance, and administrative survival data. The immunomodulating drugs were ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, while targeted therapies included vemurafenib, dabrafenib and trametinib.

RESULTS

We did not identify a trend for improvement over time. Median survival (years) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8) in 2004-2008, 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.5) in 2009-2013, and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) in 2014-2017, respectively. In contrast, survival improved in those with unknown primary tumor localization. In this group, median survival time was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) in the most recent period, while it was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.3) in 2009-2013, and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.2) in 2004-2008. The uptake of innovative drugs remained modest, with no drug being used by more than 30% of patients. Yearly expenditure was almost non-existent, and gradually increased, reaching several million euros in 2014-2017.

CONCLUSION

Patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 showed no apparent improvement in survival. In contrast, increased survival was observed in the subgroup of patients with unknown primary tumor localization.

Neurosarcomatous amelanotic transformation of malignant melanoma presenting as malignant periopheral nerve sheath tumor: Rare case report

RATIONALE

Malignant melanoma (MM) is notorious for its remarkable morphological variation and aberrant histopathological patterns. In addition, Malignant Periopheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) is an uncommon but aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. Because of the common embryological origin of melanocytes and Schwann cells in the neural crest, discriminating between a particular type of MM and MPNST can be difficult, particularly when they are amelanotic. Our goal is to increase awareness among clinicians of the rare variations of MM and the importance of medical history in improving the accuracy of the final clinical diagnosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 68-year-old man was admitted to the hospital due to pain in his right ankle, which had persisted for 8 months, along with swelling for 4 months. Medical history revealed delayed healing of right plantar for 5 years after a traumatic injury.

DIAGNOSES

The ankle mass was initially diagnosed as MPNST through biopsy. After reviewing the patient's medical history and receiving the final pathological report following amputation, we have revised the diagnosis to metastatic amelanotic desmoplastic melanoma in the ankle part and lentigo maligna melanoma in the plantar part. This is due to both lesions displaying positive markers or mutated genes in immunohistology and Gene Mutation Detection, indicating homology between the 2 tumors.

INTERVENTIONS

Due to the malignant characteristics of the tumor and the patient's wishes, amputation of the right lower leg was carried out.

OUTCOMES

Subsequently, the patient was treated with interferon-γ and immunosuppressant PD-1 inhibitor, and survived for 1 year after amputation.

LESSONS

Clinical data, immunohistochemisty biomarkers and genes detection results can serve as valuable evidence for pathologists and clinicians in identifying the disease process. Collaborative efforts between clinicians and scientists are crucial in order to identify specific markers that can effectively differentiate between the 2 tumors, thereby enhancing the conclusiveness of the diagnosis.

Brain metastases in adult patients with melanoma of unknown primary in the Netherlands (2011-2020)

BACKGROUND

Although patients with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) have a better prognosis than similar-staged melanoma patients with known primary, the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) entails a serious complication. This study provides an overview of the incidence, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) of adult patients with BM-MUP in the Netherlands.

METHODS

BM-MUP cases were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient, disease and treatment-related characteristics were summarised using descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of prognostic factors on OS was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1779 MUP patients, 450 were identified as BM-MUP (25.3%). Of these patients, 381 (84.7%) presented with BM along with other metastases, while 69 (15.3%) had BM only. BM-MUP patients were predominantly male (68.2%), and had a median age of 64 years at diagnosis (interquartile range 54-71 years). Over time, the proportion of BM along other metastatic sites increased, and the occurrence of BM decreased (p = 0.01). 1-Year OS improved for the total population, from 30.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.8-40.9%) in 2011-2012 to 43.6% (95%CI: 34.5-52.3%) in 2019-2020, and median OS more than doubled from 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.3-6.2 months) to 9.8 months (95%CI: 7.0-13.2 months). Patient's age, localisation of BM, presence of synchronous liver metastasis and treatment were identified as independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding the progress made in OS for patients with BM-MUP in the past decade, their overall prognosis remains poor, and further efforts are needed to improve outcomes.

Melanoma of unknown primary origin with skeletal muscle metastasis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is usually discovered from an irregular skin patch or a modification of a preexisting patch. Cutaneous and lymph node metastases are common. Muscle metastases are rare. We report a case of melanoma with infiltration of the gluteus maximus, which had normal dermatological examination.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 43-year-old Malagasy man with no history of skin surgery was admitted with progressively worsening dyspnea. On admission, he presented with superior vena cava syndrome, painless cervical lymphadenopathy, and a painful swelling in the right buttock. Skin and mucous membrane examination did not reveal any abnormal or suspicious lesions. The biology was limited to a C-reactive protein of 40 mg/L, a white blood cell count of 23 G/L, and a lactate dehydrogenase level of 1705 U/L. The computed tomography scan showed several lymphadenopathies, compression of the superior vena cava, and a tissue mass at the expense of the gluteus maximus. Cervical lymph node biopsy and cytopuncture of the gluteus maximus were consistent with a secondary melanoma location. A stage IV melanoma of unknown primary origin, and with stage TxN3M1c associated with lymph node metastases and extension to the right gluteus maximus, was suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma of unknown primary origin accounts for 3% of diagnosed melanomas. Diagnosis is difficult in the absence of a skin lesion. Patients are diagnosed with multiple metastases. Muscle involvement is unusual and may suggest a benign pathology. In this context, biopsy remains essential for diagnosis.

Construction, validation and, visualization of a web-based nomogram to identify the best candidates for primary tumor resection in advanced cutaneous melanoma patients

Background

Existing studies have shown whether primary site resection (PSR) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with stage IV is controversial. Our study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of CM patients with stage IV who benefited from PSR on a population-based study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed stage IV CM patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. Patients were divided into surgical and non-surgical groups according to whether PSR was performed or not. According to the median cancer-specific survival (CSS) time of the non-surgery group, the surgical group was divided into the surgery-benefit group and the non-surgery-benefit group. Multivariate cox regression analysis was used to explore independent CSS prognostic factors in the surgical group. Then, based on the independent prognostic factors of the surgical group, we established a web-based nomogram based on logistics regression.

Results

A total of 574 stage IV CM patients were included in our study, and 491 (85.60%) patients were included in the surgical group. The clinical characteristics (benefit group and non-benefit group) included age, M stage, lesion location, and ulceration status. These independent prognostic factors were includeed to construct a web-based nomogram.

Conclusions

We constructed a web-based nomogram. This model was suitable for identifying the best candidates suitable for PSR in stage IV CM patients.

Canine melanoma: A review of diagnostics and comparative mechanisms of disease and immunotolerance in the era of the immunotherapies

Melanomas in humans and dogs are highly malignant and resistant to therapy. Since the first development of immunotherapies, interest in how the immune system interacts within the tumor microenvironment and plays a role in tumor development, progression, or remission has increased. Of major importance are tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) where distribution and cell frequencies correlate with survival and therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, efforts have been made to identify subsets of TILs populations that can contribute to a tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting environment, such as the case with T regulatory cells versus CD8 T cells. Furthermore, cancerous cells have the capacity to express certain inhibitory checkpoint molecules, including CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-L2, that can suppress the immune system, a property associated with poor prognosis, a high rate of recurrence, and metastasis. Comparative oncology brings insights to comprehend the mechanisms of tumorigenesis and immunotolerance in humans and dogs, contributing to the development of new therapeutic agents that can modulate the immune response against the tumor. Therapies that target signaling pathways such as mTOR and MEK/ERK that are upregulated in cancer, or immunotherapies with different approaches such as CAR-T cells engineered for specific tumor-associated antigens, DNA vaccines using human tyrosinase or CGSP-4 antigen, anti-PD-1 or -PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies that intercept their binding inhibiting the suppression of the T cells, and lymphokine-activated killer cells are already in development for treating canine tumors. This review provides concise and recent information about diagnosis, comparative mechanisms of tumor development and progression, and the current status of immunotherapies directed toward canine melanoma.

A rare case of endobronchial melanoma of unknown primary

A 62-year-old man who presented with complaints of cough and hemoptysis was found to have an endobronchial tumor which obstructed the lingular bronchus. Histopathologic examination of a bronchoscopic biopsy of the tumor was consistent with malignant melanoma. Skin, mucosal, and eye examinations failed to detect the primary site of melanoma and the patient was diagnosed with endobronchial melanoma of unknown primary (MUP). Although the patient underwent a curative surgical resection, recurrence was detected in 4 months. Endobronchial MUP is a rare presentation of melanoma and better therapeutic strategies need to be established.

Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Melanoma

The utilization of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has transformed the workup and staging of intermediate-thickness cutaneous melanomas. SLN biopsy, performed at the time of primary tumor excision, accurately maps lymph nodes at risk of harboring occult metastatic deposits from head and neck cutaneous melanomas and represents the current standard of care. Completion lymphadenectomy identifies additional tumor in 12% to 24% of SLN biopsy positive cases but does not affect melanoma-specific survival.

Thoracic metastasis of malignant melanoma of unknown primary: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is an unusual entity found in distant sites without evident skin lesion. We report a case of 45-year-old woman who underwent monobloc resection of a metastatic thoracic malignant melanoma of unknown primary, and who is currently under immunotherapy without local or distant recurrence during a follow-up of 18 months. We demonstrate through this case that R0 resection of an MUP associated with immunotherapy improves the prognosis and survival in these patients.

CASE REPORT

This is a 45-year-old woman who underwent monobloc resection of a mass carrying the anterior arch of the second left rib associated with a wedge resection of a nodule at the left upper lobe. Histology confirmed that it was a malignant melanoma. Her history was negative for melanocytic lesions, physical examination and imaging had failed to identify a primary lesion. The patient is currently under nivolumab for Stage IV melanoma and does not present any complications or recurrence during the long term follow up.

DISCUSSION

Metastatic melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is a melanocytic lesion in distant sites in the absence of apparent skin involvement and is rare, accounting for 3, 2% of all incident melanomas as well as being yet poorly understood in terms of pathogenesis (Bae et al., 2015) [1]. MUP is clinically understudied, investigators to date have reported largely on the use of localized treatment for MUP (surgery or radiotherapy), while the efficacy of systemic therapy in MUP patients remains unexplored. Clinical trials of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma have not explicitly reported response rates specific to MUP patient subgroups due to its low incidence and lack of annotation. MUP's response to these now FDA-approved therapies could add to the discussion of MUP's elusive biological characteristics, as well as aid in making clinical recommendations (Utter et al., 2017).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic MUP is an extremely rare entity which is still poorly understood, few cases are described in the literature, its treatment remains controversial and there are no specific treatment recommendations for patients with MUP. Several authors recommend local treatment when possible and tend to apply similar strategies for patients with paired stage primary known melanoma (PKM).

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagogastric junction: A case report

RATIONALE

Most gastrointestinal melanomas are metastatic from an oculocutaneous primary lesion; however, primary gastrointestinal melanomas have been found in all levels of the gastrointestinal tract. We present the case of Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus and discuss the diagnostic methods, differentiation from metastatic lesions and treatment options.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 78-year-old male patient presented with fresh blood vomiting and tarry stools for 1 day.

DIAGNOSES

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy of this patient revealed a tumor ∼4 cm in size at the cardia side of the esophagogastric junction with dark-red and gray pigmentation. Immunohistochemical stains of the biopsy specimens were positive for S-100 and HMB-45, which are specific markers of melanoma.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparotomy with proximal gastrectomy was performed by the surgeon. Histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed the tumor arose from the distal esophagus with invasion of the proximal stomach. Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus was diagnosed after a full skin and ophthalmic examination and positron emission tomography, which revealed no lesions elsewhere in the body.

OUTCOMES

No tumor recurrence was noted at the 1-year follow-up.

LESSONS

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus is an extremely rare but highly aggressive tumor. The special pattern of pigmentation should be recognized while performing endoscopy. Early detection and radical resection of the tumor are critical to ensure favorable outcomes.

Comparative genomic characterization of melanoma of known and unknown primary

BACKGROUND

This study aims to genomically characterize melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) in comparison to melanomas of cutaneous primary (MCP).

METHODS

Eligible cases were collected from the MSK-IMPACT™ Clinical Sequencing Cohort published in the cBioPortal database. Genomic analysis was performed using a hybridization-capture-based next-generation sequencing assay designed to detect mutations, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and genomic rearrangements.

RESULTS

Among 462 patients of whom 18.4% had MUP, brain metastasis was more common among patients with MUP (23% vs 7.1%). The differences in genomic profiling between MCP and MUP did not reach statistical significance. The 187 MCP and 44 MUP patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had a median overall survival of 49 and 44 months, respectively (p = 0.705).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in somatic mutation patterns and survival outcomes were not statistically significant. These findings may allude to similar carcinogenic processes but should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution.

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors of CTLA4 and PD-1 for hepatic melanoma of unknown primary origin: A case report

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is uncommonly found in lymph nodes, subcutaneous tissue, or visceral organs without a primary lesion, where it is identified as metastatic melanoma with unknown primary (MUP). Hepatic MUP is extremely rare and has a poor prognosis. There is limited information on its pathogenesis, clinical and imaging features, and pathological findings. There are no guidelines for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatic MUP, and the treatment outcome has rarely been reported.

CASE SUMMARY

A 42-year-old woman presented to our hospital with hepatic tumors found incidentally during a routine check-up. Contrast-enhanced abdominal com-puterized tomography showed multiple mass lesions in the liver. Pathological results revealed melanoma, which was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining for HMB-45(+), Melan-A(+), S-100(+), and SOX10(+). There was no evidence of primary cutaneous, ocular, gastrointestinal, or anal lesion on a comprehensive examination. The patient was diagnosed with hepatic MUP. She received combined antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4, ipilimumab) and programmed death protein-1 (PD-1, nivolumab). She died of hepatic failure 9 mo after hepatic MUP was diagnosed. This the first case of hepatic MUP treated with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab, who showed better outcome than previous cases.

CONCLUSION

Combined ICIs of PD-1 and CTLA-4 may be considered as the first-line therapy for patients with hepatic MUP.

Clinical outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma of unknown primary in the era of novel therapy

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is considered different from melanoma of known primary (MKP), and it is unclear whether these patients benefit equally from novel therapies. In the current study, characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and metastatic MUP and MKP were compared in the era of novel therapy. Patients were selected from the prospective nation-wide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). The following criteria were applied: diagnosis of stage IIIc unresectable or IV cutaneous MKP (cMKP) or MUP between July 2012 and July 2017 and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition and/or targeted therapy. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The stratified multivariable Cox regression model was used for adjusted analysis. A total of 2706 patients were eligible including 2321 (85.8%) patients with cMKP and 385 (14.2%) with MUP. In comparative analysis, MUP patients more often presented with advanced and metastatic disease at primary diagnosis with poorer performance status, higher LDH, and central nervous system metastases. In crude analysis, median OS of cMKP or MUP patients was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5 – 44) and 14 months (IQR 5 – not reached), respectively (P = 0.278). In adjusted analysis, OS in MUP patients was superior (hazard rate 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.85; P < 0.001). As compared to patients with advanced and metastatic cMKP, MUP patients have superior survival in adjusted analysis, but usually present with poorer prognostic characteristics. In crude analysis, OS was comparable indicating that patients with MUP benefit at least equally from treatment with novel therapies.

Melanoma of Unknown Primary: Evaluation of the Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, Prognostic Factors in a Monocentric Retrospective Study

Background

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP), accounts for up to 3% of all melanomas and consists of a histologically confirmed melanoma metastasis to either lymph nodes, (sub)cutaneous tissue, or visceral sites without any evidence of a primary cutaneous, ocular, or mucosal melanoma. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, treatment strategies, and prognostic factors of MUP patients, in order to shed some light on the clinical behavior of this malignancy.

Methods

All the consecutive patients with a diagnosis of MUP referring to our institutions between 1985 and 2018 were considered in this retrospective cohort study. The records of 173 patients with a suspected diagnosis of MUP were retrospectively evaluated for inclusion in the study. Patient selection was performed according to the Das Gupta criteria, and a total of 127 MUP patients were finally included in the study, representing 2.7% of the patients diagnosed with melanoma skin cancer at our institutions during the same study period. A second cohort of all consecutive 417 MKP patients with AJCC stages IIIB–IV, referring tions in the period considered (1985–2018), was included in the study to compare survival between MUP and MKP patients. All the diagnoses were based on histopathologic, cytologic and immunohistochemical examination of the metastases. All tumors were re-staged according to the 2018 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8^th Edition.

Results

Median follow-up was 32 months (IQR: 15–84). 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 54%, while 3-year overall survival (OS) was 62%. Worse OS and PFS were associated with older age (P = 0.0001 for OS; P = 0.008 for PFS), stage IV (P < 0.0001 for OS; P = 0.0001 for PFS) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.0001 for OS and P = 0.01 for PFS). Patients with lymph node disease showed longer PFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.0008) than those with (sub)cutis disease. Complete lymph node dissection (CLND) was the most common surgical treatment; a worse OS in these patients was associated with the number of positive lymph nodes (P = 0.01), without significant association with the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P = 0.79). Survival rates were lower in patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT) and target therapy (TT), and higher in those receiving immunotherapy (IT). 417 patients with AJCC stages IIIB–IV of Melanoma Known Primary (MKP) were included for the survival comparison with MUP. 3-year PFS rates were 54 and 58% in MUP and MKP, respectively (P = 0.30); 3-year OS rates were 62 and 70% in MUP and MKP, respectively (P = 0.40).

Conclusions

The most common clinical scenario of our series was a male patient around 59 years with lymph node disease. We report that CLND associated with IT was the best treatment in terms of survival outcome. In the current era of IT and TT for melanoma, new studies have to clarify the impact of novel drugs on MUP.

The Diminishing Importance of Primary Site Identification in Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Canadian Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) describes patients with metastatic disease without an identified primary tumor site. Successful diagnosis and treatment of these patients remains difficult. Published guidelines on CUP have highlighted "favorable" subtype groups. We investigated a series of CUP patients to review adherence to guidelines, and identification of primary cancers or "favorable" subtypes.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed CUP at an academic institution from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patient demographics, tumor presentation, diagnostic work-up and treatment information were retrospectively collected from electronic data records for descriptive analysis and compared to published clinical guidelines. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients where the primary site was identified. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with primary site identification. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine factors associated with poorer OS.

RESULTS

Three hundred and five patients were included with a median follow-up time of 4.3 months. Primary tumor sites were identified in 109 patients (37.5%), which was most commonly lung cancer (33%). Statistical analyses did not identify any demographic or initial presentation factors associated with identifying the primary or not. More diagnostic tests did not increase the likelihood of primary site identification (P=0.44). Patients with an identified primary did not have longer OS than other patients (median 5.2 months vs. 4.7 months, P=0.47). 57 patients (18.7%) who had a defined "favorable" subtype experienced superior OS (36.6 months vs. 3.8 months; P<0.0001). Further, patients with good prognostic status who followed published treatment guidelines had longer OS (17.6 months vs. 13.2 months; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

CUP remains a difficult cancer to diagnose and treat. These results suggest identifying the primary has less impact than anticipated, but particular efforts to identify patients with "favorable" subtypes of CUP is important prognostically.

Multidisciplinary Care for Melanoma of Unknown Primary: Experience in the Era of Molecular Profiling

BACKGROUND

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) accounts for approximately 3% of melanoma diagnoses. This study sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes for a modern MUP cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective review of MUP was performed at a tertiary referral cancer center.

RESULTS

Of 815 melanoma patients, 67 (8.2%) had MUP. Men were more likely to have MUP than women (67% vs. 55%; p = 0.04). The most common sites of MUP were lymph nodes (28%), visceral solid organs (25%), brain (16%), and skin/subcutaneous tissues (10%). Of the patients who underwent tumor genomic profiling, 52% harbored pathogenic BRAF mutations. Of the 24 patients who underwent multi-gene panel testing, all had pathogenic mutations and 21 (88%) had mutations in addition to or exclusive of BRAF, including 11 patients (46%) with telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations. Checkpoint inhibitors (39%) and BRAF-MEK inhibitors (7%) were the most common first-line treatments. Upfront surgical resection was used for 25% of the MUP patients, and 12 of these resections were for curative intent. During a median follow-up period of 22.1 months, the median overall survival (OS) was not met for the patients with MUP isolated to lymph nodes. At 56.8 months, 75% of these patients were alive. The median OS was 37.4 months for skin/soft tissue MUP, 33.3 months for single solid organ viscera MUP, and 29.8 months for metastatic brain MUP.

CONCLUSION

Multigene panel testing identified pathogenic mutations in all tested MUP patients and frequently identified targets outside BRAF. Despite advanced stage, aggressive multimodal therapy for MUP can be associated with 5-year OS and should be pursued for appropriate candidates.

The diagnostic challenges of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a disease entity encompassing heterogeneous malignancies without a clinically-detectable anatomical primary. It is usually a poor prognosis malignancy with dismal prognosis where molecular and genetic testing were expected to be a major breakthrough.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of the advances in the understanding of the carcinogenesis, biology, diagnosis and treatment of patients with CUP. This review focuses on the advantages and inconveniences of immunohistochemistry and CUP classifiers in assessing the progress in the management of CUP.

EXPERT OPINION

CUP classifiers were expected to gradually replace the classical multistep approach in identifying the culprit tumors to guide site-specific therapy. Immunohistochemistry staining led to the prediction of a single tissue of origin in 10.8-51%. CUP classifiers identified the primary site in 61-89% of these cases and were concordant with immunohistochemistry in 57.1-100%. Immunohistochemistry is cheap, fast and broadly available whereas CUP classifiers are less widely available and have not been validated in randomized control trials. The diagnostic recommendations consist of a standard pathology evaluation based on morphology and algorithmic immunohistochemistry assessment. Physicians should weigh in the input of the CUP classifier to the clinical picture and pathology investigations before performing additional investigations.

Uncommon Subtypes of Malignant Melanomas: A Review Based on Clinical and Molecular Perspectives

Malignant melanoma represents the most aggressive type of skin cancer. Modern therapies, including targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have changed the dismal prognosis that characterized this disease. However, most evidence was obtained by studying patients with frequent subtypes of cutaneous melanoma (CM). Consequently, there is an emerging need to understand the molecular basis and treatment approaches for unusual melanoma subtypes. Even a standardized definition of infrequent or rare melanoma is not clearly established. For that reason, we reviewed this challenging topic considering clinical and molecular perspectives, including uncommon CMs-not associated with classical V600E/K BRAF mutations-malignant mucosal and uveal melanomas, and some unusual independent entities, such as amelanotic, desmoplastic, or spitzoid melanomas. Finally, we collected information regarding melanomas from non-traditional primary sites, which emerge from locations as unique as meninges, dermis, lymph nodes, the esophagus, and breasts. The aim of this review is to summarize and highlight the main scientific evidence regarding rare melanomas, with a particular focus on treatment perspectives.

How to overcome the side effects of tumor immunotherapy

The incidence of cancer is increasing year by year. Cancer has become one of the health threats of modern people. Simply relying on the surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, not only the survival rate is not high, but also the quality of life of patients is not much better. Fortunately, the emergence and rapid development of cancer immunotherapy have brought more and more exciting results. However, when scientists think it is possible to overcome cancer, they find that not all cancer patients can benefit from immunotherapy, that is to say, the overall efficiency of immunotherapy is not high. Drug resistance and side effects of immunotherapy cannot be ignored. In order to overcome these difficulties, scientists continue to improve the strategy of immunotherapy and find that combination therapy can effectively reduce the incidence of drug resistance. They also found that by reprogramming tumor blood vessels, activating ferroptosis, utilizing thioredoxin, FATP2 and other substances, the therapeutic effect can be improved and side effects can be alleviated. This article reviews the principles of immunotherapy, new strategies to overcome drug resistance of cancer immunotherapy, and how to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy and reduce side effects.

Patients with melanoma of unknown primary show better outcome under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy than patients with known primary: preliminary results

Background: Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is an uncommon clinical subtype of melanoma of known primary (MKP). Objectives: We aimed to compare treatment outcomes of MUP and MKP patients who had undergone therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI). Methods: We studied 41 metastatic melanoma patients (32 with MKP and 9 with MUP) with an indication for ICPI. Results: Clinical characteristics such as age, gender, stage of disease, etc., did not significantly differ (P < .05) between MUP and MKP patients. 20/32 (62.5%) melanoma-specific deaths (MSD) were observed in the MKP group, whereas 2/9 (22.2%) were detected in the MUP group (P = .035). On logistic regression, the MUP status proved to be an independent predictor for a more favorable outcome under immunotherapy when compared to MKP (P = .030). Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that MUP patients show better clinical outcome under ICPI when compared to MKP.