1
|
Kodali N, Bhattaru A, Blanchard I, Sharma Y, Lipner SR. Assessing melanoma prognosis: the interplay between patient profiles, survival, and BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and TWT mutations in a retrospective multi-study analysis. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:419-428. [PMID: 38564430 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of melanoma are increasing globally, presenting a significant public health concern. The main genetic drivers of melanoma include BRAF, NRAS, KIT and triple wild-type (TWT) mutations. Little is known about the effects of these mutations on outcomes in terms of demographics and patient characteristics. We examined differences in melanoma mortality risk and mutation count across mutation type and patient disease profile. We extrapolated primary melanoma patient data from 14 studies via the cBioportal database. Patients were divided into demographic groups and classified according to BRAF, NRAS, KIT and TWT mutation status. Analyses included two-sample Student t -test and two-way analysis of variance tests analysis with Tukey's post hoc test. Survival outcomes were compared via Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression. NRAS-mutated patients exhibited decreased overall survival compared to BRAF-mutated patients. Male patients had higher mutation counts across all gene groups than females, with the fewest TWT mutations in comparison to BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations. Males also exhibited increased mortality risk for NRAS, KIT and TWT mutations compared to BRAF mutations. An unknown primary melanoma was associated with increased mortality risk across all gene groups. NRAS-mutated acral melanoma patients had an increased mortality risk compared to NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma patients. Older patients had a higher mortality risk than younger patients. Patients with heavier versus lower weights had lower mortality risk, which was more pronounced for BRAF-mutated patients. These relationships highlight the importance of demographic and pathologic relationships to aid in risk assessment and personalize treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilesh Kodali
- Department of Education, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Abhijit Bhattaru
- Department of Education, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Isabella Blanchard
- Department of Education, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Yash Sharma
- Derpartment of Education, UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Shari R Lipner
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Padilla CS, Ho VKY, Mooijenkind TWAN, Louwman MWJ, de Vos FYFL, Bekkenk MW, Minnaard WA, Loef C, van Zanten SEMV. Brain metastases in adult patients with melanoma of unknown primary in the Netherlands (2011-2020). J Neurooncol 2023; 163:239-248. [PMID: 37169949 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04335-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) have a better prognosis than similar-staged melanoma patients with known primary, the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) entails a serious complication. This study provides an overview of the incidence, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) of adult patients with BM-MUP in the Netherlands. METHODS BM-MUP cases were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient, disease and treatment-related characteristics were summarised using descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of prognostic factors on OS was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS Among 1779 MUP patients, 450 were identified as BM-MUP (25.3%). Of these patients, 381 (84.7%) presented with BM along with other metastases, while 69 (15.3%) had BM only. BM-MUP patients were predominantly male (68.2%), and had a median age of 64 years at diagnosis (interquartile range 54-71 years). Over time, the proportion of BM along other metastatic sites increased, and the occurrence of BM decreased (p = 0.01). 1-Year OS improved for the total population, from 30.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.8-40.9%) in 2011-2012 to 43.6% (95%CI: 34.5-52.3%) in 2019-2020, and median OS more than doubled from 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.3-6.2 months) to 9.8 months (95%CI: 7.0-13.2 months). Patient's age, localisation of BM, presence of synchronous liver metastasis and treatment were identified as independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION Notwithstanding the progress made in OS for patients with BM-MUP in the past decade, their overall prognosis remains poor, and further efforts are needed to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Padilla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - V K Y Ho
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T W A N Mooijenkind
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W J Louwman
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M W Bekkenk
- Department of Dermatology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam / Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Minnaard
- Missie Tumor Onbekend, Patient Organisation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Loef
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rousset P, Dalle S, Mortier L, Dereure O, Dalac S, Dutriaux C, Leccia MT, Legoupil D, Brunet-Possenti F, De Quatrebarbes J, Grob JJ, Saiag P, Maubec E, Stoebner PE, Granel-Brocard F, Arnault JP, Allayous C, Oriano B, Lebbe C, Montaudié H. Impact of systemic therapies in metastatic melanoma of unknown primary: A study from MELBASE, a French multicentric prospective cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:808-815. [PMID: 36543626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes of advanced melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) in the era of novel therapies have been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments in patients with advanced MUP compared to patients with stage-matched melanoma of known cutaneous primary (cMKP). METHODS Based on the nationwide MelBase prospective database, this study included advanced melanoma patients treated from March 2013 to June 2021 with first-line immunotherapies, targeted therapies, or chemotherapy. Co-primary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary outcome was treatment-related toxicities. Multivariate and propensity score analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 1882 patients, 265 (14.1%) had advanced MUP. Patients with advanced MUP displayed more often unfavorable initial prognostic factors than those with cMKP. Progression-free and overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (P = .73 and P = .93, respectively), as well as treatment-related toxicity rate and severity, regardless of treatment type. LIMITATIONS No record of standard diagnostic criteria of MUP used in the participating centers. CONCLUSIONS Although patients with MUP had less favorable baseline prognostic factors, they benefited from the novel therapies as much as those with cMKP. They should be managed according to similar strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Rousset
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Stéphane Dalle
- Hospices Civils De Lyon, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyion 1, Immucare, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Laurent Mortier
- Dermatology Department, University of Lille, ONCO-THAI INSERM, U1189, Lille, France
| | - Olivier Dereure
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Dalac
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Jacques Grob
- Dermatology Department, Hopital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Saiag
- AP-HP, Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, EA4340, UVSQ University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Eve Maubec
- AP-HP, Dermatology Department, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
| | | | | | | | - Clara Allayous
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Oriano
- AP-HP, Clinical Epidemiology Center, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
| | - Céleste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Henri Montaudié
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France; INSERM U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Persa OD, Mauch C. Outcomes after retreatment with MAPK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3809-3817. [PMID: 34254534 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: When patients with advanced melanoma progress after MAPK inhibitor (MAPKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, they can either undergo chemotherapy or rechallenge with previously used treatments. Methods: The outcomes of 48 patients retreated with MAPKIs and 50 patients retreated with ICIs following progression were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Upon retreatment with MAPKIs, the disease control rate was 60%. Univariate analysis of possible risk factors associated with short progression-free survival upon MAPKI treatment showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase to be associated with decreased progression-free survival. Disease control rate after ICI retreatment was 24%. Melanoma of unknown primary was associated with prolonged progression-free survival upon ICI retreatment. Conclusion: Retreatment with MAPKIs or ICIs is a feasible option for patients with advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oana D Persa
- Department of Dermatology & Venereology, Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department of Dermatology & Venereology, Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ellebaek E, Svane IM, Schmidt H, Haslund CA, Donia M, Hoejberg L, Ruhlmann C, Guldbrandt LM, Køhler UH, Bastholt L. The Danish metastatic melanoma database (DAMMED): A nation-wide platform for quality assurance and research in real-world data on medical therapy in Danish melanoma patients. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 73:101943. [PMID: 33962356 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials enroll patients with specific diseases based on certain pre-defined eligibility criteria. Disease registries are crucial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new expensive oncology medicines in broad non-trial patient populations. METHODS We provide detailed information on the structure, including variables, and the scientific results from a nation-wide Danish database covering advanced melanoma, illustrating the importance of continuous real-world data registration. Disease status and treatment-related information on all patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage III or IV melanoma candidates to medical treatment in Denmark are prospectively registered in the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED). RESULTS By January 1st, 2021, DAMMED includes 4156 patients and 7420 treatment regimens. Response rates and survival data from published randomized clinical trial data are compared with real-world efficacy data from DAMMED and presented. Overall, nine independent manuscripts highlighting similarities and discrepancies between real-world and clinical trial results are already reported to date. CONCLUSION Nation-wide disease registries take into consideration the complexity of daily clinical practice. We show a concrete example of how disease registries can complement clinical trials' information, improving clinical practice, and support health-related technology assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Ellebaek
- Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Henrik Schmidt
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Marco Donia
- Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lise Hoejberg
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rassy E, Boussios S, Chebly A, Farra C, Kattan J, Pavlidis N. Comparative genomic characterization of melanoma of known and unknown primary. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:2302-2308. [PMID: 33934271 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to genomically characterize melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) in comparison to melanomas of cutaneous primary (MCP). METHODS Eligible cases were collected from the MSK-IMPACT™ Clinical Sequencing Cohort published in the cBioPortal database. Genomic analysis was performed using a hybridization-capture-based next-generation sequencing assay designed to detect mutations, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and genomic rearrangements. RESULTS Among 462 patients of whom 18.4% had MUP, brain metastasis was more common among patients with MUP (23% vs 7.1%). The differences in genomic profiling between MCP and MUP did not reach statistical significance. The 187 MCP and 44 MUP patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had a median overall survival of 49 and 44 months, respectively (p = 0.705). CONCLUSIONS The differences in somatic mutation patterns and survival outcomes were not statistically significant. These findings may allude to similar carcinogenic processes but should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rassy
- Gustave Roussy, Département de médecine oncologique, 94805, Villejuif, France. .,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - S Boussios
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.,Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, UK.,AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki, Thermi, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Chebly
- Medical Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - C Farra
- Medical Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.,Department of Genetics, Hotel Dieu de France Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - J Kattan
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - N Pavlidis
- University of Ioannina, 45110, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clinical outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma of unknown primary in the era of novel therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:3123-3135. [PMID: 33774697 PMCID: PMC8505371 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02871-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is considered different from melanoma of known primary (MKP), and it is unclear whether these patients benefit equally from novel therapies. In the current study, characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and metastatic MUP and MKP were compared in the era of novel therapy. Patients were selected from the prospective nation-wide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). The following criteria were applied: diagnosis of stage IIIc unresectable or IV cutaneous MKP (cMKP) or MUP between July 2012 and July 2017 and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition and/or targeted therapy. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The stratified multivariable Cox regression model was used for adjusted analysis. A total of 2706 patients were eligible including 2321 (85.8%) patients with cMKP and 385 (14.2%) with MUP. In comparative analysis, MUP patients more often presented with advanced and metastatic disease at primary diagnosis with poorer performance status, higher LDH, and central nervous system metastases. In crude analysis, median OS of cMKP or MUP patients was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5 – 44) and 14 months (IQR 5 – not reached), respectively (P = 0.278). In adjusted analysis, OS in MUP patients was superior (hazard rate 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.85; P < 0.001). As compared to patients with advanced and metastatic cMKP, MUP patients have superior survival in adjusted analysis, but usually present with poorer prognostic characteristics. In crude analysis, OS was comparable indicating that patients with MUP benefit at least equally from treatment with novel therapies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Boussios S, Rassy E, Samartzis E, Moschetta M, Sheriff M, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pavlidis N. Melanoma of unknown primary: New perspectives for an old story. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 158:103208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
9
|
Bol KF, Donia M, Heegaard S, Kiilgaard JF, Svane IM. Genetic Biomarkers in Melanoma of the Ocular Region: What the Medical Oncologist Should Know. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21155231. [PMID: 32718045 PMCID: PMC7432371 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma of the ocular region (ocular melanoma) comprises about 5% of all patients with melanoma and covers posterior uveal melanoma, iris melanoma, and conjunctival melanoma. The risk of metastasis is much higher in patients with ocular melanoma compared to a primary melanoma of the skin. The subtypes of ocular melanoma have distinct genetic features, which should be taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. Most relevant for current practice is the absence of BRAF mutations in posterior uveal melanoma, although present in some iris melanomas and conjunctival melanomas. In this review, we discuss the genetic biomarkers of the subtypes of ocular melanoma and their impacts on the clinical care of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalijn Fredrike Bol
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.F.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Marco Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.F.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (S.H.); (J.F.K.)
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Folke Kiilgaard
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (S.H.); (J.F.K.)
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.F.B.); (M.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +45-3868-9339
| |
Collapse
|