DNA methylation markers as triage test for the early identification of cervical lesions in a Chinese population

Performance of a six-methylation-marker assay in predicting LEEP specimen histology results of cervical HSIL patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies have been found between preoperative colposcopic biopsy results and histology results of loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens. GynTect® is a six-methylation-marker assay that has demonstrated its potential as a triage tool for cervical lesion detection and prediction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of GynTect® in predicting the histology outcomes of post-LEEP specimens.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical profiles, GynTect® results, and histology outcomes of postoperative specimens from 78 patients diagnosed with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) who underwent LEEP. The GynTect® assay is a six-marker (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671) methylation detection assay for cervical prep cell samples. Preoperative cervical cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection, and methylation analysis were obtained from each participant. Preoperative colposcopic impression and biopsy results were recorded. Statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.

RESULTS

Among the negative-GynTect® patients, 19 cases (57.6%) showed histology downgrading post-LEEP, while 14 cases (42.4%) showed sustained or upgrading histology results. In the positive-GynTect® patients, 8 cases (17.8%) showed downgrading histology results post-LEEP and 37 cases (82.2%) showed sustained or upgrading histology. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified positive GynTect® outcomes and colposcopic impressions indicating HSIL on the day of surgery as independent predictors of pathological sustained or upgrading after LEEP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the potential of GynTect® in predicting histology outcomes of post-LEEP specimens, thereby showcasing its promising ability to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate therapeutic regimens for patients with HSIL.

Identification of a novel hypermethylation marker, ZSCAN18, and construction of a diagnostic model in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer (CC), a common female malignancy, has been linked to alterations in DNA methylation. This study employed an integrated "dry-wet lab" strategy combining bioinformatics, machine learning, and experimental validation to identify novel methylation biomarkers for CC.

METHODS

Methylome and transcriptome data from the TCGA and GEO cohorts (n=349 discovery, n=414 validation) were analyzed to identify differentially methylated CpGs. The top candidates were validated by pyrosequencing, methylation-specific PCR, and quantitative assays. Diagnostic models were developed, and functional studies were performed for the target markers.

RESULTS

Eighteen differentially methylated CpGs were identified, with five top candidates (three in the ZSCAN18 promoter) showing diagnostic potential. ZSCAN18 promoter methylation levels and positivity rates were significantly greater in CC tissues than in normal tissues (p<0.05), reaching 77.8% (21/27) in ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) samples. The ridge regression diagnostic model achieved an AUC of 0.9421 in the validation cohort. Similarly, ZSCAN18 overexpression suppressed CC cell proliferation (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a rapid, effective and systematic systemic research strategy to screen novel methylation markers for CC. ZSCAN18 promoter methylation correlates with cervical lesion severity, and the diagnostic model enhances the diagnostic ability. These findings highlight the dual role of ZSCAN18 as a diagnostic marker and potential therapeutic target.

Clinical indications for host-cell DNA methylation markers in cervical screening and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A review

DNA methylation of host-cell genes is an epigenetic process that regulates gene expression and is associated with cervical cancer development. Studies on the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the molecular alterations associated with cervical carcinogenesis led to the identification of several host-cell DNA methylation markers. Over the past years, various studies on methylation markers have shown promising results in terms of diagnostic and prognostic value to improve cervical cancer screening and management of CIN. This review provides an overview of the clinical indications of host-cell DNA methylation markers in cervical screening and management of CIN, and outlines avenues for further applications.

DNA methylation at individual CpG-sites of EPB41L3, HTERT and FAM19A4 are useful for detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or worse: Analysis of individual CpG-sites outperforms averaging

Global methylation analysis of gene promoters is promising for detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) in high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women. However, diagnostic performance of methylation data at individual CpG-sites is limited. We explored methylation for predicting HSIL+ in self- and clinician-collected samples from Papua New Guinea. Methylation of EPB41L3 (1-6 CpG-sites), hTERT (1-10 CpG-sites) and FAM19A4 (1-5 CpG-sites) was assessed through pyrosequencing from 44 HPV+ samples (4 cancers, 19 HSIL, 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 17 normal). New primers were designed for FAM19A4 directed to the first exon region not explored previously. In clinician-collected samples, methylation at CpG-sites 4 and 5 of EPB41L3 were the best HSIL predictors (AUC >0.83) and CpG-site 4 for cancer (0.925). Combination of EPB41L3 sites 2/4 plus FAM19A4 site 1 were the best HSIL+ markers [100% sensitivity, 63.2% specificity]. Methylation at CpG-site 5 of FAM19A4 was the best HSIL predictor (0.67) in self-collected samples, and CpG-sites 1 and 3 of FAM19A4 for cancer (0.77). Combined, FAM19A4 site 1 plus HPV 16/18 detection yielded sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 61.9%. In conclusion, methylation at individual CpG-sites of EPB41L3 and FAM19A4 outperformed global analysis and improved HSIL+ detection, warranting further investigation.

Triage performance of DNA methylation for women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection

OBJECTIVE

DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for cervical cancer screening. This study aimed to validate the triage performance of cytological DNA methylation for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) in women with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection from a large prospective cohort undergoing opportunistic screening in China (METHY3).

METHODS

The triage performance for detecting CIN3+ lesions was compared between HPV16/18 genotyping, a liquid-based cytology (LBC) test, and the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test according to cervical pathologic outcomes. Among the 4394 women infected with hrHPV, 1105 had definitive cervical histological findings that were analyzed.

RESULTS

For detecting CIN3+, the specificity of HPV16/18(+), the LBC result of ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) was 66.4%, 23.9%, and 89.6%, respectively, with odds ratios of 4.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.85-6.40), 4.44 (2.27-10.1), and 18.5 (12.1-28.7) (P < .001), respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m(+) had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.790, 95% CI, 0.747-0.832) in the whole cohort and in women of various ages. PAX1m/JAM3m (+) was detected in all patients with cancer (n = 28). Compared with HPV16/18 genotyping and the LBC test, PAX1m/JAM3m testing reduced referrals to colposcopy by 20.64 percentage points and 61.18 percentage points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX1 m /JAM3 m testing is highly specific for detecting CIN3+. As a triage biomarker, it is superior to HPV 16/18 genotyping and LBC testing for women with hrHPV infection.

Autoimmunity related to anti-Nax and anti-ZSCAN1 autoantibodies in adipsic hypernatremia

"Adipsic hypernatremia" is clinically characterized by chronic elevation of plasma [Na+] with an inappropriate lack of thirst and upward resetting of the osmotic set point for arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion, combined with a relative deficiency of AVP, thereby resulting in persistent hypernatremia. Many cases are accompanied by structural lesions in the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and circumventricular organs (CVOs). On the other hand, cases without structural lesions have been reported since the 1970s, but the pathophysiology was unknown for a long time. In 2010, Hiyama et al. reported that an anti-Nax antibody response caused adipsic hypernatremia in a pediatric case with ganglioblastoma. In recent years, advances in clinical research have led researchers to recognize that an autoimmunological pathogenic mechanism might be associated with periventricular organs such as the subfornical organ (SFO). In addition, in pediatric cases diagnosed as ROHHAD (rapid-onset obesity with hypoventilation, hypothalamic dysfunction, autonomic dysregulation) syndrome, it has been reported that half of the cases have abnormal serum Na levels, and some research findings indicated an autoimmune mechanism acting on the organs of the hypothalamus and CVOs. Then, anti-ZSCAN1 antibody response was detected in cases diagnosed as ROHHAD-NET in 2022. In this review, by summarizing a series of studies on Nax and ZSCAN1, which are expressed in the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and SFO, I would like to describe the current findings of the autoimmune pathogenesis of adipsic hypernatremia.

Comprehensive insights into human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: Pathophysiology, screening, and vaccination strategies

This article provides an in-depth review of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), a predominant etiological factor in cervical cancer, exploring its pathophysiology, epidemiology, and mechanisms of oncogenesis. We examine the role of proteins, DNA methylation markers, and non-coding RNAs as predictive biomarkers in cervical cancer, highlighting their potential in refining diagnostic and prognostic practices. The evolution and efficacy of cervical cancer screening methods, including the Papanicolaou smear, HPV testing, cytology and HPV test, and colposcopy techniques, are critically analyzed. Furthermore, the article delves into the current landscape and future prospects of prophylactic HPV vaccines and therapeutic vaccines, underscoring their significance in the prevention and potential treatment of HPV-related diseases. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize recent advances and ongoing challenges in the field, providing a foundation for future research and clinical strategies in the prevention and management of cervical cancer.

Triage performance of PAX1m/JAM3m in opportunistic cervical cancer screening of non‒16/18 human papillomavirus-positive women: a multicenter prospective study in China

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).

METHODS

The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1m/JAM3m(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1m/JAM3m(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1m/JAM3m was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.

PAX1 and SOX1 Gene Methylation as a Detection and Triage Method for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Methylation assays have demonstrated potential as dependable and high-precision approaches for identifying or triaging individuals with cervical cancer (CA) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Our investigation aimed to assess the efficacy of the diagnosis and triage of the PAX1/SOX1 methylation panel in detecting CIN or CA.

METHODS

A total of 461 patients with abnormal high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) or cytology test results were recruited for this study. Each patient underwent an assortment of assessments, comprising a cytology test, hrHPV test, colposcopy examination, and PAX1 and SOX1 methylation tests.

RESULTS

The extent of methylation of both genes demonstrates a positive correlation with the severity of CIN lesions and CA. To determine the correlation for patients with CIN2 or worse (CIN2+), the area under curve was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.782-0.853) for PAX1 and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.766-0.838) for SOX1, while for CIN3 or worse (CIN3+), 0.881 (95% CI: 0.839-0.908) for PAX1 and 0.867 (95% CI: 0.830-0.901) for SOX1. The PAX1/SOX1 methylation marker panel performed sensitivity and specificity of 77.16% and 91.67% for CIN2+, 84.76% and 90.50% for CIN3+, respectively. Regarding triaging hrHPV+ patients, the PAX1/SOX1 methylation test only referred 11.83% of the patients who are unnecessary for colonoscopy examination, which is comparatively lower than cytology, thereby signifying a promising triage strategy for hrHPV-positive women. Furthermore, we observed that the positive PAX1/SOX1 methylation test result for untreated CIN1 or fewer patients would result in a higher likelihood of progression upon a 24-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation demonstrates that the PAX1/SOX1 methylation marker panel exhibits favorable diagnostic performance in CIN detection and holds the potential to be employed for individual CIN tests or hrHPV-positive triage.

Performance of DNA methylation analysis in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+): a cross-sectional study

It is commonly accepted that host genes show high methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3) or worse (CIN3+). However, study quality varies, as does the clinical performance of markers in different populations. We aimed to validate candidate gene DNA methylation with standardized testing methods in the same batch of samples. We first compared the performance of 16 DNA methylation markers for detecting CIN3+ in the 82-sample training set, including 24 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 10 subjects with CIN2, 23 subjects with CIN3, and 25 subjects with cervical cancer (CC). Then five methylation markers were selected and subsequently validated among an independent set of 74 subjects, including 47 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 13 subjects with CIN2, 6 subjects with CIN3, and 8 subjects with CC. The results in the validation set revealed that methylation analysis of the SOX1 (SOX1m) showed a superior level of clinical performance (AUC = 0.879; sensitivity = 85.7%; specificity = 90.0%). SOX1m had better accuracy than cytology, with a reduced referral rate (23.0% vs. 31.4%) and a lower number of overtreatment (5 vs. 13) cases among high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women. Importantly, among hrHPV-positive and SOX1m-negative women, only 1 CIN3 patient was at risk for follow-up after 1 year, whereas 1 CIN3 patient and 1 CC patient were at risk among hrHPV-positive and cytology-negative women. In this investigation, we screened 16 reported methylation markers to provide a basis for future studies related to potential precancerous lesion/cancer methylation markers in the Chinese population. The study also revealed that SOX1m has optimal CIN3+ detection performance, suggesting that it may be a promising biomarker for detecting CIN3+ in the Chinese population.

Cytological DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a validation set

Background

In a previous training set with a case-controlled design, cutoff values for host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation were obtained for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). This validation trial was conducted to evaluate the role of DNA methylation in screening for CIN2+ by cervical cytology among unselected participants.

Methods

From June 1, 2019, to September 1, 2019, in our study center, we collected liquid-based samples from cervical swabs for methylation assays and hrHPV testing in eligible patients. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation and hrHPV genotyping for CIN2+ according to confirmed histology results.

Results

Among 307 participants, compared with hrHPV testing, the methylation assay for CIN2+ had lower sensitivity (68.7% versus 86.1%, p=0.002) but higher specificity (96.7% versus 0.696, p<0.001). The methylation assay also had favorable sensitivity and specificity in patients with negative hrHPV testing (56.3% and 96.9%) and in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (73.7% and 92.7%). DNA methylation had higher specificity than the hrHPV assay (100.0% versus 44.4%, p<0.001) for identifying residual CIN2+ in patients without residual lesions. Positive cervical DNA methylation was associated with a diagnostic probability of endometrial carcinoma (odds ratio 15.5 [95% confidence interval 4.1-58.6]) but not of ovarian epithelial carcinoma (1.4 [0.3-6.5]).

Conclusions

The host EPB41L3 and JAM3 gene methylation assay in cervical cytology had favorable diagnostic accuracy for CIN2+ and was highly specific for residual CIN2+ lesions The methylation assay is a promising triage tool in hrHPV+ women, or even an independent tool for cervical cancer screening. The methylation status in cervical cytology could also serve as a prognostic biomarker. Its role in detecting endometrial carcinomas is worthy of further exploration.

DNA methylation as a triage marker for colposcopy referral in HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Screening plays a key role in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing, a highly sensitive test but with limited specificity, has become the gold standard frontline for screening programs. Thus, the importance of effective triage strategies, including DNA methylation markers, has been emphasized. Despite the potential reported in individual studies, methylation markers still require validation before being recommended for clinical practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of DNA methylation-based biomarkers for detecting high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in hrHPV-positive women.

METHODS

Hence, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that assessed methylation in hrHPV-positive women in cervical scrapes. Histologically confirmed HSIL was used as endpoint and QUADAS-2 tool enabled assessment of study quality. A bivariate random-effect model was employed to pool the estimated sensitivity and specificity as well as positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in this meta-analysis, from which cohort and referral population-based studies corresponded to nearly 65%. Most of the women analyzed were Dutch, and CADM1, FAM19A4, MAL, and miR124-2 were the most studied genes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (CI 95% 0.63-0.72) and 0.75 (CI 95% 0.71-0.80) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection, respectively. For CIN3+ detection, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (CI 95% 0.74-0.82) and 0.74 (CI 95% 0.69-0.78), respectively. For pooled prevalence, PPV for CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection were 0.514 and 0.392, respectively. Furthermore, NPV for CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection were 0.857 and 0.938, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed the great potential of DNA methylation-based biomarkers as triage tool for hrHPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening. Standardization and improved validation are, however, required. Nevertheless, these markers might represent an excellent alternative to cytology and genotyping for colposcopy referral of hrHPV-positive women, allowing for more cost-effective screening programs.

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of MCM3 in ThinPrep Samples of Patients with Cervical Preinvasive Cancer

Triage methods for cervical cancer detection show moderate accuracy and present considerable false-negative and false-positive result rates. A complementary diagnostic parameter could help improve the accuracy of identifying patients who need treatment. A pilot study was performed using a targeted proteomics approach with opportunistic ThinPrep samples obtained from women collected at the hospital's outpatient clinic to determine the concentration levels of minichromosome maintenance-3 (MCM3) and envoplakin (EVPL) proteins. Forty samples with 'negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy' (NILM), 21 samples with 'atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance' (ASC-US), and 33 samples with 'low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and worse' (≥LSIL) were analyzed, using cytology and the patients' histology reports. Highly accurate concordance was obtained for gold-standard-confirmed samples, demonstrating that the MCM3/EVPL ratio can discriminate between non-dysplastic and dysplastic samples. On that account, we propose that MCM3 and EVPL are promising candidate protein biomarkers for population-based cervical cancer screening.

Zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 1, ZSCAN1, is a novel stemness-related tumor suppressor and transcriptional repressor in breast cancer targeting TAZ

Introduction

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) targeted therapy holds the potential for improving cancer management; identification of stemness-related genes in CSCs is necessary for its development.

Methods

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets were used for survival analysis. ZSCAN1 correlated genes was identified by Spearman correlation analysis. Breast cancer stem-like cells (BCSLCs) were isolated by sorting CD44+CD24- cells from suspension cultured breast cancer (BC) spheroids. The sphere-forming capacity and sphere- and tumor-initiating capacities were determined by sphere formation and limiting dilution assays. The relative gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR, western blot. Lentivirus system was used for gene manipulation. Nuclear run-on assay was employed to examine the levels of nascent mRNAs. DNA pull-down and Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used for determining the interaction between protein and target DNA fragments. Luciferase reporter assay was used for evaluating the activity of the promoter.

Results and discussion

ZSCAN1 is aberrantly suppressed in BC, and this suppression indicates a bad prognosis. Ectopic expression of ZSCAN1 inhibited the proliferation, clonogenicity, and tumorigenicity of BC cells. ZSCAN1-overexpressing BCSLCs exhibited weakened stemness properties. Normal human mammary epithelial (HMLE) cells with ZSCAN1 depletion exhibited enhanced stemness properties. Mechanistic studies showed that ZSCAN1 directly binds to -951 ~ -925bp region of WWTR1 (encodes TAZ) promoter, inhibits WWTR1 transcription, thereby inhibiting the stemness of BCSCs. Our work thus revealed ZSCAN1 as a novel stemness-related tumor suppressor and transcriptional repressor in BC.

Triage performance and predictive value of the human gene methylation panel among women positive on self-collected HPV test: Results from a prospective cohort study

Triaging of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) on self-collected samples requires a molecular reflex test to avoid recall for cytology or visual tests. We assessed triage performance and predictive value of human gene methylation panel (ZNF671/ASTN1/ITGA4/RXFP3/SOX17/DLX1) alone and with combination of HPV16/18 genotyping in a longitudinal screening study. Out of 9526 women at baseline, 1758 women positive for hrHPV on self-collected samples followed up yearly were included in the current analysis. Satisfactory risk stratification to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) was demonstrated by the methylation panel with an odds ratio (OR) of 11.3 among methylation-positive women compared to methylation-negative counterparts. Triaging with methylation panel reduced colposcopy referral rate by 67.2% with sensitivity and specificity of 83.0% and 69.9% to detect CIN2+. The corresponding values for the combining methylation and HPV 16/18 were 96.6% and 58.3%. The cumulative 3-year incident CIN2+ risk was 6.8% (95% CI: 4.9%-8.6%) for hrHPV positive women, which was reduced to 4.5% (95% CI: 2.7%-6.3%) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.2%-4.5%) for women negative on methylation triaging alone and negative on the combined strategy. The corresponding risk for women positive for both methylation and HPV 16/18 reached 33.7% (95% CI: 19.0%-45.8%). Our study demonstrated the satisfactory triage performance and predictive value of the methylation panel, especially in combination with HPV 16/18 genotyping. The substantially lower risk of CIN2+ among the triage negative women over the next 3 years suggests that the interval for repeat HPV test can be safely extended to at least 2 years.

miR-127-5p Targets JAM3 to Regulate Ferroptosis, Proliferation, and Metastasis in Malignant Meningioma Cells

Objective

Meningiomas are one of the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system. Most of them are benign and can be cured by surgery, while a few meningiomas are malignant. Ferroptosis gene characteristics might be associated with drug therapy and survival in patients with clinically aggressive, unresectable meningiomas. This study explored the mechanism of differentially expressed miRNAs and ferroptosis in meningioma to provide a new reference to treat meningioma.

Methods

Bioinformatics analysis of differential miRNA profiles and functions in patients with meningioma was performed. The contents of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and Fe²⁺ were determined. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) values, as well as cell cycle changes, were analyzed by flow cytometry. The targets of miR-127-5p and JAM3 were detected by dual luciferase assays. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and Transwell assays were used to analyze cell activity. Ki67 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Expression levels of miR-127-5p and JAM3 were analyzed by RT-qPCR. GPX4 expression was quantified by western blotting.

Results

miR-127-5p was expressed at low levels in IOMM-Lee cells, while JAM3 was highly expressed in IOMM-Lee cells. A dual luciferase assay demonstrated that miR-127-5p could target JAM3. Upregulation of miR-127-5p in IOMM-Lee cells resulted in cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell activity. Upregulation of miR-127-5p increased LDH, MDA, and ROS levels and Fe²⁺ content and inhibited the expression of GPX4 protein. Upregulation of JAM3 reversed the results of miR-127-5p upregulation.

Conclusion

miR-127-5p regulated meningioma formation and ferroptosis through JAM3, providing insights for the development of new treatments for meningioma.

Epigenetic and Transcriptomic Regulation Landscape in HPV+ Cancers: Biological and Clinical Implications

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is an oncogenic virus that causes the highest number of viral-associated cancer cases and deaths worldwide, with more than 690,000 new cases per year and 342,000 deaths only for cervical cancer (CC). Although the incidence and mortality rates for CC are declining in countries where screening and vaccination programs have been implemented, other types of cancer in which HPV is involved, such as oropharyngeal cancer, are increasing, particularly in men. Mutational and transcriptional profiles of various HPV-associated neoplasms have been described, and accumulated evidence has shown the oncogenic capacity of E6, E7, and E5 genes of high-risk HPV. Interestingly, transcriptomic analysis has revealed that although a vast majority of the human genome is transcribed into RNAs, only 2% of transcripts are translated into proteins. The remaining transcripts lacking protein-coding potential are called non-coding RNAs. In addition to the transfer and ribosomal RNAs, there are regulatory non-coding RNAs classified according to size and structure in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and small RNAs; such as microRNAs (miRNAs), piwi-associated RNAs (piRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and endogenous short-interfering RNAs. Recent evidence has shown that lncRNAs, miRNAs, and circRNAs are aberrantly expressed under pathological conditions such as cancer. In addition, those transcripts are dysregulated in HPV-related neoplasms, and their expression correlates with tumor progression, metastasis, poor prognosis, and recurrence. Nuclear lncRNAs are epigenetic regulators involved in controlling gene expression at the transcriptional level through chromatin modification and remodeling. Moreover, disruption of the expression profiles of those lncRNAs affects multiple biological processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration. This review highlights the epigenetic alterations induced by HPV, from infection to neoplastic transformation. We condense the epigenetic role of non-coding RNA alterations and their potential as biomarkers in transformation's early stages and clinical applications. We also summarize the molecular mechanisms of action of nuclear lncRNAs to understand better their role in the epigenetic control of gene expression and how they can drive the malignant phenotype of HPV-related neoplasia. Finally, we review several chemical and epigenetic therapy options to prevent and treat HPV-associated neoplasms.

Histone Deacetylation Regulated by KDM1A to Suppress DACT1 in Proliferation and Migration of Cervical Cancer

Objective

Increased expression of KDM1A and decreased expression of DACT1 in cervical cancer cells were noticed in a previous study. This study is aimed at exploring the mechanism behind the KDM1A regulation on DACT1 in cervical cancer cells.

Methods

The expression profile of KDM1A and DACT1 in cervical cancer tissues was searched in TCGA database. In vitro experiments verified the effect of KDM1A and DACT1 on proliferation and migration ability of cervical cancer cell lines after cell transfection. The interaction of KDM1A with HDAC1 was identified by coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP). The expression levels of KDM1A and DACT1 in cervical cancer cell lines were determined by qRT-PCR and western blot.

Results

TCGA database showed that cervical cancer tissues had elevated expression of KDM1A and decreased expression of DACT1, which was consistent with the observation in cervical cancer cell lines. KDM1A was found to negatively regulate DACT1 through histone deacetylation. Meanwhile, the downregulation of KDM1A or overexpression of DACT1 could suppress the cell proliferation and migration ability in HeLa and SiHa cells. Cotransfection of KDM1A and DACT1 overexpression could reverse the increased cell proliferation and migration ability induced by KDM1A overexpression.

Conclusion

KDM1A can downregulate DACT1 expression through histone deacetylation and therefore suppress the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells.

DNA methylation markers as triage test for the early identification of cervical lesions in a Chinese population

Objective strategies are required in cervical cancer screening. We have identified several DNA methylation markers with high sensitivity and specificity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse (CIN2+) in Dutch women. Our study aims to analyze the diagnostic characteristics of these markers in a Chinese cohort. A total of 246 liquid-based cytology samples were included, of which 205 women underwent colposcopy due to an abnormal cytology result (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] or worse), while 227 were tested high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positive. All six individual markers (ANKRD18CP, C13ORF18, EPB41L3, JAM3, SOX1 and ZSCAN1) showed enhanced methylation levels and frequency with increasing severity of the underlying lesion (P ≤ .001). In cytological abnormal women, sensitivity to detect CIN2+ was 79%, 76% and 72% for the three panels (C13ORF18/EBP41L3/JAM3, C13ORF18/ANKRD18CP/JAM3 and ZSCAN1/SOX1, respectively), with a specificity of 57%, 65% and 68%. For the first two panels, these diagnostic characteristics were similar to the Dutch cohort, while for ZSCAN1/SOX1 the sensitivity was higher in the Chinese cohort, but with a lower specificity (both P < .05). In hrHPV-positive samples, similar sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2+ were found as for the abnormal cytology cohort, which were now all similar between both cohorts and non-inferior to HPV16/18 genotyping. Our analysis reveals that the diagnostic performances are highly comparable for C13ORF18/EBP41L3/JAM3 and C13ORF18/ANKRD18CP/JAM3 methylation marker panels in both Chinese and Dutch cohorts. In conclusion, methylation panels identified in a Dutch population are also applicable for triage testing in cervical cancer screening in China.