Survival outcomes of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer concomitantly receiving proton pump inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

FGL1: a novel biomarker and target for non-small cell lung cancer, promoting tumor progression and metastasis through KDM4A/STAT3 transcription mechanism

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is characterized by a high incidence rate and poor prognosis worldwide. A deeper insight into the pathogenesis of NSCLC and identification of novel therapeutic targets are essential to improve the prognosis of NSCLC. In this study, we revealed that fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC cells. Mechanistically, we found that Stat3 acts as a transcription factor and can be recruited to the FGL1 promoter, enhancing FGL1 promoter activity. Lysine-specific demethylase 4A (KDM4A) interacts with Stat3 and facilitates the removal of methyl groups from H3K9me3, thereby enhancing Stat3-mediated transcription of FGL1. Furthermore, we observed that Stat3 and KDM4A promote NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion partly by upregulating FGL1 expression. Additionally, the expression of FGL1 was significantly higher in cancer tissues (n = 90) than in adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 90). Furthermore, patients with high FGL1 expression had a shorter overall survival (OS) compared to those with low FGL1 expression. We measured the expression levels of FGL1 on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in 65 patients and found that patients with a dynamic decrease in FGL1 expression on CTCs exhibited a better therapeutic response. These findings suggest that the dynamic changes in FGL1 expression can serve as a potential biomarker for predicting treatment efficacy in NSCLC. Overall, this study revealed the significant role and regulatory mechanisms of FGL1 in the development of NSCLC, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for patients with NSCLC. Future studies should provide more personalized and effective treatment options for patients with NSCLC to improve clinical outcomes.

Gut Microbiota Are a Novel Source of Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Despite the recent availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors, not all patients affected by Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) benefit from immunotherapy. The reason for this variability relies on a variety of factors which may allow for the identification of novel biomarkers. Presently, a variety of biomarkers are under investigation, including the PD1/PDL1 axis, the tumor mutational burden, and the microbiota. The latter is made by all the bacteria and other microorganisms hosted in our body. The gut microbiota is the most represented and has been involved in different physiological and pathological events, including cancer. In this light, it appears that all conditions modifying the gut microbiota can influence cancer, its treatment, and its treatment-related toxicities. The aim of this review is to analyze all the conditions influencing the gut microbiota and, therefore, affecting the response to immunotherapy, iRAEs, and their management in NSCLC patients. The investigation of the landscape of these biological events can allow for novel insights into the optimal management of NSCLC immunotherapy.

Diagnosis and management of immune mediated liver injury from checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to summarize the latest data on the incidence, clinical manifestations, and management of immune- mediated liver injury from checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI).

RECENT FINDINGS

ILICI develops in 10-15% of oncology patients receiving immunotherapy with most having asymptomatic serum aminotransferase and/or alkaline phosphatase elevations. Most grade 1-2 ILICI patients improve with drug discontinuation and/or short-term oral corticosteroids. In contrast, the 2-3% with grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity frequently require oral or intravenous corticosteroids and some are hospitalized to initiate further immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. Liver biopsy is generally reserved for patients with atypical features or those with severe hepatotoxicity who fail to respond to treatment. Up to 3% of ILICI patients with a cholestatic profile have MRI evidence of intra or extrahepatic cholangitis that responds poorly to immunosuppression. Most ILICI patients improve during follow-up and liver-related death is very uncommon (<1%). Up to 30% of rechallenged ILICI patients develop recurrent hepatotoxicity with a shorter latency.

SUMMARY

ILICI is increasingly encountered by gastroenterologists evaluating oncology patients with abnormal liver biochemistries. A stepwise approach to exclude viral hepatitis, alcohol, hepatic metastases, and pancreaticobiliary disease is recommended. The majority of ILICI patients fully recover with ICI discontinuation and short-term corticosteroids or a second line immunosuppressant.

Impact of concurrent medications on clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: analysis of Health Insurance Review and Assessment data

PURPOSE

Medications regulating immune homeostasis and gut microbiota could affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent medications on the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer receiving ICI therapy in South Korea.

METHODS

We identified patients newly treated with ICI for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and malignant melanoma (MM) between August 2017 and June 2020 from a nationwide database in Korea. The effect of concurrent antibiotics (ATBs), corticosteroids (CSs), proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), and opioids prescribed within 30 days before ICI initiation on the treatment duration and survival was assessed.

RESULTS

In all, 8870 patients were included in the ICI cohort (NSCLC, 7,128; UC, 960; MM, 782). The patients were prescribed ATBs (33.8%), CSs (47.8%), PPIs (28.5%), and opioids (53.1%) at the baseline. The median overall survival durations were 11.1, 12.2, and 22.1 months in NSCLC, UC, and MM subgroups, respectively, since starting the ICI mostly as second-line (NSCLC and UC) and first-line (MM) therapy. Early progression was observed in 34.2% of the patients. Opioids and CS were strongly associated with poor survival across all cancer types. A high number of concurrent medications was associated with early progression and short survival. Opioid and CS use was associated with poor prognosis in all patients treated with ICIs. However, ATBs and PPIs had a cancer-specific effect on survival.

CONCLUSION

A high number of concurrent medications was associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Proton pump inhibitors associated with an increased risk of mortality in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The increased use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the elderly has raised concerns about potential severe adverse effects. Our systematic review investigated the mortality associated with PPI use in elderly populations.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant publications until August 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and observational studies on the association between proton pump inhibitors and mortality in the elderly. To estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), the inverse-variance random effect model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Subgroup analyses were performed by follow-up period, population, and study design.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs and 36 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Four RCTs showed that there was no significant association between PPIs and the risk of death. From 23 observational studies (26 cohorts), the use of proton pump inhibitors was not significantly associated with increased mortality in the elderly (RR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.90-1.45). However, when controlling for covariates from 33 observational studies (41 cohorts), proton pump inhibitors in older adults aged 50 years or more were significantly associated with a 15% higher risk of mortality compared to nonusers (RR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis of RCTs found that PPIs did not show a significant association with increased mortality risk in older adults. However, the meta-analysis of cohort studies and long-term follow-up studies showed a higher increased risk of death with PPI use in older adults. The prescription of PPIs in patients aged 50 years or older should be carefully considered.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.

METHODS

Data from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Comedications with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Involvement of the Microbiota, Impact on Efficacy and Practical Implications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a major breakthrough in solid oncology over the past decade. The immune system and the gut microbiota are involved in their complex mechanisms of action. However, drug interactions have been suspected of disrupting the fine equilibrium necessary for optimal ICI efficacy. Thus, clinicians are facing a great deal of sometimes contradictory information on comedications with ICIs and must at times oppose conflicting objectives between oncological response and comorbidities or complications. We compiled in this review published data on the role of the microbiota in ICI efficacy and the impact of comedications. We found mostly concordant results on detrimental action of concurrent corticosteroids, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors. The timeframe seems to be an important variable each time to preserve an initial immune priming at ICIs initiation. Other molecules have been associated with improved or impaired ICIs outcomes in pre-clinical models with discordant conclusions in retrospective clinical studies. We gathered the results of the main studies concerning metformin, aspirin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, opioids, and statins. In conclusion, one should always assess the necessity of concomitant treatment according to evidence-based recommendations and discuss the possibility of postponing ICI initiation or switching strategies to preserve the critical window.

Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure

New concepts and drugs have revolutionized medical treatment for cancers. These drugs, which are very expensive and usually well tolerated, have dramatically improved cancer prognosis. We must use them wisely for patients to fully benefit. Gastric acid antisecretory drugs and particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionized the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and severe gastroesophageal reflux, but are frequently overused for symptomatic treatment of epigastric pain or heartburn. Long-term acid suppression may alter the efficacy of many anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by either decreasing gastric acid secretion and thus drug absorption, or by modifying the gut microbiome that modulates the response to ICIs. Oncologists thus need to pay particular attention to the concomitant use of PPIs and anticancer drugs. These interactions translate into major clinical impacts, with demonstrated loss of efficacy for some TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib), and conflicting results with many other oral drugs, including capecitabine and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, the profound changes in the gut microbiome due to using PPIs have shown that the benefit of using ICIs may be suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. The first sentence of a recent Comment in Nature was "Every day, millions of people are taking medications that will not help them". We fear that every day millions of cancer patients are taking medications that harm them. While this may well be only association and not causation, there is enough to make us pause until we reach a clear answer. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

Effect of Antacid Use on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The influence of antacids use on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on ICI efficacy in advanced solid cancer patients. A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to retrieve studies investigating the effect of antacid use on ICI efficacy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse events were measured using hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs). Thirty studies enrolling 16,147 advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were included. The pooled analysis indicated that PPI use was associated with shorter OS (HR=1.40, 95% CI, 1.25-1.57) and PFS (HR=1.34, 95% CI, 1.19-1.52) in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. PPI use did not show effect on ORR or immune-related adverse event of advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. OS, PFS, and ORR did not differ between H2RA users and non-H2RA users. In subgroup analyses, PPI use was associated with shorter OS and PFS in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma patients and in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy. In addition, ICI efficacy was different in the antacid exposure time frame subgroups. In conclusion, PPI use has a negative effect on OS and PFS among advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. PPIs should be cautiously administered among advanced cancer patients treated with ICI. The safety of H2RAs and the influence of H2RAs on ICI efficacy need further investigation.

Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis

Introduction

Gut microbiota can significantly affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. Recently, antibiotics were shown to decrease survival rate of patients treated by ICIs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can indeed modulate microbiota's diversity, therefore altering ICIs response. A meta-analysis was performed based on published data to verify this hypothesis.

Methods

In this study, over 41 publications, exploring the impact of concomitant PPI treatment on outcomes of ICI-treated patients, were analyzed. Evaluated endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported in ICIs in PPI users versus non-PPI users. Subgroup analyses were performed to minimize the impact of study heterogeneity and to investigate the influence of PPI on the different groups of interest. There was no evidence of publication bias for OS and PFS analysis in subgroup analysis.

Results

Forty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 20,042 patients. OS of patients receiving ICIs was negatively correlated in patients concomitantly treated with PPI (HR=1.37; 95%CI, 1.23-1.52). PFS of cancer patients receiving ICIs was also negatively correlated with PPI treatment (HR=1.28; 95%CI, 1.15-1.42). PPI and ICI use was associated with worst OS and PFS not only for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial cancer patients but also for patients treated with anti PD-1 (OS) and anti PD-L1 (OS and PFS) immunotherapies when administered in non-first line and when PPI was received as baseline treatment or in 60 days before ICI initiation. PPI and ICI use also showed the worst OS and PFS for patients from Europe and Asia.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that PPI treatment leads to significantly worse outcomes in advanced cancer patients treated by ICIs in terms of PFS and OS.

The Association between Baseline Proton Pump Inhibitors, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, and Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis

(1) Although emerging evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-induced dysbiosis negatively alters treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, no study systematically investigates the association between PPIs, ICIs, and chemotherapy; (2) Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and PubMed were searched from inception to 20 May 2022, to identify relevant studies involving patients receiving ICIs or chemotherapy and reporting survival outcome between PPI users and non-users. Survival outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. p-scores, with a value between 0 and 1, were calculated to quantify the treatment ranking, with a higher score suggesting a higher probability of greater effectiveness. We also conducted pairwise meta-analyses of observational studies to complement our network meta-analysis; (3) We identified 62 studies involving 26,484 patients (PPI = 8834; non-PPI = 17,650), including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the neck and head. Eight post-hoc analyses from 18 randomized-controlled trials were included in our network, which demonstrated that, in advanced NSCLC and UC, patients under ICI treatment with concomitant PPI (p-score: 0.2016) are associated with both poorer OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.67) and poorer PFS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.61) than those without PPIs (p-score: 1.000). Patients under ICI treatment with concomitant PPI also had poorer OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.31) and poorer PFS (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.48) in comparison with those receiving chemotherapy (p-score: 0.6664), implying that PPIs may compromise ICI's effectiveness, making it less effective than chemotherapy. Our pairwise meta-analyses also supported this association. Conversely, PPI has little effect on patients with advanced melanoma, RCC, HCC, and SCC of the neck and head who were treated with ICIs; (4) "PPI-induced dysbiosis" serves as a significant modifier of treatment response in both advanced NSCLC and UC that are treated with ICIs, compromising the effectiveness of ICIs to be less than that of chemotherapy. Thus, clinicians should avoid unnecessary PPI prescription in these patients. "PPI-induced dysbiosis", on the other hand, does not alter the treatment response to ICIs in advanced melanoma, RCC, HCC, and SCC of the head and neck.

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to regulate the gut microbiome and affect the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Contradictory results on survival have been observed in patients concomitantly treated with ICIs and PPIs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between PPI use and survival outcomes in ICI-treated cancer patients.

Methods:

EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched. Studies comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between PPI-treated and PPI-free groups of ICI-treated cancer patients were included. Data regarding study and patient characteristics, ICI and PPI treatments, and survival outcomes were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using random effects models. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed to explore possible factors of heterogeneity among the studies.

Results:

A total of 33 studies were included, comprising 7383 ICI- and PPI-treated patients and 8574 ICI-treated and PPI-free patients. The pooled HR was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19–1.44; p < 0.001) for OS and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.17–1.46; p < 0.001) for PFS, indicating a significant negative association between PPI use and survival in ICI-treated patients. Subgroup meta-analyses by factors including cancer type, ICI type, and time window of PPI use revealed that ICI and PPI use impacted survival in patients with non-small cell lung or urothelial cancer, patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and patients receiving PPI as baseline treatment or 60 days before ICI treatment initiation.

Conclusions:

PPI use in patients treated with ICIs was associated with shorter OS and PFS, especially in several specific subgroups of cancer patients. PPIs should be strictly controlled and appear to not impact survival if given temporarily after ICI initiation. These observations could provide the basis for clinical guidelines for concomitant PPI and ICI use.

Influence of concomitant gastric acid suppressants use on the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with programmed death-1/ligand-1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (GAS) on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors has rarely been comprehensively evaluated. A meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the effect of concomitant GAS in NSCLC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 26, 2022. A random-effect model which incorporates the possible between-study heterogeneity was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective and one prospective cohort studies including 5892 patients were patients were included. Influence of concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was evaluated in ten studies, and influence of GAS, including PPIs or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists were evaluated in one study. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of GAS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20 to 1.45, P < 0.001; I² = 0%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.48, P < 0.001; I² = 0%) in NSCLC patients taking PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors. Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of GAS and poor survival in NSCLC patients taking PD-L1inhibitors was consistent in univariate and multivariate studies (P values for subgroup difference both > 0.05 for PFS and OS).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis by summarizing the up-to-date literatures showed that use of GAS, primarily PPIs, may be associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors.

An Up-To-Date Investigation Into the Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current anticancer therapies, a considerable proportion of patients are found to hardly benefit from these drugs. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may affect the clinical efficacy of ICIs; however, their results are inconsistent. In this study, based on updated evidence, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic significance of PPI use in advanced solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy.

Methods

Eligible literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and other network resources before July 2021. Clinical outcome was evaluated using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation of PPI use with OS or PFS was determined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 17 studies enrolling 9,978 ICI-treated cancer patients were included in our meta-analysis. The global analysis demonstrated that PPI use was significantly correlated with worse OS [HR = 1.29 (1.10-1.50)] instead of PFS [HR = 1.19 (0.98-1.44)] in solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. In a subgroup analysis, the negative correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy was significant in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [PFS, HR = 1.27 (1.10-1.47)] and urothelial carcinoma [OS, HR = 1.55 (1.31-1.84), PFS, HR = 1.52 (1.13-2.06)] and mixed cohorts containing multiple cancer types [OS, HR = 1.40 (1.16-1.69)], while an opposite result was observed in the PFS of patients with melanoma [HR = 0.48 (0.25-0.90)]. Moreover, the unfavorable prognostic impact of PPI use was also significant in patients over 65 years old [OS, HR = 1.28 (1.05-1.55), PFS, HR = 1.32 (1.12-1.56)] or those receiving anti-PD-1 [OS, HR = 1.37 (1.04-1.79)] or anti-PD-L1 therapies (OS, HR = 1.49 (1.30-1.69), PFS, HR = 1.34 (1.20-1.50). Finally, PPI use was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis in patients receiving PPIs 30 days before and/or after ICI initiation (OS, HR = 1.38 (1.18-1.62), PFS, HR = 1.23 (1.06-1.43)).

Conclusion

Although our global analysis revealed PPI use was not correlated with the PFS of ICI-treated patients, considering the results of our subgroup analysis, PPIs should be still cautiously used shortly before or during ICI therapy. Furthermore, more clinical validations and related mechanism investigations are of great necessity to clarify the clinical correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], PROSPERO [No. CRD42021243707].

Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: An Opinion Paper

Simple Summary

Proton pump inhibitors are frequently used in cancer patients to alleviate some symptoms, epigastric pain or heartburn. However, acid suppression decreases the absorption of some oral-targeted anticancer treatments (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors) and induces changes in the gut microbiome. Recent data are showing that these interactions have important clinical impacts and medical oncologists and patients must be aware of these possible interactions.

Abstract

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and particularly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), are currently some of the major breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionised the treatment of acid-related diseases, but are frequently overused for epigastric pain or heartburn. However, long-term acid suppression from using PPIs may lead to safety concerns, and could have a greater impact in cancer patients undergoing therapy, like bone fractures, renal toxicities, enteric infections, and micronutrient deficiencies (iron and magnesium). Moreover, acid suppression may also affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs (at least during acid suppression) and decrease the absorption of many molecularly-targeted anticancer therapies, which are mostly weak bases with pH-dependent absorption. This type of drug-drug interaction may have detrimental effects on efficacy, with major clinical impacts described for some orally administrated targeted therapies (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib, palbociclib), and conflicting results with many others, including capecitabine. Furthermore, the long-term use of PPIs results in severe alterations to the gut microbiome and recent retrospective analyses have shown that the benefit of using CPIs was suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. These very expensive drugs are of great importance because of their efficacy. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.