1
|
Benedict KC, Brown MI, Berry HA, Berry SM, O’Brien RC, Davis JM. Oncoplastic Breast Reduction: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5355. [PMID: 37850204 PMCID: PMC10578759 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Breast-conserving therapy with oncoplastic reduction is a useful strategy for partial mastectomy defect reconstruction. The most recently published systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction outcomes from 2015 showed wound dehiscence in 4.3%, hematoma in 0.9%, infection in 2.8%, and nipple necrosis in 0.9% of patients. We performed a systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction literature, comparing outcomes and complication rates reported over the past 8 years. Methods Studies describing the use of oncoplastic breast reduction and discussion of postoperative complications were included. The primary outcome assessed was the postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes analyzed were rates of margin expansion, completion mastectomy, and delays in adjuvant therapy due to complications. Results Nine articles met inclusion criteria, resulting in 1715 oncoplastic breast reduction patients. The mean rate of hematoma was 3%, nipple necrosis was 2%, dehiscence was 4%, infection was 3%, and seroma was 2%. The need for re-excision of margins occurred in 8% of patients, and completion mastectomy in 2%. Finally, delay in adjuvant treatment due to a postoperative complication occurred in 4% of patients. Conclusions Oncoplastic breast reduction is an excellent option for many patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy; however, postoperative complications can delay adjuvant radiation therapy. Results of this systematic literature review over the past 8 years showed a slight increase in complication rate compared to the most recent systematic review from 2015. With increased popularity and surgeon familiarity, oncoplastic breast reduction remains a viable option for reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects despite a slight increase in complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Benedict
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Madyson I. Brown
- School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Hunter A. Berry
- School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Scott M. Berry
- Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Robert C. O’Brien
- Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| | - Jared M. Davis
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nussbaumer RL, Maggi N, Castrezana L, Zehnpfennig L, Schwab FD, Krol J, Oberhauser I, Weber WP, Kurzeder C, Haug MD, Kappos EA. The impact of neoadjuvant systemic treatment on postoperative complications in breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 197:333-341. [PMID: 36403182 PMCID: PMC9823081 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06811-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) on postoperative complications and the beginning of adjuvant treatment. METHODS This study includes data from a prospectively maintained database including patients with breast cancer (BC) stage I-IV with or without NST undergoing breast cancer surgery between January 2010 and September 2021. RESULTS Out of 517 enrolled patients, 77 received NST, 440 had primary breast surgery. After NST patients underwent surgery after a meantime of 34 days (26.5-40 days). No statistical significance could be found comparing the complication grading according to the Clavien Dindo classification. The complications were most frequently rated as grade 3b. There were no complications with grade 4 or higher. When differentiating into short and long-term, the overall rate of short-term complications was 20.3% with no significant difference between the two groups (20.8% vs. 20.2%). Regarding long-term complications, there was more impairment of shoulder mobility (26.0% vs. 9.5%, p ≤ 0.001) and chronic pain (42.9% vs. 28.6%, p ≤ 0.016) for patients with NST. The beginning of the administration of the adjuvant treatment was comparable in both groups (46.3 days vs. 50.5 days). CONCLUSION In our cohort, complications between both groups were comparable according to Clavien Dindo. This study shows that NST has no negative impact on postoperative short-term complications and most importantly did not lead to a delay of the beginning of adjuvant treatment. Therefore, NST can be safely admitted, even when followed by extensive breast reconstruction surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. L. Nussbaumer
- grid.410567.1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - N. Maggi
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L. Castrezana
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L. Zehnpfennig
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - F. D. Schwab
- grid.410567.1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J. Krol
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - I. Oberhauser
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W. P. Weber
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - C. Kurzeder
- grid.410567.1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M. D. Haug
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.410567.1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth A. Kappos
- grid.410567.1Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ,grid.410567.1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao L, Xu C, Wang MD, Qi WX, Cai G, Cai R, Wang SB, Ou D, Li M, Shen KW, Chen JY. Influence of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Timing on Survival Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatments. Front Oncol 2022; 12:905223. [PMID: 35912233 PMCID: PMC9334789 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo determine the relationship between time to radiotherapy (TTR) and survival outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant treatments (NATs).MethodsContinuous non-metastatic BC patients receiving NAT and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox model with restricted cubic splines (RCSs) was used to determine the panoramic relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding factors between the groups of TTR.ResultsA total of 315 patients were included. The RCS modeling demonstrated a non-linear relationship between TTR and survival outcomes. The lowest risk for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed at the TTR of 12 weeks, and the lowest risk of BC-specific survival (BCSS) at 10 weeks. TTR was accordingly transformed into categorical variables as ≤10, 11–20, and >20 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that the TTR of ≤10 weeks was an independent prognostic factor for worse DMFS (HR = 2.294, 95% CI 1.079–4.881) and RFS (HR = 2.126, 95% CI 1.038–4.356) compared with the TTR of 10–20 weeks, while the is no difference in DMFS, RFS, and BCSS between TTR >20 weeks and TTR of 10–20 weeks.ConclusionThere exists a non-linear relationship between TTR after surgery and survival outcomes in patients treated with NAT. Early initiation of RT following surgery does not seem to be associated with a better therapeutic outcome. A relatively flexible recommendation of TTR could be adopted in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng-Di Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun-Wei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jia-Yi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|