L1CAM expression as a predictor of platinum response in high‐risk endometrial carcinoma

Evaluation of prognostic potential of β-catenin and L1CAM expression according to endometrial cancer risk group

OBJECTIVE

We investigate the prognostic role of β-catenin and L1 neuronal cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM) according to risk groups in endometrial carcinomas (EC).

METHODS

A total of 335 EC patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. We evaluated the expression of ß-catenin and L1CAM using immunohistochemistry, and their association with clinicopathological characteristics and survival.

RESULTS

The expressions of β-catenin and L1CAM were observed in 10.4% of all patients, respectively, and showed mutually exclusive pattern. While β-catenin expression was associated with endometrioid histology (p = 0.035) and low tumor grade (p = 0.045), L1CAM expression was associated with non-endometrioid histology (p < 0.001), high tumor grade (p < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (p = 0.006), and advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (p = 0.001). β-catenin expression was most frequent in the no specific molecular (NSMP) group (26/35, 74.3%), followed by the DNA polymerase-ε-mutated (POLE-mut) (6/35, 17.1%), and mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR) (3/35, 8.6%). L1CAM expression was most frequent in the p53-abnormal group (22/35, 62.9%), followed by the NSMP (6/35, 17.1%), dMMR (4/35, 11.4%), and POLE-mut (3/35, 8.6%). Although both markers did not show statistical significance in multivariate analysis for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in entire cohort, β-catenin positivity was identified as the sole factor associated with worse PFS in the high-intermediate risk subgroup (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The expression of nuclear β-catenin may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting recurrence and guiding therapeutic strategies in high-intermediate risk EC patients.

It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer

A huge effort has been done in redefining endometrial cancer (EC) risk classes in the last decade. However, known prognostic factors (FIGO staging and grading, biomolecular classification and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classes stratification) are not able to predict outcomes and especially recurrences. Biomolecular classification has helped in re-classifying patients for a more appropriate adjuvant treatment and clinical studies suggest that currently used molecular classification improves the risk assessment of women with EC, however, it does not clearly explain differences in recurrence profiles. Furthermore, a lack of evidence appears in EC guidelines. Here, we summarize the main concepts why molecular classification is not enough in the management of endometrial cancer, by highlighting some promising innovative examples in scientific literature studies with a clinical potential significant impact.

Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression in addition to ProMisE in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), β-catenin, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients, with a focus on p53 wild-type subgroup, for additional risk stratification.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included EC patients classified according to Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) who underwent primary surgical treatment at the single center between January 2014 and December 2018. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for four mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, L1CAM, β-catenin, and PD-L1. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutation was detected by hot spot sequencing via droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Survival outcome of each subgroup of L1CAM, β-catenin, and PD-L1 was measured according to their expression.

RESULTS

A total of 162 EC patients were included. Endometrioid histologic type and early-stage disease were 140 (86.4%) and 109 (67.3%), respectively. ProMisE classification assigned 48 (29.6%), 16 (9.9%), 72 (44.4%), and 26 (16.0%) patients to MMR-deficient, POLE-mutated, p53 wild-type, and p53 abnormal subgroups, respectively. L1CAM was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.207; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.432-7.187; P = 0.005), whereas β-catenin and PD-L1 positivity were not associated with recurrence (P = 0.462 and P = 0.152, respectively). In p53 wild-type subgroup, L1CAM positivity was associated with worse PFS (aHR, 4.906; 95% CI, 1.685-14.287; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

L1CAM positivity was associated with poor prognosis in EC and further stratified the risk of recurrence in p53 wild-type subgroup, whereas β-catenin and PD-L1 were not informative for risk stratification.

Pure and mixed clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A molecular and immunohistochemical analysis study

BACKGROUND

Uterine clear cell carcinoma (CCC) consists of either pure clear cell histology but can also display other histological components (mixed uterine CCCs). In this study, the molecular and immunohistochemical background of pure and mixed uterine CCC was compared. Secondly, it was evaluated whether histological classification and molecular background affected clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was performed comparing pure uterine CCCs (n = 22) and mixed uterine CCCs (n = 21). Targeted next-generation sequencing using a 12-gene targeted panel classified cases as polymerase-ε (POLE) mutated, microsatellite instable (MSI), TP53 wildtype or TP53 mutated. Immunohistochemistry was performed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, L1 cell adhesion molecule, MSH6, and PMS2.

RESULTS

The following molecular subgroups were identified for pure and mixed uterine CCCs, respectively: POLE mutated 0% (0/18) and 6% (1/18); MSI in 6% (1/18) and 50% (9/18); TP53 wildtype in 56% (10/18) and 22% (4/18); TP53 mutated in 39% (7/18) and 22% (4/18) (p = 0.013). Patients with mixed CCCs had improved outcome compared to patients with pure CCCs. Frequent TP53 mutations were found in pure CCCs and frequent MSI in mixed CCCs, associated with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pure and mixed uterine CCCs are two entities with different clinical outcomes, which could be explained by different molecular backgrounds. These results underline the relevance of both morphological and molecular evaluation, and may assist in tailoring treatment.

LINC02323 facilitates development of lung squamous cell carcinoma by miRNA sponge and RBP dysregulation and links to poor prognosis

BACKGROUND

The poor outcome of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) highlights the importance of the identification of novel effective prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have generally been considered to serve important roles in tumorigenesis and the development of various types of cancer, including LUSC.

METHODS

Here, we aimed to investigate the role of LINC02323 in LUSC and its potential mechanisms by performing comprehensive bioinformatic analyses.

RESULTS

LINC02323 was elevated and positively associated with unfavorable prognosis of LUSC patients. LINC02323 exerted oncogenic function by competitively binding to miR-1343-3p and miR-6783-3p, thereby upregulating L1CAM expression. Indeed, we also determined that LINC02323 could interact with the RNA-binding protein DDX3X, which regulates various stages of RNA expression and processing.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, we identified that LINC02323 and its indirect target L1CAM can act as novel biomarkers for determining the prognosis of patients with LUSC and thus deserves further study.

Integrated Biomarker Analysis Reveals L1CAM as a Potential Stratification Marker for No Specific Molecular Profile High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma

Histopathologic assessment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) suffers from intersubject variability and poor reproducibility. The pragmatic classification in four molecular subgroups helps to overcome these limits, showing a significant prognostic value. The "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) is the most heterogeneous EC subgroup, requiring further characterization to better guide its clinical management. DNA sequencing of POLE exonuclease domain and immunohistochemistry for PMS2, MSH6, and p53 were performed in order to stratify a cohort of 94 high-risk EC patients in the four molecular subgroups. Moreover, a panel of seven additional biomarkers was tested. Patients were found to be 16% POLE-mutated, 36% mismatch repair-deficient, 27% p53-abnormal, and 21% NSMP. In the multivariable model, molecular groups confirmed their significant association with disease-specific survival and progression-free survival, with p53-abnormal and NSMP endometrial cancer characterized by poor outcomes. Among the additional evaluated biomarkers, L1CAM was the only one with a significant prognostic value within the NSMP subgroup. NSMP/L1CAM-positive patients experienced the worst outcome and were "early-relapsing" after platinum-based chemotherapy, with a significantly shorter platinum-free interval compared to L1CAM-negative patients. L1CAM appears to be a promising candidate as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the high-risk NSMP subgroup, which is actually known to lack specific molecular markers.