Somatic genomic landscape of East Asian epithelial ovarian carcinoma and its clinical implications from prospective clinical sequencing; A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3047)

TP53 mutations and survival in ovarian carcinoma patients receiving first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: Results of the MITO16A/MaNGO OV-2 study

To date, there are no biomarkers that define a patient subpopulation responsive to bevacizumab (BEV), an effective treatment option for advanced ovarian carcinoma (OC). In the context of the MITO16A/MaNGO OV-2 trial, a Phase IV study of chemotherapy combined with BEV in first-line treatment of advanced OC, we evaluated TP53 mutations by next-generation sequencing and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on 202 and 311 cases, respectively. We further correlated TP53 mutations in terms of type, function, and site, and IHC data with patients' clinicopathological characteristics and survival. TP53 missense mutations of unknown function (named unclassified) represented the majority of variants in our population (44.4%) and were associated with a significantly improved overall survival (OS) both in univariable (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20-0.92, p = .03) and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18-0.86, p = .02). Concordance between TP53 mutational analysis and IHC was 91%. We observed an HR of 0.70 for OS in patients with p53 IHC overexpression compared to p53 wild-type, which however did not reach statistical significance (p = .31, 95% CI = 0.36-1.38). Our results indicate that the presence of unclassified TP53 mutations has favorable prognostic significance in patients with OC receiving upfront BEV plus chemotherapy. In particular, unclassified missense TP53 mutations characterize a subpopulation of patients with a significant survival advantage, independently of clinicopathological characteristics. Our findings warrant future investigations to confirm the prognostic impact of TP53 mutations in BEV-treated OC patients and deserve to be assessed for their potential predictive role in future randomized clinical studies.

From the Beginning of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group to the Present and Next Steps

The Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) was established in 2002 and is the only organization in Korea conducting multi-center clinical trials for gynecologic cancers. Since its re-establishment as a non-profit organization in 2021, KGOG has grown significantly, now including 207 gynecologic oncology specialists from 76 hospitals. This growth is a testament to the dedication and hard work of all those involved in the organization. KGOG is committed to maximizing the activation of multi-center clinical research through policies that support patients with rare diseases and gynecologic cancer research, focusing on strengthening institutional capacity, equalizing participation opportunities, and enhancing information sharing. A significant milestone for KGOG was becoming a member of the US Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) in 2005, allowing participation in GOG clinical trials. KGOG later joined the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) and strengthened its capabilities by hosting the first Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference-Clinical Research (ECCC-CR) in 2023. KGOG holds biannual meetings and symposia, as well as 224 operating committee meetings annually to review the discussions of the Tumor Site Committee. KGOG has conducted 156 investigator-initiated trial (IIT) or sponsor-initiated trial (SIT) studies as KGOG-led or participated in research. Currently, 18 studies are registered, and 10 are in preparation. To date, 68 papers have been published. KGOG conducts six national projects and collaborates with external organizations such as the NRG Oncology Foundation, Gynecologic Oncology Group Partners (GOG-P), GCIG, East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial group (EAGOT), and the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG). Through collaboration with renowned international research institutions, KGOG has significantly expanded the scope of its research, achieving noteworthy clinical outcomes. This report not only introduces the history and recent status of KGOG but also presents the exciting future direction of the organization, filled with potential breakthroughs and advancements in gynecologic oncology research.

Pure large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary with a somatic BRCA1 mutation: The first reported case and the review of the literature

Pure large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the ovary are extremely rare, so there is a lack of molecular information on this type of cancer. Herein, we presented a pure primary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the ovary in a 72-year-old female with a pathogenic somatic mutation at the c.5332+1g>a splice site of the BRCA1 gene and with no TP53 mutation. She was uneventful 32 months after the operation and chemotherapies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a BRCA1 somatic mutation in the ovary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Testing BRCA1/2 mutations in patients with large ovarian cell neuroendocrine carcinomas might provide an opportunity for their future target treatments. It would expand our understanding.

Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Carcinomas: How PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Affects Their Pathogenesis

Ovarian clear cell (OCCC) and endometrioid (EnOC) carcinomas are often subsumed under the umbrella term "endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer" (EAOC), since they frequently arise from ectopic endometrium settled in the ovaries. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is known to be aberrantly activated both in endometriosis and EAOC; however, its role in the progression of endometriosis to ovarian cancer remains unclear. In fact, cancer-associated alterations in the mTOR pathway may be found in normal uterine epithelium, likely acting as a first step towards ovarian cancer, through the intermediary stage of endometriosis. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge regarding mTOR signaling dysregulation in the uterine endometrium, endometriosis, and EAOC while focusing on the interconnections between the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and other signaling molecules that give rise to synergistic molecular mechanisms triggering ovarian cancer development in the presence of endometriosis.

Prognostic value of ALK overexpression and molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) aberrations have an established role in pathogenesis of many neoplasms, but their clinical significance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the frequency of ALK overexpression, molecular abnormalities of ALK, and their impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HGSOC.

METHODS

Protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using three different clones of anti-ALK antibody. The presence of translocations was analysed using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Next-generation sequencing was used for studying the copy number variation, as well as point mutation and translocations involving other commonly rearranged genes.

RESULTS

ALK overexpression was demonstrated in up to 52% of tumours, whereas ALK copy gains in 8.2%, with no clear impact on survival. ALK point mutations were identified in 13 tumours (8.9%), with 3 belonging to the class IV showing significantly better OS. A trend suggesting better PFS was also noticed in these cases. Additionally, three gene fusions were found: ERBB2-GRB7, PRKCA-BRCA1 and SND1-BRAF, none of which has been previously described in HGSOC.

CONCLUSIONS

HGSOC harbouring activating ALK mutations might be associated with a better survival, while ALK overexpression and ALK amplification does not impact the prognosis.

The Impact of KRAS Mutational Status on Long-Term Survival following Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

KRAS mutation is reportedly associated with poor prognosis in patients with different cancer types. However, mutational data on hilar cholangiocarcinoma are few and controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of KRAS mutations in a single-center homogeneous population resected for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the subsequent impact on prognosis. KRAS mutation status was evaluated in 54 patients undergoing major hepatectomy combined with resection of the main biliary confluence and regional lymphadenectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2001 and 2019. Among these 54 patients, 12 (22.2%) had a KRAS mutation. KRAS mutation was not related with pathologic characteristics of the tumor. Five-year overall survival (OS) in patients with KRAS mutation was significantly lower than that observed in patients with KRAS wild type (0 vs. 49.2%, respectively; p = 0.003). In the multivariable analysis; independent predictors of poor OS were KRAS mutation (HR = 5.384; p = 0.003) and lymph node metastases (HR = 2.805; p = 0.023). The results of our study suggested that KRAS mutation in hilar cholangiocarcinoma was not rarely observed. KRAS mutation was an independent strong predictor of poor OS. KRAS mutation analysis should be included in the routine pathologic evaluation of resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to better stratify prognosis.