Immunotherapy with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody in infants with high-risk neuroblastoma

From mechanism to therapy: the journey of CD24 in cancer

CD24 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that is expressed in a wide range of tissues and cell types. It is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological processes, including cell adhesion, migration, differentiation, and apoptosis. Additionally, CD24 has been studied extensively in the context of cancer, where it has been found to play a role in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. In recent years, there has been growing interest in CD24 as a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. This review summarizes the current knowledge of CD24, including its structure, function, and its role in cancer. Finally, we provide insights into potential clinical application of CD24 and discuss possible approaches for the development of targeted cancer therapies.

Revolutionizing pediatric neuroblastoma treatment: unraveling new molecular targets for precision interventions

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most frequent solid tumor in pediatric cases, contributing to around 15% of childhood cancer-related deaths. The wide-ranging genetic, morphological, and clinical diversity within NB complicates the success of current treatment methods. Acquiring an in-depth understanding of genetic alterations implicated in the development of NB is essential for creating safer and more efficient therapies for this severe condition. Several molecular signatures are being studied as potential targets for developing new treatments for NB patients. In this article, we have examined the molecular factors and genetic irregularities, including those within insulin gene enhancer binding protein 1 (ISL1), dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 (DPYSL3), receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) and murine double minute 2-tumor protein 53 (MDM2-P53) that play an essential role in the development of NB. A thorough summary of the molecular targeted treatments currently being studied in pre-clinical and clinical trials has been described. Recent studies of immunotherapeutic agents used in NB are also studied in this article. Moreover, we explore potential future directions to discover new targets and treatments to enhance existing therapies and ultimately improve treatment outcomes and survival rates for NB patients.

Toxicity Spectrum of Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy: A Real-World Study Leveraging the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Anti-disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies are effective immunotherapeutic drugs for treating neuroblastoma, yet their toxicity spectrum is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the toxicity profiles of three anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (dinutuximab, dinutuximab β, and naxitamab) in clinical applications by mining and evaluating the adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

METHODS

Data in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from the time anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies became available in the market to the first quarter of 2023 were searched. The signals of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody-associated ADRs were quantified using four types of algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the combination of the proportional reporting ratio and χ2 statistic method used by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. The ADRs were categorized by System Organ Class based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, and were sorted according to the frequency and signal strength of ADRs.

RESULTS

A total of 370 adverse drug event reports with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies listed as the 'primary suspected drugs' were identified, with 116 ADR signals detected, of which 22 were not in the drug labels. Among the adverse drug event reports, 276 reports concerned dinutuximab/dinutuximab β as primary suspected drugs with 90 ADR signals, involving 19 System Organ Classes, of which 21 signals were not in the label; 94 adverse drug event reports concerned naxitamab as the primary suspected drug with 26 ADR signals, involving 11 System Organ Classes, of which one was not in the label. For dinutuximab/dinutuximab β-related ADRs, the top five most frequent were "fever", "abdominal pain", "elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST)", "elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT)" and "hypotension"; the top five most intensive signals were "hypoalbuminemia", "elevated AST", "capillary leakage syndrome", "hypoxia" and "elevated ALT". For naxitamab-related ADRs, the top five most frequent were "hypotension", "pain", "urticarial", "hypertension" and "rash"; the top five most intensive signals were "hypotension", "urticaria", "hypoxemia", "bronchospasm" and "hypertension". Involved System Organ Classes included "investigations" and "respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders" containing the most types of ADR signals in dinutuximab/dintuximab β-related ADRs and naxitamab-related ADRs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study comprehensively analyzed the toxicity profiles of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies and provides an important reference for clinical monitoring and ADR identification of these drugs.

Survival Benefit of Myeloablative Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Multimodal treatment of newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) includes induction chemotherapy, consolidation with myeloablative therapy (MAT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), followed by anti-disialoganglioside 2 (GD2) immunotherapy, as recommended by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and the Society of Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN). Some centres proposed an alternative approach with induction chemotherapy followed by anti-GD2 immunotherapy, without MAT+ASCT.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic literature review was to compare survival outcomes in patients with HRNB treated with or without MAT+ASCT and with or without subsequent anti-GD2 immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational comparative studies in patients with HRNB using search terms for 'neuroblastoma' and ('myeloablative therapy' OR 'stem cell transplantation'). Reporting of at least one survival outcome [event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival, relapse-free survival and/or overall survival (OS)] was required for inclusion. Outcomes from RCTs were synthesized in meta-analysis, while meta-analysis of non-RCTs was not planned owing to expected heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Literature searches produced 2587 results with 41 publications reporting 34 comparative studies included in the review. Of these, 7 publications reported 4 RCTs, and 34 publications reported 30 non-RCT studies. Studies differed with respect to included populations, induction regimen, response to induction, additional treatments and transplantation procedures. Subsequent treatments of relapse were rarely reported and could not be compared. In the meta-analysis, EFS was in favour of MAT+ASCT over conventional chemotherapy or no further treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.91, p = 0.001] with a trend favouring MAT+ASCT for OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.00, p = 0.05). Tandem MAT+ASCT was found to improve EFS compared with the single procedure, with improvement in both EFS and OS in patients treated with anti-GD2 therapy. Non-RCT comparative studies were broadly consistent with evidence from the RCTs; however, not all reported survival benefits of MAT+ASCT (single or tandem). Limited comparative evidence on treatment without MAT+ASCT in patients treated with anti-GD2 immunotherapy suggests an increased risk of relapse. In relapsed patients, MAT+ASCT appears to improve OS, but evidence remains scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival benefits in patients treated with MAT+ASCT confirm that the procedure should remain an integral part of multimodal therapy. In patients treated with anti-GD2 immunotherapy, limited evidence suggests that omitting MAT+ASCT is associated with an increased risk of relapse, and therefore, a change in clinical practice can currently not be recommended. Evidence suggests the use of tandem MAT+ASCT compared with the single procedure, with greater benefits observed in patients treated with anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Limited evidence also suggests improved survival following MAT+ASCT in relapsed patients, which needs to be viewed in light of emerging chemoimmunotherapy in this setting.