Cladribine- and decitabine-containing conditioning regimen has a low post-transplant relapse rate in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

The roles of epigenetic regulation in graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is utilized as a potential curative treatment for various hematologic malignancies. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) post-aHSCT is a severe complication that significantly impacts patients' quality of life and overall survival, becoming a major cause of non-relapse mortality. In recent years, the association between epigenetics and GVHD has garnered increasing attention. Epigenetics focuses on studying mechanisms that affect gene expression without altering DNA sequences, primarily including DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) regulation, and RNA modifications. This review summarizes the role of epigenetic regulation in the pathogenesis of GVHD, with a focus on DNA methylation, histone modifications, ncRNA, RNA modifications and their involvement and applications in the occurrence and development of GVHD. It also highlights advancements in relevant diagnostic markers and drugs, aiming to provide new insights for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of GVHD.

Efficacy and safety of cladribine in combination with busulfan and cyclophosphamide as an intensive conditioning regimen preceding allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Cladribine, an analogue of deoxyadenosine, is used for therapy of hematological malignancies. Cladribine-containing regimen has been recommended as a rescue therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Its combination with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy), as an intensive conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), requires more clinical evidence. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of cladribine plus BuCy administered as an intensive conditioning regimen before allo-HSCT in R/R AML patients.

METHODS

Twenty-three R/R AML patients, who underwent cladribine plus BuCy intensive conditioning regimen before allo-HSCT, were retrospectively analyzed. The median (range) follow-up duration time of observation was 0.73 (0.08-2.69) years.

RESULTS

The median (range) returned levels of mononuclear cells were 11.5 (6.1-18.5) x 108/kg and CD34+ cells were 5.5 (3.5-9.3) x 106/kg. The median (range) time of platelet reconstitution was 13.0 (9.0-21.0) days and neutrophil reconstitution was 14.0 (11.0-26.0) days. The incidence of conditioning regimen related toxicity (CRRT) affected 69.6% of patients; all CRRT-affected patients had grade I-II symptoms, including gastrointestinal tract (39.1%), oral cavity (26.1%), liver (8.7%), and kidney (4.3%) CRRTs. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVDH) included 30.4% among all patients with 4.3% of grade III-IV acute GVHD, and 34.8% of chronic GVHD. During the follow-up period, 4 (17.4%) patients relapsed, and 6 (26.1%) patients died (cause of death: disease relapse, n = 3; infection, n = 2; GVHD, n = 1). The 1-year and 2-year accumulating event-free survival rates were 66.3% and 53.1%, respectively. The 1-year accumulating overall survival rate was 74.7% and 2-year survival rate was 64.0%.

CONCLUSION

Cladribine plus BuCy intensive conditioning regimen before allo-HSCT exhibits favorable treatment efficacy with acceptable toxicity in R/R AML patients.

Epigenetic therapy: Research progress of decitabine in the treatment of solid tumors

Decitabine's early successful therapeutic outcomes in hematologic malignancies have led to regulatory approvals from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for addressing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These approvals have sparked keen interest in exploring the potential of decitabine for treating solid tumors. Continuous preclinical and clinical trials have proved that low doses of decitabine also bring benefits in treating solid tumors, and various proposed mechanisms attempt to explain the potential efficacy. It is important to note that the application of decitabine in solid tumors is still considered investigational. This article reviews the application mechanism and current status of decitabine in the treatment of solid tumors.