Different treatment efficacies and T790M acquisition of EGFR-TKIs on NSCLC patients with variable Del-19 subtypes of EGFR

RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants

Introduction

EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).

Results

The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044-2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344-0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363-0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.

Conclusions

RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

Survival analysis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKI treatment of Yunnan in southwestern China: a real-world study

Importance

Patients with EGFR mutations who have advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) already receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the standard first-line therapy. Notably, Yunnan is a regional high incidence area of lung cancer in the highlands with a high rate of rare EGFR mutations. Overall, lung cancer patients in Xuanwei may present a distinct subgroup globally. Recent studies suggested that the NSCLC cohort in Xuanwei harbored a significantly higher uncommon mutation rate. However, little was known about the clinicopathological features and treatment efficacy of EGFR-TKI in Yunnan NSCLC patients.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of histologic type on the survival outcomes of patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI treatment of Yunnan in southwestern China.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled advanced NSCLC patients (IIIB-IV) with EGFR mutations who were first diagnosed and treated at Yunnan Cancer hospital from January 2016 to December 2019. Sociodemographics, lifestyle, survival, and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the OS and PFS of patients. An analysis of prognostic factors was conducted using Cox regression.

Results

A total of 468 eligible patients were included. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) were 11.30(95% CI, 10.12-12.48) months and 30.30(95% CI, 26.24-34.36) months. Based on survival analysis among all the patients,females(HR=0.815;95% CI:0.671-0.989; P=0.017), Xuanwei origin (HR=0.776; 95% CI: 0.609-0.989; P=0.040), sample types(HR=0.780; 95% CI: 0.642-0.947; P=0.012) had a longer PFS. Multivariable analysis showed that only the sample type was an independent factor on median PFS with EGFR-TKI therapy. Patients less than 60 years old (HR=1.433; 95% CI:1.134-1.812, P=0.003)had better OS, but objectives with BMI≥24kg/m2(HR=0.653; 95% CI: 0.500-0.864; P=0.002), females(HR=0.776; 95% CI:0.613-0.982; P=0.035)and patients with tissue sample type (HR=0.760; 95% CI:0.600-.0961; P=0.022) had better OS. Notably, subgroup analysis of our study also found that PFS was significantly better in patients with G719X, L861Q, S768I, G719X+L861Q, and G719X+S768I in Xuanwei than classical mutation ones, including 19-Del and L858R (median 22.7 vs. 12.0 months, HR=0.523, P=0.010), while PFS was inferior in patients with rare mutations of EGFR in non-Xuanwei than the classical mutation ones (median 5.10 vs. 11.10 months, HR=1.760, P=0.015).

Conclusion

NSCLC patients in Yunnan displayed a unique EGFR mutation profile, especially a higher prevalence of EGFR uncommon and compound mutations subtype. This study indicates prognostic factors of NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI in Yunan and Xuanwei. This study will provide new clinical evidence for EGFR-TKI-targeted therapy in patients with rare EGFR mutations in China and worldwide. More researchs were needed for NSCLC EGFR-TKI therapy and medical insurance policy-making in Yunnan, Xuanwei area and uncommon especially.