1
|
Zou J, Ni T, Yang M, Li H, Gao M, Zhu Y, Jiang W, Zhang Q, Yan J, Wei D, Chen ZJ. The effect of parental carrier of de novo mutated vs. inherited balanced reciprocal translocation on the chance of euploid embryos. F&S SCIENCE 2023; 4:193-199. [PMID: 37182600 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfss.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the effect of de novo mutated balanced reciprocal translocation on the rate of euploid embryos varied from inherited balanced reciprocal translocation. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study compared the percentage of euploid embryo and proportion of patients with at least 1 euploid embryo between de novo mutated balanced reciprocal translocation (i.e., the group of de novo mutated carriers) and inherited balanced reciprocal translocation (i.e., the group of inherited carriers). SETTING An academic fertility center. PATIENT(S) A total of 413 couples with balanced reciprocal translocation (219 female carriers and 194 male carriers) who underwent their first cycle of preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements were included. INTERVENTION(S) Carriers of balanced reciprocal translocation either de novo mutated or inherited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The percentage of euploid embryo and proportion of patients with at least 1 euploid embryo. RESULT(S) The carriers of the de novo mutated balanced reciprocal translocation had a lower percentage of euploid embryos (19.5% vs. 25.5%), and were less likely to have at least 1 euploid embryo (47.1% vs. 60.1%) compared with the carriers of the inherited balanced reciprocal translocation. In the male-carrier subgroup, the percentage of euploid embryos (16.7% vs. 26.7%) and proportion of patients with at least 1 euploid embryo (41.9% vs. 67.5%) were lower among the de novo mutated carriers than those among the inherited carriers. However, in the female-carrier subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of euploid embryos (22.4% vs. 24.4%) or the proportion of patients with at least 1 euploid embryo (52.3% vs. 53.7%) between the de novo mutated carriers and inherited carriers. CONCLUSION(S) The de novo mutated balanced reciprocal translocation was associated with a lower percentage of euploid embryos and lower chance of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo than the inherited balanced reciprocal translocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialin Zou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongchang Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Gao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yueting Zhu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenjie Jiang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Daimin Wei
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, People's Republic of China; Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Effect of carriers' sex on meiotic segregation patterns and chromosome stability of reciprocal translocations. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 43:1011-1018. [PMID: 34654612 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does the sex of reciprocal translocation carriers affect meiotic segregation patterns and stability of non-translocated chromosomes during meiosis? DESIGN A total of 790 couples who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for reciprocal translocations by using the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array platform between October 2016 and December 2019 were included. Among them, 294 couples had their euploid embryos distinguished between normal euploidies and balanced translocation carriers. RESULTS Female translocation carriers had a significantly lower incidence of alternate segregation pattern than male carriers (43.26% versus 47.98%, P = 0.001), but a higher incidence of 3:1 segregation pattern (6.70% versus 4.29%, P < 0.001). Stratified analysis showed only female translocation carriers with acrocentric chromosome (Acr-ch) involved had a lower incidence of alternate segregation pattern and a higher incidence of 3:1 segregation pattern compared with male carriers (41.63% versus 47.73%, P = 0.012; 9.32% versus 5.03%, P = 0.001). In 2233 embryos of 294 couples with identification of normal and balanced embryos, no significant differences were found in the paternal-origin aneuploidy rate (5.61% versus 5.82%, P = 0.861) and the maternal-origin aneuploidy rate (12.82% versus 12.08%, P = 0.673) in both male and female carriers. After excluding segmental aneuploidies, no differences were found between male and female carriers in both paternal-origin aneuploidy rate (2.14% versus 1.75%, P = 0.594) and maternal-origin aneuploidy rate (11.75% versus 11.06%, P = 0.683). CONCLUSION The sex of the translocation carriers affected meiotic segregation patterns with no effect on the stability of non-translocated chromosomes during meiosis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lei C, Zhang S, Zhu S, Wu J, Xiao M, Zhou J, Fu J, Sun Y, Xu C, Sun X. Conventional ICSI improves the euploid embryo rate in male reciprocal translocation carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 38:129-138. [PMID: 33230615 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02013-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether the morphologically normal spermatozoa selected for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) under microscope had a higher rate of normal/balanced chromosome contents than that in the whole unselected sperm from reciprocal translocation carriers. METHODS Five hundred unselected spermatozoa from each of 40 male translocation carriers were performed with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to determine the rates of gametes with different meiotic contents of translocated chromosomes. Meanwhile, 3030 biopsied blastocysts from 239 male and 293 female reciprocal translocation carriers were detected with the microarray technique to analyze the rates of embryos with different translocated chromosome contents. RESULTS The D3 embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and euploid rate of blastocysts were remarkably higher in male carriers than those in female (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.035, respectively). In addition, the percentages of alternate products, which contained normal/balanced chromosome contents, in embryos from male carriers were markedly higher than those in sperm FISH (p = 2.48 × 10-5 and p = 2.88 × 10-10), while the percentages of adjacent-2 and 3:1 products were lower than those in sperm FISH (p = 0.003 and p = 5.28 × 10-44). Moreover, consistent results were obtained when comparing the rates of products in embryos between male and female carriers. Specifically, the incidence of alternate products in male carriers was higher than those in female carriers (p = 0.022). However, no similar differences were seen between sperm and embryos of female carriers. CONCLUSION ICSI facilitates the selection of spermatozoa with normal/balanced chromosome contents and improves the D3 embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and the euploid embryo rate in male carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caixia Lei
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Shuo Zhang
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Saijuan Zhu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Junping Wu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Min Xiao
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Jing Fu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Yijuan Sun
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Congjian Xu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.,Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Xiaoxi Sun
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. .,Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. .,, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Approximately 50% of the causes of infertility are of genetic origin. The objective of this study was to analyze the role of genetics in human reproduction by reviewing the main genetic causes of infertility and the use of preimplantation genetic testing in Brazil. This literature review comprised articles in English and Portuguese published on databases PubMed, Scielo, and Bireme from 1990 to 2019. Randomized clinical trials and specialized guidelines were given preference whenever possible. Genetic cause can be traced back to up to 20% of the cases of severe azoospermia or oligozoospermia. Subjects with these conditions are good candidates for genetic screening. In women, genetic causes of infertility (fragile X syndrome, X-trisomy, and Turner's syndrome, some of which diagnosed with karyotyping) culminate with premature ovarian failure. Genetic screening helps advise couples of the risk of experiencing early reproductive capacity loss and of the chances of their offspring carrying genetic disorders. In addition to enhancing the prevention of serious diseases in the offspring of couples at increased risk of genetic diseases, preimplantation genetic screening improves the success rates of assisted reproduction procedures by allowing the selection of euploid embryos for transfer. The interface between genetics and human reproduction has gained significant relevance, but discussions are still needed on which procedures are clinically and ethically acceptable and how they should be regulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernanda Polisseni
- Surgery Department, Medical School - Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:1471-1479. [PMID: 31104291 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01486-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Infertility is estimated to affect 15% of couples, having chromosome abnormalities an important role in its etiology. The main objective of this work was to access the reproductive success of ART in infertile couples with chromosomal abnormalities comparing to a control group with normal karyotype. METHODS A 7-year retrospective karyotype analysis of infertile couples was done. Data regarding type of infertility, couples' ages, ART performed, and their reproductive success were obtained. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) were used to estimate magnitude of association between the reproductive success and the different groups. RESULTS We found a prevalence of 7.83% of chromosome abnormalities in our population (233 couples out of 2989). Chromosomal anomalies were found in 82 men (34.75%) and 154 women (65.25%), with low-grade mosaicism being the most prevalent (50.85%), followed by autosomal translocations (17.37%) and sex chromosomes abnormalities (13.56%). Only 2359 couples were treated with ART. There was a non-significant lower reproductive success rate in the cases (OR = 0.899, p = 0.530) with IVF providing the higher success rate. In general, female carriers of chromosome anomalies had a higher success rate, although not significant. CONCLUSION Although the differences regarding success rate between groups were not found statistically significant, we still advocate that cytogenetic analysis should be performed routinely in all infertile couples namely before ART. This might help deciding the best treatment options including Preimplantation Genetic Testing for aneuploidies or structural rearrangements and minimize the risk of transmission of anomalies to the offspring.
Collapse
|