Spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio as a diagnostic test in pre-eclampsia: A gold standard?

Determining the relationship between severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between the severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia (PE).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study conducted in Gauteng, South Africaover 12 months. Patientswith PE 18 years or olderwith singleton pregnancieswere recruited. Weincluded248in the final analysis.

METHODS

Proteinuria was quantified using urine protein: creatinine ratio (UPCR). Preeclamptic patients' outcomeswere compared according to the UPCR values using regression models and by generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Primary maternal outcomes were gestational age (GA) at diagnosis, GA at delivery, development of eclampsia, development of severe features and the need for more than one antihypertensiveagent. Neonatal outcomes were admission to neonatal unit, 5-min APGAR score, need for ventilatory support and early neonatal death.

RESULTS

There was a weak but significant negative correlation between GA at delivery and UPCR (Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) -0.191, p = 0.002). Most patients (77 %) required >1 agent to control their blood pressure, however there was no correlation between UPCR and the need for additional agents (SCC -0.014, p = 0.828). There was a statistically significant correlation between UPCR and severe features, especially the development of haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome (p = 0.005). There was no significant correlation between neonatal outcomes and UPCR.

CONCLUSION

Severity of proteinuria correlated with earlier delivery and development of severe features, specifically HELLP syndrome and pulmonary oedema. There was no correlation between UPCR and requiring additional antihypertensiveagentsor neonatal outcomes.

A meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of spot urinary protein to creatinine ratio versus 12-h proteinuria in preeclampsia

To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of spot urinary protein to creatinine ratio (PCR) and 12-h proteinuria in preeclampsia and to estimate which is a preferred alternative method for 24-h proteinuria, we carried out this meta-analysis. 25 primary studies were included based on searching strategy. For spot urinary PCR, our results showed pooled sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-91%) and specificity of 86% (95% CI 79%-91%), with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 (0.90-0.95). For 12-h proteinuria, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95% CI 87%-96%) and 99% (95% CI 75%-100%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.97 (0.95-0.98). Fagan plot and likelihood ratio scattergram showed that 12-h proteinuria yielded a better discriminatory performance on diagnosis of proteinuria (≥0.3 g/24 h). These results indicated that 12-h proteinuria estimation shows better clinical value than spot urine PCR for diagnosis of preeclampsia. However, due to the severity of condition and the fact that preeclampsia patients cannot wait for 12 h, spot urine PCR can be used as one of the diagnostic indicators.

[Preeclampsia: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]

OBJECTIVE

To identify strategies to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity related to preeclampsia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE® method with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and recommendations were formulated as a (i) strong, (ii) weak or (iii) no recommendation. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Preeclampsia is defined by the association of gestational hypertension (systolic blood pressure≥140mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure≥90mmHg) and proteinuria≥0.3g/24h or a Proteinuria/Creatininuria ratio≥30mg/mmol occurring after 20 weeks of gestation. Data from the literature do not show any benefit in terms of maternal or perinatal health from implementing a broader definition of preeclampsia. Of the 31 questions, there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 31 (100%). In general population, physical activity during pregnancy should be encouraged to reduce the risk of preeclampsia (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) but an early screening based on algorithms (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) or aspirin administration (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence very low) is not recommended to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity related to preeclampsia. In women with preexisting diabetes or hypertension or renal disease, or multiple pregnancy, the level of evidence is insufficient to determine whether aspirin administration during pregnancy is useful to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity (No recommendation, Quality of the evidence low). In women with a history of vasculo-placental disease, low dose of aspirin (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate) at a dosage of 100-160mg per day (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low), ideally before 16 weeks of gestation and not after 20 weeks of gestation (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) until 36 weeks of gestation (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence very low) is recommended. In a high-risk population, additional administration of low molecular weight heparin is not recommended (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate). In case of preeclampsia (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low) or suspicion of preeclampsia (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate, the assessment of PlGF concentration or sFLT-1/PlGF ratio is not routinely recommended) in the only goal to reduce maternal or perinatal morbidity. In women with non-severe preeclampsia antihypertensive agent should be administered orally when the systolic blood pressure is measured between 140 and 159mmHg or diastolic blood pressure is measured between 90 and 109mmHg (Weak recommendation, Quality of the evidence low). In women with non-severe preeclampsia, delivery between 34 and 36+6 weeks of gestation reduces severe maternal hypertension but increases the incidence of moderate prematurity. Taking into account the benefit/risk balance for the mother and the child, it is recommended not to systematically induce birth in women with non-severe preeclampsia between 34 and 36+6 weeks of gestation (Strong recommendation, Quality of evidence high). In women with non-severe preeclampsia diagnosed between 37+0 and 41 weeks of gestation, it is recommended to induce birth to reduce maternal morbidity (Strong recommendation, Low quality of evidence), and to perform a trial of labor in the absence of contraindication (Strong recommendation, Very low quality of evidence). In women with a history of preeclampsia, screening maternal thrombophilia is not recommended (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate). Because women with a history of a preeclampsia have an increased lifelong risk of chronic hypertension and cardiovascular complications, they should be informed of the need for medical follow-up to monitor blood pressure and to manage other possible cardiovascular risk factors (Strong recommendation, Quality of the evidence moderate).

CONCLUSION

The purpose of these recommendations was to reassess the definition of preeclampsia, and to determine the strategies to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity related to preeclampsia, during pregnancy but also after childbirth. They aim to help health professionals in their daily clinical practice to inform or care for patients who have had or have preeclampsia. Synthetic information documents are also offered for professionals and patients.

Withstanding the test of time: Morning versus afternoon/evening urine protein-to-creatinine ratios in preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

There are mixed findings regarding time preference for measuring spot urine protein to creatinine ratios (UPCR) in renal patients but no such literature among pregnant patients. We compare AM versus PM measurements for UPCR among pregnant patients with preeclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included 163 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia. Laboratory tests of UPCR, urine specificity gravity, and uric acid were collected for these patients during the morning (AM) 12:00 AM (00:00) through 11:59 AM (11:59) and afternoon/evening (PM) 12:00 PM (12:00) through 11:59 PM (23:59).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were UPCR percentages indicative of preeclampsia, UPCR median values, abnormal uric acid, and normal urine specific gravity indicative of a quality sample for measuring UPCR.

RESULTS

UPCR ≥ 0.3 indicative of preeclampsia significantly differed (p < 0.001) where the AM group (76.7 %) had a greater percentage than the PM group (52.8 %). Median UPCR significantly differed (p < 0.001) where the AM group had a greater median (0.44) than the PM group (0.32). None of the uric acid or urine specific gravity comparisons significantly differed between the AM and PM groups. Similar patterns occurred for subgroups of those with hypertension, nulliparous, and preeclampsia with severe features.

CONCLUSION

We found that UPCR had greater median values and more values indicative of preeclampsia for AM measurements than PM measurements. Clinicians who use spot urine measurements and not 24-hour urine measurements should preferably measure UPCR in the AM rather than the PM.

Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of self-testing for proteinuria during hypertensive pregnancies: The UDIP study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of self-testing for proteinuria during pregnancy.

DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

Antenatal clinics, maternity assessment units and inpatient wards at three hospital sites.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

345 pregnant women.

METHODS

Pregnant women self-tested in-clinic for urinary protein using visually read dipsticks with samples then sent for laboratory estimation of the spot protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) (primary reference test). Secondary index tests included testing by antenatal healthcare professionals and an automated colorimetric reader.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and likelihood ratios were calculated for self-testing (primary index test) along with healthcare professional and colorimetric testing compared to the primary reference test (PCR).

RESULTS

335/345 (97%) had sufficient data to be included in the analysis. Self-testing had a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.79) and a specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) compared to PCR. Sensitivity and specificity of testing by healthcare professionals and the colorimetric reader were similar: sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.80) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.85), respectively; specificity 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.92) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women can visually read a dipstick for urinary protein with similar accuracy to antenatal healthcare professionals. Automated colorimetric testing was not significantly different, in contrast to some previous studies. Self-testing has the potential to form part of a self-monitoring regime in pregnancy.

Diagnosis of proteinuria using a random urine protein-creatinine ratio and its correlation with adverse outcomes in pregnancy with preeclampsia characterized by renal damage

Based on a limited number of studies, a random urine protein‐creatinine ratio (uPCR) value of ≥ 0.3 indicates abnormal proteinuria in preeclampsia with renal damage. However, current guidelines do not recommend a reasonable diagnostic threshold of uPCR for severe preeclampsia with renal damage. Furthermore, the correlation between the uPCR value and clinical adverse outcomes remains poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of uPCR in the diagnosis of significant proteinuria and to assess its correlation with adverse pregnancy outcomes in preeclampsia characterized by renal damage. In all, 1837 women were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Eventually, 961 women were enrolled under the exclusion criteria. First, the authors found that uPCR and 24‐hour proteinuria showed a significant association (r = 0.901). The optimal threshold of uPCR for diagnosing preeclampsia was 0.295, and for diagnosing severe preeclampsia the cut‐off was 0.625. Meanwhile, the adjusted odds ratio per 1 unit increase in ln (uPCR) was 1.679 (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.142–2.469) for severe adverse perinatal outcomes; 1.456 (95% CI: 1.242–1.705) for small for gestational age; 1.380 (95% CI: 1.051–1.811) for severe small for gestational age; 1.672 (95% CI: 1.210–2.310) for very early preterm birth; 1.989 (95% CI 1.726–2.293) for severe hypertension; and 2.279 (95% CI 1.906–2.724) for preterm birth. This study indicated that there was a significant and positive correlation between uPCR and 24‐hour urine protein. For neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes, uPCR is an independent predictor of prognosis.

Protein-creatinine ratio and albumin-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant proteinuria in pregnant women with hypertension: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for assessment and diagnosis of significant proteinuria in pregnancy has been by 24-hour urine collection and analysis. Determining fast, accurate methods to identify clinically significant proteinuria would aid diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of spot protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) measurements compared with 24-hour urine collection for the identification of clinically significant proteinuria in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

METHODS

Search strategies were developed for electronic databases from inception to 1st October 2020. Data were assessed for methodological quality using the QUADAS-II checklist for risk of bias and quality of the evidence using GRADE. Meta-analysis was performed where there were at least four studies presenting data for the same comparison (test and threshold). This is an update of the review for NICE guideline NG133 (published June 2019) and includes additional data.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included. PCR measurements (28 studies) showed high sensitivity (91%) and specificity (89%) at a threshold of 30 mg/mmol (n = 3577). Higher thresholds (>60 mg/mmol) increased specificity, but reduced sensitivity. At a threshold of PCR 30 mg/mmol, diagnostic accuracy improved for sensitivity and specificity (93% for both) in studies where the first morning void was excluded (n = 1868). Data available (4 studies) for ACR supports ruling out of significant proteinuria at less than 2 mg/mmol, though evidence was limited by paucity of data and wide confidence intervals around the result.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR and ACR have high accuracy compared to the gold standard 24-hour urine collection.

Relationship between proteinuria and optical coherence tomographic features of the chorioretina in patients with pre-eclampsia

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the correlation between ophthalmologic factors and proteinuria in patients with pre-eclampsia using swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography. In total, 61 pregnant patients diagnosed with pre-eclampsia were recruited during their hospital stay. The authors investigated the relationship between urine protein–creatinine ratio (PCR) and chorioretinal measurements including choroidal thickness (CT), choroidal vascularity index (CVI), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), vascular density (VD), ganglion cell layer+ (GCL+) and GCL++. The associations between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ophthalmologic factors were also evaluated. Central subfield CT of the right eye (p = 0.031) and paracentral CT of both eyes were related to higher PCR (≥1.35 mg/mg). A significant association with PCR after logarithm transformation was noted (r = 0.284, p = 0.026). Retinal measurements (FAZ, VD, GCL+ and GCL++) and CVI were not related with PCR. There was a positive association between MAP and PCR after logarithm transformation (r = 0.296, p = 0.021); however, chorioretinal factors were not related with MAP. In pregnant women with pre-eclampsia, CT using OCT is a novel factor that is correlated with PCR. Ocular structural alteration in patients with pre-eclampsia may be one of systemic vascular changes caused by pre-eclampsia rather than hypertension.