What is the normal range of obstetric shock index in the immediate postpartum period in a low-resource setting?

Shock index as a predictor of postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery: Secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To describe the shock index (SI) distribution during the first 2 hours after delivery and to evaluate its performance when measured 15 and 30 minutes after delivery for predicting postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) occurrence in the general population of parturients after vaginal delivery.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial testing prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid versus placebo in addition to prophylactic oxytocin to prevent PPH.

SETTING

15 French maternity units in 2015-2016.

SAMPLE

3891 women with a singleton live fetus ≥35 weeks, born vaginally.

METHODS

For each PPH-related predicted outcome, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of the SI at 15 and 30 minutes after delivery and its predictive performance for SI cut-off values of 0.7, 0.9 and 1.1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quantitative blood loss ≥1000 ml (QBL ≥1000 ml) measured in a graduated collector bag and provider-assessed clinically significant PPH (cPPH).

RESULTS

Prevalence of QBL ≥1000 ml and cPPH was respectively 2.7% (104/3839) and 9.1% (354/3891). The distributions of the SI at 15 and 30 minutes after delivery were similar with a median value of 0.73 and 97th percentile of 1.11 for both. The AUROC values of the 15-minute SI for discriminating QBL ≥1000 ml and cPPH were respectively 0.66 (lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [LCI] 0.60) and 0.56 (LCI 0.52); and for the 30-minute SI 0.68 (LCI 0.61) and 0.49 (LCI 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

The shock index at 15 and 30 minutes after delivery did not satisfactorily predict either QBL ≥1000 ml or clinical PPH.

[Evolution of the obstetrical Shock Index in postpartum haemorrhage according to the use of sulprostone]

OBJECTIVES

The Shock Index (SI) is used in emergency medicine to assess the severity of active bleeding and in the postpartum context for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). We investigated the diagnostic value of haemodynamic parameters (SI, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) in predicting subsequent use of uterotonic sulprostone treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including parturients with PPH ≥ 500mL between January 2017 and December 2018. Hemodynamic parameters at the diagnosis of PPH were compared according to whether the patient required subsequent sulprostone treatment (sulprostone(+) group) or not (sulprostone(-) group).

RESULTS

We included in the analysis 147 patients. The SI was significantly higher in the sulprostone(+) group (0.92±0.28 vs. 0.83±0.22; p=0.04). The SBP (107.2±17.5 vs. 113.8±17.7mmHg; p=0.03), DBP (56.8±12,2 vs. 61.5±13,2mmHg; p=0.04), MAP (73.6±12.6 vs. 78.5±13.4mmHg; p=0.03) were significantly lower in the same group. No difference between AUC of these parameters to predict the use of sulprostone was found (AUC between 0.59 and 0.61). No significant difference was found for the HR between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic value of SI appeared to be low and similar to other haemodynamic parameters in predicting the use of sulprostone.