Can in vitro maturation overcome cycles with repeated oocyte maturation arrest? A classification system for maturation arrest and a cohort study

Comparison of luteal phase and follicular phase in-vitro maturation in women with oocyte maturation abnormalities

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are there differences in immature oocyte retrieval following luteal phase in-vitro maturation (IVM) compared with follicular phase IVM in women with oocyte maturation abnormalities (OMAs).

DESIGN

From January 2019 to May 2023, a retrospective cohort study at a private IVF centre included 36 women with 53 IVM cycles in Group 1 (follicular phase) and 24 women with 32 IVM cycles in Group 2 (luteal phase). Additionally, nine women had both follicular and luteal phase IVM cycles for intracycle variability analysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences in oocyte maturation stages between the groups at collection. Group 1 and Group 2 exhibited comparable median metaphase II oocyte rates per patient at 48 h after collection [40.0%, interquartile range (IQR) 0.0-66.7% versus 22.5%, IQR 0.0-52.9%] (P = 0.53). The median fertilization rate in Group 1 (66.7%, IQR 50.0-66.7%) was found to be comparable with that in Group 2 (66.7%, IQR 50.0-66.7%). There were no significant differences in the yielded embryo grades and pregnancy rates between the groups. Comparing follicular and luteal phase IVM within the same menstrual cycle in nine patients, no differences were observed in metaphase II oocyte maturation rates (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant differences in oocyte maturation, fertilization rate, embryo quality or pregnancy outcomes between luteal phase and follicular phase IVM in women with OMAs. These findings suggest that luteal phase IVM can be used similarly to follicular phase IVM, offering a potential avenue to enhance embryo yield for women with OMAs.

Oocyte in-vitro maturation primed with letrozole-HCG versus FSH-HCG in women with oocyte maturation abnormalities: a retrospective study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are there differences between in-vitro maturation (IVM) primed with letrozole-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and IVM primed with FSH-HCG in women with oocyte maturation abnormalities (OMAs), defined as at least two failed IVF cycles where immature oocytes were retrieved?

DESIGN

This retrospective study was conducted at a private fertility clinic from January 2009 to April 2023. The final analysis included 75 women in Group 1 (IVM primed with FSH-HCG) and 52 women in Group 2 (IVM primed with letrozole-HCG).

RESULTS

A significantly higher median number of oocytes was obtained in Group 1 compared with Group 2 {9 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-5] versus 5 (IQR 1-18); P < 0.001}. However, no differences in oocyte maturation stage at collection were found between the groups (P > 0.05). At the end of IVM, Group 1 had 73/666 mature oocytes and Group 2 had 106/322 mature oocytes, and the median metaphase II oocyte rate per patient was higher in Group 2 [33.3% (IQR 66.7-100.0%) versus 0.0% (IQR 0.0-22.2%); P < 0.001]. Moreover, Group 2 demonstrated a higher median fertilization rate [66.7% (IQR 50.0-100.0%) versus 50.0% (IQR 0.0-66.7%); P = 0.027]. Group 2 had a higher proportion of Grade 2 embryos (58.5% versus 6.3%), and Group 1 had a higher proportion of Grade 3 embryos (93.8% vs 24.4%; P < 0.001). Notably, all pregnancies obtained in the study were in Group 2 (5 versus 0; P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

IVM primed with letrozole-HCG in women with prior failed IVF cycles due to OMAs may result in mature oocytes, clinical pregnancies and live births. The effectiveness of letrozole priming for the subtypes of OMAs needs further investigation, with studies including greater numbers of cases.

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†

STUDY QUESTION

Which add-ons are safe and effective to be used in ART treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-two recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in the diagnosis of fertility problems, the IVF laboratory and clinical management of IVF treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The innovative nature of ART combined with the extremely high motivation of the patients has opened the door to the wide application of what has become known as 'add-ons' in reproductive medicine. These supplementary options are available to patients in addition to standard fertility procedures, typically incurring an additional cost. A diverse array of supplementary options is made available, encompassing tests, drugs, equipment, complementary or alternative therapies, laboratory procedures, and surgical interventions. These options share the common aim of stating to enhance pregnancy or live birth rates, mitigate the risk of miscarriage, or expedite the time to achieving pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

ESHRE aimed to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations focusing on the safety and efficacy of add-ons currently used in fertility procedures in order to improve the quality of care for patients with infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group consisting of practising clinicians, embryologists, and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of infertility. Patient representatives were included in the working group. To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, recommendations were based on the professional experience and consensus of the working group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 46 independent international reviewers. A total of 272 comments were received and incorporated where relevant.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary working group formulated 42 recommendations in three sections; diagnosis and diagnostic tests, laboratory tests and interventions, and clinical management.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 42 recommendations, none could be based on high-quality evidence and only four could be based on moderate-quality evidence, implicating that 95% of the recommendations are supported only by low-quality randomized controlled trials, observational data, professional experience, or consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of patients undergoing ART treatment for infertility. Their purpose is to promote safe and effective ART treatment, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. The guidelines aim to ensure that patients are fully informed about the various treatment options available to them and the likelihood of any additional treatment or test to improve the chance of achieving a live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESHRE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. K.L. reports speakers fees from Merck and was part of a research study by Vitrolife (unpaid). T.E. reports consulting fees from Gynemed, speakers fees from Gynemed and is part of the scientific advisory board of Hamilton Thorne. N.P.P. reports grants from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare, speakers fees from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare. S.R.H. declares being managing director of Fertility Europe, a not-for-profit organization receiving financial support from ESHRE. I.S. is a scientific advisor for and has stock options from Alife Health, is co-founder of IVFvision LTD (unpaid) and received speakers' fee from the 2023 ART Young Leader Prestige workshop in China. A.P. reports grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck A/S, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos and Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Theramex and Organon, travel fees from Gedeon Richter. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or bedeemedinclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.Theydo not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

TUBB8 mutations as a cause of oocyte maturation abnormalities: presentation of oocyte and embryo profiles and novel mutations

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the embryonic profiles and oocyte maturation dynamics in patients with tubulin beta eight class VIII (TUBB8) mutations leading to oocyte maturation abnormalities (OMAS), and are pregnancies possible in this population?

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study was undertaken in a private fertility clinic between January 2019 and December 2022. Whole-exome genomic studies (WES) were performed to detect mutation types. In-vitro maturation (IVM) was compared in 18 subjects: nine with TUBB8 mutations, and nine without TUBB8 mutations to act as the control group. The distributions of oocyte maturation and embryonic development profiles were recorded. IVF and IVM outcomes of the 18 cases were evaluated. The primary outcomes were the embryonic profiles and maturation dynamics of oocytes derived from IVF or IVM in women as related to TUBB8 mutations.

RESULTS

Mutations were detected in 52 of 89 (58.4%) women who underwent WES analysis. Twelve TUBB8 mutations were detected in nine women (10.1%) with OMAS. Seven novel TUBB8 mutations were noted. Two pregnancies were obtained in women with c.535 G>A TUBB8 mutations. When comparing IVM outcomes between women with and without TUBB8 mutations, there were no differences in oocyte, embryo or pregnancy parameters (P>0.05 in all cases).

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that further TUBB8 mutations which cause oocyte or embryonic arrest will be detected in future. Although biochemical or ectopic pregnancies may be possible in some of these women, no live births or ongoing pregnancies have been reported to date.

Unraveling the Puzzle: Oocyte Maturation Abnormalities (OMAS)

Oocyte maturation abnormalities (OMAS) are a poorly understood area of reproductive medicine. Much remains to be understood about how OMAS occur. However, current knowledge has provided some insight into the mechanistic and genetic origins of this syndrome. In this study, current classifications of OMAS syndromes are discussed and areas of inadequacy are highlighted. We explain why empty follicle syndrome, dysmorphic oocytes, some types of premature ovarian insufficiency and resistant ovary syndrome can cause OMAS. We discuss live births in different types of OMAS and when subjects can be offered treatment with autologous oocytes. As such, we present this review of the mechanism and understanding of OMAS to better lead the clinician in understanding this difficult-to-treat diagnosis.

Oocyte maturation abnormalities - A systematic review of the evidence and mechanisms in a rare but difficult to manage fertility pheneomina

A small proportion of infertile women experience repeated oocyte maturation abnormalities (OMAS). OMAS include degenerated and dysmorphic oocytes, empty follicle syndrome, oocyte maturation arrest (OMA), resistant ovary syndrome and maturation defects due to primary ovarian insufficiency. Genetic factors play an important role in OMAS but still need specifications. This review documents the spectrum of OMAS and to evaluate the multiple subtypes classified as OMAS. In this review, readers will be able to understand the oocyte maturation mechanism, gene expression and their regulation that lead to different subtypes of OMAs, and it will discuss the animal and human studies related to OMAS and lastly the treatment options for OMAs. Literature searches using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence were performed to identify articles written in English focusing on Oocyte Maturation Abnormalities by looking for the following relevant keywords. A search was made with the specified keywords and included books and documents, clinical trials, animal studies, human studies, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, reviews, systematic reviews and options written in english. The search detected 3,953 sources published from 1961 to 2021. After title and abstract screening for study type, duplicates and relevancy, 2,914 studies were excluded. The remaining 1,039 records were assessed for eligibility by full-text reading and 886 records were then excluded. Two hundred and twenty seven full-text articles and 0 book chapters from the database were selected for inclusion. Overall, 227 articles, one unpublished and one abstract paper were included in this final review. In this review study, OMAS were classified and extensively evaluatedand possible treatment options under the light of current information, present literature and ongoing studies. Either genetic studies or in vitro maturation studies that will be handled in the future will lead more informations to be reached and may make it possible to obtain pregnancies.

Oocyte phenotype, genetic diagnosis, and clinical outcome in case of patients with oocyte maturation arrest

BACKGROUND

oocyte maturation arrest (OMA) is currently one of the major causes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure, and several gene mutations were found to be associated with OMA. The purpose of this study was to identify the oocyte phenotype, genetic diagnosis, and clinical outcomes of patients with OMA and explore their possible interrelationships, thus providing a more individualized and efficient treatment strategy guidance accordingly.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, involving 28 infertile women with OMA in the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tongji Hospital from 2018 to 2021. Whole-exome sequencing was performed for the detection of gene mutations. Patients were classified into three groups based on their oocyte phenotype, and for each group, the immature oocytes were cultured in vitro and mature oocytes were fertilized to evaluate both the maturation capacity and developmental potential. The clinical outcomes of OMA patients with different gene mutations or from different groups were further analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight women with OMA were evaluated in this study. According to the stage of OMA, 14 (50.0%) women were classified as OMA Type-1 (GV arrest), 5 (17.9%) were OMA Type-2 (MI arrest), and 9 (32.1%) were OMA Type-3 (with both GV and MI arrest). Immature oocytes from OMA patients exhibited significantly lower maturation rates even after IVM, compared to those in general patients. Seven patients (25.0%) were detected to have deleterious variations in two genes (PATL2 and TUBB8), known to be associated with the OMA phenotype. Patients with identified mutations were found to have little opportunity to obtain offspring with their own oocytes. Among the patients without mutations identified, those classified as OMA Type-1 or Type-3 still had a chance to obtain offspring through IVF or natural pregnancy, while all patients in the Type-2 group failed to obtain live birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Three different phenotypes were observed in patients with OMA. The clinical outcomes of patients were associated with the presence of gene mutations and the classification of oocyte phenotype, thus a reasonable triage system was proposed to optimize the allocation of health care resources and maximize patient benefit.