Hypoglycemia during the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy-maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes

Hypoglycemia in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test during Pregnancy and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes-A Five-Year Cohort Study

Objective: To evaluate the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D) following reactive hypoglycemia in 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of parturients with up to 5-year follow-up postpartum. Data were extracted from the computerized laboratory system of Meuhedet, an Israeli HMO and cross-linked with the Israeli National Registry of Diabetes. Included were parturients with no prior diabetesand available oGTT values during pregnancy. Reactive hypoglycemia was defined as glucose levels lower than 60 mg/dL in at least one of 3 post-glucose load values in oGTT. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: normal glucose status, reactive hypoglycemia, and GDM. Maternal characteristics, laboratory data, and progression to T2D over 5 years were compared. Univariate and survival analyses assessed the adjusted hazard ratio for T2D, stratified by obesity Results: Among 14,122 parturients, 16.8% had reactive hypoglycemia, 71% had normal glucose status, and 12.2% had GDM. Adjusted for age, obesity, and hypertension, Parturients with reactive hypoglycemia had similar T2D risk compared to normal glucose status and a lower risk compared to GDM patients, regardless of obesity status. Conclusions: Reactive hypoglycemia during oGTT does not increase the risk of progressing to T2D.

Normal glucose tolerant women with low glycemia during the oral glucose tolerance test have a higher risk to deliver a low birth weight infant

Background

Data are limited on pregnancy outcomes of normal glucose tolerant (NGT) women with a low glycemic value measured during the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Our aim was to evaluate maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of NGT women with low glycemia measured at fasting, 1-hour or 2-hour OGTT.

Methods

The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy-N study was a multicentric prospective cohort study with 1841 pregnant women receiving an OGTT to screen for gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared the characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in NGT women according to different groups [(<3.9mmol/L), (3.9-4.2mmol/L), (4.25-4.4mmol/L) and (>4.4mmol/L)] of lowest glycemia measured during the OGTT. Pregnancy outcomes were adjusted for confounding factors such as body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain.

Results

Of all NGT women, 10.7% (172) had low glycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) during the OGTT. Women in the lowest glycemic group (<3.9mmol/L) during the OGTT had compared to women in highest glycemic group (>4.4mmol/L, 29.9%, n=482), a better metabolic profile with a lower BMI, less insulin resistance and better beta-cell function. However, women in the lowest glycemic group had more often inadequate gestational weight gain [51.1% (67) vs. 29.5% (123); p<0.001]. Compared to the highest glycemia group, women in the lowest group had more often a birth weight <2.5Kg [adjusted OR 3.41, 95% CI (1.17-9.92); p=0.025].

Conclusion

Women with a glycemic value <3.9 mmol/L during the OGTT have a higher risk for a neonate with birth weight < 2.5Kg, which remained significant after adjustment for BMI and gestational weight gain.

Nutritional and Exercise-Focused Lifestyle Interventions and Glycemic Control in Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Diabetes disrupts one in six pregnancies, bestowing immediate and long-term health risks to mother and child. Diet and exercise are commonly prescribed to control dysglycemia, but their effectiveness across sub-populations and types of diabetes (type-1; type-2; or gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM) is uncertain. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of diet and/or exercise on glycemia in pregnant women with diabetes was conducted. Random effects models were used to evaluate effect sizes across studies and anticipated confounders (e.g., age, ethnicity, BMI). Of the 4845 records retrieved, 26 studies (8 nutritional supplements, 12 dietary, and 6 exercise interventions) were included. All studies were conducted in patients with GDM. Overall, supplement- and exercise-based interventions reduced fasting glucose (−0.30 mmol/L; 95% CI = −0.55, −0.06; p = 0.02; and 0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI = −0.20, −0.01; p = 0.04); and supplement- and diet-based interventions reduced HOMA-IR (−0.40; 95% CI = −0.58, −0.22; p < 0.001; and −1.15; 95% CI = −2.12, −0.17; p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis by confounders only confirmed marginal changed effect sizes. Our results suggest a favorable role of certain nutritional supplements, diet, and exercise practices on glycemia in women with GDM and underline a lack of evidence in ~20% of other diabetes-related pregnancies (i.e., women with pre-existing diabetes).

Antenatal maternal hypoglycemia in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of antenatal maternal hypoglycemia after initiation of pharmacotherapy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDMA2) and its association with pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort of GDMA2 women receiving either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. Composite neonatal outcome included macrosomia, jaundice, respiratory distress syndrome, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, 5-minute Apgar < 7, and neonatal hypoglycemia, and was compared between women with and without hypoglycemia using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 489 women included in the study, 95 (19.4%) had at least one episode of hypoglycemia, most often in the setting of glyburide. Newborns exposed to maternal hypoglycemia had higher rates of the composite neonatal outcome (54.7% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.004). After controlling for confounding factors, maternal hypoglycemia remained independently associated with the composite neonatal outcome (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.04-2.72).

CONCLUSION

Maternal hypoglycemia in GDMA2 was associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes.