1
|
Cai J, Luo X, Wang Z, Chen Z, Huang D, Cao H, Chen J, Wu J. Comparing GDF9 in mature follicles and clinical outcomes across different PCOS phenotype. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29879. [PMID: 38711644 PMCID: PMC11070807 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is main cause of anovulatory infertility in women with gestational age. There are currently four distinct phenotypes associated with individualized endocrinology and metabolism. Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) is a candidate as potential biomarker for the assessment of oocyte competence. The effect on oocyte capacity has not been evaluated and analyzed in PCOS phenotypes. Objective We aimed to screen the expression levels of GDF9 in mature follicles of women with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) with different PCOS phenotypes. To determine the correlation between the expression level of GDF9 and oocyte development ability. Methods In Part 1, we conducted a retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes and endocrine characteristics of patients with PCOS according to different subgroups (depending on the presence or absence of the main features of polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), hyperandrogenism (HA), and oligo-anovulation (OA)) and non-PCOS control group. We stratified PCOS as phenotype A (n = 29), phenotype B (n = 18) and phenotype D (n = 24). In Part 2, the expression of GDF9 in follicular fluid (FF) and cumulus cells (CCs) were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Results In Part 1, the baseline clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic characteristics of the study population were matched with the presence or absence of the cardinal features of each PCOS phenotypes showed a clear difference. Phenotypes A and D had statistically significant associations with blastocyst formation and clinical pregnancy compared with phenotypes B (p < 0.001). In Part 2, the levels of GDF9 in FF and CCs for phenotype A and B were significantly were higher than those of phenotype D (P = 0.019, P = 0.0015, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GDF9 was an important independent predictor of blastocyst formation (P<0.001). The blastocyst formation rate of phenotype A was higher than that of phenotype B and D (P<0.001). Combining the results of the two parts, GDF9 appears to play a powerful role in the development of embryos into blastocysts. Conclusions GDF9 expression varies with different PCOS phenotypes. Phenotype A had higher GDF9 levels and blastocyst formation ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Cai
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Xiangmin Luo
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Zhengyao Wang
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Zixuan Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Affiliated First Quanzhou Hospital, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Donghong Huang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Hui Cao
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| | - Jinxiang Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medcine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, FuJian, 362000, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guixue G, Yifu P, Xiaofeng T, Qian S, Yuan G, Wen Y, Conghui H, Zuobin Z. Investigating the causal impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1337562. [PMID: 38375192 PMCID: PMC10875069 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1337562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Determining the causal relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) holds significant implications for GDM prevention and treatment. Despite numerous observational studies suggesting an association between PCOS and GDM, it remains unclear whether a definitive causal relationship exists between these two conditions and which specific features of PCOS contribute to increased incidence of GDM. Methods The causal relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), its characteristic indices, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was investigated using a two-sample Mendelian randomization study based on publicly available statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The inverse-variance weighted method was employed as the primary analytical approach to examine the association between PCOS, its characteristic indices, and GDM. MR Egger intercept was used to assess pleiotropy, while Q values and their corresponding P values were utilized to evaluate heterogeneity. It is important to note that this study adopts a two-sample MR design where PCOS and its characteristic indices are considered as exposures, while GDM is treated as an outcome. Results The study results indicate that there is no causal relationship between PCOS and GDM (all methods P > 0.05, 95% CI of OR values passed 1). The IVW OR value was 1.007 with a 95% CI of 0.906 to 1.119 and a P value of 0.904. Moreover, the MR Egger Q value was 8.141 with a P value of 0.701, while the IVW Q value was also 8.141 with a P value of 0.774, indicating no significant heterogeneity. Additionally, the MR Egger intercept was 0.0004, which was close to zero with a P value of 0.988, suggesting no pleiotropy. However, the study did find a causal relationship between several other factors such as testosterone, high-density lipoprotein, sex hormone-binding globulin, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, apolipoprotein A-I, number of children, diabetes illnesses of mother, father and siblings, hemoglobin A1c, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, years of schooling, and GDM based on the IVW method. Conclusion We observed no association between genetically predicted PCOS and the risk of GDM, implying that PCOS itself does not confer an increased susceptibility to GDM. The presence of other PCOS-related factors such as testosterone, high-density lipoprotein, and sex hormone-binding globulin may elucidate the link between PCOS and GDM. Based on these findings, efforts aimed at preventing GDM in individuals with PCOS should prioritize those exhibiting high-risk features rather than encompassing all women with PCOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan Guixue
- Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Pu Yifu
- Laboratory of Genetic Disease and Perinatal Medicine, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Tang Xiaofeng
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Sun Qian
- Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Gao Yuan
- Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yang Wen
- Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Han Conghui
- Department of Urology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhu Zuobin
- Xuzhou Engineering Research Center of Medical Genetics and Transformation, Key Laboratory of Genetic Foundation and Clinical Application, Department of Genetics, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|