Delayed nivolumab-induced hepatotoxicity during pazopanib treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: An autopsy case

Mortality associated with the development of acute liver failure after a single dose of nivolumab

AIM

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors are reported in all organs; however, the frequency of liver injury is low compared to irAEs in other organs. We describe a case of fulminant hepatitis after administration of the first dose of nivolumab for the management of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A man in his 80s was treated with nivolumab as a second-line therapy after his overall health worsened during preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. He was admitted to the hospital as an emergency case 30 days later with complaints of vomiting, following which acute liver failure was diagnosed.

RESULTS

The patient developed hepatic encephalopathy on the third day after admission and died on the seventh day. The pathological results showed sub-extensive spread hepatocellular necrosis throughout the liver, and immunostaining confirmed the presence of CD8-positive cells, which is consistent with irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be effective for the treatment of malignant tumors, and although fatalities due to acute liver failure are extremely rare, such cases have been reported previously. Among the immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-programmed death-1 receptor is associated with less hepatotoxicity. However, even a single dose of this treatment can cause acute liver failure, which could be fatal.

Case Study: A Japanese patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who achieved long‐term treatment‐free survival with pembrolizumab and axitinib in the KEYNOTE‐426 phase III trial of pembrolizumab and axitinib versus sunitinib

Introduction

Case presentation

Conclusion

Disseminated intravascular coagulation induced by pazopanib following combination therapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Recently, combination therapy including immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has proven to be effective as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although the first-line combination therapies with ICI have shown clinical benefit, a number of patients require second-line treatment. We report a 60-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who was treated with pazopanib soon after nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy. He experienced Grade 3 disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). We suspect that this was caused by an interaction between pazopanib and nivolumab even though ICI therapy was discontinued. He was treated with thrombomodulin and platelet transfusion and recovered from DIC. Treatment with pazopanib was subsequently restarted. No evidence of DIC was observed thereafter. This severe adverse reaction may have been induced by an interaction between activated proinflammatory immune cells and cytokines from an exacerbated inflammatory state and pazopanib. This report highlights the need to perform careful monitoring of patients who receive molecular targeted therapy after ICI-based immunotherapy.

A Phase I/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Pazopanib and Pembrolizumab Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study assessed whether antiangiogenic treatment may potentiate immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, two-part, multicenter study involving treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Part 1 consisted of a phase I dose escalation and expansion of pazopanib plus pembrolizumab (combination therapy). Cohorts A and B received pazopanib in combination with pembrolizumab, whereas Cohort C received pazopanib monotherapy for 9 weeks before receiving the combination therapy. Part 2 was planned as a randomized three-arm study but was not conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 patients were enrolled (10 each in Cohorts A and B, 22 in Cohort C). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and the recommended phase II dose was not declared, as Cohort C was closed early because of safety concerns. The overall response rates were 60% and 20% in Cohorts A and B, respectively. In Cohort C, the overall response rates were 33%, 25%, and 0% in the combination therapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy, and pazopanib monotherapy groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival rates were 21.95 months and 41.40 months in Cohorts A and B, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 90% of patients in Cohorts A and B. In Cohort C, the frequencies of grade 3 or 4 AEs, serious adverse events, and AEs leading to dose reduction were typically high in the combination therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preliminary signs of efficacy, significant hepatotoxicity was observed in Cohorts A and B. The sequential schedule of pazopanib followed by pazopanib plus pembrolizumab showed reduced hepatotoxicity; however, other safety issues emerged with this approach.