Noble classical and quantum approach to model the optical properties of metallic nanoparticles to enhance the sensitivity of optoplasmonic sensors

The bright light obtained from the quantum principle has a key role in the construction of optical sensors. Yet, theoretical and experimental work highlights the challenges of overcoming the high cost and low efficiency of such sensors. Therefore, we report a metallic nanoparticle-based metasurface plasmons polariton using quantum and classical models. We have investigated the material properties, absorption cross-section, scattering cross-section, and efficiency of the classical model. By quantizing light-matter interaction, the quantum features of light - degree of squeezing, correlation, and entanglement are quantified numerically and computationally. In addition, we note the penetration depth and propagation length from a hybrid model in order to enhance the optoplasmonic sensor performance for imaging, diagnosing, and early perception of cancer cells with label-free, direct, and real-time detection. Our study findings conclude that the frequency of incident light, size, shape, and type of nanoparticles has a significant impact on the optical properties of metallic nanoparticles and the nonlinear optical properties of metallic nanoparticles are dynamic, enhancing the sensitivity of the optoplasmonic sensor. Moreover, the resulting bright light shows the systematic potential for further medical image processing.

Belief and Possibility Belief Interval-Valued N-Soft Set and Their Applications in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Problems

In this research article, we motivate and introduce the concept of possibility belief interval-valued N-soft sets. It has a great significance for enhancing the performance of decision-making procedures in many theories of uncertainty. The N-soft set theory is arising as an effective mathematical tool for dealing with precision and uncertainties more than the soft set theory. In this regard, we extend the concept of belief interval-valued soft set to possibility belief interval-valued N-soft set (by accumulating possibility and belief interval with N-soft set), and we also explain its practical calculations. To this objective, we defined related theoretical notions, for example, belief interval-valued N-soft set, possibility belief interval-valued N-soft set, their algebraic operations, and examined some of their fundamental properties. Furthermore, we developed two algorithms by using max-AND and min-OR operations of possibility belief interval-valued N-soft set for decision-making problems and also justify its applicability with numerical examples.

CED: A Distance for Complex Mass Functions

Evidence theory is an effective methodology for modeling and processing uncertainty that has been widely applied in various fields. In evidence theory, a number of distance measures have been presented, which play an important role in representing the degree of difference between pieces of evidence. However, the existing evidential distances focus on traditional basic belief assignments (BBAs) modeled in terms of real numbers and are not compatible with complex BBAs (CBBAs) extended to the complex plane. Therefore, in this article, a generalized evidential distance measure called the complex evidential distance (CED) is proposed, which can measure the difference or dissimilarity between CBBAs in complex evidence theory. This is the first work to consider distance measures for CBBAs, and it provides a promising way to measure the differences between pieces of evidence in a more general framework of complex plane space. Furthermore, the CED is a strict distance metric with the properties of nonnegativity, nondegeneracy, symmetry, and triangle inequality that satisfies the axioms of a distance. In particular, when the CBBAs degenerate into classical BBAs, the CED will degenerate into Jousselme et al.'s distance. Therefore, the proposed CED is a generalization of the traditional evidential distance, but it has a greater ability to measure the difference or dissimilarity between pieces of evidence. Finally, a decision-making algorithm for pattern recognition is devised based on the CED and is applied to a medical diagnosis problem to illustrate its practicability.

A SWOT method to evaluate safety risks in life cycle of wind turbine extended by D number theory

Wind power is a typical clean and renewable energy, which has been widely regarded as one of the replaceable energies in many countries. Wind turbine is the key equipment to generate wind power. It is necessary to evaluate the risks of each stage of the wind turbine with regard to occupational health and safety. In this study, the stage of production of life cycle of wind turbine is considered. The aim of this study is to propose a new method to identify and evaluate the risk factors based on strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats (SWOT) analysis and D number theory, named D-SWOT method. A wind turbine firm is used to demonstrate the detailed steps of the proposed method. SWOT is conducted to identify the risk factors of production stage of the wind turbine company. Experts are invited to perform the risk assessment, and D number theory is carried out to do the processes of information representation and integration. After that, some suggestions are provided to the company to lower the risks. The D-SWOT method obtains the same results as the previous method of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS). Compared with HFLTS method, D-SWOT method simplifies the process of information processing, and D-SWOT method is more intuitional and concise. Besides, a property of pignistic probability transformation of D number theory (DPPT) is proposed in the manuscript, which extends D number theory and has been used in the process of decision making of D-SWOT.

Complex Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making for Medical Diagnosis

In decision-making systems, how to measure uncertain information remains an open issue, especially for information processing modeled on complex planes. In this paper, a new complex entropy is proposed to measure the uncertainty of a complex-valued distribution (CvD). The proposed complex entropy is a generalization of Gini entropy that has a powerful capability to measure uncertainty. In particular, when a CvD reduces to a probability distribution, the complex entropy will degrade into Gini entropy. In addition, the properties of complex entropy, including the nonnegativity, maximum and minimum entropies, and boundedness, are analyzed and discussed. Several numerical examples illuminate the superiority of the newly defined complex entropy. Based on the newly defined complex entropy, a multisource information fusion algorithm for decision-making is developed. Finally, we apply the decision-making algorithm in a medical diagnosis problem to validate its practicability.

Complex Pignistic Transformation-Based Evidential Distance for Multisource Information Fusion of Medical Diagnosis in the IoT

Multisource information fusion has received much attention in the past few decades, especially for the smart Internet of Things (IoT). Because of the impacts of devices, the external environment, and communication problems, the collected information may be uncertain, imprecise, or even conflicting. How to handle such kinds of uncertainty is still an open issue. Complex evidence theory (CET) is effective at disposing of uncertainty problems in the multisource information fusion of the IoT. In CET, however, how to measure the distance among complex basis belief assignments (CBBAs) to manage conflict is still an open issue, which is a benefit for improving the performance in the fusion process of the IoT. In this paper, therefore, a complex Pignistic transformation function is first proposed to transform the complex mass function; then, a generalized betting commitment-based distance (BCD) is proposed to measure the difference among CBBAs in CET. The proposed BCD is a generalized model to offer more capacity for measuring the difference among CBBAs. Additionally, other properties of the BCD are analyzed, including the non-negativeness, nondegeneracy, symmetry, and triangle inequality. Besides, a basis algorithm and its weighted extension for multi-attribute decision-making are designed based on the newly defined BCD. Finally, these decision-making algorithms are applied to cope with the medical diagnosis problem under the smart IoT environment to reveal their effectiveness.

Evidence combination based on prospect theory for multi-sensor data fusion

Multi-sensor data fusion (MSDF) is an efficient technology to enhance the performance of the system with the involvement of different kinds of sensors, which are broadly utilized in many fields at present. However, the data obtained from multi-sensors may have different degrees of uncertainty in the practical applications. Evidence theory is very useful to convey and manage uncertainty without a priori probability, so that it has been proverbially adopted in the information fusion fields. However, in the face of conflicting evidences, it has the possibility of producing counterintuitive results via conducting the Dempster's combination rule (DCR). To solve the above-mentioned issue, a hybrid MSDF method is exploited through integrating a newly defined evidential credibility measure of evidences based on prospect theory and the evidence theory. More specifically, a series of concepts for the evidential credibility measure are first presented, including the local credibility degree, global credibility degree, evidential credibility estimation and credibility prospect value function to comprehensively describe the award and punish grades in terms of credible evidence and incredible evidence, respectively. Based on the above researches, an appropriate weight for each evidence can be obtained. Ultimately, the weight of each evidence is leveraged to amend the primitive evidences before conducting DCR. The results attained in the experiments demonstrate that the hybrid MSDF approach is efficient and superior to handle conflict evidences as well as the application in data fusion problems.

A GMCDM approach with linguistic Z-numbers based on TOPSIS and Choquet integral considering risk preference

Group multi-criteria decision-making (GMCDM) is an important part of decision theory, which is aimed to assess alternatives according to multiple criteria by collecting the wisdom of experts. However, in the process of evaluating, because of the limitation of human knowledge and the complexity of problems, an efficient GMCDM approach under uncertain environment still need to be further explored. Thus, in this paper, a novel GMCDM approach with linguistic Z-numbers based on TOPSIS and Choquet integral is proposed. Firstly, since linguistic Z-numbers performs better in coping with uncertain information, it is used to express the evaluation information. Secondly, TOPSIS, one of the most useful and systematic multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is adopted as the framework of the proposed approach. Thirdly, frequently it exists interaction between criteria, so Choquet integral is introduced to capture this kind of influence. What’s more, viewing that decision makers (DMs) show different preferences for uncertainty, the risk preference is regarded as a vital parameter when calculating the score of linguistic Z-numbers. An application in supplier selection is illustrated to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Finally, a further comparison and discussion of the proposed GMCDM method is given.

A New Evaluation Methodology for Quality Goals Extended by D Number Theory and FAHP

Evaluation of quality goals is an important issue in process management, which essentially is a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. The process of assessment inevitably involves uncertain information. The two crucial points in an MADM problem are to obtain weight of attributes and to handle uncertain information. D number theory is a new mathematical tool to deal with uncertain information, which is an extension of evidence theory. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) provides a hierarchical way to model MADM problems, and the comparison analysis among attributes is applied to obtain the weight of attributes. FAHP uses a triangle fuzzy number rather than a crisp number to represent the evaluation information, which fully considers the hesitation to give a evaluation. Inspired by the features of D number theory and FAHP, a D-FAHP method is proposed to evaluate quality goals in this paper. Within the proposed method, FAHP is used to obtain the weight of each attribute, and the integration property of D number theory is carried out to fuse information. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Some necessary discussions are provided to illustrate the advantages of the proposed method.

Refined Expected Value Decision Rules under Orthopair Fuzzy Environment

Refined expected value decision rules can refine the calculation of the expected value and make decisions by estimating the expected values of different alternatives, which use many theories, such as Choquet integral, PM function, measure and so on. However, the refined expected value decision rules have not been applied to the orthopair fuzzy environment yet. To address this issue, in this paper we propose the refined expected value decision rules under the orthopair fuzzy environment, which can apply the refined expected value decision rules on the issues of decision making that is described in the orthopair fuzzy environment. Numerical examples were applied to verify the availability and flexibility of the new refined expected value decision rules model. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model can apply refined expected value decision rules in the orthopair fuzzy environment and solve the decision making issues with the orthopair fuzzy environment successfully.

Determining Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Negation of Probability Distribution under Uncertain Environment

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) refers to the decision making in the limited or infinite set of conflicting schemes. At present, the general method is to obtain the weight coefficients of each scheme based on different criteria through the expert questionnaire survey, and then use the Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory (D-S theory) to model all schemes into a complete identification framework to generate the corresponding basic probability assignment (BPA). The scheme with the highest belief value is then chosen. In the above process, using different methods to determine the weight coefficient will have different effects on the final selection of alternatives. To reduce the uncertainty caused by subjectively determining the weight coefficients of different criteria and further improve the level of multi-criteria decision-making, this paper combines negation of probability distribution with evidence theory and proposes a weights-determining method in MCDM based on negation of probability distribution. Through the quantitative evaluation of the fuzzy degree of the criterion, the uncertainty caused by human subjective factors is reduced, and the subjective error is corrected to a certain extent.

A New Divergence Measure of Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Based on Belief Function and Its Application in Medical Diagnosis

As the extension of the fuzzy sets (FSs) theory, the intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) play an important role in handling the uncertainty under the uncertain environments. The Pythagoreanfuzzy sets (PFSs) proposed by Yager in 2013 can deal with more uncertain situations than intuitionistic fuzzy sets because of its larger range of describing the membership grades. How to measure the distance of Pythagorean fuzzy sets is still an open issue. Jensen–Shannon divergence is a useful distance measure in the probability distribution space. In order to efficiently deal with uncertainty in practical applications, this paper proposes a new divergence measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, which is based on the belief function in Dempster–Shafer evidence theory, and is called PFSDM distance. It describes the Pythagorean fuzzy sets in the form of basic probability assignments (BPAs) and calculates the divergence of BPAs to get the divergence of PFSs, which is the step in establishing a link between the PFSs and BPAs. Since the proposed method combines the characters of belief function and divergence, it has a more powerful resolution than other existing methods. Additionally, an improved algorithm using PFSDM distance is proposed in medical diagnosis, which can avoid producing counter-intuitive results especially when a data conflict exists. The proposed method and the magnified algorithm are both demonstrated to be rational and practical in applications.