Validation of the French version of the ICHOM adult oral health standard set

INTRODUCTION

The ICHOM Adult Oral Health Standard Set (AOHSS) recently developed by the ICHOM Oral Adult Health Working Group is a standard set of outcomes designed for its collection in clinical practice in dental health. The outcome standard set is made up of clinical-reported outcome measures (CROMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PROM section of the Standard Set in French for France to enable comprehensive evaluation of the patients' oral health quality of life in a French population.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research (ISPOR). We included patients consulting in a dentistry clinic (n = 127) and seeking dental care. The PROM and CROM data were collected from all patients. Both reliability and the internal consistency were evaluated.

RESULTS

The ICHOM AOHSS was successfully translated into French. We sampled and surveyed 126 patients in a dentistry clinic in France using the French translation of the ICHOM AOHSS. Cronbach's α was calculated to measure the internal consistency. The resulting Cronbach's α was 0.8, indicating acceptable homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The French version of the ICHOM AOHSS shows acceptable psychometric properties in terms of reliability and internal consistency. This translation is suitable for its implementation in a French-speaking patient population.

The implementation of PROMs/PREMs in the assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: A questionnaire survey

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of self-perceived treatment outcomes and experiences on psychological aspects, reflecting the importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in orthodontic practice.

Materials and Methods:

A questionnaire was constructed using the PROMs/PREMs concepts. It contained five parts: “Demographic data”, “Self-perceived esthetics”, “Self-perceived functional concern”, “Satisfaction of treatment procedures”, and “Psychological aspect”. The questionnaire was piloted in five experts and 50 orthodontic patients to ensure its quality, using content validity, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach’s alpha. The validated version was provided to patients who had a complete fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. These data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation. In addition, a multiple linear regression was used to analyze whether there were any influential factors on a psychological aspect. Statistical significance was taken at P < 0.05.

Results:

A total of 271 respondents completed the questionnaire. They tended to have positive perceptions toward the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. There was a significant difference in self-perceived esthetics between the male and female groups. Self-perceived esthetic and functional concerns as well as satisfaction of treatment procedures were found to have significant correlations with the psychological aspect. Sex and self-perceived esthetics were also found to be significant predictors of the psychological aspect.

Conclusion:

PROMs/PREMs should be considered as an important tool to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice. There appeared to be significant impact of self-perceived esthetics on psychological aspects. Consequently, PROMs and PREMs should be introduced in orthodontic postgraduate programs to enhance the concept of patient-centered care in orthodontic practice.

Developing a Standard Set of Patient-centred Outcomes for Adult Oral Health - An International, Cross-disciplinary Consensus

Objective

To develop a minimum Adult Oral Health Standard Set (AOHSS) for use in clinical practice, research, advocacy and population health.

Materials and methods

An international oral health working group (OHWG) was established, of patient advocates, researchers, clinicians and public health experts to develop an AOHSS. PubMed was searched for oral health clinical and patient-reported measures and case-mix variables related to caries and periodontal disease. The selected patient-reported outcome measures focused on general oral health, and oral health-related quality of life tools. A consensus was reached via Delphi with parallel consultation of subject matter content experts. Finally, comments and input were elicited from oral health stakeholders globally, including patients/consumers.

Results

The literature search yielded 1,453 results. After inclusion/exclusion criteria, 959 abstracts generated potential outcomes and case-mix variables. Delphi rounds resulted in a consensus-based selection of 80 individual items capturing 31 outcome and case-mix concepts. Global reviews generated 347 responses from 87 countries, and the patient/consumer validation survey elicited 129 responses. This AOHSS includes 25 items directed towards patients (including demographics, the impact of their oral health on oral function, a record of pain and oral hygiene practices, and financial implications of care) and items for clinicians to complete, including medical history, a record of caries and periodontal disease activity, and types of dental treatment delivered.

Conclusion

In conclusion, utilising a robust methodology, a standardised core set of oral health outcome measures for adults, with a particular emphasis on caries and periodontal disease, was developed.

An innovative approach to assess comprehensive care: Temple University's patient wellness report

PURPOSE

The transition from a paper-based to an all-electronic patient health record took a major step forward in 2018, with the implementation of an electronic health record that supports the School's patient-centered comprehensive care model and facilitates outcomes assessment. The Patient Wellness Report (PWR) summarizes findings of the patient assessment, and it does so automatically by locating data already entered in axiUm forms. This study aimed to describe the PWR implementation procedures and to examine outcomes and characteristics among patients with completed treatment plans during an 18-month period.

METHODS

Outcome data were extracted from axiUm for patients aged ≥16 years who completed comprehensive care treatment plans. Each PWR contained 14 metrics related to "dimensions" of wellness (quality of life, general health factors, oral hygiene, caries risk, and degree of periodontal inflammation and pocketing), each of which is rated on a 3-point scale based on best available scientific evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 2074 patients completed planned procedures between July 2018 and January 2020, and met the study eligibility criteria. Improvement of several conditions was observed between baseline and follow-up in caries lesions (21%), blood pressure (9%), and periodontal pocket (3.2%). A majority of patients rated in good condition at baseline had their scores unchanged at follow-up in the following areas: dental anxiety (92%), speaking (88%), smoking (87%), and alcohol consumption (79%).

CONCLUSION

Improvements in dental caries and blood pressure metrics were easily monitored using the PWR. In addition, disparities exist in improvement of patient outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Early Clinical Exposure in U.S. Dental Schools and Correlation with Earlier Competencies Evaluation

Early clinical exposure (ECE), defined as any interaction with patients prior to the portion of the curriculum when den- tal students spend most of their time at school as a primary provider, is a growing trend in curriculum reform across U.S. dental schools in the 21st century. The aims of this study were to characterize the types of ECE implementation in U.S. dental schools and determine if ECE correlated with earlier clinical competency assessments. In September 2018, the academic deans of all 66 U.S. dental schools were invited to respond to an eight-item electronic survey about ECE at their schools. Representatives of 40 schools submitted complete responses, for a response rate of 60.6%. Among the respondents, 85% reported their schools started their principal clinical experience (PCE), the portion of the curriculum when students spend most of their time as the primary provider for patients, during the last quarter of Year 2 or the first quarter of Year 3. Respondents at all 40 schools reported offering some form of ECE as part of the formal curriculum, with shadowing and performing dental prophylaxis the most commonly of- fered types. No statistically significant associations were found between specific types of ECE and related Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) clinical standards for both formative and summative assessments. Although U.S. dental schools have been incorporating more ECE into their curricula over the past decade, these findings suggest that it has not led to earlier clinical competency assessments.

Patient-reported outcomes associated with different restorative techniques in pediatric dentistry: A systematic review and MTC meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing number of studies evaluating patient reported outcome measures (PROs), there is no clearness regarding which restorative treatment offers major benefits based on the pediatric patient perspective.

AIM

To compare different restorative techniques in pediatric dentistry regarding patient-reported outcomes.

DESIGN

Literature searching was carried out on prospective studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus and OpenGrey. A Mixed Treatment Comparisons (MTC) meta-analysis was undertaken considering the results from reviewed studies. Anxiety, pain and quality of life were extracted as mean with standard deviation, percentage of pain, and mean difference of scores with standard deviation, respectively. For direct comparisons, data were combined using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. For indirect comparisons, fixed and random effects were chosen through comparison of competing models based on the Deviance Information Criteria (DIC). The expected efficacy ranking based on the posterior probabilities of all treatment rankings was also calculated.

RESULTS

An initial search resulted in 4,322 articles, of which 17 were finally selected. Due to unavailability of data, only pain, anxiety and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were statistically analyzed. The difference in means (95% CI) of anxiety between treatments using only hand instruments with or without chemomechanical agents were -5.35 (-6.42 to -4.20) and -5.79 (-7.77 to -3.79) respectively when compared to conventional treatment using rotary instruments and/or local anesthesia. Regarding pain, there was a trend for treatments without rotary instruments and local anesthesia to be less frequently reported as painful. No statistical difference was found intragroup nor among treatments for OHRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety and pain are directly related with more invasive restorative treatments. On the other hand, quality of life is not improved regardless of the restorative technique used. Further well-designed prospective studies regarding PROs in children are still necessary.