The gastrointestinal side effects of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Effect of caffeine on antinociceptive action of ketoprofen in rats

BACKGROUND

To assess a possible synergistic antinociceptive interaction, the antinociceptive effects of ketoprofen (KET), and caffeine (CAF) administered either separately or in combinations were determined in a model of arthritic pain.

METHODS

Antinociceptive activity was assayed using "ellipsis pain-induced functional impairment in the rat" (PIFIR model). The antinociceptive efficacies were evaluated using several dose-response curves and time courses. The antinociceptive effects from the combination that produced the greater effect were compared with the maximal antinociceptive effect of either morphine, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or KET alone. The animals were administered with 0.05 mL intra-articular (i.a.) of uric acid to induce nociception. Groups of six rats received orally either ASA, morphine (MOR), KET, CAF, or a combination KET + CAF (24 combinations).

RESULTS

ASA (ED(50) 465.2 +/- 1.5 mg/kg), MOR (ED(50) 71.0 +/- 1.6 mg/kg), and KET (ED(50) 7.2 +/- 1.4 mg/kg) alone induced dose-dependent antinociception, whereas CAF alone showed no activity at the assayed doses. Nine combinations showed various degrees of potentiation (p <0.01), while the remainder exhibited the antinociceptive effect of KET only. Combinations of 17.8 mg/kg CAF with either 1.0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6, or 10.0 mg/kg KET yielded the highest antinociceptive potentiations. For example, antinociceptive effect was 125.6 +/- 21.4 area units (au) with KET (3.2 mg/kg) alone, but the combination with CAF (17.8 mg/kg) showed 309.5 +/- 10.3 au. The median effective dose (ED(50)) of KET alone was 7.2 +/- 1.4 mg/kg, whereas the ED(50) of KET + CAF 17.8 mg/kg was 0.4 +/- 0.6 mg/kg: KET in the presence of CAF was approximately 18 times more potent than the analgesic drug without CAF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that CAF was able to potentiate the analgesia of KET, but only at selected dose combinations: CAF in the doses of 10.0 and 17.8 mg/kg was able to potentiate the analgesic effect of KET, the most efficacious drug combination being CAF 17.8 mg/kg + KET 3.2 mg/kg. The combination of analgesic drugs and CAF can produce better antinociceptive effects than the analgesic drug alone. This knowledge will permit the selection of the therapeutically most effective combination ratio of drugs, employing lower doses of each drug.

GI effects of OTC analgesics: implications for product selection

Adverse GI effects of NSAIDs include dyspepsia, occult bleeding, overt bleeding and ulcer disease. Consequences of NSAID-induced GI toxicity include anemia, hospitalization, and death. External factors, such as drugs and alcohol, can disrupt the gastric barrier that protects the GI tract from erosive substances. Pharmacists should counsel patients who frequently use non-prescription analgesics and determine whether further medical evaluation is needed. In contrast to NSAIDs, acetaminophen has not been associated with GI toxicity of increased risk of GI tract bleeding.

Are systemic levels of non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs relevant to acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage?

It is uncertain as to the extent which gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage related to NSAIDs is due to a local, topical effect or to an action related to systemic absorption. We hypothesised that, should systemic drug concentrations be of importance, plasma levels of NSAIDs might be higher in patients who had developed GI haemorrhage, from controls who had not. Ten patients with GI haemorrhage, who had ingested piroxicam (and no other NSAID), within the preceding 64 h, at the same dosage and on no new medication for the past 14 days, had blood taken at presentation for measurement of piroxicam concentrations. Plasma piroxicam concentrations were measured in 19 community dwelling controls, matched for age +/- 8 years, gender, daily piroxicam dosage, and time from last dose as their respective index case. All had been taking piroxicam for at least 3 months, and none had experienced GI adverse effects. Median plasma piroxicam concentrations in patients at 8.27 micrograms/l, was higher than in controls at 5.06 micrograms/l. These results suggest that a systemic component, at least with piroxicam, may play a significant (though not necessarily exclusive) role in causing major gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Nabumetone: a "nonacidic" nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic disposition, dosage recommendations, adverse effects, drug interactions, and efficacy of nabumetone in patients with selected rheumatic disorders and soft-tissue injuries.

DATA SOURCES

Data from scientific literature were extracted, evaluated, and summarized for presentation. A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following indexing terms: antiinflammatory agents, nonsteroidal, nabumetone, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and osteoarthritis (OA). Studies evaluating nabumetone reported in articles, abstracts, or proceedings involving human subjects were considered for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

Special consideration was given to clinical studies using double-blind, randomized, parallel, controlled designs. Studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of nabumetone with placebo and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from human studies published in the English language were evaluated. Trials were assessed according to study design, sample size, and description of outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nabumetone is a nonacidic prodrug that is metabolized to an active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory moiety, 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA). 6-MNA is a structural analog of naproxen. Like naproxen and other NSAIDs, 6-MNA possesses analgesic, antipyretic, and antiinflammatory activity, 6-MNA has a prolonged elimination half-life, ranging from 17 to 74 hours, which allows for once-daily dosing. The efficacy of nabumetone for treating symptoms of RA and OA has been established in controlled clinical trials. Nabumetone also has been studied in ankylosing spondylitis and soft-tissue injuries. Adverse effects associated with nabumetone are similar to those associated with other NSAIDs. Gastrointestinal reactions occur most frequently in the form of abdominal pain or indigestion, nausea, or vomiting. Central nervous system adverse effects occur less frequently, and are followed in order of occurrence by rashes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nabumetone is a prodrug metabolized to an active metabolite structurally related to naproxen. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nabumetone, but no advantages over the many other NSAIDs now available.

Gastrointestinal blood loss after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Measurement by selective determination of faecal porphyrins

1. A method for the detection of gastrointestinal blood loss based upon the selective measurement of faecal porphyrins was tested in two studies in healthy volunteers. 2. In the first study subjects (n = 6) received intragastric autologous blood (saline, 2 and 6 ml as a single dose) resulting in a dose dependent increase in faecal porphyrins. 3. In a subsequent placebo controlled cross over study in 12 subjects acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), nabumetone (a new NSAID) or placebo were administered for 5 days with a washout period of 9 days. They were no dietary restrictions. 4. All faeces were collected during the treatment period and both the full faecal homogenate and a random faecal sample were analyzed for deutero- and pemptoporphyrin content by h.p.l.c. Additionally a benzidine reaction was performed. 5. There was a highly significant correlation (r = 0.95) between the values obtained from random samples and the full homogenate. ASA increased the faecal porphyrin excretion (P less than 0.001) compared with placebo in contrast to nabumetone. Complaints of dyspepsia were most common after ASA. 6. Measurement of faecal porphyrins is useful for monitoring NSAID induced upper gastrointestinal blood loss and lacks some of the practical constraints of other methods.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to previous use of analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Catalan Countries Study on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

To assess the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of individual non-narcotic analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a multicentre study of 875 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 2682 hospital controls was done. With control for confounding factors, the overall odds ratio estimate for aspirin taken at least once during the week before the first symptom was 7.2 (95% confidence interval 5.4-9.6). Non-aspirin NSAIDs associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were diclofenac (7.9 [4.3-14.6]), indomethacin (4.9 [2.0-12.2]), naproxen (6.5 [2.2-19.6]), and piroxicam (19.1 [8.2-44.3]). Paracetamol, propyphenazone, and dipyrone did not increase the risk. A previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer did not greatly affect odds ratio estimates, which differed according to sex and were higher for younger than for older patients. However, the incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was higher among the elderly.