Impact of Chronic Oral H2-Antagonist Therapy on Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Exercise Capacity

The role of cisapride in the treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux. The European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

Cisapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent that is used worldwide in the treatment of gastrointestinal motility-related disorders in premature infants, full-term infants, and children. Efficacy data suggest that it is the most effective commercially available prokinetic drug.

METHODS

Because of recent concerns about safety, a critical and in-depth analysis of all reported adverse events was performed and resulted in the conclusions and recommendations that follow.

RESULTS

Cisapride should only be administered to patients in whom the use of prokinetics is justified according to current medical knowledge. If cisapride is given to pediatric patients who can be considered healthy except for their gastrointestinal motility disorder, and the maximum dose does not exceed 0.8 mg/kg per day in 3 to 4 administrations of 0.2 mg/kg (not exceeding 40 mg/d), no special safety procedures regarding potential cardiac adverse events are recommended. However, if cisapride is prescribed for patients who are known to be or are suspected of being at increased risk for drug-associated increases in QTc interval, certain precautions are advisable. Such patients include those:(1) with a previous history of cardiac dysrhythmias, (2) receiving drugs known to inhibit the metabolism of cisapride and/or adversely affect ventricular repolarisation, (3) with immaturity and/or disease causing reduced cytochrome P450 3A4 activity, or (4) with electrolyte disturbances. In such patients, ECG monitoring to quantitate the QTc interval should be used before initiation of therapy and after 3 days of treatment to ascertain whether a cisapride-induced cardiac adverse effect is present.

CONCLUSIONS

With rare exceptions, the total daily dose of cisapride should not exceed 0.8 mg/kg divided into 3 or 4 approximately equally spaced doses. If higher doses than this are given, the precautions above are advisable. In any patient in whom a prolonged QTc interval is found, the dose of cisapride should be reduced or the drug discontinued until the ECG normalizes. If the QTc interval returns to normal after withdrawal of cisapride, and the administration of cisapride is considered to be justified because of its efficacy and absence of alternative treatment options, cisapride can be restarted at half dose with control of the QTc interval. Unfortunately, at present, normal ranges of QTc interval in children are unknown. However, a critical analysis of the literature suggests that a duration of less than 450 milliseconds can be considered to be within the normal range and greater than 470 milliseconds as outside it.

The safety of ranitidine in over a decade of use

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine hydrochloride (Zantac) is one of the most extensively studied and widely used drugs of all time. This has provided an excellent opportunity to define its safety profile.

METHODS

Data from 189 controlled clinical trials in which more than 26,000 patients received daily doses of ranitidine for 4 weeks or more were reviewed. More than 80% of patients were treated with up to 300 mg ranitidine daily; the remaining patients received doses of up to 1200 mg daily. Eighty-seven trials were placebo controlled. Analyses of post-marketing surveillance and a database of all spontaneously reported adverse events were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall in the clinical trial programme adverse events were reported by 20% of those receiving ranitidine compared with 27% of those receiving placebo. The pattern of events was similar in all treatment groups with no evidence of dose-related toxicity in regimens encompassing an eightfold range of therapeutic doses. Similarly in a programme of studies designed to evaluate a dose of ranitidine of 75 mg for non-prescription (over-the-counter) use in the treatment of heartburn, ranitidine was not associated with an adverse event profile distinct from that of placebo. Analysis of spontaneously reported adverse event data allowed identification of rare idiosyncratic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of data from a large population of controlled clinical trials with analyses of postmarketing surveillance studies and spontaneously reported adverse events confirmed the excellent safety profile of ranitidine.

Clinical aspects of cardiovascular effects of H2-receptor antagonists

In vitro studies and animal experiments as well as clinical observations in humans concerning cardiovascular effects of H2-receptor antagonists have been published shortly after the development. Thus, clinical studies were performed to investigate these effects. The following review summarizes the results from in vitro studies up to the clinical investigations performed.

Gastric and extragastric actions of the histamine antagonist ranitidine during posttraumatic sepsis

BACKGROUND

Histamine H2 antagonists (e.g., ranitidine) are generally thought to specifically reduce gastric acid secretion and are commonly used for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients because of their efficacy and safety profile. A few reports suggest that ranitidine might also bind to extragastric sites and/or act as an immunomodulator. The potential effects on posttraumatic sepsis are unknown.

METHODS

Mongrel pigs (n = 24) were anesthetized with fentanyl, injured by a 10 kg steel bar dropped from a height of 1 m onto the fleshy portion of the posterior thigh, and then 35% of their blood volume was drained through the arterial catheter. All the shed blood plus two times the hemorrhage volume as lactated Ringer's solution was infused after a 1-hour shock period. Either vehicle or ranitidine (1.5 mg/kg) was intravenously administered at the time of resuscitation and every 12 hours thereafter in a blinded fashion. After 72 hours a septic challenge was administered (15 micrograms/kg Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide [LPS] x 30 min). Serial gastroscopy, gastric pH, hemodynamics, leukocyte counts, cortisol, and tumor necrosis factor were recorded for 180 minutes after LPS.

RESULTS

Immediately before LPS all hemodynamic variables were identical between treatments, but gastric pH was slightly higher and stress gastritis was marginally lower with ranitidine. LPS caused profound leukopenia and a hyperdynamic circulatory response (i.e., tachycardia, increased cardiac output, and decreased peripheral vascular resistance at relatively constant blood pressure); these changes were not altered by ranitidine. Gastric pH remained elevated after LPS with ranitidine, but LPS-induced gastritis was not modified. Ranitidine delayed the LPS-induced ventilation-perfusion imbalance and attenuated the peak increase in the proinflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor, without altering its antiinflammatory opponent, cortisol. Similar changes were observed in four additional animals treated with cimetidine. The proportion of circulating neutrophils and lymphocytes was slightly altered 180 minutes after LPS, but there was no obvious effect on T lymphocytes in vivo, and no effect on the LPS-induced increase in neutrophil CD18 expression in vitro was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Ranitidine increased gastric pH, which blunted the stress gastritis caused by trauma but not that caused by LPS; (2) ranitidine delayed the early LPS-evoked pulmonary changes and reduced the tumor necrosis factor spike, which is consistent with a favorable immunomodulatory action that has been reported in patients who are critically ill or are undergoing an elective abdominal surgical procedure; (3) the mechanism is probably related to H2 receptor antagonism rather than to a nonspecific side effect of ranitidine, which suggests that histamine may have a previously unrecognized role in posttraumatic septic responses; and (4) the site of action is probably not in the heart or peripheral resistance vessels, but salutary effects on circulating lymphocytes or neutrophils cannot be excluded.