Oral ondansetron pharmacokinetics: the effect of chemotherapy

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Systemic Ondansetron Concentration in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Ondansetron is a drug that is routinely prescribed for the management of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer, radiation therapy, and surgical operations. It is mainly metabolized in the liver, and it might accumulate in patients with hepatic impairment and lead to unwanted adverse events.

METHODS

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to predict the exposure of ondansetron in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The population-based PBPK simulator PK-Sim was utilized for simulating ondansetron exposure in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations.

RESULTS

The developed model successfully described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The predicted area under the curve, maximum systemic concentration, and clearance were within the allowed twofold range. The exposure of ondansetron in the population of Child-Pugh class C has doubled in comparison to Child-Pugh class A. The dose has to be adjusted for liver cirrhosis patients to ensure comparable exposure to a healthy population.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the developed PBPK model has described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron successfully. The PBPK model has been successfully evaluated to be used as a tool for dose adjustments in liver cirrhosis patients.

Flavored Intravenous Ondansetron Administered Orally for the Treatment of Persistent Vomiting in Children

OBJECTIVE

To study the serum level of ondansetron after oral administration of intravenous ondansetron, and test the palatability of the drug after being flavored.

METHOD

This is a single-center prospective study enrolling children aged 3-8 years with gastroenteritis treated for persistent vomiting; patients received single dose of flavored intravenous ondansetron orally. The primary outcome was ondansetron serum level at 4 hours. Secondary outcome was palatability of the drug.

RESULTS

Forty previously healthy patients presenting with acute gastroenteritis were enrolled. The mean age was 4.86±1.37 years. Serum level at 4 h had a median of 26.23 ng/ml, range (8.3-52 ng/ml). Palatability of the drug had a mean of 3.23 (of 5) ± 0.80, based on score from visual analog scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Flavored intravenous ondansetron administered orally is a safe and an effective option and can be considered in the absence of the oral forms of the drug.

Effects of Food on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Agents

Pharmacokinetic interactions between food and orally administered drugs involve changes mainly in the absorption and metabolism of a drug, and may have clinical implications. Such interactions, in particular, may be of major clinical significance for cancer chemotherapy since the majority of anticancer agents are toxic, have a low therapeutic index and are administered long term, most often in combination with other cytotoxic agents. The purpose of this review is to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of various anticancer drugs, including chemopreventive agents that have been examined previously in fasted and fed conditions, and to discuss the underlying basis/mechanisms of food effect in light of a drug's physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Clinical pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, time to maximum concentration and half-life for each drug are compared in fasted and fed states, and specific dietary recommendations are summarised accordingly. In addition, the effects of food on the metabolite kinetics and pharmacodynamic responses, and the potential role of food effect in the modulation of oral biovariability and multidrug resistance have been extensively discussed. Overall, this comprehensive pharmacokinetic analysis indicates that a broad spectrum of food effects is seen among anticancer agents because of diverse factors regulating each drug's oral bioavailability and its interactions with food. The consideration of such effects is important, as it could lead to more rational pharmacological monitoring and possibly improve the oral chemotherapy of cancer in children, adults and the elderly.

The cardiotoxic potential of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetics: is there cause for concern?

PURPOSE

To review and evaluate the potential cardiac effects of 5-HT(3) antiemetic treatment in patients who may be predisposed to cardiac complications resulting from malignancy, cytotoxic oncologic regimens, or preexisting comorbid conditions.

DESIGN

A literature review was conducted on the negative cardiovascular effects of chemotherapeutic agents, and, more specifically, on the cardiac interactions of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists commonly used to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Clinical studies in healthy subjects have reported electrocardiograph changes following administration of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. However, there are limited data on the use of 5-HT(3) antiemetics when administered with cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Nonetheless, the development of significant electrocardiograph changes with some agents may indicate a potential for significant cardiac effects in patients, particularly those who may be predisposed to cardiac complication.

CONCLUSIONS

As the predicted human life span increases, clinicians will be treating a larger, older oncology population. Because two of the most common major comorbidities are cardiovascular related, we need to be acutely aware of the toxic effects of chemotherapy, as well as the possible cardiac interaction of supportive agents, specifically the 5-HT(3) antiemetics. Until more data are made available, the best antiemetic option for patients receiving emetogenic and cardiotoxic chemotherapy may be the agent with the fewest apparent cardiac effects.

Population pharmacokinetics of ondansetron: a covariate analysis

AIMS

To construct a population model to account for the variability in ondansetron pharmacokinetics and to evaluate methods for the efficient development of population models.

METHODS

Population models were developed using 99 subjects consisting of paediatric patients, young, elderly and aged volunteers. A two compartment pharmacokinetic model with a zero order input was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron. Three stepwise methods were proposed and used alongside a three step approach to develop population models with both rich and sparse data sets. The stepwise methods were based on obtaining empirical Bayes posterior estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters within a nonlinear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM) program. The parameters were then regressed against covariates in a stepwise procedure. Variance parameters were obtained by fitting the proposed population model to the data in one further NONMEM run. The population model was validated against a test data set of 54 subjects, including children, young and elderly patients and volunteers.

RESULTS

The population model adequately described the differences in ondansetron pharmacokinetics between paediatric patients, young, elderly and aged volunteers. Different covariates were identified by the various methods. Weight was found to have a strong positive linear relationship with all four pharmacokinetic parameters. Clearance showed a weak negative relationship with age. Males were found to have a greater clearance than females after weight adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The stepwise search procedures potentially are capable of considerably reducing the time required to develop population pharmacokinetic models. The model developed for ondansetron gave accurate predictions of both the concentration-time profile and variability in an independent data set.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of ondansetron. A review

5-HT3 receptors are ubiquitous in the enteric, sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory nervous systems and in the central nervous system (CNS) (Kilpatrick et al 1990). In man 5-HT3 receptors are mainly situated on enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal mucosa, which are innervated by vagal afferents (Reynolds et al 1989), and the area postrema of the brain stem, which forms the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Ondansetron is a selective antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors. It is 100 times more potent than metoclopramide at this site (Tyers 1992). It shows limited binding to other receptors and has a wide therapeutic window. Ondansetron is a useful antiemetic which probably has both central and peripheral actions in patients undergoing radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy or general anaesthesia (Naylor & Rudd 1992). This paper reviews the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in health and disease to provide information for clinicians; it might alter prescribing and alert them to possible drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetic profile and clinical efficacy of a once-daily ondansetron suppository in cyclophosphamide-induced emesis: a double blind comparative study with ondansetron tablets

We investigated the pharmacokinetic profile and the efficacy of ondansetron (day 1) given as 16 mg suppository once a day, as compared with ondansetron 8 mg tablets twice daily, in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The study was primarily aimed at investigating the pharmacokinetics and was part of a large multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy efficacy trial. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a total of 20 patients, 11 of whom had received a suppository containing ondansetron, and nine patients had received the oral formulation. The median area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) obtained with the oral formulation was 226 ng ml-1h-1 (range 91-750), and the median maximum plasma level (Cmax) was 50.5 ng ml-1 (range 24.7-199.6) after a dose of 8 mg. For the ondansetron suppository the median AUC was 140 ng ml-1h-1 range (77-405) and the median Cmax was 17.1 ng ml-1 (range 13-48.3) after a dose of 16 mg. The systemic exposure after correction for the dose difference after the suppository was on average 70% lower than after the tablet. The median time to reach the maximum level (Tmax) was 60 min (range 28-120) with the oral formulation and 209 min (range 90-420) with the suppository. For both the tablet and suppository, there was no apparent relationship between either Cmax or AUC, and efficacy. Although the patient numbers were too small for a formal exposure-response relationship to be derived, the slightly poorer pharmacokinetic performance of the suppository did not appear to be associated with a lessening of control of emesis following chemotherapy. The study demonstrates that the pharmacokinetic analysis of a once-daily 16 mg ondansetron suppository results in appropriate plasma concentrations and AUC, and that this rectal formulation is effective in the protection against nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. This formulation will provide a useful alternative to the currently available oral formulation.

Preoperative oral ondansetron for pediatric tonsillectomy

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of preoperative oral ondansetron, 0.075 mg/kg or 0.15 mg/kg, in 136 preadolescent children premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg per os and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg intravenously prior to undergoing tonsillectomy with isoflurane anesthesia. The incidence of vomiting during the 24 h after tonsillectomy was significantly reduced (P < 0.04) by ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg compared with placebo and ondansetron 0.075 mg/kg (15%, 38%, and 36%, respectively). There was a significant reduction (P < 0.03) in the mean number of vomiting episodes per patient during the 24 h immediately after tonsillectomy in the ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg group compared with the placebo and ondansetron 0.075 mg/kg study groups (0.2 +/- 0.6, 0.8 +/- 1.3, and 0.8 +/- 1.3, respectively). The need for antiemetic rescue therapy (ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg intravenously after three episodes of emesis prior to discharge) was significantly greater in children who received placebo compared with the ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg study group (13% vs 0%, P < 0.05). We conclude that ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, administered orally prior to tonsillectomy, is associated with reduced postoperative vomiting in preadolescent children. In addition, the preoperative oral administration of ondansetron 0.075 mg/kg is no more effective than placebo in preventing posttonsillectomy vomiting in preadolescent children.

The use of ondansetron in the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting associated with poisoning can complicate treatment and in some cases delay potential antidote administration. Side effect such as lowering the seizure threshold may at times discourage the use of traditional phenothiazine and butyrophenone antiemetics.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, single arm, observational study examining the effectiveness of the 5HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron in the management if nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning. Patients with a history or laboratory evidence of acetaminophen poisoning were eligible for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 or greater than 65, use of other antiemetic therapy within the previous 12 hours, history of preexisting hepatic or hematologic disease, pregnancy, or significant ingestion of other substances. Upon meeting entry criteria, patients were administered 8 mg of intravenous ondansetron. Nausea was graded on a 100 mm scale with number of emetic episodes recorded before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Six patients were entered in the study. All patients had nausea and at least one emetic episode prior to ondansetron and prior to administration of N-acetylcysteine. All patients reported relief of nausea after ondansetron. The degree of nausea decreased by an average of 52% at 30 min and 88% at 60 min following ondansetron administration. No significant vital sign changes were recorded in any patient, and there were no complications related to therapy. Three patients were administered N-acetylcysteine, and all tolerated this therapy without vomiting after ondansetron.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron appears to be a potentially useful adjunct in the management of nausea and vomiting associated with acetaminophen poisoning.