Pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil enantiomers after administration of immediate and controlled-release formulations to humans:evidence suggesting input-rate determined stereoselectivity

Stereoselective Inhibition of High- and Low-Affinity Organic Cation Transporters

Many drugs have chiral centers and are therapeutically applied as racemates. Thus, the stereoselectivity in their interactions with membrane transporters needs to be addressed. Here, we studied stereoselectivity in inhibiting organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 and the high-affinity monoamine transporters (MATs) NET and SERT. Selectivity by the inhibition of 35 pairs of enantiomers significantly varied among the three closely related OCTs. OCT1 inhibition was nonselective in almost all cases, whereas OCT2 was stereoselectively inhibited by 45% of the analyzed drugs. However, the stereoselectivity of the OCT2 was only moderate with the highest selectivity observed for pramipexole. The (R)-enantiomer inhibited OCT2 4-fold more than the (S)-enantiomer. OCT3 showed the greatest stereoselectivity in its inhibition. (R)-Tolterodine and (S)-zolmitriptan inhibited OCT3 11-fold and 25-fold more than their respective counterparts. Interestingly, in most cases, the pharmacodynamically active enantiomer was also the stronger OCT inhibitor. In addition, stereoselectivity in the OCT inhibition appeared not to depend on the transported substrate. For high-affinity MATs, our data confirmed the stereoselective inhibition of NET and SERT by several antidepressants. However, the stereoselectivity measured here was generally lower than that reported in the literature. Unexpectedly, the high-affinity MATs were not significantly more stereoselectively inhibited than the polyspecific OCTs. Combining our in vitro OCT inhibition data with available stereoselective pharmacokinetic analyses revealed different risks of drug-drug interactions, especially at OCT2. For the tricyclic antidepressant doxepine, only the (E)-isomer showed an increased risk of drug-drug interactions according to guidelines from regulatory authorities for renal transporters. However, most chiral drugs show only minor stereoselectivity in the inhibition of OCTs in vitro, which is unlikely to translate into clinical consequences.

Effect of absorption rate on pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in relation to chiral inversion in humans

The effect of absorption rate on the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers was investigated in 12 healthy Han Chinese male volunteers following oral administration of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) preparations containing racemic ibuprofen (rac-ibuprofen). The area under the curve of the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC; (mean ± s.d.) values for rac-ibuprofen were 192.90 ± 43.47 for the SR preparation and 195.90 ± 31.69 μg h mL−1 for the IR preparation. AUC values for the enantiomers after administration of the SR formulation were 55.38 ± 17.79 and 92.51 ± 30.68 μg h mL−1 for R- and S-ibuprofen, respectively, and were 65.94 ± 20.06 and 100.81 ± 32.28 μg h mL−1 for R- and S-ibuprofen after administration of the IR preparation. These values did not differ significantly. Cmax values were significantly decreased with the SR preparation: 25.11 ± 5.71, 12.24 ± 3.79 and 12.38 ± 3.55 μg mL−1 for rac-, R-, and S-ibuprofen, respectively, after administration of the SR preparation, vs 46.21 ± 8.20, 20.82 ± 5.90 and 23.46 ± 7.30 μg mL−1 for rac-, R-, and S-ibuprofen, respectively, after administration of the IR preparation. Mean residence time was significantly increased: 7.01 ± 1.29, 5.52 ± 1.25 and 7.04 ± 1.30 h for rac-, R-, and S-ibuprofen, respectively, after administration of the SR preparation vs 4.34 ± 0.89, 3.43 ± 0.64 and 4.51 ± 0.79 h for rac-, R-, and S-ibuprofen, respectively, after administration of the IR preparation. AUC values for S-ibuprofen were significantly larger than those for R-ibuprofen in both preparations, indicating unidirectional chiral inversion. The S/R ratio of serum concentrations of enantiomers was 1.78-fold higher at 6 h after administration of the SR preparation compared with the IR preparation (P < 0.01).

These results indicate that ibuprofen undergoes pre-systemic chiral inversion in parallel with a systemic process and that the clinical effects of rac-ibuprofen in humans depend on the absorption rate.

Drug disposition in three dimensions: an update on stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics

Many marketed drugs are chiral and are administered as the racemate, a 50:50 combination of two enantiomers. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers are well documented. Because of enantioselectivity in pharmacokinetics, results of in vitro pharmacodynamic studies involving enantiomers may differ from those in vivo where pharmacokinetic processes will proceed. With respect to pharmacokinetics, disparate plasma concentration vs time curves of enantiomers may result from the pharmacokinetic processes proceeding at different rates for the two enantiomers. At their foundation, pharmacokinetic processes may be enantioselective at the levels of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. In some circumstances, one enantiomer can be chemically or biochemically inverted to its antipode in a unidirectional or bidirectional manner. Genetic consideration such as polymorphic drug metabolism and gender, and patient factors such as age, disease state and concomitant drug intake can all play a role in determining the relative plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of a racemic drug. The use of a nonstereoselective assay method for a racemic compound can lead to difficulties in interpretation of data from, for example, bioequivalence or dose/concentration vs effect assessments. In this review data from a number of representative studies involving pharmacokinetics of chiral drugs are presented and discussed.

Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs

Many antiarrhythmic drugs introduced into the market during the past three decades have a chiral centre in their structure and are marketed as racemates. Most of these agents, including disopyramide, encainide, flecainide, mexiletine, propafenone and tocainide, belong to class I antiarrhythmics, whereas verapamil is a class IV antiarrhythmic agent. Except for encainide and flecainide, there is substantial stereoselectivity in one or more of the pharmacological actions of chiral antiarrhythmics, with the activity of enantiomers differing by as much as 100-fold or more for some of these drugs. The absorption of chiral antiarrhythmics appears to be nonstereoselective. However, their distribution, metabolism and renal excretion usually favour one enantiomer versus the other. In terms of distribution, plasma protein binding is stereoselective for most of these drugs, resulting in up to two-fold differences between the enantiomers in their unbound fractions in plasma and volume of distribution. For disopyramide, stereoselective plasma protein binding is further complicated by nonlinearity in the binding at therapeutic concentrations. Hepatic metabolism plays a significant role in the elimination of these antiarrhythmics, accounting for >90% of the elimination of mexiletine, propafenone and verapamil. Additionally, in most cases, significant stereoselectivity is observed in different pathways of metabolism of these drugs. For some drugs, such as propafenone and verapamil, the stereoselectivity in metabolism is further complicated by nonlinearity in one or more of the metabolic pathways. Further, the metabolism of a number of chiral antiarrhythmics, such as mexiletine, propafenone, encainide and flecainide, cosegregates with debrisoquine/sparteine hydroxylation phenotype. Therefore, it is not surprising that a wide interindividual variability exists in the metabolism of these drugs. Excretion of the unchanged enantiomers in urine is an important pathway for the elimination of disopyramide, flecainide and tocainide. The renal clearances of both disopyramide and flecainide exceed the filtration rate for these drugs, suggesting the involvement of active tubular secretion. However, the stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of these drugs, if any, is minimal. Similarly, there is no stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of tocainide, a drug that undergoes tubular reabsorption in addition to glomerular filtration. Overall, substantial stereoselectivity has been observed in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral antiarrhythmic agents. Because the effects of these drugs are related to their plasma concentrations, this information is of special clinical relevance.

Influence of input rate on the stereospecific and nonstereospecific first pass metabolism and pharmacokinetics of metoprolol extended release formulations

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of input rate on the stereoselective and nonstereoselective pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, alpha-hydroxymetoprolol, and its acid metabolite. Extended release formulations (100 mg) of metoprolol with varying release rates (e.g., slow (S), moderate (M), and fast (F)) and an oral solution (OS, 50 mg) were administered to normal, healthy extensive metabolizers. Serial blood samples were collected over 48 h, plasma was obtained, and subsequently analyzed by a validated HPLC method with fluorescence detection. The mean T(max) of metoprolol after the S, M, F (4.43, 4.00, 3.14 h, respectively) was found to be different ( P < 0.05) as compared to the OS (2.07 h). The ratio of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol/metoprolol was higher for the OS (1.26) vs. the S, M, and F (1.02, 0.96, 0.99). The S/R enantiomer ratios of the concentration for metoprolol, ACMB, and alpha-hydroxmetoprolol were calculated at each time point and showed a significant difference ( P < 0.05) in the absorption phase (1-4 h) vs. terminal phase (8-16 h) for fast input (solution and fast extended release formulations). Based on these results, it would appear that input rate influences the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, its metabolites, and their enantiomers.

Pharmacokinetics of controlled-release verapamil in healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension or angina

AIMS

To study the dose-ranging population pharmacokinetics of controlled release verapamil in healthy subjects and patients with angina or hypertension. To characterize the pharmacodynamics of controlled-release verapamil in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Dose-ranging studies were conducted in healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension and angina. Subjects received doses of 120, 180, 360, or 540 mg racemic verapamil as an osmotic controlled-release formulation. A population pharmacokinetic model involving zero-order release of verapamil into the gastrointestinal tract with first-order absorption and elimination was used to describe the steady-state plasma concentration profile for R- and S-verapamil. A population sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model was used to describe the effect of R- and S-verapamil on mean arterial blood pressure.

RESULTS

S-verapamil had an approximate 4-fold greater apparent clearance than R-verapamil in both healthy volunteers and patients. The apparent plasma clearance of R- and S-verapamil in healthy volunteers decreased over the dose range of 120-540 mg. A similar dose-dependent decrease in apparent plasma clearance was also noted in patients. None of the patient demographic variables examined (age, total body weight, lean body weight, body mass index, and height) explained the variability in verapamil pharmacokinetics. The pharmacodynamic model describing the relationship between verapamil plasma concentration and mean arterial blood pressure indicated that the S-verapamil had a 3.6-fold lower estimated EC(50) compared to R-verapamil.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this dose-ranging pharmacokinetic investigation in healthy volunteers and patients are consistent with previous reports in healthy subjects. S-verapamil is cleared more rapidly than R-verapamil and the estimated EC(50) for S-verapamil was 3.6-fold lower than for R-verapamil. Estimated EC(50) values for R- and S-verapamil decreased with increasing age and decreasing weight.

Enantioselective assays in comparative bioavailability studies of racemic drug formulations: nice to know or need to know?

The importance of enantiospecific assays in studying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and drug-drug interactions of racemic drugs is widely recognized. Use of such assays in comparative bioavailability studies, however, remains controversial. This commentary proposes a PK/PD-based rationale for deciding whether an enantioselective assay is important in such studies. Racemic drugs are divided into three major categories: those with negligible or nonenantioselective first-pass metabolism (category I), those where the first-pass metabolism of the less-active enantiomer is predominant (category II), and those where the first-pass metabolism of the more active and/or toxic enantiomer is predominant (category III). In addressing the need for assay selectivity, a simple analogy is made between these drug categories and the protein-binding phenomenon. Enantioselective assays are not essential for category I drugs, or for category II drugs in the majority of cases. A special consideration, however, is needed for those category II drugs that undergo racemic inversion that may be influenced by the dose level and/or the residence time of the drug formulation in the gastrointestinal tract. It is with category III drugs that enantioselective assays become important, especially when metabolism, distribution, and/or elimination processes of the active or toxic enantiomer are saturable, leading to variable enantiomeric ratios in the plasma. Factors contributing to these ratio changes include routes of administration, dose level, and input rate differences. In put rate differences are particularly relevant to bioavailability evaluation of category III drugs.