Evaluation of the diurnal variation in the pharmacokinetics of zileuton in healthy volunteers

High ability of zileuton ((±)-1-(1-benzo[b]thien-2-ylethyl)-1-hydroxyurea) to stimulate IK(Ca) but suppress IK(DR) and IK(M) independently of 5-lipoxygenase inhibition

Zileuton (Zyflo®) is regarded to be an inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase. Although its effect on Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ currents has been reported, its overall ionic effects on neurons are uncertain. In whole-cell current recordings, zileuton increased the amplitude of Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ currents with an EC₅₀ of 3.2 μM in pituitary GH₃ lactotrophs. Furthermore, zileuton decreased the amplitudes of both delayed-rectifier K⁺ current (I_K(DR)) and M-type K⁺ current (I_K(M)). Conversely, no modification of hyperpolarization-activated cation current (I_h) was demonstrated in its presence of zileuton, although the subsequent addition of cilobradine effectively suppressed the current. In inside-out current recordings, the addition of zileuton to the bath increased the probability of large-conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ (BK_Ca) channels; however, the subsequent addition of GAL-021 effectively reversed the stimulation of channel activity. The kinetic analyses showed an evident shortening in the slow component of mean closed time of BK_Ca channels in the presence of zileuton, with minimal change in mean open time or that in the fast component of mean closed time. The elevation of BK_Ca channels caused by zileuton was also observed in hippocampal mHippoE-14 neurons, without any modification of single-channel amplitude. In conclusion, except for its suppression of 5-lipoxygenase, our results indicate that zileuton does not exclusively act on BK_Ca channels, and its inhibitory effects on I_K(DR) and I_K(M) may combine to exert strong influence on the functional activities of electrically excitable cells in vivo.

Regulation of leukotriene and 5oxoETE synthesis and the effect of 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors: a mathematical modeling approach

BACKGROUND

5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) is a key enzyme in the synthesis of leukotrienes and 5-Oxo-6E,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenoic acid (oxoETE). These inflammatory signaling molecules play a role in the pathology of asthma and so 5-LO inhibition is a promising target for asthma therapy. The 5-LO redox inhibitor zileuton (Zyflo IR/CR(®)) is currently marketed for the treatment of asthma in adults and children, but widespread use of zileuton is limited by its efficacy/safety profile, potentially related to its redox characteristics. Thus, a quantitative, mechanistic description of its functioning may be useful for development of improved anti-inflammatory targeting this mechanism.

RESULTS

A mathematical model describing the operation of 5-LO, phospholipase A2, glutathione peroxidase and 5-hydroxyeicosanoid dehydrogenase was developed. The catalytic cycles of the enzymes were reconstructed and kinetic parameters estimated on the basis of available experimental data. The final model describes each stage of cys-leukotriene biosynthesis and the reactions involved in oxoETE production. Regulation of these processes by substrates (phospholipid concentration) and intracellular redox state (concentrations of reduced glutathione, glutathione (GSH), and lipid peroxide) were taken into account. The model enabled us to reveal differences between redox and non-redox 5-LO inhibitors under conditions of oxidative stress. Despite both redox and non-redox inhibitors suppressing leukotriene A4 (LTA4) synthesis, redox inhibitors are predicted to increase oxoETE production, thus compromising efficacy. This phenomena can be explained in terms of the pseudo-peroxidase activity of 5-LO and the ability of lipid peroxides to transform 5-LO into its active form even in the presence of redox inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The mathematical model developed described quantitatively different mechanisms of 5-LO inhibition and simulations revealed differences between the potential therapeutic outcomes for these mechanisms.

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics

In this article, aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been described bearing in mind the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and their possible therapeutic opportunities. The importance of the routes of administration of the different therapeutic groups has been emphasized. The classical aspects of drug metabolism and disposition related to oral administration have been reviewed, but special emphasis has been given to intranasal, cutaneous, transdermal, and ocular administration as well as to the absorption and the subsequent bioavailability of drugs. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters present in extrahepatic tissues, such as nasal mucosa and the respiratory tract, have been particularly discussed. As marketed antiallergic drugs include both racemates and enantiomers, aspects of stereoselective absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been discussed. Finally, a new and promising methodology, microdosing, has been presented, although it has not yet been applied to drugs used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

Treatment of asthma with antileukotrienes: first line or last resort therapy?

Twenty five years after the structure elucidation of slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis, antileukotrienes are established as a new therapeutic modality in asthma. The chapter reviews the biochemistry and pharmacology of leukotrienes and antileukotrienes with particular focus on the different usage of antileukotrienes for treatment of asthma and rhinitis in Europe and the US. Further research needs and new areas for leukotriene involvement in respiratory diseases are also discussed.

Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma

Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.

Antileukotrienes in asthma: present situation

Leukotrienes are key mediators in asthma. Over the last 5 years, several antileukotrienes, including three receptor antagonists (montelukast, pranlukast and zafirlukast) and one 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (zileuton), have been marketed and, to date, this class of drugs is being used widely. Still, their definite place in the asthma treatment algorithm is not yet established. These novel drugs have not yet all been evaluated in the same depth, but they have all been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties and to be effective in chronic asthma treatment. Zafirlukast and montelukast are particularly efficacious in exercise-induced asthma and zileuton appears valuable for treating aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. Clinical comparisons to other anti-asthma drugs are still sparse. The corticosteroid-sparing effect of antileukotrienes is fairly well established except for zileuton, even though this drug has been evaluated most thoroughly in terms of its anti-inflammatory effects. Montelukast is the antileukotriene most extensively evaluated in children and zafirlukast has recently been approved for use in children in the USA, although not yet in Europe. Therapeutic regimes are quite variable depending on the drug, but all of the antileukotrienes marketed to date are taken orally; hence, compliance is usually greater than that with inhaled medication. Response to antileukotrienes appears to depend on the individual patients' characteristics, in particular on genetic polymorphisms related to leukotriene metabolism. All drugs of this class are well tolerated and only in the case of zileuton is there potential for hepatic adverse effects. The diagnosis of Churg-Strauss syndrome made among patients taking antileukotrienes seems to be more related to the withdrawal of corticosteroids than to the antileukotrienes themselves.

Pharmacokinetics of zileuton and its metabolites in patients with renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of zileuton and its conjugated metabolites were evaluated in patients with chronic renal impairment. Five healthy volunteers (creatinine clearance > 90 mL/min), five patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis, six with mild (creatinine clearance, 60-90 mL/min), eight with moderate (creatinine clearance, 30-59 mL/min), and six with severe (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) renal impairment participated in the study. Zileuton was well tolerated by all participants including those with severe renal impairment and those receiving hemodialysis. The pharmacokinetics of zileuton were similar in healthy volunteers; in patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment; and in patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The mean metabolite/parent-area ratios for the pharmacologically inactive zileuton glucuronides progressively increased with the decline in renal function. A very small percentage of the administered zileuton dose (< 0.5%) was removed by hemodialysis. Therefore, adjustment in the dose regimen of zileuton does not appear to be necessary for patients with various degrees of renal impairment and patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis.