1
|
Westaway K, Sluggett J, Alderman C, Moffat A, Procter N, Roughead E. The extent of antipsychotic use in Australian residential aged care facilities and interventions shown to be effective in reducing antipsychotic use: A literature review. DEMENTIA 2018; 19:1189-1202. [DOI: 10.1177/1471301218795792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
At least half of all residents of Australian residential aged care facilities have dementia. Most residents living with dementia will at some stage experience behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which can be challenging to manage and distressing for the resident, their family and carers. This literature review examined the prevalence of antipsychotic use in Australian residential aged care facilities, which may be used to manage BPSD only after non-pharmacological treatments have failed. Sixteen studies assessing care between 2000 and 2017 were identified and reviewed. The proportion of residents prescribed an antipsychotic ranged from 13% to 42%. Evidence from six Australian interventions showed that the antipsychotic use can be reduced, especially when non-pharmacological interventions that are individualised to the person and the behaviour are implemented. Research has shown that antipsychotics can be tapered and ceased without re-emergence of behavioural symptoms in many instances. Multidisciplinary, multi-strategic approaches have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing antipsychotic use by up to 3% (absolute reduction) in the aged-care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerrie Westaway
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Janet Sluggett
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia; NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Hornsby, Australia
| | - Christopher Alderman
- Pharmacy Practice, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anna Moffat
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nicholas Procter
- Mental Health Nursing, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Roughead
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elliott RA, Lee CY, Beanland C, Vakil K, Goeman D. Medicines Management, Medication Errors and Adverse Medication Events in Older People Referred to a Community Nursing Service: A Retrospective Observational Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2016; 3:13-24. [PMID: 27747809 PMCID: PMC4819471 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-016-0065-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of older people are receiving support with medicines management from community nursing services (CNSs) to enable them to live in their own homes. Little is known about these people and the support they receive. OBJECTIVES To explore the characteristics of older people referred for medicines management support, type of support provided, medication errors and adverse medication events (AMEs). METHODS A retrospective observational study of a random sample of 100 older people referred to a large non-profit CNS for medicines management support over a 3-month period was conducted. Measures were: demographics, referral source, current medical problems, medicines, medication aids, types of medication authorisations used by nurses, frequency of nurse visits and type of support provided, medication errors, AMEs and interdisciplinary teamwork among community nurses, general practitioners and pharmacists. RESULTS Older people (median 80 years) were referred for medicines support most often by hospitals (39 %). Other referrals were from families/carers, case-managers, palliative care services and general practitioners. Multiple health conditions (median 5) and medicines (median 10) were common; 66 % used ≥5 medicines; 48 % used ≥1 high-risk medicines-most commonly opiates, anticoagulants and insulin. Medication aids were frequently used, mostly multi-compartment dose administration aids (47 %). Most people received regular community nurse visits (≥4 per week) to administer medicines or monitor medicine-taking. Only 16 % had a medication administration chart; for other clients nurses used medicine lists or letters from doctors for medication authorisation. Medication errors occurred in 41 % of people and 13 % had ≥1 AME requiring medical consultation or hospitalisation; 9/13 (64 %) AMEs were potentially preventable. There was little evidence of interdisciplinary teamwork or medication review. CONCLUSION CNS clients had multiple risk-factors for medication misadventure. Deficiencies in medicines management were identified, including low use of medication charts and interdisciplinary medication review. Strategies are needed to improve medicines management in the home-care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan A Elliott
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, P.O. Box 5444, Heidelberg West, VIC, 3081, Australia.
| | - Cik Yin Lee
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia
| | - Christine Beanland
- RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia
| | - Krishna Vakil
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Dianne Goeman
- RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Commercial Rd, Prahran, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee CY, Beanland C, Goeman D, Johnson A, Thorn J, Koch S, Elliott RA. Evaluation of a support worker role, within a nurse delegation and supervision model, for provision of medicines support for older people living at home: the Workforce Innovation for Safe and Effective (WISE) Medicines Care study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:460. [PMID: 26445343 PMCID: PMC4594889 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1120-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Support with managing medicines at home is a common reason for older people to receive community nursing services. With population ageing and projected nurse shortages, reliance on nurses may not be sustainable. We developed and tested a new workforce model: ‘Workforce Innovation for Safe and Effective (WISE) Medicines Care’, which enabled nurses to delegate medicines support home visits for low-risk clients to support workers (known as community care aides [CCAs]). Primary study aims were to assess whether the model increased the number of medicines support home visits conducted by CCAs, explore nurses’, CCAs’ and consumers’ experiences with the CCAs’ expanded role, and identify enablers and barriers to delegation of medicines support. Methods A prospective before-after mixed-methods study was conducted within a community nursing service that employed a small number of CCAs. The CCAs’ main role prior to the WISE Medicines Care model was personal care, with a very limited role in medicines support. CCAs received training in medicines support, and nurses received training in assessment, delegation and supervision. Home visit data over two three-month periods were compared. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with purposive samples of nurses (n = 27), CCAs (n = 7) and consumers (n = 28). Results Medicines support visits by CCAs increased from 43/16,863 (0.25 %) to 714/21,552 (3.3 %) (p < 0.001). Nurses reported mostly positive experiences, and high levels of trust and confidence in CCAs. They reported that delegating to CCAs sometimes eliminated the need for duplicate nurse and CCA visits (for people requiring personal care plus medicines support) and enabled them to visit people with more complex needs. CCAs enjoyed their expanded role and were accepted by clients and/or carers. Nurses and CCAs reported effective communication when medicine-related problems occurred. No medication incidents involving CCAs were reported. Barriers to implementation included the limited number of CCAs employed in the organisation and reluctance from some nurses to delegate medicines support to CCAs. Enablers included training and support, existing relationships between CCAs and nurses, and positive staff attitudes. Conclusions Appropriately trained and supervised support workers can be used to support community nurses with providing medicines management for older people in the home care setting, particularly for those who are at low risk of adverse medication events or errors. The model was acceptable to nurses, clients and carers, and may offer a sustainable and safe and effective future workforce solution to provision of medicines support for older people in the home care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cik Yin Lee
- Royal District Nursing Service, RDNS Institute, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, Victoria, 3182, Australia. .,Monash University Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
| | - Christine Beanland
- Royal District Nursing Service, RDNS Institute, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, Victoria, 3182, Australia.
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Royal District Nursing Service, RDNS Institute, 31 Alma Road, St Kilda, Victoria, 3182, Australia. .,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Commercial Rd, Prahran, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
| | - Ann Johnson
- Royal District Nursing Service (Koonung), 690 Elgar Road, Box Hill, Victoria, 3129, Australia.
| | - Juliet Thorn
- Austin Health Aged Care Services, P.O. Box 5444, Heidelberg West, Victoria, 3081, Australia.
| | - Susan Koch
- Monash University Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
| | - Rohan A Elliott
- Monash University Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia. .,Austin Health, Pharmacy Department, P.O. Box 5444, Heidelberg West, Victoria, 3081, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elliott RA, C. Booth J. Problems with medicine use in older Australians: a review of recent literature. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan A. Elliott
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Heidelberg Victoria Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; Monash University; Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Jane C. Booth
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Heidelberg Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee CY, George J, Elliott RA, Stewart K. Exploring stakeholder perspectives on medication review services for older residents in retirement villages. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2012; 20:249-58. [DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00189.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore stakeholder perspectives on a government-subsidised Home Medicines Review (HMR) service and factors affecting the uptake of HMRs for older residents of retirement villages in Australia.
Methods
Thirty-two in-depth interviews and four focus groups were undertaken with a purposive sample of 32 residents of retirement villages, 10 pharmacists, nine general practitioners (GPs) and a general practice nurse. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework approach.
Key findings
Three major themes were identified: participants' perceptions of the HMR service, barriers to the uptake of HMRs and strategies for increasing the uptake of HMR. Residents had positive, negative or mixed perceptions, whereas health professionals were generally positive about the benefits of the service. Barriers to the uptake of HMRs were related to GPs, pharmacists, patients and the healthcare system. A strategy recommended by multiple stakeholders for increasing the uptake of HMRs was to use a multi-faceted intervention targeting residents and their health professionals.
Conclusions
Multiple barriers to the uptake of HMRs and multiple strategies for increasing the uptake of HMRs were identified. These findings could inform the design of interventions to improve uptake of HMRs by residents and health professionals, in turn leading to better medicine use and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cik Yin Lee
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|