1
|
Aldardeer NF, Alshreef MM, Alharbi EA, Aljabri AK, Aljawadi MH, Almangour TA, Alobaili S, Alarifi MI, Alomari A, Alhammad AM. Early Versus Late Antipseudomonal β-Lactam Antibiotic Dose Adjustment in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae059. [PMID: 38434610 PMCID: PMC10906704 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of sepsis, contributing to an increased mortality rate. However, some studies have demonstrated that renal function improves in sepsis patients with AKI within 48 hours, raising questions about the necessity for early antibiotic adjustment. This study evaluates the association between the timing of antipseudomonal β-lactam dose adjustment and the outcomes of critically ill sepsis patients with AKI. Methods A prospective, multicenter observational study of critically ill patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis and AKI and started on antipseudomonal β-lactam therapy. After the initial dose, eligible patients were grouped as early β-lactam antibiotic (E-BLA) or late β-lactam antibiotic (L-BLA) dose adjustments based on the administration of subsequent renally adjusted doses within 24 hours and after 24 hours of sepsis recognition, respectively. The main outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Results Among 1185 patients screened, 224 (mean age, 62.7 ± 16.8 years; 62% were male) met inclusion criteria. Eighty-four and 140 patients were included in the E-BLA and L-BLA groups, respectively. Approximately half of the cohort presented with AKI stage II, and piperacillin-tazobactam was prescribed as initial empirical therapy in more than 50% of the cohort. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, L-BLA was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality compared to E-BLA (hazard ratio, 0.588 [95% confidence interval, .355-.974]). Conclusions In sepsis patients with AKI, L-BLA was associated with in-hospital mortality benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namareq F Aldardeer
- Department of Pharmacy Services, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maram M Alshreef
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Emad A Alharbi
- Department of Pharmacy Services, King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad K Aljabri
- Department of Pharmacy Services, King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad H Aljawadi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thamer A Almangour
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad Alobaili
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed I Alarifi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Awad Alomari
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah M Alhammad
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Corporate Department of Pharmacy Services, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allen JM, Surajbali D, Nguyen DQ, Kuczek J, Tran M, Hachey B, Feild C, Shoulders BR, Smith SM, Voils SA. Impact of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing in Septic Shock Patients Using Real-World Evidence: An Observational, Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Pharmacother 2023; 57:653-661. [PMID: 36154486 PMCID: PMC10433263 DOI: 10.1177/10600280221125919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis and septic shock are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Rapid initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy is essential, as inadequate therapy early during septic shock has been shown to increase the risk of mortality. However, despite the importance of appropriate antibiotic initiation, in clinical practice, concerns for renal dysfunction frequently lead to antibiotic dose reduction, with scant evidence on the impact of this practice in septic shock patients. OBJECTIVE The purpose if this article is to investigate the rate and impact of piperacillin-tazobactam dose adjustment in early phase septic shock patients using real-world electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS A multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted of septic shock patients who received at least 48 hours of piperacillin-tazobactam therapy and concomitant receipt of norepinephrine. Subjects were stratified into 2 groups according to their cumulative 48-hour piperacillin-tazobactam dose: low piperacillin-tazobactam dosing (LOW; <27 g) group and normal piperacillin-tazobactam dosing (NORM; ≥27 g) group. To account for potential confounding variables, propensity score matching was used. The primary study outcome was 28-day norepinephrine-free days (NFD). RESULTS In all, 1279 patients met study criteria. After propensity score matching (n = 608), the NORM group had more median NFD (23.9 days [interquartile range, IQR: 0-27] vs 13.6 days [IQR: 0-27], P = 0.021). The NORM group also had lower rates of in-hospital mortality/hospice disposition (25.9% [n = 79] vs 35.5% [n = 108]), P = 0.014). Other secondary outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the propensity score-matched cohort, the NORM group had significantly more 28-day NFD. Piperacillin-tazobactam dose reduction in early phase septic shock is associated with worsened clinical outcomes. Clinicians should be vigilant to avoid piperacillin-tazobactam dose reduction in early phase septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Allen
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Maithi Tran
- Winter Haven Hospital, Winter Haven, FL, USA
| | | | - Carinda Feild
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Bethany R. Shoulders
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Steven M. Smith
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stacy A. Voils
- Cardiovascular & Metabolism Medical Science Liaison, Syneos Health/Janssen, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haseeb A, Faidah HS, Alghamdi S, Alotaibi AF, Elrggal ME, Mahrous AJ, Abuhussain SSA, Obaid NA, Algethamy M, AlQarni A, Khogeer AA, Saleem Z, Iqbal MS, Ashgar SS, Radwan RM, Mutlaq A, Fatani N, Sheikh A. Dose optimization of β-lactams antibiotics in pediatrics and adults: A systematic review. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:964005. [PMID: 36210807 PMCID: PMC9532942 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.964005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: β-lactams remain the cornerstone of the empirical therapy to treat various bacterial infections. This systematic review aimed to analyze the data describing the dosing regimen of β-lactams. Methods: Systematic scientific and grey literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of pre-defined exclusion and inclusion criteria. The cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and case reports that reported the dosing schedule of β-lactams are included in this study. Results: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 40 were cohort studies, 2 were case reports and 10 were RCTs. The majority of the studies (34/52) studied the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a drug. A total of 20 studies proposed dosing schedule in pediatrics while 32 studies proposed dosing regimen among adults. Piperacillin (12/52) and Meropenem (11/52) were the most commonly used β-lactams used in hospitalized patients. As per available evidence, continuous infusion is considered as the most appropriate mode of administration to optimize the safety and efficacy of the treatment and improve the clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic therapy is challenging due to pathophysiological changes among different age groups. The optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters is useful to support alternative dosing regimens such as an increase in dosing interval, continuous infusion, and increased bolus doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Haseeb
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- *Correspondence: Abdul Haseeb,
| | - Hani Saleh Faidah
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alghamdi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Clinical Pharmacy, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal F. Alotaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahmoud Essam Elrggal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad J. Mahrous
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Najla A. Obaid
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Algethamy
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control Program, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullmoin AlQarni
- Infectious Diseases Department, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Asim A. Khogeer
- Plan and Research Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs of Makkah Region, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Medical Genetics Unit, Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah Healthcare Cluster, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zikria Saleem
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya Univrsity, Multan, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami S. Ashgar
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rozan Mohammad Radwan
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alaa Mutlaq
- General Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sandaradura I, Alffenaar JW, Cotta MO, Daveson K, Day RO, Van Hal S, Lau C, Marriott DJE, Penm J, Roberts JA, Tabah A, Williams P, Imani S. Emerging therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-infective agents in Australian hospitals: Availability, performance and barriers to implementation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:669-679. [PMID: 34289135 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of the study was to assess the status of emerging therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infective agents in Australian hospitals. METHODS A nationwide cross-sectional survey of all Australian hospitals operating in the public and private health sector was conducted between August and September 2019. The survey consisted of questions regarding institutional TDM practice for anti-infective agents and clinical vignettes specific to β-lactam antibiotics. RESULTS Responses were received from 82 unique institutions, representing all Australian states and territories. All 29 (100%) of principal referral (major) hospitals in Australia participated. Five surveys were partially complete. Only 25% (20/80) of hospitals had TDM testing available on-site for any of the eight emerging TDM candidates considered: β-lactam antibiotics, anti-tuberculous agents, flucytosine, fluoroquinolones, ganciclovir, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs, linezolid and teicoplanin. A considerable time lag was noted between TDM sampling and reporting of results. With respect to β-lactam antibiotic TDM, variable indications, pharmacodynamic targets and sampling times were identified. The three greatest barriers to local TDM performance were found to be (1) lack of timely assays/results, (2) lack of institutional-wide expertise and/or training and (3) lack of guidelines to inform ordering of TDM and interpretation of results. The majority of respondents favoured establishing national TDM guidelines and increasing access to dose prediction software, at rates of 89% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION Translating emerging TDM evidence into daily clinical practice is slow. Concerted efforts are required to address the barriers identified and facilitate the implementation of standardised practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indy Sandaradura
- Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, New South Wales Health Pathology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jan-Willem Alffenaar
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Menino O Cotta
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kathryn Daveson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Queensland Statewide Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Metro North Hospital and Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Richard O Day
- St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sebastiaan Van Hal
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cindy Lau
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah J E Marriott
- St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Clinical Microbiology, SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Penm
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason A Roberts
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Departments of Pharmacy and Intensive Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Alexis Tabah
- Intensive Care Unit, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Paul Williams
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Pharmacy, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Sahand Imani
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
International Survey of Thrombolytic Use for Treatment of Cardiac Arrest Due to Massive Pulmonary Embolism. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2:e0132. [PMID: 32695997 PMCID: PMC7314323 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This survey sought to characterize the national prescribing patterns and barriers to the use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of pulmonary embolism, with a specific focus on treatment during actual or imminent cardiac arrest. Design A 19-question international, cross-sectional survey on thrombolytic use in pulmonary embolism was developed, validated, and administered. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine factors predictive of utilization of thrombolytics in the setting of cardiac arrest secondary to pulmonary embolism. Setting International survey study. Subjects Physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who were members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Thrombolytic users were compared with nonusers. Respondents (n = 272) predominately were physicians (62.1%) or pharmacists (30.5%) practicing in an academic medical center (54.8%) or community teaching setting (24.6%). Thrombolytic users (n = 177; 66.8%) were compared with nonusers (n = 88; 33.2%) Thrombolytic users were more likely to work in pulmonary/critical care (80.2% thrombolytic use vs 59.8%; p < 0.01) and emergency medicine (6.8% vs 3.5%; p < 0.01). Users were more likely to have an institutional guideline or policy in place pertaining to the use of thrombolytics in cardiac arrest (27.8% vs 13.6%; p < 0.01) or have a pulmonary embolism response team (38.6% vs 19.3%; p < 0.01). Lack of evidence supporting use and the risk of adverse outcomes were barriers to thrombolytic use. Working in a pulmonary/critical care environment (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.24-4.52) and comfort level (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.7-4.53) were predictive of thrombolytic use in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions Most survey respondents used thrombolytics in the setting of cardiac arrest secondary to known or suspected pulmonary embolism. This survey study adds important data to the literature surrounding thrombolytics for pulmonary embolism as it describes thrombolytic user characteristic, barriers to use, and common prescribing practices internationally.
Collapse
|