Impact of a pharmacist‐to‐dose direct oral anticoagulant protocol on medication errors at an academic medical center

Role of Clinical Pharmacy anticoagulation service on Apixaban prescribing appropriateness in atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate DAOC dosing is precuarious and frequently encountered. Apixaban is the most reported DOAC to be inappropriately dosed. We examined the effect of adding a Clinical Pharmacist to the cardiology team rounds to the standard practice in Apixaban prescription patterns in a tertiary center in KSA.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of clinical pharmacy services on Apixaban dose appropriateness upon discharge in Atrial Fibrillation patient pobulation.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation using a quasi-experiment of pre-post design to evaluate Apixaban dose appropriateness using clinical pharmacy services. Clinical pharmacist was added to the team to evaluate and change the regimen according to FDA dosing. Data were collected for 9 months for each, patients were followed up for efficacy and safety outcomes for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 550 patients were initially collected after follow-up, the number of patients was in the pre-phase cohort (NO CCP; n= 112) from July 2018 to the March 2019 and compared to post phase cohort (CCP, n=103) from July 2019 to March 2020. 215 Patients were included, For primary end point, CCP cohort had significantly appropriate prescriptions of apixaban compared to Non-CCP (90.2 % vs 71.5 %, p<0.001)., no differences in thromboembolic and hemorrhagic adverse events betewwn 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team approach including clinical pharmacy services is effective in increasing the appropriate use of Apixaban upom discharge without apparent increased risk of bleeding or Adverse events.

Prevalence and predictors of inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Information on inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is scarce in the Australian context.

AIM

To describe the prevalence and potential predictors of inappropriate dosing of DOACs.

METHODS

Patients who received DOACs during admission under a general medical unit over a 2-year period (from January 2017 to December 2018) were retrospectively studied. Appropriateness of the dosing regimen was verified against the recommendations of the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia. Data were obtained from medical records and analysed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The variables associated with under- and overdosing were also determined.

RESULTS

A total of 203 (mean age 71.6 ± 14.5 years, females 52%) patients were studied. Inappropriate dosing occurred in 44 (22%) patients: underdosing 27 (13%) and overdosing 17 (8%). Age ≥75 years (P < 0.01), lower estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) (P < 0.01), prescription of DOAC prior to index admission (P < 0.01) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.01), HAS-BLED (P < 0.01) and CHA2 DS2 -VASc (P < 0.01) scores had a significant univariate association with inappropriate dosing. However, in the multivariate logistic regression only lower CrCl (odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.07, P < 0.01) and prescription of DOAC prior to index admission (OR 2.62, 95% CI: 1.01-6.75, P = 0.047) remained significantly associated with inappropriate dosing. Impaired renal function also had a significant association with underdosing (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, P = 0.01) and borderline significance with overdosing (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate dosing of DOACs, especially underdosing, is common in clinical practice. Clinicians should exercise due diligence when prescribing DOACs to patients with renal impairment and in outpatient settings.

Medication errors in relation to direct-acting oral anticoagulants: a qualitative study of pharmacists' views and experiences

BACKGROUND

Despite their effectiveness and ease of use, medication errors have been reported to be highly prevalent with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC).

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore views and experiences of pharmacists on contributory factors and mitigation strategies around medication errors in relation to DOAC.

METHOD

This study used a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists in Saudi Arabia. The interview topic guide was developed based on previous literature and Reason's Accident Causation Model. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2020 was used to thematically analyse the data (VERBI Software).

RESULTS

Twenty-three participants representing a range of experiences participated. The analysis recognised three major themes: (a) enablers and barriers faced by pharmacists in promoting safe utilisation of DOAC, such as opportunities to conduct risk assessments and offer patient counselling (b) factors related to other healthcare professionals and patients, such as opportunities for effective collaborations and patient health literacy; and (c) effective strategies to promote DOAC safety such as empowering the role of pharmacists, patient education, opportunities for risk assessments, multidisciplinary working and enforcement of clinical guidelines and enhanced roles of pharmacists.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists believed that enhanced education of healthcare professionals and patients, development and implementation of clinical guidelines, improvement of incident reporting systems, and multidisciplinary team working could be effective strategies to reduce DOAC-related errors. In addition, future research should utilise multifaceted interventions to reduce error prevalence.

Impact of Hospital-based Multidisciplinary Anticoagulation Stewardship Programs

Antithrombotic therapies, especially anticoagulants, are high-risk medications with increased potential for adverse events. The development and implementation of a well-functioning, designated, multidisciplinary anticoagulation stewardship program (MASP), tailored to each hospital-center's needs, has the primary objectives of improving patient-centered outcomes, minimizing undesirable anticoagulation-related adverse events and minimizing hospital length of stay (LOS) and other patient-related costs. Such stewardship programs are pivotal in supporting busy clinicians with consultation on challenging clinical case scenarios, ensuring appropriate use of valuable healthcare resources, achieving compliance with anticoagulant-associated accreditation standards, and positively impacting patient-specific morbidity/mortality outcomes. Herein, we review and discuss the critical need for antithrombosis stewardship and the benefit of formalized MASP in optimizing use of antithrombotic therapies.

Views, experiences and contributory factors related to medication errors associated with direct oral anticoagulants: a qualitative study with physicians and nurses

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become preferable for the management of thromboembolic events. Recent publications have however identified high volume of medication errors related to DOACs. There is limited literature on why and how such errors occur or happen in clinical practice.

AIM

This study aimed to explore views, experiences, contributory factors related to DOACs medication errors from the perspectives of healthcare professionals.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews using online videoconferencing were conducted with physicians and nurses from tertiary care hospitals in three different regions in Saudi Arabia. Questions included views, experiences and perceived factors contributing to errors. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and were thematically analyzed using MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2020 (VERBI Software).

RESULTS

The semi-structured interviews (n = 34) included physicians (n = 20) and nurses (n = 14) until data saturation was achieved. The analysis identified five themes: Factors related to healthcare professionals (e.g. knowledge, confidence and access to guidelines); Factors related to patients (e.g. comorbidity, polypharmacy, medication review, and communication barriers); Factors related to organization (e.g. guidelines, safety culture and incidents reporting system); Factors related to the DOACs medications (e.g. lack of availability of antidotes and dosing issues); and Strategies for error prevention/mitigation (e.g. the need for professional training and routine medication review).

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals identified errors in relation to DOACs as multifactorial including their own and patient lack of knowledge, lack of clinical guidelines and organizational factors including safety culture. Medication review and reconciliation on discharge were key strategies suggested to reduce DOACs related errors. These strategies support the role of pharmacists as direct patients care providers to minimize DOACs errors.