1
|
Spiliotopoulos D, Koelbert C, Audebert M, Barisch I, Bellet D, Constans M, Czich A, Finot F, Gervais V, Khoury L, Kirchnawy C, Kitamoto S, Le Tesson A, Malesic L, Matsuyama R, Mayrhofer E, Mouche I, Preikschat B, Prielinger L, Rainer B, Roblin C, Wäse K. Assessment of the performance of the Ames MPF™ assay: A multicenter collaborative study with six coded chemicals. MUTATION RESEARCH. GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 2024; 893:503718. [PMID: 38272629 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The Ames MPF™ is a miniaturized, microplate fluctuation format of the Ames test. It is a standardized, commercially available product which can be used to assess mutagenicity in Salmonella and E. coli strains in 384-well plates using a color change-based readout. Several peer-reviewed comparisons of the Ames MPF™ to the Ames test in Petri dishes confirmed its suitability to evaluate the mutagenic potential of a variety of test items. An international multicenter study involving seven laboratories tested six coded chemicals with this assay using five bacterial strains, as recommended by the OECD test guideline 471. The data generated by the participating laboratories was in excellent agreement (93%), and the similarity of their dose response curves, as analyzed with sophisticated statistical approaches further confirmed the suitability of the Ames MPF™ assay as an alternative to the Ames test on agar plates, but with advantages with respect to significantly reduced amount of test substance and S9 requirements, speed, hands-on time and, potentially automation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marc Audebert
- PrediTox, 1 place Pierre Potier, 31100 Toulouse, France; INRAE UMR1331 Toxalim, 180 chemin de Tournefeuille, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Ilona Barisch
- Genetic Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Deborah Bellet
- GenEvolutioN, 2, 8 Rue de Rouen, 78440 Porcheville, France
| | | | - Andreas Czich
- Genetic Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Francis Finot
- GenEvolutioN, 2, 8 Rue de Rouen, 78440 Porcheville, France
| | - Véronique Gervais
- Servier Group, Non-Clinical Safety Department, F-45403 Orléans-Gidy, France
| | - Laure Khoury
- PrediTox, 1 place Pierre Potier, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Christian Kirchnawy
- OFI, Austrian Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology, Department for Microbiology and Cell Culture, Franz-Grill Straße 5, Objekt 213, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sachiko Kitamoto
- Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 1-98, Kasugadenaka 3-chome, konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Audrey Le Tesson
- Servier Group, Non-Clinical Safety Department, F-45403 Orléans-Gidy, France
| | - Laure Malesic
- GenEvolutioN, 2, 8 Rue de Rouen, 78440 Porcheville, France
| | - Ryoko Matsuyama
- Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 1-98, Kasugadenaka 3-chome, konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Elisa Mayrhofer
- OFI, Austrian Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology, Department for Microbiology and Cell Culture, Franz-Grill Straße 5, Objekt 213, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Birgit Preikschat
- Genetic Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Prielinger
- Department of Applied Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstraße 222, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Rainer
- Department of Applied Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstraße 222, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Clémence Roblin
- Servier Group, Non-Clinical Safety Department, F-45403 Orléans-Gidy, France
| | - Kerstin Wäse
- Genetic Toxicology, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujimoto K, Higaki T, Abe J, Fujita M, Kawakami T. Theoretical Validation of In Chemico Skin Sensitization Assay "ADRA" Using the Products Formed by Nucleophilic Reagents and Chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol 2022; 35:2107-2121. [PMID: 36315617 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico assay for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals by evaluating the reactivity of nucleophilic reagents that mimic skin proteins. N-(2-(1-Naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC) and α-N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-lysine (NAL), used as nucleophilic reagents, are small-molecule derivatives of two different amino acids, each with a naphthalene ring attached. The rate of decrease in the amount of NAC or NAL in the reaction solution is evaluated in this assay as an indicator of the test substance's skin sensitization ability. However, the products formed between the nucleophilic reagent and the test substance, which play an important role in vivo, are not directly identified. Therefore, six highly reactive chemicals, including the proficiency substances listed in the OECD Test Guidelines─squaric acid diethyl ester, 2-methyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one (MI), p-benzoquinone, palmitoyl chloride, diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP), and imidazolidinyl urea (IU)─were used to determine each formed product. Samples were prepared according to the standard ADRA method, and the formed products were predicted on the basis of the reaction mechanism. Excluding DPCP, the estimated structures were validated using mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry on the synthesized samples. In this manner, the products of each nucleophile were confirmed for all examined test substances. The estimated structure products were obtained through a series of reactions initiated by the nucleophilic attack of NAC's thiol group or NAL's amino group on the test substance's electron-deficient carbonyl carbon. However, contrary to expectations, disulfide-linked-type ring-opened products were detected in the case of MI, and products with free formaldehyde in solution were detected in the case of IU. In summary, all skin sensitizers tested herein reacted with NAC and/or NAL to give products. This supports the theoretical validity of ADRA, which provides an indirect evaluation of the formed products based on a decrease in nucleophilic reagents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichi Fujimoto
- Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 1-98, Kasugade-Naka 3-Chome, Konohana-Ku, Osaka City 554-8558, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tamaki Higaki
- Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 1-98, Kasugade-Naka 3-Chome, Konohana-Ku, Osaka City 554-8558, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jun Abe
- Environmental Health Science Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 1-98, Kasugade-Naka 3-Chome, Konohana-Ku, Osaka City 554-8558, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaharu Fujita
- Safety Evaluation Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, 210, Nakanuma, Minamiashigara 250-0193, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Kawakami
- Division of Environmental Chemistry, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-9501, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|