Protein conformation changes on block copolymer surfaces detected by antibody-functionalized atomic force microscope tips

A review of block copolymer-based biomaterials that control protein and cell interactions

Block copolymers posses the ability to phase separate into micro and nanoscale patterns resulting in nonhomogeneous surfaces and solids. This nonhomogeneity has been harnessed to improve mechanical properties, control degradation, and add functionality to biomaterials. The ability of block copolymers to generate a wide variety of surface chemistries and morphologies can also be harnessed to control protein adsorption, protein conformation, and cell adhesion. Proteins and cells will respond to periodically structured surfaces, so block copolymers have a great deal of potential as biomaterials. This review will explore the ability of block copolymers to control specific biological responses such as cell adhesion, protein adsorption and conformation, parameters that govern the overall host response to a material. In addition, some of the specific applications of block copolymer, antithrombogenic materials and their ability to pattern proteins, will be discussed.

Designing nanostructured block copolymer surfaces to control protein adhesion

The profile and conformation of proteins that are adsorbed onto a polymeric biomaterial surface have a profound effect on its in vivo performance. Cells and tissue recognize the protein layer rather than directly interact with the surface. The chemistry and morphology of a polymer surface will govern the protein behaviour. So, by controlling the polymer surface, the biocompatibility can be regulated. Nanoscale surface features are known to affect the protein behaviour, and in this overview the nanostructure of self-assembled block copolymers will be harnessed to control protein behaviour. The nanostructure of a block copolymer can be controlled by manipulating the chemistry and arrangement of the blocks. Random, A-B and A-B-A block copolymers composed of methyl methacrylate copolymerized with either acrylic acid or 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate will be explored. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), the surface morphology of these block copolymers will be characterized. Further, AFM tips functionalized with proteins will measure the adhesion of that particular protein to polymer surfaces. In this manner, the influence of block copolymer morphology on protein adhesion can be measured. AFM tips functionalized with antibodies to fibronectin will determine how the surfaces will affect the conformation of fibronectin, an important parameter in evaluating surface biocompatibility.

Bioadhesion: a review of concepts and applications

Bioadhesion refers to the phenomenon where natural and synthetic materials adhere to biological surfaces. An understanding of the fundamental mechanisms that govern bioadhesion is of great interest for various researchers who aim to develop new biomaterials, therapies and technological applications such as biosensors. This review paper will first describe various examples of the manifestation of bioadhesion along with the underlying mechanisms. This will be followed by a discussion of some of the methods for the optimization of bioadhesion. Finally, nanoscale and macroscale characterization techniques for the efficacy of bioadhesion and the analysis of failure surfaces are described.

Block copolymer arrangement and composition effects on protein conformation using atomic force microscope-based antigen-antibody adhesion

The conformational changes of fibronectin (FN) deposited on various block copolymers where one block is composed of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and the other block is either poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) or poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) were investigated using a functionalized atomic force microscope (AFM) tip. The tip was modified with an antibody sensitive to the exposure of the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) groups in FN. By studying the adhesive interactions between the antibody and the proteins adsorbed on the block copolymer surface and phase imaging, it was found that the triblock copolymers PAA-b-PMMA-b-PAA and PMMA-b-PHEMA-b-PMMA, which both have large domain sizes, are conducive to the exposure of the FN RGD groups on the surface. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that the surface chemistry as well as the nanomorphology dictated by the block copolymer arrangement could both tune protein conformation and orientation and optimize cell adhesion to the biomaterial surface.