Physiological osmolarities do not enhance long-term tissue synthesis in chondrocyte-laden degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels

Use of Acellular Matrices as Scaffolds in Cartilage Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Significance: Cartilage regeneration remains a significant challenge in the field of regenerative medicine. Acellular matrix (AM)-based cartilage tissue regeneration offers an innovative approach to repairing cartilage defects by providing a scaffold for new tissue growth. Its significance lies in its potential to restore joint function, mitigate pain, and improve the quality of life for patients suffering from cartilage-related injuries and conditions. Recent Advances: Recent advances in AM-based cartilage regeneration have focused on enhancing scaffold properties for improved cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Moreover, several scaffold techniques such as combining acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and acellular cartilage matrix (ACM) with cartilage tissue, as well as biphasic scaffolding, enjoy rising research activity. Incorporating bioactive factors and advanced manufacturing techniques holds promise for producing more biomimetic scaffolds, advancing efficient cartilage repair and regeneration. Critical Issues: Obstacles in AM-based cartilage regeneration include achieving proper integration with the surrounding tissue and ensuring long-term durability of the regenerated cartilage. Furthermore, issues such as high costs and limited availability of suitable cells for scaffold seeding must be considered. The heterogeneity and limited regenerative capabilities of cartilage need to be addressed for successful clinical translation. Future Directions: Research should focus on exploring advanced biomaterials and developing new techniques, regarding easily reproducible scaffolds, ideally constructed from clinically validated and readily available commercial products. Findings underline the potential of AM-based approaches, especially the rising exploration of tissue-derived ADM and ACM. In future, the primary objective should not only be the regeneration of small cartilage defects but rather focus on fully regenerating a joint or larger cartilage defect.

Osmolyte Type and the Osmolarity Level Affect Chondrogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

The inductive effects of increased osmolarity on chondrogenesis are well approved. However, the effects of the osmolyte agent invoked to induce hyperosmolarity are largely neglected. Herein, we scrutinized how hyperosmotic conditions acquired by addition of different osmolytes would impact chondrogenesis. We briefly assessed whether such conditions would differentially affect hypertrophy and angiogenesis during MSC chondrogenesis. Chondrogenic and hypertrophic marker expression along with VEGF secretion during adipose-derived (AD)-MSC chondrogenesis under three osmolarity levels (350, 450, and 550 mOsm) using three different osmolytes (NaCl, sorbitol, and PEG) were assessed. MTT assay, qRT-PCR, immunocytochemistry, Alcian Blue staining, ELISA, and ALP assays proved osmolyte-type dependent effects of hyperosmolarity on chondrogenesis, hypertrophy, and angiogenesis. At same osmolarity level, PEG had least cytotoxic/cytostatic effect and most prohibitive effects on angiogenesis. As expected, all hyperosmolar conditions led to enhanced chondrogenesis with slightly varying degrees. PEG and sorbitol had higher chondro-promotive and hypertrophy-suppressive effects compared to NaCl, while NaCl had exacerbated hypertrophy. We observed that TonEBP was involved in osmoadaptation of all treatments in varying degrees. Of importance, we highlighted differential effects of hyperosmolarity obtained by different osmolytes on the efficacy of chondrogenesis and more remarkably on the induction/suppression of cartilage pathologic markers. Our study underlies the need for a more vigilant exploitation of physicobiochemical inducers in order to maximize chondrogenesis while restraining unwanted hypertrophy and angiogenesis.