Macrophage responses to selective laser-melted Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds of different pore geometries and the corresponding osteoimmunomodulatory effects toward osteogenesis

In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis of the Effects of 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffold Structure on Osteogenic Activity

The effect of titanium scaffold geometry on the bone regeneration ability of the scaffold remains unclear. Here, selective laser melting as a 3D printing technology was used to create porous titanium alloy scaffolds with two unit structures: a hollow hexagonal prism (group A) and a hollow triangular prism (group B). The structures and morphologies of the scaffolds were characterized before mechanical properties were simulated. Cell adhesion behaviors, osteoblast activity and proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were evaluated, in addition to in vivo testing in an animal model. The results showed that the two scaffolds made of Ti6Al4V had compression moduli similar to that of human cortical bone (116.91 ± 0.01 and 174.29 ± 2.21 MPa vs. 89–164 MPa). The two scaffolds were nontoxic to cells and had good biocompatibility, while group A scaffolds facilitated cell adhesion. The number of cells increased gradually in culture. The ALP activity of cells on group A scaffolds demonstrated higher osteogenic ability than that of group B scaffolds. The in vivo tests showed that all scaffolds retained their shape well after implantation, and no obvious inflammatory reaction or infection in surrounding tissues was found. Based on fluorescence staining, mature new bone formation was found at week 12. Group A scaffolds showed better bone integration ability compared with group B scaffolds. The percentage of new bone area in group A (7.5%) was higher than that in group B (6.5%). This research suggests that the hollow hexagonal prism structure of porous scaffolds can promote osteogenic differentiation and osseointegration better than the triangular prism structure.

Titanium Surface Characteristics Induce the Specific Reprogramming of Toll-like Receptor Signaling in Macrophages

Most of the research on titanium-based dental implants (Ti-discs) is focused on how they are able to stimulate the formation of new tissue and/or cytotoxic studies, with very scarce data on their effects on functional responses by immunocompetent cells. In particular, the link between the rewiring of innate immune responses and surface biomaterials properties is poorly understood. To address this, we characterize the functional response of macrophage cultures to four different dental titanium surfaces (MA: mechanical abrasion; SB + AE: sandblasting plus etching; SB: sandblasting; AE: acid etching). We use different Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands towards cell surface receptors (bacterial lipopolysaccharide LPS for TLR4; imiquimod for TLR7; synthetic bacterial triacylated lipoprotein for TLR2/TLR1) and endosomal membrane receptor (poly I:C for TLR3) to simulate bacterial (cell wall bacterial components) or viral infections (dsRNA and ssRNA). The extracellular and total LDH levels indicate that exposure to the different Ti-surfaces is not cytotoxic for macrophages under resting or TLR-stimulated conditions, although there is a tendency towards an impairment in macrophage proliferation, viability or adhesion under TLR4, TLR3 and TLR2/1 stimulations in SB discs cultures. The secreted IL-6 and IL-10 levels are not modified upon resting macrophage exposure to the Ti-surfaces studied as well as steady state levels of iNos or ArgI mRNA. However, macrophage exposure to MA Ti-surface do display an enhanced immune response to TLR4, TLR7 or TLR2/1 compared to other Ti-surfaces in terms of soluble immune mediators secreted and M1/M2 gene expression profiling. This change of characteristics in cellular phenotype might be related to changes in cellular morphology. Remarkably, the gene expression of Tlr3 is the only TLR that is differentially affected by distinct Ti-surface exposure. These results highlight the relevance of patterned substrates in dental implants to achieve a smart manipulation of the immune responses in the context of personalized medicine, cell-based therapies, preferential lineage commitment of precursor cells or control of tissue architecture in oral biology.