Platelet and leukocyte count assay for thrombogenicity screening of biomaterials and medical devices: Evaluation and improvement of ASTM F2888 test standard

Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials

To develop standardized in vitro thrombogenicity test methods for evaluating medical device materials, three platelet activation biomarkers, beta-thromboglobulin (β-TG), platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble p-selectin (CD62P), and a plasma coagulation marker, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), were investigated. Whole blood, drawn from six healthy human volunteers into Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution A was recalcified and heparinized over a concentration range of 0.5-1.5 U/mL. The blood was incubated with test materials with different thrombogenic potentials for 60 min at 37°C, using a 6 cm2/mL material surface area to blood volume ratio. After incubation, the blood platelet count was measured before centrifuging the blood to prepare platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of the biomarkers. The results show that all four markers effectively differentiated the materials with different thrombogenic potentials at heparin concentrations from 1.0 to 1.5 U/mL. When a donor-specific heparin concentration (determined by activated clotting time) was used, the markers were able to differentiate materials consistently for blood from all the donors. Additionally, using PFP instead of PPP further improved the test method's ability to differentiate the thrombogenic materials from the negative control for β-TG and TAT. Moreover, the platelet activation markers were able to detect reversible platelet activation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP). In summary, all three platelet activation markers (β-TG, PF4, and CD62P) can distinguish thrombogenic potentials of different materials and detect ADP-induced reversible platelet activation. Test consistency and sensitivity can be enhanced by using a donor-specific heparin concentration and PFP. The same test conditions are applicable to the measurement of coagulation marker TAT.

Influence of titanium nanoscale surface roughness on fibrinogen and albumin protein adsorption kinetics and platelet responses

Biomaterials with nanoscale topography have been increasingly investigated for medical device applications to improve tissue-material interactions. This study assessed the impact of nanoengineered titanium surface domain sizes on early biological responses that can significantly affect tissue interactions. Nanostructured titanium coatings with distinct nanoscale surface roughness were deposited on quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) sensors by physical vapor deposition. Physico-chemical characterization was conducted to assess nanoscale surface roughness, nano-topographical morphology, wettability, and atomic composition. The results demonstrated increased projected surface area and hydrophilicity with increasing nanoscale surface roughness. The adsorption properties of albumin and fibrinogen, two major plasma proteins that readily encounter implanted surfaces, on the nanostructured surfaces were measured using QCM-D. Significant differences in the amounts and viscoelastic properties of adsorbed proteins were observed, dependent on the surface roughness, protein type, protein concentration, and protein binding affinity. The impact of protein adsorption on subsequent biological responses was also examined using qualitative and quantitative in vitro evaluation of human platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activation. Qualitative platelet morphology assessment indicated increased platelet activation/aggregation on titanium surfaces with increased roughness. These data suggest that nanoscale differences in titanium surface roughness influence biological responses that may affect implant integration.

Hemocompatibility challenge of membrane oxygenator for artificial lung technology

The artificial lung (AL) technology is one of the membrane-based artificial organs that partly augments lung functions, i.e. blood oxygenation and CO₂ removal. It is generally employed as an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to treat acute and chronic lung-failure patients, and the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has re-emphasized the importance of this technology. The principal component in AL is the polymeric membrane oxygenator that facilitates the O₂/CO₂ exchange with the blood. Despite the considerable improvement in anti-thrombogenic biomaterials in other applications (e.g., stents), AL research has not advanced at the same rate. This is partly because AL research requires interdisciplinary knowledge in biomaterials and membrane technology. Some of the promising biomaterials with reasonable hemocompatibility - such as emerging fluoropolymers of extremely low surface energy - must first be fabricated into membranes to exhibit effective gas exchange performance. As AL membranes must also demonstrate high hemocompatibility in tandem, it is essential to test the membranes using in-vitro hemocompatibility experiments before in-vivo test. Hence, it is vital to have a reliable in-vitro experimental protocol that can be reasonably correlated with the in-vivo results. However, current in-vitro AL studies are unsystematic to allow a consistent comparison with in-vivo results. More specifically, current literature on AL biomaterial in-vitro hemocompatibility data are not quantitatively comparable due to the use of unstandardized and unreliable protocols. Such a wide gap has been the main bottleneck in the improvement of AL research, preventing promising biomaterials from reaching clinical trials. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art and status of AL technology from membrane researcher perspectives. Particularly, most of the reported in-vitro experiments to assess AL membrane hemocompatibility are compiled and critically compared to suggest the most reliable method suitable for AL biomaterial research. Also, a brief review of current approaches to improve AL hemocompatibility is summarized. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The importance of Artificial Lung (AL) technology has been re-emphasized in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. The utmost bottleneck in the current AL technology is the poor hemocompatibility of the polymer membrane used for O₂/CO₂ gas exchange, limiting its use in the long-term. Unfortunately, most of the in-vitro AL experiments are unsystematic, irreproducible, and unreliable. There are no standardized in-vitro hemocompatibility characterization protocols for quantitative comparison between AL biomaterials. In this review, we tackled this bottleneck by compiling the scattered in-vitro data and suggesting the most suitable experimental protocol to obtain reliable and comparable hemocompatibility results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review paper focusing on the hemocompatibility challenge of AL technology.